#Ken McCallum
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
mariacallous · 1 month ago
Text
“We’ve seen arson, sabotage and more: dangerous actions conducted with increasing recklessness,” warned Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, Britain’s domestic security and counter-intelligence agency, of the threat posed by Russia and the GRU, its military-intelligence agency. “The GRU in particular is on a sustained mission to generate mayhem on British and European streets,” he said on October 8th. Other European intelligence agencies are equally concerned. On October 14th Bruno Kahl, Germany’s spy chief, said that Russia’s covert measures had reached a “level previously unseen”. Thomas Haldenwang, the head of Germany’s domestic intelligence services, told lawmakers that an act of sabotage had almost caused a plane to crash earlier this year as he warned that “aggressive behaviour” by Russian spies was putting lives at risk.
Russia’s war in Ukraine has been accompanied by a crescendo of aggression, subversion and meddling elsewhere. In particular, Russian sabotage in Europe has grown dramatically. “We see acts of sabotage happening in Europe now,” Vice-Admiral Nils Andreas Stensones, the head of the Norwegian Intelligence Service, said in September. Sir Richard Moore, the chief of MI6, Britain’s foreign-intelligence agency, put it more bluntly: “Russian intelligence services have gone a bit feral, frankly.”
The Kremlin’s men have squeezed the West out of several African states. Its hackers, Poland’s security services said, have tried to paralyse the country in the political, military, and economic spheres. Russia’s propagandists have pumped disinformation around the world. Its armed forces want to put a nuclear weapon in orbit. Russian foreign policy has long dabbled in chaos. Now it seems to aim at little else.
Start with the summer of sabotage. In April Germany arrested two German-Russian nationals on suspicion of plotting attacks on American military facilities and other targets on behalf of the GRU. The same month Poland arrested a man who was preparing to pass the GRU information on Rzeszow airport, a hub for arms to Ukraine, and Britain charged several men over an arson attack on a Ukrainian-owned logistics firm in London. The men were accused of aiding the Wagner Group, a mercenary outfit now under the GRU’s control. In June France arrested a Russian-Ukrainian who was wounded after attempting to make a bomb in his hotel room in Paris. In July it emerged that Russia had plotted to kill Armin Papperger, the boss of Rheinmetall, Germany’s largest arms firm. On September 9th air traffic at Stockholm’s Arlanda airport was shut down for more than two hours after drones were spotted over runways. “We suspect it was a deliberate act,” a police spokesperson said. American officials warn that Russian vessels are reconnoitring underwater cables.
Even where Russia has not resorted to violence, it has sought to stir the pot in other ways. The Baltic states have arrested a number of people for what they say are Russian-sponsored provocations. French intelligence officials claim that Russia was responsible for the appearance of coffins draped with the French flag and bearing the message “French soldiers of Ukraine” left at the Eiffel Tower in Paris in June. Many of these actions are aimed at fanning opposition to aid for Ukraine. But others are intended simply to widen splits in society of all kinds, even if these have little or no link to the war. France says that Russia was also behind the graffiti of 250 Stars of David on walls in Paris in November, an effort to fuel antisemitism, which has surged since the start of the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Much of Russia’s activity has been virtual. In April hackers with ties to the GRU seem to have manipulated control systems for water plants in America and Poland. In September America, Britain, Ukraine and several other countries published details of cyber-attacks by the GRU’s Unit 29155, a group that was previously known for assassinations in Europe, including a botched effort to poison Sergei Skripal, a former Russian intelligence officer. The GRU’s cyber efforts, which had been ongoing since at least 2020, were not just aimed at espionage, but also “reputational harm” by stealing and leaking information and “systematic sabotage” by destroying data, according to America and its allies.
Beyond Europe, GRU officers have been in Yemen alongside the Houthis, a rebel group that has attacked ships in the Red Sea, ostensibly in solidarity with Palestinians. Russia, angered by America’s provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine, came close to providing weapons to the group in July, CNN reported, but reversed course after strong opposition from Saudi Arabia. The fact that Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president, was willing to alienate Muhammad bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto ruler whom he had courted for years, is an indication of how Russia’s war has cannibalised its wider foreign policy.
