#adding a rape that was not in the source material (at least explicitly) and FOR WHAT
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
After episode 5, I'm going to have to take back every single good thing I said about the Like Water for Chocolate series adaptation because OH MY GOD. How do you fuck up an adaptation with such a rich source material SO BADLY. How do you make the lead female characters become almost supporting characters in their own story by adding a bunch of unnecessary, male-centric revolutionary bullshit, to the point that sometimes it seems like the show is about Revolutionary War Hero Pedro MĂşzquiz and the two women vying for his affections. How do you turn a beautiful, female-centric cornerstone of Latin American literature into a glorified telenovela (and not one of the good ones). How can you claim to be based on BOTH "Like Water for Chocolate" and "Tita's Diary" when it's clear that NO ONE in the writing staff has read either of them beyond the Wikipedia summaries. HOW DARE YOUUUUUUUUUUU.
#the thing that really just turned this show into an unforgivable affront upon laura esquivel's masterpiece for me#was the reveal that tita was a product of rape and that's why mamĂĄ elena resents her so much#like what the ACTUAL FUCK is wrong with y'all#adding a rape that was not in the source material (at least explicitly) and FOR WHAT#just to make things more unnecessarily telenovela-ish by making tita be the redheaded stepchild#(even though in the book mamĂĄ elena didn't overtly dislike tita more than her other daughters she was just a mean person in general)??#I am LIVID#I really just wanna rage quit right now but one of the most heart-wrenching parts of the book is coming up#and I wanna see what they do with it (especially since it involves dr. brown#who is literally the ONE character who has been translated masterfully to the screen because he is EXACTLY like I pictured him)#and also I have no other show with which to replace this and I don't like leaving things halfway#why is life so hard#salma hayek I will never forgive you for this sorry babe#like water for chocolate
1 note
¡
View note
Text
I know this is an issue thatâs already been talked about but this is my blog and I get to choose the hair shirt we wear.
âStark Raving Dad,â S03E01 of The Simpsons and the episode with Michael Jackson in it, is so damn hard to find. Itâs not on Disney+ with the rest of the Simpsons, itâs not on Amazon Prime, and the only place left I can possibly access it legally is YouTube, if I pay to watch the whole third season of the Simpsons. Thatâs $19.99 for the one episode I actually want to watch.Â
But aside from me being dead broke at the moment, Iâm not spending $19.99 to watch what YouTube calls the âcompleteâ third season of the Simpsons, because after doing some research, they might claim to have it and not actually have it at all, even if they say they have it by name. Even if they do have it, I donât want to pay $20 for something I donât fully own (more on that in a bit.)
I checked out my less-than-legal alternatives too, and made the discovery that you can label a torrent anything you want, but the file people download can be anything else. You could, hypothetically, go to download what appears to be âStark Raving Dad,â S03E01 of The Simpsons, in 1080p, and wait and wait and wait while the file downloads, and be totally confident youâre downloading âStark Raving Dadâ because the torrent listing claims to be âStark Raving Dadâ and has a screenshot of âStark Raving Dadâ and has the plot summary of âStark Raving Dadâ and the correct episode number of âStark Raving Dadâ...
Then when you go to open the file itâs âMr. Lisa Goes To Washingtonâ because FUCK YOU THATâS WHY.
Hypothetically, of course.
And thatâs if you (hypothetically) try to torrent the episode standalone, by itself. You could take the time and bandwidth to download the entire third season of The Simpsons, but if the people uploading it got it from Disney+ or Amazon Prime or anywhere else thatâs going to be 1080p, itâs not gonna have âStark Raving Dad.â The issue still remains, too, that it could say it has âStark Raving Dad,â but doesnât actually include it once youâve downloaded the files, in which case youâve wasted possible hours downloading videos you donât want only to find out the thing you downloaded it for wasnât even there to begin with. Same disappointment, longer time to figure it out.
All of this assuming there are even seeders on the (hypothetical) torrents, which if there arenât, it doesnât matter if someone else has this file, because you wonât.
