Tumgik
#Ponniyan Selvan I
kisshim · 1 year
Text
you know how women in ancient india would adorn themselves with every type of jewelry, literally from their head to toe and they’d wear saris draped in however the locals did it and it’s just so beautiful idk
2 notes · View notes
wandachilda · 2 years
Text
mani ratnam you mad lad
1 note · View note
khaleesiofalicante · 7 months
Note
To get to know you better I hope you can indulge in my ask! :)
Favourite 5 novels of all time (and why?)
Favourite ships of all time (and why?)
What are your favourite Shadowhunter novels? (and why)?
Favourite Shadowhunter ships (and why)?
Much love :)
Of course! This is lovely! Thank you!
A) I have more favorite 'series' than books/novels tbh.
You'll see that I love books more for the plot than the characters, It's the same for any media I consume. I often don't relate to characters a lot. But I love stories and if the plot is good then I don't care if I like the characters!
In no particular order:
A Song of Ice and Fire (novel version of Game of Thrones) - I've never read a better series with a plot so captivating and the world building is just something else. I also love the characters so much!
The shadowhunter chronicles - I've always been obsessed with the concept of angels and demons (maybe it's my catholic upbringing) but I got sucked into the series very easily. One of the things I love about tsc is that the friendships have just as much emphasis as romantic relationships.
Red White Royal Blue/Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe - These are two of my favourite queer novels because these were some of the first queer novels I read so they mean a lot to me. I love the characters in both!
Sherlock Holmes - I've read every single story and I was obsessed with Sherlock Holmes growing up. Mystery is my favourite genre and the writing of Conan Doyle really influenced my own in turns of how much I love leaving clues and plot twists. He is just brilliant!
Ponniyan Selvan (This is a novel in my native tongue) - I read this when I was very young and this is, to this day, one of the most brilliant pieces of writing I've ever read. I started writing stories when I was 8 (my mom took me to school competitions etc) and this story was my inspiration to start writing. (because growing up I only write in my native language. I think fan fiction was the first time I started writing in English).
B) Favourite ships:
I don't actually have many hehe. Like I said, I don't connect with characters/ships easily. But some ships I do like include Malec, Firstprince (rwrb) and Ineffable husbands (Good Omens).
There are also this from my own writing that I love a lot hehe. But I'll save them for later.
C) My favorite shadowhunter novels:
My favourite series is TMI. I think it's because I like the gang best (they felt like an actual real friend group to me as opposed to the others who had too many mini friend group inside them). I also like the plot of tmi and the villains much better.
I also love the three novellas - the bane chronicles, TFTSA, and GOTSM. This is some of CC's best work if you ask me (And those who co-wrote them with her!). And of course, I love the red scrolls of magic. The book was perfection. 100% perfection.
D) Favorite TSC ships:
Malec - Just because I understand them the most and I love their dynamic and I love how much growth we've seen from them (individually and together). They're the kind of couple that inspires others (in the tsc world and outside). I love that!
Herongraystairs - Idk there is something about the three of them and how much they love each other that gets to me. I wish we got to see more of them together!
Some honourable mentions I love: Henry/Charlotte, Gideon/Sophie, Gabriel/Cecily (I actually like all the ships in TID actually), Gwyn/Diana, Jace/Clary.
Thank you for the questions! Please feel free to tell me about all of yours too! I'd love to hear it 🧡
11 notes · View notes
Text
I need more ponniyan Selvan fanfiction!!! And i need them now!!!
37 notes · View notes
Text
The emergence of ponniyan Selvan fanfics on this site is scratching a very specific itch of mine and it’s just what I need rn while also simultaneously making the itch worse cuz I consume that material like a starving dog eating treats thank you
20 notes · View notes
holly-mckenzie · 6 months
Note
Hello! I love LOVE your blog it's so good. I always find the most interesting shows because of your posts so i wanted to ask what are your fav ships with the best chemistry in a newer film/tv show? I saw a whole debate a few days ago about how "ships nowadays are always lacking chemistry " and i was interested in your opinion. Have a nice day!
Hello anon... I need to clarify, I wrote this answer essay thinking about romcoms, bc that's what film twitter has been talking about, but I realised you said "ships". I will answer your question here. Under the cut, is my thoughts on romcoms, please be aware what is hiding beneath the cut is a behemoth of an answer.