Everything everywhere
“What Putin is trying to do is hit us all over the place,” argues Fiona Hill, who previously served as the top Russia official in America’s National Security Council. She compares the strategy to the Oscar winning film: “Everything Everywhere All at Once”. In Africa, for instance, Russia has used mercenaries to supplant French and American influence in the aftermath of coups in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.
Russia’s meddling in America takes a very different form. In May Avril Haines, America’s director of national intelligence, called Russia “the most active foreign threat to our elections” above China or Iran. This was not merely about trying to shape America’s policy on Ukraine. “Moscow most likely views such operations as a means to tear down the United States as its perceived primary adversary,” she said, “enabling Russia to promote itself as a great power.” In July American intelligence agencies said that they were “beginning to see Russia target specific voter demographics, promote divisive narratives, and denigrate specific politicians”.
These efforts are generally crude and ineffectual. But they are prolific, intense and sometimes innovative. In September America’s Justice Department accused two employees of RT, a Kremlin-controlled media outlet that regularly spews out Russian talking points and lurid conspiracy theories, of paying $10m to an unnamed media company in Tennessee. The firm, thought to be Tenet Media, posted nearly 2,000 videos on TikTok, Instagram, X and YouTube. (Commentators paid by the company denied wrongdoing.) The department also seized 32 Kremlin-controlled internet domains designed to mimic legitimate news sites.
Russian propagandists are also experimenting with technology. CopyCop, a network of websites, took legitimate news articles and used ChatGPT, an AI model, to rewrite them. More than 90 French articles were modified with the prompt: “Please rewrite this article taking a conservative stance against the liberal policies of the Macron administration in favour of working-class French citizens.” Another rewritten piece included evidence of its instructions, saying: “This article…highlights the cynical tone towards the US government, NATO, and US politicians.”
Russian disinformation campaigns are hardly new, acknowledges Sergey Radchenko, a historian of Russian foreign policy, pointing to episodes such as the Tanaka memorandum, an alleged Soviet forgery that was used to discredit Japan in 1927. Nor are proxy wars or assassinations a novelty. Soviet troops were already fighting in Yemen, disguised as Egyptians, in the early 1960s, he notes. The KGB’s predecessors and successors have killed many people abroad, from Leon Trotsky to ex-spy Alexander Litvinenko.
The genuinely new part, says Mr Radchenko, “is that whereas previously special operations supported foreign policy, today special operations are foreign policy.” Ten years ago the Kremlin worked with America and Europe to counter Iran and North Korea’s nuclear programme. Such co-operation is now fanciful. “It is as if the Russians no longer feel they have a stake in preserving anything of the post-war international order,” says Mr Radchenko. This period reminds him more of Mao’s nihilistic foreign policy during China’s Cultural Revolution than the Soviet Union’s cold-war thinking, which included periods of pragmatism and caution. Ms Hill puts it another way: “It’s Trotsky over Lenin.”
Mr Putin embraces these ideas. “We are in for probably the most dangerous, unpredictable and at the same time most important decade since the end of World War II,” he said in late 2022. “To cite a classic,” he added, invoking an article by Vladimir Lenin in 1913, “this is a revolutionary situation.” That belief—that the post-war order is rotten and needs rewriting, by force if necessary—also gives Russia common cause with China. “Right now there are changes the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years,” Xi Jinping told Mr Putin last year in Moscow, “and we are the ones driving these changes together.”
Russia’s foreign-policy strategy, published in 2023, offers the bland reassurance that it “does not consider itself an enemy of the West…and has no ill intentions”. A classified addendum acquired by the Washington Post from a European intelligence service suggests otherwise. It proposes a comprehensive containment strategy against a “coalition of unfriendly countries” led by America. That includes an “offensive information campaign” among other actions in the “military-political, trade-economic and informational-psychological…spheres”. The ultimate aim, it notes, is “to weaken Russia’s opponents”.