Then of course, the other less-than-legal options would be various websites that host uploaded videos of cartoon shows (like KissCartoon or WCOStream,) but the reason almost anyone who accesses these sites knows at least a handful of them or inevitably asks what the ânew domainâ is when they change their URL for the 80th time is because while those websites technically work, they arenât reliable sources. Theyâre less-than-legal, so theyâre not explicitly illegal, as far as I know, but they arenât totally legal either. Even if you find what you want to watch, youâre gonna have to deal with spammy banner ads and pop-ups (because they all ask you to remove your adblock and refuse to play the content with adblock running,) and itâll only ever be in as high a quality as the site can source it, which takes you back to the issues I just mentioned.
I had to go into my bookshelf and dig for my box set of The Simpsonsâ season 3, which fortunately still has all the discs, but the box is grody and beat up and the disc that has the episode also has a fair amount of schmutz and dust on it. That got me thinking; Iâm very fortunate to have bought this boxset when I did all those years ago, and I bought my current desktop tower specifically because it still had a CD drive so I could watch my movies. But DVDs are falling out of favor for Blu-rays, which are in turn falling out of favor for digital downloads.
How long until CD-ROM players and DVD players go the way of the VCR and you canât find one that isnât secondhand on eBay for $200? What happens if my disc wonât play, if the plastic degrades enough that it wonât even run? If the computer gets too advanced to recognize it? If any future releases of The Simpsons omit âStark Raving Dadâ for the same bullshit reasons that Disney+ omitted it? But, more importantly;
What happens when this isnât just about Michael Jackson anymore?
Itâs annoying when itâs only a quality issue, when now all of The Simpsons is 1080p except âStark Raving Dad,â which if this DVD still works will be in 720p (I could try to find a Blu-ray of The Simpsonsâ third season, if one exists, but again; would they still include the episode on a Blu-ray sold in 2020?) but itâs going to become an issue of much greater importance when the DVD becomes obsolete.
When my DVD stops working, I wonât be able to access this episode in anything beyond 480p. If and when torrent sites and less-than-legal sites like KissCartoon are taken down, I wonât be able to access this episode at all. Sure, Iâve seen it before and itâs just an episode of The Simpsons, but if this can happen to my silly little Simpsons episode, imagine what will happen when this happens to something of cultural significance.
Weâve lost footage of the fucking moon landing because the people working on it didnât think to save the original film, weâve lost some of the very first films in general because the celluloid was turned into heels for shoes and materials for war. If media of that much importance can be lost because of carelessness, imagine what can be lost because of malice.
âStark Raving Dadâ is maliciously being left behind because people think Michael Jackson is a child molester. I 100% believe he is not, and thereâs no evidence to support that he is, but that doesnât change what some other people think. And unfortunately for me, itâs those people that decide whether or not the thing they made with Michael Jackson gets to be saved with all the other episodes of their animated TV show.
However, I feel this sets a precedent for censorship moving forward. How many movies, TV show episodes, Hell; even entire TV series, are we going to lose? Who gets to make those determinations? And at that rate, for which reasons? It can already be for accused crimes, not actual guilty verdicts (because Michael Jackson has only ever been accused, never found guilty, and no evidence of wrongdoing ever found.)Â
So what if I accuse someone Iâve never met of raping me? Can I get the stuff they worked on taken down too if I make my accusation sound horrible enough? If I come up with the most disgusting thing imaginable, can I get anything taken down? How graphic do I have to describe my (fictional) rape to get a movie I donât like taken off of Netflix? To make sure that itâs unreasonably hard for anyone to ever see that hypothetical movie ever again?
With all this in mind, I hate not owning things. I hate paying to access a streaming service where someone can censor or remove something I paid for, or where itâs not guaranteed to even be there in the first place. I hate when a service wants to gaslight me into thinking episodes are out of order, or didnât exist in the first place, or didnât air the way I remember them airing. If I pay for something, I want what I bought and I want it to keep, not to be altered or taken away just because someone somewhere said so!
Today itâs âStark Raving Dad,â because of Michael Jackson, but what is it gonna be next time Iâm trying to find something? What else are we going to lose not because itâs âLost Media,â but âDestroyed Media?â Who gets to decide, and why? (That should always be the question, shouldnât it? âWho gets to decide, and why?â We need to make that phrase a common daily occurrence. Critical thinking is so important.)
âCause this is exploitable as hell, and mark my words, itâs gonna keep getting worse as time goes on.
2 notes
¡
View notes