#i know it's not an actually useful phrase as far as praxis goes but why can't people be normal

[the-voice-of-night-vale]

thank you @rjalker and @flowerdoggy and the anon in my inbox for informing me!! i truly had no idea this was a thing and i've only ever heard radqueer used by truscum and reclaimed by mogai people (a la tucute), hence my assumption (which sucks bc i kind of like the reclamation of radical queerness and radical inclusionism WITHOUT the weird and gross shit)

rjalker is 100% right we should not humor people like this and let them dictate the narrative not just because it's confusing but also because it obfuscates the truth behind their ideology.

good as time as any to remind folks that i am 100% against pedophilia, zoophilia, abuse romanticism, etc. even in fiction, and the idea that you can be transracial, transdisabled, etc. is ridiculous and harmful in ways much smarter people have said in much better ways than me. if that's an issue i invite you to block me and go the fuck away :)

(also, i'm going to delete the post since it is VERY misinformative lol, but i wanted to respond to the folks who came into my notes to correct me :))

had some1 with the url "i hate proshippers and radqueers" reblog one of my posts about proshits being weirdos and obviously i blocked them (what is a radqueer you might ask? no idea, a cursory examination of their blog and one of their mutuals' blogs did not give me a clear definition, but regardless calling someone a radqueer with any kind of seriousness is inherently hilarious nd cringe) but the capacity for the human brain to be full of air a la a bag of lays chips never ceases to amaze me