But in terms of "ships" and lacking chemistry. I think there's a few things to think about. Specifically, I believe there has been way to much focus on "ships" and sometimes this conversation detracts from other elements of storytelling, or completely takes over the entire story and what it makes it interesting (e.g. - the conversation surrounding Anatomy of a Fall or what Reylo did to Star Wars). On the subject of Star Wars, one of the things to think about in this conversation is how racism, misogyny, or general bigotry shape peoples opinions. The argument of "they don't have chemistry" is a common phrase used by racists and bigots who don't want to engage with their faves being involved with characters of colour/woman etc.
Now unto other reasons why "ships" might not have chemistry. I think if you are discussing American Television, one thing to note is the departure of shows that had 20+ episodes. With the fear that the show might get cancelled and with a shorter time to establish the narrative, I think we, as audiences, are seeing less of the long con, "will they, won't they" game, that we saw in the late 90's/2000's. I would argue this could be one of the reasons that British TV does so well, most British series are only 6 episodes long, and there may be a better understanding of how to write a more compact narrative, and perhaps there's even better job security... But maybe not considering Joe Barton's history.
Lastly, there is a world of media out there and you need to make the effort to find and engage with it. I talk more about this under the cut, but so many people who are minorities are not given the same advantages as white straight people... So if you want to find good stuff. You gots to look for it. It might not be in a language you understand, or about people who you can relate to, but its out there. Go find it.
So in Answer to your Question, what are my fav ships with the best chemistry in a newer film/tv show.
Television: Starstruck (2021– ) : Tom x Jessie The Lazarus Project (2022– ) : Janet x Rebrov & Zhao x Archie & Shiv x George The Artful Dodger (2023) : Belle x Jack Foundation (2021– ) : Hober Mallow x Brother Constant Alex Rider (2020– ) : Alex x Kyra Animal Control (2023– ) : Shred x Emily Tom Jones (2023) : Tom x Sophia
Other Honourable Mentions: Summer Love (2022– ), Colin from Accounts (2022), Still Up (2023– ), Little Woman (2022), Lockwood and Co. (2023), The Flatshare (2022), The Other Two, Suzhal (2022), In Limbo (2023– ), The Buccaneers (2023– ).
Films: Femme (2023), Here (2023), Decision to Leave (2022), Stay the Night (2022), The Big Four (2022), Ponniyan Selvan i & ii, Stellar (2022), Wildhood (2022), Lakelands (2023), Wedding Season (2022), 7 Days (2021), Scream VI, Sanctuary (2022)
Books: Anything by Tia Williams, Sarah Beth Durst, Uzma Jalaluddin, Jane Igharo
Stage: The Effect (2023/2024), Much Ado About Nothing (2019), Much Ado About Nothing (2022), The Notebook (2024), Hadestown
My Original Answer:
Hello anon, thank you so much! Thanks for appreciating my questionable taste. I do really enjoy watching TV, film, and books and then writing academic papers about them in my head. So obviously this question is really fun.
I need to start by saying, I have been thinking about chemistry for weeks, so I am going to answer your question, just maybe not the question you were asking. Brace yourselves, I wrote an essay.
The whole debate is deeply fascinating to me for various reasons. In part I do really believe that people need to broaden their horizons when it comes to the art they interact with. There is a world of cinema out there. If you surround yourselves by clowns and then complain you are in a circus... that's a choice, no?
Expand your horizons, dip into Asian cinema, African cinema, American Cinema (North, South, and Central), that European stuff (that isn't just what the BBC is pumping out or starring your French favs). And if you must watch Hollywood, then watch some indie stuff. Watch some gay stuff. Watch some stuff by people of colour.
Lichrelly no one is forcing you to watch the blandest/whitest romcoms/romdrams. Are they more accessible to watch? Sure. But complaining, when you don't even care to do the research is a choice. Especially, bc of the way that racism/misogyny/homophobia/ableism makes it harder for people to get their stories out. If you really care about these things. You gots to put the effort into caring and finding them.