This does not mean Russia is unstoppable. It is increasingly a junior partner to China. Its influence has slipped in some countries, such as Syria. It does not always back up its own proxies—dozens of Wagner fighters were killed in an ambush by Malian rebels, aided by Ukraine, in July. And Russian subversion can be disrupted, says Sir Richard, by “good old-fashioned security and intelligence work” to identify the intelligence officers and criminal proxies behind it. The fact that Russia is increasingly reliant on criminals to carry out these acts, in part because Russian spies have been expelled en masse from Europe, is a sign of desperation. “Russia’s use of proxies further reduces the professionalism of their operations, and—absent diplomatic immunity—increases our disruptive options,” says Mr McCallum.
Russian meddling is intended to put pressure on NATO without provoking a war. “We also have red lines,” says Ms Hill, “and Putin is trying to feel those out.” But if he is truly driven by a revolutionary spirit, convinced that the West is a rotten edifice, that suggests more lines will be crossed in the months and years ahead.
50 notes · View notes
master-john-uk · 3 months ago
Text
The latest BBC television news reports have focused on possible terrorist attacks originating from Russia, Iran and China.
This is not the whole picture. The current detected threats are mainly from Al-Qaeda linked Islamic groups, and extremist right-wing UK groups.
The worrying part is that all potential terrorist attacking groups, and nations are using social media to recruit the help of the criminal underworld, and people under the age of 18.
My company's main focus changed in 2017, from providing technology to the military, to protecting the public against a possible mass attack. Our early surveillance equipment in Central London helped prevent at least three incidents in the first year.
The systems have since been upgraded... and since Monday my teams have been installing new Intelligent Cameras, and updating the software on the existing ones.
STAY ALERT... and report anything suspicious by dialling 999, or contacting the anti-terror hotline on 0800 789 321.
3 notes · View notes
usafphantom2 · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
My father was picked by a computer in 1964 to become a candidate for a new position, called the reconnaissance systems officer in the new SR-71.
He was picked because of his outstanding bomb record in the B-58. He was the first man interviewed by Doug Nelson at Little Rock Air Force Base home of the 43rd wing of the B-58 because he had walking pneumonia; Colonel Nelson interviewed him first, took him into a small closet, and asked him these questions: would you be willing to fly over Russia or China and are you a volunteer?
The Sheffield family was the first SR 71 family to arrive at Beale Air Force Base March of 1965. My Dad was picked not because he knew someone important. He didn’t know anyone. He came from a small town in Ohio called Rootstown. His father worked at the Goodyear rubber plant in Akron, Ohio. The first group were all like Dad, and they knew what an honor it was to be selected. This was a noble calling. They put the love of their country first in their life. These men were sincere, and their word was so honorable that you knew it was a solemn promise that they would rather die before they revealed it. You could just feel feel the goodness of these men trust honor, faithful, noble, confident, and humility. The tradition of selecting, the very best was continued throughout the whole program.
I would go to basketball and baseball games to watch my Dad and his coworkers play. I was shocked at how aggressive Daddy was. He didn’t act like that at home. They were all aggressive men .
These men knew how to handle social situations expertly. I would go to the officers club with my parents occasionally. Who could turn down a colored TV in the lobby near the bar at the Beale Air Force Base officers club with all the Shirley Temples (7-Up with grenadine ) with cherries on top that I could possibly drink. My friends lived near by they were mostly SR 71 pilots and RSO‘s children. I spent a lot of time eating dinner with them, watching TV , going to the bowling alley, going on picnics, running down the street to Ryan Park. Stopping by the Vicks, the Jarvis’s, the McCallum’s and Payne’s last, but not least I practically lived at Janet Payne’s house.
When I was a teenager, I hung out with Kent and Sherry Collins I would babysat for the younger kids in family. I didn’t know that their father Ken Collins’s was an A-12 pilot turned SR-71 pilot until many years later. I’m sure the postman was confused as an another Collins lived across the street. Charles “Pete” Collins SR-71 Pilot and his wife Shirley and kids Petey, Kim and Kathy they moved back after being away for a year, and now lived across the street from us.
The neighbors and my parents all came around with bottles of liquor. It was getting kind of late and they were getting rather noisy. I thought it would be funny to call the police on them. Just to see what they would do. I had my friend Jeff Anderson, deepen his voice and call the police from my kitchen. The police quickly came. I didn’t know that the phones were bugged. The base police assumed that the call came from my father not from one of his daughter’s friends . Jeff and I and a few other friends that had stopped by were hiding behind the bushes . The police said I heard there was a disturbance up here. As the two young police officers looked at the sidewalk with spilled liquor and bottles everywhere and four couples sitting in the grass !
