#also im aware some people are saying that this comparison is ''invoking jewish pain for political reasons''
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
I entirely agree with Med. I think it's perfectly apt to draw parallels between the Gaza genocide and the Holocaust. Of course, parallels can be drawn with other genocides as well, but there is a very specific rhetorical/argumentative power from talking about the Holocaust here.
IMO, the main reason is that these comparisons are a counter argument to the Zionist talking point that Jewish people NEED their own ethnostate because of the Holocaust. Obviously Zionism has nothing to do with reparations or nothing, but it's a big talking point of theirs that this is all for the sake of defending people from genocide. To point out that Israel is doing genocide then showcases their hypocrisy and calls into question their real motives.
Yes, we absolutely have to study these two genocides and understand as much as we can about both, and there are many differences, but I think anon is missing the point entirely as to why this comparison is being made. You're getting bogged down by the details and in turn missing the big picture of the debate entirely.
I’m a genocide historian and I do think comparisons between the Holocaust and the genocide in Palestine are unproductive because A) the Holocaust is pretty distinct from Palestinian genocide not in its exceptionalism but in its method - the “shipping” of victims from 20+ countries by international rail to a handful of centralized killing sites; 15000 people being gassed in Auschwitz daily (a single gas chamber had standing capacity for 2,000 people) and their stolen hair sold in bales for use as maritime rope and cushion stuffing - and forcing Holocaust parallels obfuscates the terrible and very unique methods of genocide being used by Israel against Palestinians. B) People often invoke the Holocaust as an emotional appeal regarding the moral culpability of all Jews (“how could you do what was done to your ancestors!”) when the same responsibility to end the genocide in Palestine exists regardless of one’s background or religion.
What Israel is doing in Palestine is 100% a genocide. Whether or not it is similar to the Holocaust (or any previous atrocity) does not make this any more or less true.
The thing that doesn't make sense to me with this point is that no one is saying that the Holocaust and Palestinian genocide are a 1:1 comparison. Like most people acknowledge the terrible genocide that occurred in the Holocaust against all its victims. But when they're talking about comparing genocides, there are tell tale signs that repeat throughout history that are precursers to larger events. Like when people compare the Warsaw ghetto to Gaza. I'd say those are quite similar in practice and intention. When we "compare" genocides (not a 1:1 but more of a drawing parellels by disecting the inteion and reasoning behind certain events that werent necessarily actively violent but passively violent) its to show "hey this is going to get really bad really soon because something like this happened before." Masha Gessen has an article about this that I reblogged.
People should care about fighting injustice everywhere I agree. But that doesn't change the fact that parallel drawing is an act separate from emotional invocation. When genocide scholars and survivors talk about "Hey this was like xyz that happened to me/in history" it's to show that there is precedent for this thinking and a terrible methodology happening when genocides occur. They dont just get really bad out of nowhere, you need to examine the precursors to prevent the large event from happening. How that large event happens differs from place to place, I agree. But to say that because things happen differently against different people means you can't examine the underlying reasons behind those actions is kind of reductive. By this definition you can never compare any genocide ever and all the terrible things that happen just happen naturally without any political or social influence.
Arnesa talks about how the Bosnian genocide precursors mirror the Palestinian genocide. She also talks about how Lula specifically should have mentioned other genocides (like Rwanda, Bosnia, etc) in his statement because there are parallels there too. I'd argue that's the real intention behind genocide studies, in that you notice trends and patterns to analyze how certain events might turn out.
I do want to mention because this is where im coming from a little bit, it is a pretty big zionist talking point (by especially American dems) saying you can't compare the holocaust to what's happening to Palestinians because it's antisemitic, which is not a real talking point and actually kind of rude in that it assumes that Palestinians can't call out parallels between their treatment and the treatment of those in the Holocaust because they're fundamentally doing it from a point of antisemitism and not a plea for recognition that the events are mirroring each other.
#also im aware some people are saying that this comparison is ''invoking jewish pain for political reasons''#and with all due respect (which is none) that's genuinely the dumbest shit you could ever say#palestinians are invoking jewish trauma by being genocided??? are you fucking kidding me#israel is the one invoking jewish trauma in order to push people into reactionary genocidal rhetoric#if you're more mad about palestinians comparing the gaza genocide to the holocaust#than you are mad about israel CONSTANTLY invoking images of the holocaust in order to manufacture consent for this all#then i truly have no words for you
365 notes
·
View notes