Secondly, boiling down chemistry to romance is absolutely wild, considering there are different type of chemistry needed for different roles. For example Rob Collins and Shantae Barnes-Cowan have mad chemistry in the show Firebite. Now let me clarify, I am not saying its romantic. They pulled off the single dad and adopted daughter in a survival/action story story so well. Pedro Pascal, who? And it takes chemistry to pull that off. More popularly, one of the reasons that Succession works as a show is because the actors have chemistry. Some of which is romantic ofc, but the vast majority of it isn't (no matter what the in*est shippers on A*3 say). But I understand, the people want what they want, and that's romance.
I also think that chemistry is an odd thing. I know people are inclined to think that its an objective. You look at two people and are like, "Wow, they have chemistry!", and everyone agrees, because "Wow, they have chemistry!". But I am inclined to think its not that straight forward. There is something to be said about our interactions with art being subjective and biased. This is because as we interact with art, we are interacting with it through our own lens. The author is truly dead, and all that matters is the individual reader's interpretation. So, for example, many people love the movie Anyone But You. If you go on YouTube there are many people who have made ship videos about Bea and Ben. But there is a category of people who fucking hate it and think that its trash and the leads don't have chemistry (Yes, I am talking about myself in third person. I will avenge you Much Ado About Nothing).
So, who is right? Who is wrong? Honestly, it really doesn't matter, because its a fucking movie, and like I said, the author is dead. Similarly, some critics really didn't like the series Tom Jones. In certain reviews and articles, criticism of the series was that Solly McLead and Sophie Wilde don't have chemistry. However, if you follow me, you know I completely disagree and made that show my personality for a couple of months.
But on the subject of chemistry (of the romantic variety), I definitely think its more complicated then people let on. I think most people believe that it's about the actors. You put them in a movie, show, whatever, and chemistry they have just happens. It's like love, you can't explain it, but its there. Or, according to my friend, who used to work in the film industry, the best chemistry comes across when the actors hate each other or they secretly like each other/are fucking each other. It's brought on by strong emotions. Which is obviously a school of thought.
However, as my bestie Merry (@akajustmerry) has been discussing, there are actors who are dating/fucking IRL and none of that comes across in the film/show. I highly recommend checking out Merry's blog to see their opinions on this bc Merry is THE film critic of our generation! Someone please hire them!
But I do think it takes more than just what the actors can bring. It's about the direction they are being given, its about the script, its about the staging. It's about the framing. And it's about the actors and their acting ability. Actors are working professionals and contrary to popular belief, it takes skills to act (not just a pretty face). And one of the skills needed is the ability to create trust between the leads, as Merry and an anon discusses in this post. Because without trust, how can there be chemistry. Which is why intimacy coordinators are SO important. Fuck anyone who says otherwise!
To argue against my friend who used to work in the industry, yes hating/loving someone IRL can create tangible chemistry. And yeah, it might be hard to overcome friendship, if you are friends with your co-star (e.g. - that one interview where Jessica Matten jokes about how weird it was to kiss Kiowa Gordan in Dark Winds). But think about Nikesh Patel and Rose Matafeo in Starstruck. From what I can tell, which is little bc I don't know them IRL and its none of my business, Rose and Nikesh weren't hating each other or fucking in each other. They seem to be friends, but mostly co-workers. But regardless of all of that, Starstruck is literally one of the greatest romcoms of our era. And they have mad chemistry.
Additionally, in my opinion, Lee Pace and Laura Birn of Foundation fame, and Lana Gordon and MPQ/Zachary James and Gloria Onitiri of Hadestown fame have chemistry. But all the men I just listed are gay/in relationship with men, so we can't chalk up chemistry to already existing romantic tension. It is an aspect of acting and skill. Both Zachary James and MPQ have spoken about how the trust they have in their co-stars, have allowed space to shape and cultivate the characters they play (including the romance of the show).
You can't just cast two conventionally attractive people and expect their attractiveness to do the rest. You know my thoughts on Anyone But You. But similarly, think about the way that people were thirsting over Zoë Kravitz and Robert Pattinson bc of all the press and photo shoots they did for The Batman. But then also think of the accusations of whorebaiting, that followed. They simply, in my opinion, did not have chemistry. Even if the Bat and the Cat are one of the funnest dynamics in them comics.