Ken Collins quickly gets up approach the police car I said “You can move on now we took care of it.” I waited about 25 years before I told my mother that I was the one that instigated the call to the police. I think she was still thinking about putting me on restriction. Linda Sheffield
@Habubrats71 via X
9 notes · View notes
brookstonalmanac · 3 months ago
Text
Birthdays 9.19
Beer Birthdays
Coletta Möritz (1860)
Jim Dorsch (1951)
Keith Lemcke (1959)
Ken Kelley (1960)
Justin Crossley (1982)
Five Favorite Birthdays
William Golding; English writer (1911)
Jeremy Irons; English actor (1948)
David McCallum; actor (1933)
Arthur Rackham; English illustrator, artist (1867)
Adam West; actor (1928)
Famous Birthdays
Mario Batali; chef (1960)
David Bromberg; musician, singer, songwriter (1945)
Helen Carter; country singer (1927)
Jack Dunham; animator (1910)
George Cadbury; chocolatier (1839)
"Mama" Cass Elliot; singer (1943)
Brian Epstein; Beatles manager (1934)
Jimmy Fallon; comedian, actor (1974)
Frances Farmer; actor (1913)
Lita Ford; rock guitarist, singer (1958)
Henry Arthur Jones; English writer (1851)
William Hesketh Lever; soap-maker (1851)
James Lipton; actor, television host (1926)
Joan Lunden; television journalist (1950)
Joe Morgan; Houston Astros 2B (1943)
Soledad O'Brien; television journalist (1966)
Freda Payne; pop singer (1942)
Louis F. Powell Jr.; U.S. Supreme Court justice (1907)
Amber Rayne; porn actor (1984)
Faye Reagan; porn actor (1988)
Nile Rogers; rock musician (1952)
Victoria Silvstedt; Swedish actor (1974)
Duke Snider; Brooklyn/L.A. Dodgers CF (1926)
Twiggy; English model (1949)
Paul Williams; songwriter (1940)
Trisha Yearwood; country singer (1964)
Richard Zsigmondy; Austrian-Hungarian chemist (1865)
2 notes · View notes
garudabluffs · 1 year ago
Text
"Trumps Criminal Associates from A to Z”
Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump; >>> Greg Abbott, Ali Alexander, Samuel Alito, Rick Allen, Brian Babin, Jim Banks, Steve Bannon, Kathy Barnette, Bill Barr, Tom Barrack, Maria Bartiromo, Glenn Beck, John Bennett, Andy Biggs, Dan Bishop, Christina Bobb, Lauren Boebert, John Bolton, David Bossie, Kevin Brady, Mike Braun, Mo Brooks, Taylor Budowich, Ted Budd, Aileen Cannon, Madison Cawthorn, Tucker Carlson, Matthew Calamari, Kenneth Chesebro, Andrew Clyde, Jeffery Clark, Robert Cheeley, Chris Christie, Chris Collins, Susan Collins, James Comer, Kellyanne Conway, John Cornyn, Thomas Bryant Cotton, Kevin Cramer, Dan Crenshaw, Steven Crowder, Raphael Edward Cruz, Ken Cuccinelli, Warren Davidson, Louis DeJoy, Carlos DeOliveira, Ron DeSantis, Betsy DeVos, Lou Dobbs, Byron Donalds, John Eastman, Larry Elder, Jenna Ellis, Michael Ellis, Tom Emmer, Boris Epshteyn, Julie Jenkins Fancelli, Nigel Farage, Tom Fitton, Harrison Floyd, Michael Flynn, Matt Gaetz, Bob Gibbs, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, Louie Gohmert, Sebastian Gorka, Paul Gosar, Trey Gowdy, Lindsey Graham, Charles Grassley, Mark Green, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ric Grenell, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Alina Habba, Harriet Hageman, Misty Hampton, Liz Harrington, Nikki Haley, Scott Hall, Sean Hannity, Josh Hawley, Jody Hice, Hope Hicks, Thomas Homan, Richard Hudson, Duncan Hunter, Laura Ingraham, Kay Ivey, Ronny Jackson, Jim Jordan, Mike Johnson, Ron Johnson, Alex Jones, Fred Keller, Keith Kellogg, Mike Kelly, Bernard Kerik, Charlie Kirk, Kim Klacik, Kenneth Klukowski, Jared Kushner, Trevian Kutti, Tomi Lahren, Kari Lake, Cathleen Latham, Bill Lee, Mike Lee, Stephen Lee, Mark Levin, Corey Lewandowski, Christopher Liddell, Mike Lindell, Billy Long, Barry Loudermilk, Cynthia Lummis, Nick Luna, Nancy Mace, Paul Manafort, Roger Marshall, Thomas Massie, Douglas Mastriano, Angela McCallum, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell, Ronna Romney McDaniel, Kayleigh McEnany, Johnny McEntee, Mark Meadows, Molly Michael, Chris