#idk labels don't confer morality so why we trying to judge people's morality based on their perceived sexuality?

[postsforposting]

can you reclaim the f slur?

limp wristed fops were never in the closet. they define themselves by showing off their frocking frippery finery. fucks hard, imo.

how obnoxious of him to appropriate gay stereotypes when he's not even Real Enough To Matter! explicitly stays in the curio cabinet, even with a big bag of marvel cash! it's like he knows his life is fake!

if a word is fine to say due to the speaker's identity, then GASP i think we just said even bad nasty words aren't inherently bad and nasty. BUT it's totes proper to judge a person's moral character based on someone's identity like their gender, sexuality, race, creed, disability because some people are should be branded evil due to who they are and---uh oh. are we playing for the other team here???

"don't say gay" was supposed to be about converting a ~slur~ into an acceptable characteristic. it was not meant literally as "don't say gay, cause that's a bad bad word and a bad bad thing to be and that should never, ever change". broomstick twiggy friends of dorothy aren't any different, because that would be extremely fucking strange, peculiar, curious, and unusual.

there was an entire years long arc in the marvel comics about demanding people get publicly branded to avoid persecution. but that could mean fuck all to fops and their colorful wardrobes, right?