So now that we have discussed actors, and audiences. We gots to discuss actual story telling. Writing is a skill. I know on the tumblr dot com, we have discussed that writing good sex scenes is a skill. Writing good romance is the same... I don't want to labour on about this, bc I feel like you must already know that. But some things to consider is the way in which the focus on tropes instead of storytelling is a detriment to the genre. The fanfictionization of romance. The way in which abuse is touted as romance. The way that studios (coughcough Netflix) are churning out these stories (some of which are def US military propaganda). The lean towards making these movies, more and more explicit. The way that some studios/book publishers are trying to profit off already successful stories without realising what made it successful (e.g. - the amount of fake dating stories in the wake of To All the Boys, or the remakes of older movies).
So what made the movies of old so special. What made romcoms from the late 90's early 2000's, the movies by Nora Ephron and Garry Marshall oh so special. The bleak answer is nostalgia. But you could also discuss the type of narratives that were told during the time. The type of backgrounds these actors and storytellers had before they took these roles. The socio-political enviroment that cultivated these stories. The amount of money and time the studios were willing to invest in these movies. The lack of AI technology... All of the cheating scandals that arose on the sets. The existence of the Film Stars™ vs. just actors.
The fact that streaming has changed the way that movies/tv are made, and the way people consume them. Which could potentially lesson the impact on audiences, as there is less need to go to theatres. To wait for the movies to be released on DVD/VCD/VHS. Lessen the need to re-watch the movies obsessively, bc it was one of three movies you owned on DVD/VCD/VHS, and thus a lack of cementing it in your brain as THE RomCom. Yes, this is just an excuse to yell: BRING BACK PHYSICAL MEDIA, YOU COWARDS!
But one thing that I haven't seen discussed as much is the existence of the Hays Code.
A couple years ago, I watched this lecture and read this book by this academic that focused on RomComs. (I forgot the academic, but I can find it later, if you want. Can you tell I studied English and Film in school?). Regardless, the academic argued that during the 90's filmmakers had to grapple with the remnants of the Hays Code. The code was a "self-imposed industry set of guidelines for all the motion pictures that were released between 1934 and 1968." The Code prohibited things like "profanity, suggestive nudity, graphic or realistic violence, sexual persuasions and rape."
So, while RomComs, like Pretty Woman, were in production, more then 20 years after the Hays Code, this academic argued that filmmakers were grappling with what this freedom meant. That while Pretty Woman was definitely a movie that could have never been made during the time of the Code, the affect of the Code meant that these narratives were adhering to the Code, whether intentional or not.
I think one of the things to consider about the Code was the way that filmmakers had to figure out ways to work around the restrictions in order to tell the stories they wanted. So, for example the Noir is a genre came about during the height of the Code and a time where film-makers didn't have access to that much money. So, the filmmakers had to be creative to get the shots they wanted, which is how we got the highly stylized way of filming that is so iconic to the genre. Not out of excess but out of need. Additionally, the iconic archetypes of the Noir Detective and the Femme Fatale are directly due to the Hayes Code and the period that villanized certain types of woman, and esteemed certain types of men.
Yet, there is an entire study on the homosexual subtext, which was written into these films. For example in The Maltese Falcon, the main character, Sam Spade, refers to another character as a "gunsel". The the censors wrongly assumed this was a reference to a gunman, however, it is vulgar way to refer to someone who is gay. This is the same movie that features a different character, Joel Cairo, who is suggested to be gay (which is one of the reasons the film could not be legally shown on US television stations). Being a filmmaker meant learning how to navigate around the code. Being a filmmaker meant taking a risk, bc you may end up on wrong side of it.
If you want more information on queer films of the time, I believe that Merry or Deah would be able to help you seeing they have an entire podcast on gay movies/shows/games. Check out the @gayvclubpodcast.
So, going back to the RomComs of the 90's. You are talking about an entire industry of filmmakers, who were making movies after the wake of an extreme censorship, and on some level they must known or have heard stories about navigating that terrain. They must have also, on some level, understood what it meant to cultivate stories where characters want each other, like each other, yearn for each other. Because during the Code you couldn't just point a camera at them and say "See they are fucking each other, they did fuck each other, they will continue to do so. Clearly this is a romance". More work needed to be done and laid out in order to cultivate the romances that we now love.