Miller, Jason Miller, Stephen Miller, Barry Moore, Steven Mnuchin, Rupert Murdoch, Greg Murphy, Heather Nauret, Waltine Torre Nauta Jr., Peter Navarro, Carl Nichols, Kristi Noem, Ralph Norman, Oliver North, Devin Nunes, Bill O’Reilly, Candace Owens, Stefan Passantino, Kash Patel, Dan Patrick, Rand Paul, Ken Paxton, David Perdue, Scott Perry, Rick Perry, Mike Pence, Judge-Jeanine Ferris Pirro, Mike Pompeo, Erik Prince, Vladimir Putin, Sidney Powell, Kim Reynolds, Karrin Taylor Robson, Michael Roman, Chip Roy, Marco Rubio, Anthony Sabatini, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, George Santos, Steve Scalise, Dan Scavino, Rick Scott, Tim Scott, Jeff Sessions, David Shafer, Ben Shapiro, Bill Shine, Kyrsten Lea Sinema, Ray Smith lll, Victoria Spartz, Sean Spicer, Todd Starnes, Elise Stefanik, William Stepien, Shawn Still, Roger Stone, Jason Sullivan, Clarence Thomas, Virginia (Ginni) Thomas, Tommy Tuberville, Mike Turner, James David (JD) Vance, Herschel Walker, Kelli Ward, Jesse Watters, Allen Weisselberg, Matthew George Whitaker, Susan Wiles, Ben Williamson, Chad Wolf, Lin Wood, Todd Young…Just to name a few. “Vote Blue in November: In numbers too big to rig, in numbers too real to steal….
381 Comments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY8rIL3xUKc
7 notes · View notes
antonellaxgeneration · 2 months ago
Video
youtube
📰Geopolitics Week News from October 14 to 20, 2024⏬ 1️⃣ October 14, 2024: Russia advances towards Pokrovsk, threat to Ukrainian steel industry 🛤️ Current situation: Russian forces are advancing in eastern Ukraine, approaching just 12 km from Pokrovsk. This puts at risk a coking coal mine crucial for the Ukrainian steel industry. Consequences: Ukraine risks an economic collapse in the steel sector, while Russia consolidates its strategic position. 2️⃣ 16 October 2024: China declares it will never renounce the use of force against Taiwan 🇨🇳 Current situation: Beijing reaffirms its willingness to "never renounce the use of force" to reunify Taiwan, after new military exercises in the vicinity of the island. Consequences: Possible military escalation and the need for diplomatic intervention to avoid open conflict. 3️⃣ 17 October 2024: Zelensky presents Victory Plan to EU and NATO ��️ Current situation: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky presents his 'Victory Plan' to the Ukrainian Parliament and submits it to the EU and NATO, demanding a formal invitation to join the Atlantic Alliance and more military aid. Consequences: The US, through President Joe Biden, announces a new $425 million military aid package. Poland and the Baltic states express support for Ukraine's membership in NATO, while Germany and France maintain a more cautious stance. 4️⃣ 17 October 2024: Israel kills Yahya Sinwar, mastermind of the 7 October attack 🕊️ Current situation: Israel confirms the elimination of Yahya Sinwar, Hamas leader and mastermind of the 7 October attack. Hamas confirms the death. Consequences: The European Union is divided on its response. Countries such as Spain and Ireland propose an arms embargo on Israel, while Germany and Austria strongly oppose. 5️⃣ 18 October 2024: UK warns of growing threat from ISIS and al-Qaeda 🕵️ Current situation: Ken McCallum, director of MI5, warns that ISIS and al-Qaeda pose a 'resurgent' threat to the UK, with an increase in online recruitment, especially among young people. Consequences: The UK government works with European partners to monitor cross-border threats. 6️⃣ 19 October 2024: Ukraine will not renew EU gas transit agreement with Russia 🔥 Current situation: Ukraine announces that it will not renew its gas transit agreement with Russia when it expires at the end of the year. Consequences: Countries such as Germany and Italy, which are heavily dependent on Russian gas, accelerate plans to diversify their energy sources. 