#aamir khan ad anti indian

[news-mashable-yahoopartner-blog]

5 times when intolerant India had a problem with Bollywood

The multi-million dollar Hindi film industry, popularly known as Bollywood, has been troubled of late. Not by falling footfalls or depleting budgets or any of those typical concerns that plague showbiz. But by a rising 'intolerance' towards its stories and subjects and also the people behind them.

SEE ALSO: Teenage Bollywood actor faces vicious social media abuse and no one knows why

The latest to be hit, literally, is ace filmmaker and National Award winner Sanjay Leela Bhansali, who reportedly invited the ire of fringe religious groups in northern India for having touched upon a subject considered sacrosanct. 

The attackers claimed that he was "distorting history" in his upcoming film Padmavati, which narrates the story of a 14th century Rajput queen. Without any access whatsoever to the yet-unreleased film's script, it was perceived that it showcases an illicit romance between the pious Hindu queen Padmavati and a menacing Muslim invader Alauddin Khilji. 

And that, by India's orthodox moral standards, is a strict no-no. The film's lead actors have denied any such "distortion".

As Padmavati I can assure you that there is absolutely no distortion of history.#Padmavati

— Deepika Padukone (@deepikapadukone) January 28, 2017

Historians say that Padmavati was a work of fiction to begin with. It hardly matters though if she was real or imagined, but the fact that a storyteller is struggling to express himself in a democratic society is disturbing. 

Here are more instances in recent years that point towards a striking disapproval of Bollywood when it doesn't toe the conventional line. 

When Karan Johar apologized for working with Pakistani actors

In October 2016, prior to the release of Karan Johar's Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, there was massive outrage over the inclusion of Pakistani actors in the film. So much so that political groups in India's entertainment capital of Mumbai threatened to stall the release of the film. The producer-director Johar, one of the most high-profile figures in the industry, had to give in to the demands, and promise that he would never work with Pakistani actors again. 

A blanket ban was imposed by the government on artistes and content from Pakistan.

When Shah Rukh Khan promised that his Pakistani co-actor would not promote their new film 

Image: RED CHILLIES ENTERTAINMENT / EXCEL ENTERTAINMENT

Because of the aforementioned ban, Shah Rukh Khan's recent film Raees, starring Pakistani actress Mahira Khan, generated a lot of pre-release buzz. The actor, though highly influential, had to give in to the demands of a local political party to ensure the film's smooth release. He promised that his Pakistani co-actor, despite being the female lead, would not be seen during the film's promotions. Now, that is not only disappointing but highly unfair. And the actress later went on to speak about it.

When Aamir Khan said his family wanted to move out of India

In November 2015, another megastar Aamir Khan invited the wrath of the masses for voicing his concerns about the security situation in the country. While talking at a public event, he confessed that his wife and family were "alarmed" and wanted "to move out" of India at one point. 

He was lambasted on social media for his "unpatriotic" comments, and people threatened to boycott his films. Some even asked him to go to Pakistan, the usual right-wing barb on Twitter. Khan later clarified his statement and said that he "was born here... will die here." 

Had he not done that, who knows how his big-ticket release in 2016 would have fared? But Dangal's blockbuster success ensured that the Aamir-should-leave-India debate has been put to rest. At least for now.

When Shah Rukh Khan's "misinterpreted" comments hit his film's box office collections

Image: RED CHILLIES ENTERTAINMENT / Rohit Shetty Productions

Aamir's peer, Shah Rukh Khan, wasn't as fortunate though.

It is believed that his statements on "religious intolerance" adversely impacted the collections of his 2015 film Dilwale. Angered by Khan's comments, several political groups and activists opposed the film’s screenings in Patna, Ghaziabad, Varanasi, Jabalpur and many places in Rajasthan.

Khan later went on to admit, "At some point of time, I do regret people could not understand what I said. It was not represented properly. If anybody feels bad about it, I regret it completely." But he also added, "I have not said anything that I should apologize (for). I will fall in my own eyes if I do that."

When a satire was nearly boycotted for being "anti-Hindu"

Image: UTV MOTION PICTURES / VINOD CHOPRA FILMS

In December 2014, another Aamir Khan film PK was branded "anti-Hindu" for its satirical take on Gods and Goddesses, blind faith, customs and rituals. Several theaters were vandalized by Hindutva outfits and they demanded a boycott of the film for allegedly hurting religious sentiments.

Strangely enough, PK went on to become one of the biggest hits of Indian cinema.

BONUS: The very best (and worst) movies from Sundance 2017

[wionews]

Have been thrown out of films because someone's girlfriend was recommended instead: Priyanka Chopra

Dressed in a red jumpsuit, Priyanka Chopra looked every bit of a superstar as she took centerstage to speak at Penguin Annual Lecrture on Tuesday evening in the capital. The actress spoke about breaking the glass ceiling and how she chased her dream and became a successful global star.

While the night was mostly about how her successful career and she being able to challenge a whole lot of stereotypes, the conversation also veered towards towards the raging issues of this year- the Padmavati row and the 'Me Too' movement.

Priyanka mostly played safe while commenting on the issues and even explained that why Indian celebrities choose to keep mum about such things.

When a senior journalist prodded her to comment on the controversy around the release of Padmavati, PC stated that she supported Sanjaya Leela Bhansali and Deepika Padukone and hoped that the film would release. “ I did call them up and speak to them,” Priyanka said and added, "I hope that the film releases. And can be viewed by everyone else.”

When she was asked why she chose not to make a statement publicly on the issue, Priyanka said, “Because I as an individual feel used when my quote is run as ticker on news channels. Have you not seen? The polarisation that happens not just in terms of religion but gender as well in this country- why are such questions asked to only actors and not to government authorities and politicians? What can an actor do to change what’s happening in the country? I am as much a member of this civil society as you.” Priyanka was refering to the whole anti-National debnate that had ensued in 2016 against Shah Rukh Khan and Aamir Khan for commenting on the polrisation that has taken place in the country.

“I can have an opinion but I should not be pushed to a corner and made a scapegoat for it," the actress said.

When she was reminded how in Hollywood, actresses have come forward to speak out on issues- Priyanka said that there is a cultural difference in America which allows one to speak out. “Meryl Streep could speak out against Trump, because that’s how the culture is. In India we are very different. There are certain cultural boundaries here and we must respect that.”

The actress also believed that the ‘Me Too’ movement did not just cater to Americans but had an impact globally. Did she ever face anything similar here in India? “I am very feisty. People get scared of me,” the actress said but admitted, “Yes I have been thrown out of films because someone else has been recommended. A girlfriend of the actor or the director was recommended instead- that’s an abuse of power. I couldn’t do anything about it because I did not have the power nor did I cater to the whims and fancies of certain powerful men, so I did lose out on projects."

The actress pointed out that often women who have faced sexual harassment cannot speak out because they do not have enough support. “I urge such women to have someone who can stand with them at corner and give them strength to speak out.”

]]>