#and I truly don't believe any of the questions I've received about Noah or Finn have been 'weird' as you say

[spicybylerpolls]

I supported this account because fiction is fiction and I'm very anti censorship...

But you keep entertaining weird questions about the actors who are REAL people, not imaginary concepts like Mike and Will are, so I think you need to stop that.

I don't "need" to do anything. This blog doesn't draw lines in the sand about what questions can and can't be asked. It takes a staunch anti-censorship position across the board. If people are interested in certain topics (re: the actors) that relate to Byler, I don't see any problem with "entertaining" them, as you put it. And I've gotten many asks related to it, so people are interested. If you don't want to engage with those questions, please scroll on by or click see results.

I do agree that probably more questions should be about Byler rather than the actors since we should keep the main thing the main thing, but I don't see the harm in asking these kinds of questions in general. There's a big difference between harmless, quiet speculation and actually harassing/bothering actors about your theories IMO. Humans are curious creatures by nature, and so it's natural to speculate. We all do it. So why is it taboo to say that we do?