I remember the discussion on fnaf gore! And I'm a bit 50/50. Fnaf should embrace the gore but like...at the same time there was never excessive gore. At most in fnf 1 you see the eyeballs and teeth in the game over screen and that's it. No excessive blood or guts and gore. Fnaf 3 had a little fucking body and despite that it's not excessive. You see Afton's death but it's pixel. Similarly in fnaf 4 the death of the crying child; it's pixelated and no blood.
Sister location literally had a scooping machine and a skin suit and like...no gore.
I think fnaf needs the gore but balance it. Show gore but leave the rest open because you want to know what's worse then seeing guts and blood?
Your imagination
Because it runs wild and lets you fill the gaps that will never be filled. Scarier then any film can do
Fair fair fair, and tbh my perception and expectations are different cause I watch a lotta horror movies, but when I saw the horror tag in the genre Ig I just came in hoping for some different things... it feels less like actual horror (cause ya know. Horror is meant to horrify u) and more just mystery/thriller. So I suppose the marketing didn't do it any favors cause it rlly leaned into the scary aspect.
I completely respect ur opinion! And if anyone found it really scary?? That's awesome too! I'm just kinda hard to scare 😭 No fault of the movie
5 notes
·
View notes