#fwiw fe4 DOES give the 'special' characters way bigger mechanical strength and I think that's cool haha
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
22degreehalo · 2 years ago
Text
The most bewildering like deeply ideological and not at all real-world realistic applicable I ever see expressed in fandom and which throws me for a loop every single time is like...
‘It’s bad when the Chosen One or Royal Heir (or whatever) has some kind of actual physical or magical superiority over normal people because it means that they really do deserve their position :/ and undermines any message the story might tell that oppression is Bad :/’
Like. Am I wrong or is this just. Actual uncritical might makes right thinking...???
A person having magical powers does not grant them a moral right to rule over others. Nor the same with fighting ability or general physical fitness or whatever. People are every bit as equally valuable and meaningful regardless of how ‘fit’ they are.
Like am I wrong or are the non-magical people in these scenarios basically just the in-world equivalent of disabled people. And so... obviously it should go without saying that these people aren’t necessarily incapable of having a say in the running of the kingdom or whatever. Like. There is just no logical reason why that should be the case.
And yet over and over I see this assumption made, that ‘hero has special magic’ somehow DOES imply, inevitably, that societal castes are right and good. That the only way to actually tell a story where people all have equal value is to make them all equally physically or magically capable (i.e., make nobody disabled).
IDK maybe it’s just me but it makes perfect sense that in a world where some people have special powers, they’d tend to oppress those who don’t. And that it would be harder for those who don’t to succeed or be able to triumph as heroes. Isn’t... isn’t that just literally how oppression works, IRL...?!
#I see this a LOT#but the most recent example (if I havent explained it well enough without one)#was to do with Fire Emblem and how in Three Houses the 'crests' are meant to be extremely important#in the sense that those born with a crest (just special minor magic) are venerated#while those without one are cast aside#and someone pointed out that it kinda sucks that in-game the crests mechanically do barely anything#and wondered how it'd be if those with crests actually did have a big combat advantage as units#and one reply said that it'd completely undermine the moral of the game that discrimination based on crests is bad#because the 'tragedy' of it apparently is that those with crests aren't actually any different#is it just me or is this??? saying that discrimination would be totally fine if some people did have stronger magical powers?????#keeping in mind that the discrimination in story is like... abandoning children. or abusing crestless kids in favour of crested ones.#does this person believe that it would be okay to child abuse a kid if your other kid has super strength?#it sounds so bonkers and yet I keep seeing it expressed as some deep and important progressive message#i just. don't get it!!!!!!!!!!!#fwiw fe4 DOES give the 'special' characters way bigger mechanical strength and I think that's cool haha#it sets up the 'traditional' kind of story where the noble kids are the heroes but you can tell a different one!#yes it is harder to make the commoners into heroes but that's the point! that's why it's satisfying!!!!#ANYWAY
8 notes · View notes