I would argue, if you want to buy this argument, that this is the same reason that K-Dramas/Movies are SO popular. Because it was not that long ago, that Korea was more strict about the way in which physical intimacy was filmed. Think about the era, where actors would stand next to each other, lips touching, and the camera would spin in a dizzying way around them. Now, obviously, kisses aren't filmed in that way, and some movies feature open mouth kisses. Scandalous, I know. But I would argue this is one of the reasons that K-Dramas are so famous, because of the knowledge on how to draw out emotions from the audience that does not rely on physical/sexual intimacy.
So, I suppose the conversation of "ships nowadays are always lacking chemistry " comes down to a skill issue. Skill on the filmmakers parts for not being able to cultivate good stories. Skill on the Actors part, for not being able to do what is required of the role. Skill of the studios parts, for not realising the long term impact of physical media and what sells. And skill on the audiences part, for not seeing the world in one way, and not caring to do the research to find the stories you are looking for.
4 notes · View notes
madwoman14 · 2 years
Text
i’m too scared to watch any ponniyan selvan press because if they ask trisha or aish any sexist bs i will absolutely lose it. someone tell me if it’s safe to watch
10 notes · View notes
tulunadu1909 · 2 years
Text
I tried to draw this pose from the song "Rakshas Mama Re" from the film Ponniyan Selvan - 1, I have a long way to go when it comes to colouring and shading but at least the pose looks "realistic".
Tumblr media Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
sarayu-sunrays · 1 year
Text
can someone. explain. the plot of ponniyan selvan to me. I loved it but like I was like what????? He's who's son????? Wasn't this guy in tajore 1 second ago???? Huh?????
0 notes
indiejones · 2 years
Text
INDIES (FUN/IMAGINARY) TOP- EARNERS OF 21st c. SOUTH INDIAN CINEMA!
INDIES (FUN/IMAGINARY) TOP- EARNERS OF 21st c. SOUTH INDIAN CINEMA! (COMPARED TO OFFICIAL LIST! > https://www.checkmybudget.in/article/highest-grossing-south-indian-movies )
(IN (IMAGINARY) GROSS WORLDWIDE TICKET COLLECTIONS WRT EXCHANGE RATE OF EACH TIME)!
(Serial order below, is per serial order in above official/true 100 cr Club list) (10s of them).
So how'd South Indian Cinema’s All-Time most money-earning films look like,if put thru the Indie software!
Comparing,one might almost begin to imagine b.o. no.'s posted not from bo counters,rather from SOME CLANDESTINE ALTERNATE FILMS FUTURES & DERIVATIVES MARKET! (Joke tha!)
DISCLAIMER: BELOW INDIE LIST IS TOTALLY FAKE (OBVIOUSLY) !
1. Baahubali 2–351.2 cr
2. KGF 2–112 cr 3. RRR – 2 cr 4. 2.2 – 2.2 cr 5. Baahubali 1 – 5.3 cr 6. Ponniyan Selvan – 0.6 cr 7. Saaho – 0.7 cr 8. Vikram – 0.42 cr 9. Kantara – 53 cr 10. Pushpa The Rise – 17 cr 11. Kabali – 2.2 cr 12. Enthiran – 1.4 cr 13. Bigil – 1.2 cr 14. Ala Vaikunthapurramaloo – 1.2 cr 15. Mersal – 1.1 cr 16. Sarielru Neekevvaru – 0.51 cr 17. Darbar – 32 cr 18. KGF 1 – 32 cr 19. Sarkar – 22 cr 20. Sye Raa Narasimha Reddy – 82 cr 21. Annaatthe – 32 cr 22. I – 16 cr 23. Beast – 14 cr 24. Master – 14 cr 25. Petta – 25 cr 26. Vishwaroopam – 26 cr 27. Ranghasthalam – 33 cr 28. Dasavathaaram – 53 cr
1 note · View note
vennilavee · 2 years
Note
saran, do you have any anime movie recs / movie recs in general?
