#just phenomenal storytelling tbh i've never seen writing that illustrates something like this so well

[naivety]

you know people are going to watch lestat cry and wail and repaint events we already heard from louis in a different light and they're going to Believe him. they're going to point at louis saying you should use his version in your book. it's the better version and just Believe it the way louis does. as if his own interpretation of events is a task he's not built for, always tripping over it, unlike lestat, unlike armand. he's not meant to be believed. isn't that how it's being written? i mean how can we trust his judgement when he's casting doubt on it himself? are you saying everything lestat said on that stage was a lie? they'll ask why did they write it in that way, contest louis' version at all if we weren't meant to question it too? right? isn't the point that louis' proven himself to be an unreliable narrator? and they will fail to see it!!! they will walk headfirst into it and still miss it!! does anyone else feel like they're going crazy!!!