#and i see those dozen tracker/ad sites you're trying to get to load
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
awkward-teabag · 8 months ago
Text
This was what I was taught in school. You make sure the site works on different browsers and at different resolutions and you absolutely do not rely on hardware to compensate for you being a bad designer.
Granted this was the 00s so hardware acceleration wasn't much of a thing but still, the most important part of your job was that the site didn't punish people for their hardware/OS/resolution/browser. If people couldn't use it (or could but it was broken and/or slow), you failed.
Even in the days of Angelfire and Neocities 1.0 where gif- and midi-infested sites were a risk, if you looked up how to build a website, you'd be told not to use them just because you could and to be mindful of what others may have to deal with such as speakers turned on (don't play music unprompted and certainly don't jack up the volume and hide the pause button if you do), don't use bmps for images because they're godawfully massive and people may have slow internet and/or a data cap that a few images could take a chunk out of, make your site legible (your ~aesthetic~ doesn't make white text on yellow background readable), and so on.
Even during the MySpace era, a lot of this still held true and was seen as something you just did if you at all cared about people who would see your site.
But then hardware acceleration became commonplace and the internet became more corporarized by people who didn't have to worry about dial up, data caps, or using a machine more than 5 years old in their personal experience. Now so much of it relys on hardware to compensate for bad optimization and prioritizing looks over function and, even with widgets, you basically have to gut it and rebuild it from scratch to get away from it eating RAM like it's trying to download a car.
To say nothing of the added strain that ads cause.
Disabling hardware acceleration (god it's horrible and can cause so many issues), having ad block, and using script block to manually control how much Javascript I have to deal with is the only way to use some sites and get me to not click away out of frustration.
Sure it means some sites are broken or need to be reloaded but it makes the internet far more usable these days even with the drawbacks.
i think that web developers should be fucking required to test their shit on bad computers. it's unconscionable the way some shopping websites run.
having recently upgraded my computer from a 10-year-old castoffs build to a mid-high-grade gaming computer, it is WILD how many sites i thought were GARBAGE, just actually entirely unusable!! (one of these was ulta, but another one was an indie sex toy company!!! >O ). and it turns out they seem fine... on a computer with a near-to-highest-gen processor and a video card the size of a tank!!!!
this is ridiculous, you can't expect to sell to people when you don't know if they can't even get through checkout on your heavy-ass site! calm it tf down. make it run without 32 of gods own gIGS OF RAM. i swear to fuck
#there was a marked shift in the early or mid 10s where site design priorities shifted dramatically#around this time console makers also wanted to have digital-only games and always online requirements#and the execs were genuinely confused that not everyone had high speed internet with a high or no data cap#and it never went down#and that maybe just maybe some people were buying consoles *because* they had crap internet#so i assume it was a general shift in tech companies#specifically ones in silicon valley#but god do i dislike hardware acceleration#somehow it turned back on last year and i couldn't figure out why my browser was lagging my system#turned that shit off as soon as i realized#'disabling this may make things look worse' not as bad as it looks with it on#and i don't have to worry about my system crashing if i do more than stream one (1) video#this is also a major issue in games and programs#people don't bother optimizing because they can hide behind hardware compensating for it#so you get things like memory leaks that go unfixed because 'why wouldn't someone have more than 4gb of ram?'#uhhhhh firefox lost market share and was rightfully raked over the coals when it had a memory leak#back when 2gb of ram was considered high end and you could get away with a <300mb stick of ram#if all you wanted was to browse the internet#now it's chrome that eats ram but because google and cheaper ram it's considered a non-issue#also i swear the sites that try to be minimalist are the most resource intensive#and i see those dozen tracker/ad sites you're trying to get to load#but yeah cut to todd howard telling people to upgrade if they have trouble running starfield#only for the people he was addressing to be already using top of the line hardware#so the only upgrades available were proof of concepts that cost thousands#if any upgrade existed at all
210 notes · View notes