i honestly dont watch many movies...but as far as anime movie recs go (including ones ive seen and ones ive heard are good): hayao miyazaki movies (duh), wolf children, pokemon the movie 2000, ghost in the shell, kny: mugen train, jjk0 LMAO
movie recs in general: hereditary, ponniyan selvan, the girl on the train, tenet, glass onion
0 notes
anutheauthor · 2 years
Text
Each One Of Us Has Unique Strengths - Let's Use Them
Each One Of Us Has Unique Strengths – Let’s Use Them
I recently saw a Tamil movie – PS-1 (Ponniyan Selvan – Part 1). It is historical fiction based on events that took place centuries ago in the south of India. In short, it is about a kingdom and how it retained or lost its empire. One of the princes’ is fighting other states and is interested in just winning wars. And the other prince is also fighting but in a more peaceful way. At the same time,…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
khaleesiofalicante · 1 year
Note
Dani have you watched ponniyin selvan? Because I watched the first part yesterday and I'm about to watch the second one today (will share my thoughts about it if you wanna hear them) but honestly I loved the movie so much!!! I loved all the actors, i haven't read the book so I can't comment on the casting, but I really liked the actors and the way they were portrayed. I really liked Aishwarya as nandini, it's such a different role for her, but she looked so beautiful and the way she uses her beauty as a weapon and i really liked kundavai as well, it's really nice to see cunning female characters. And all of them were beautiful, like the women are simply divine!!!
And about the male characters i liked seeing prakash Raj in such a regal role and Vikram as the tortured hero Adithya karikalan and i really want to know more about him and nandini. Also arunmozhi varman. That's it, that's the post. I loved him?!!?! Did not expect to because he just appeared halfway through the movie but I loved him and jayam Ravi is literally perfect. Also i really liked vandiyadevan, he was so... Funny? Witty? just really amazing character and his and kundavai's chemistry???? Chef's kiss.
This is just the surface if i start talking about my favorite scenes or the bgm or anything else, i will lose it. But... One of my favorite scenes was the scene when nandini and kundavai meet, like their expressions, the passive aggressiveness, the bgm just...ugh.
So yeah, thanks for coming to my Ted talk. Also i wanted to ask,,, have you read the books, i know that the books are always worth reading and better than the movie but i just want a comparative analysis on why you prefer the books or the movies, if you have read the books that is.
Hello,
Yes, I have watched the movie. I haven't watched the second one yet. I must do it when I get back to SL.
I have indeed read the books. I did tamil literature in school so I had to study all the tamil epics including Ponniyan Selvan - which is actually my favorite tamil book ever. When I found out mani ratnam was adapting it into a movie I fucking flipped - because it's mani ratnam?? AND A R RAHAMAN?
I was kinda worried because we know sometimes they butcher the adaptation but the movie was SO SO good. I really really liked it. My favorite character was also Ponniyan Selvan or Arulmozhi Varman. He's been my favorite since the books. I also love Kundhavai because she is so fucking smart. One of my favorite thing about this book/story is how women are running the show. It's actually a common theme with all tamil epics - whether it's Kannaki in Silapathikaram or Paanjali in Maha Bharatam (my second fave story). WE REALLY MORE OF THESE MOVIES IN TAMIL BECAUSE OF HOW WOMEN ARE POTRAYED IN THEM AS OPPOSED TO HOW THEY ARE OBJECTIFIED AND SEXUALISED IN MODERN TAMIL MOVIES.
I'm so so excited for the second one and I would love to hear your thoughts.
AND THE BGM BRO-
5 notes · View notes
Text
To me the most unnecessary part of ponniyan Selvan is the last conversation between kundavai and Vandiyadevan where kundavai revealed her suspension about vandiyadevan being the only person Nandini ever loved...like was that really necessary Kalki sir? As if we didn't already have Manimeglai in the mix that he had to add Nandini in between them .This plot point feels like an afterthought , and an unnecessary addition to me. And i refused to accept this as a cannon!!
17 notes · View notes
Text
The absolute chokehold the Ponniyan selvan series has on me is ridiculous. Like I’m pissed at myself for taking so long to find this amazing piece of literature so late in my life when it literally originates from my neighbouring state. It also totally managed to send me into a spiral of omgwhatotherindianfolkorefictionhisoricalficitonspecificallymasterpiecesamimissing!!!!!!! Bottom line it’s been a few months since I last read the books and I’m still removing very very slowly and I need to rant
12 notes · View notes
idvnn · 2 years
Text
i just want really good ponniyan selvan gifsets; is that too much to ask?
0 notes