#and 'only' like a 5% chance of total economic annihilation via catastropic chain reactive system failure
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
yeahhhhh pretty much, except the only thing is it's less individual investors and more Hedge Funds.
Hedge funds use algorithms to maximize profits by any means necessary, up to and including certain tactics that will deliberately tank a stock. If it's not performing well or if they just don't want it to, they can bet against it and whip out a variety of bullshit of varying legality to push the share price down, which causes other HFs to sell to stay ahead of the market, which leads portfolio managers and accountants and regular folks to sell, and then when the selloffs are done the original HFs make fucking bank off strangling the stock. (This also works in reverse: betting a stock will rise, baiting others to buy in, profit, then bet against it again)
So a "strong" company is one with lots of gains and very few/short losses (harder to break/less room to manipulate, generally Big Name stocks like Disney/Apple/etc) whereas a "weak" company with more losses than gains or lots of volatility is a prime target for the piranhas. The people running companies are terrified of stagnation, let alone losses, because it can very, very easily be taken advantage of and even outright kill the company in just a few weeks or months. Perpetual growth is virtually required to survive the market as it is today.
Individual, casual/hobbyist investors with at most a couple dozen shares in a handful of companies don't have the numbers/margins to seriously affect a stock price. Even hobbyist/semipro "traders" who obsess/hoard and attempt to imitate The Big Guys are comparitively few in number and just don't have the weight to affect much more than their own account balance. But hedge funds do have MASSIVE weight in the market, throwing around thousands of shares at a time, several times a day, for dozens of different tickers, in multiple markets and across multiple industries.
And then there are "market makers." These are giant companies whose SOLE purpose is to manipulate the market ensure "market liquidity," or, "a buy for every sell, a sell for every buy." What this means is that if demand is high but there aren't enough shares available to sell, they make more by "borrowing" them, potentially infinitely. If these market makers feel a stock is too "overvalued," they can dump loads of those borrowed shares to saturate the market and drive the price back down. There is extremely little regulation on this, which leads to situations where the same one share can have dozens or hundreds of "owners."
This can happen because regular everyday investors don't actually "own" stock at all. Like, very literally, their "shares" are 1) not real and 2) can be liquidated by their brokers at any time, because, as the go-between third party, their brokers own the shares "on their behalf," and brokers essentially just "deliver" digital IOUs. All Actual Real Shares are held in the DTCC by a company called Cede & Co, and everything else is traded on credit.
If you buy a "share" in a company through a broker, it's not your name on the company shareholder list, it's your broker's. If you're submitting paperwork to your broker for voting for that company's policies at their annual meeting, your broker is pooling aaaaall the votes and "proportionally" voting "on your behalf." And your broker can decide to lend out your shares without telling you (to their own profit) and you may or may not ever get them back -- this is called "failure to delivers" or FTDs and there is a massive backlog of them that just ... never get addressed.
this is hella over-summarized and sloppy but the tl;dr is that supply and demand economics are beyond broken, the entire stock market is more fake than you ever imagined, it's propped up entirely by computer programs trading IOUs-of-IOUs-of-IOUs, and is easily manipulated at the literal whim of bank-and-billionaire proxies.
companies really have got to be okay with stagnant profits. what is wrong with earning the same amount every year? why does it always have to be more? it's not sustainable. there are only so many people on the planet you can profit from 😭
#stock market#it was a hyperfixation i try to forget#but sometimes i ... cannot#it still makes me so ANGRY#its a bernie madoff wet dream#and there is just SO MUCH INFO to try and organize and communicate#like i could prob make a nice masterpost with a cpl days of prep#but i rly can't right now bc irl stuff#and i shouldn't#BUT IM SO TEMPTED#a great primer tho is Jon Stewart's episode on Dark Pools#anyways#rambles#FUCKING STOCK MARKET AAAAAAAA#financial law enforcement can take YEARS and fines are often LESS THAN 5% OF PROFITS FROM THE CRIME#and they reversed the last charges from the 2008 crisis#and they're still fuckin DOIN THE SAME SHIT#when it finally implodes its gonna be like. so ungodly bad#it was never supposed to be this#it was supposed to be regular ppl supporting good companies products and employers#until a handful of ppl figured out how to turn it into a terrifyingly efficient money printing game#with a 0% chance of legal consequences#and 'only' like a 5% chance of total economic annihilation via catastropic chain reactive system failure#aaaaaAAAAAAAAAA okay. okay im done#im done im good im... letting go now#going back to normal. i can be done. i can.#sorry
64K notes
·
View notes