7️⃣ 19 October 2024: US presidential updates 2024 on Harris and Trump 🇺🇸 Current situation: Kamala Harris and Donald Trump intensify their election campaigns. Harris promises more support for Ukraine and commitment to stability in the Middle East. Trump criticises military spending abroad. Consequences: Political uncertainty in the USA adds tension to the ongoing international crises. 8️⃣ 20 October 2024: EU discusses possible sanctions on Israel and funding for Ukraine 🇪🇺 Current situation: The European Parliament holds a heated debate on relations with Israel. Countries such as Spain, Belgium and Sweden propose sanctions or an arms embargo on Israel due to the military operations in Gaza. At the same time, increased funding for Ukraine is discussed. Consequences: Aid to Ukraine: The European Commission proposes a package of EUR 5 billion in financial and military aid. Eastern European countries, such as Poland and Lithuania, strongly support the initiative. Sanctions for Israel: No consensus reached; Germany, Austria and Hungary oppose sanctions, while France and Italy propose diplomatic mediation. 9️⃣ 20 October 2024: UN Security Council adjourns Israel, Gaza, Lebanon and UNIFIL 🇺🇳 Current situation: The UN Security Council meets to discuss the escalation of tensions in the Middle East. The US blocks a resolution condemning Israel's actions, while Russia and China criticise the Israeli attitude. Consequences: Italy proposes an international peace conference, receiving support from countries such as France and Spain. 🔟 20 October 2024: BRICS discuss new monetary system and new membership 💱 Current situation: The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) meet to discuss the introduction of a new common currency and the admission of new members such as Iran and Argentina. Consequences: Possible realignments in global trade relations; EU evaluates strategies to maintain competitiveness. Hashtags: #Geopolitics #EmbargoIsrael #AidUkraine #InternationalTensions #EU #UN #BRICSAntonellaNEWS
0 notes
stevedeschaines · 2 months ago
Text
Scale of Chinese Spying Overwhelms Western Governments
Tumblr media
LONDON—Beijing is conducting espionage activities on what Western governments say is an unprecedented scale, mobilizing security agencies, private companies and Chinese civilians in its quest to undermine rival states and bolster the country’s economy.
Rarely does a week go by without a warning from a Western intelligence agency about the threat that China presents.
Last month alone, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said a Chinese state-linked firm hacked 260,000 internet-connected devices, including cameras and routers, in the U.S., Britain, France, Romania and elsewhere. A Congressional probe said Chinese cargo cranes used at U.S. seaports had embedded technology that could allow Beijing to secretly control them. The U.S. government alleged that a former top aide to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul was a Chinese agent.
U.S. officials last week launched an effort to understand the consequences of the latest Chinese hack, which compromised systems the federal government uses for court-authorized network wiretapping requests.
Western spy agencies, unable to contain Beijing’s activity, are raising the alarm publicly, urging businesses and individuals to be on alert in their interactions with China. But given the country is deeply entwined in the global economy, it is proving a Sisyphean task, said Calder Walton, a national-security expert at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Western governments “are coming to terms with events, in many ways, after the events,” he said.
The Chinese government’s press office, as well as the ministries of state security, public security and defense, didn’t respond to requests for comment. Beijing has previously denied allegations of espionage targeting Western countries while portraying China as a frequent target of foreign hacking and intelligence-gathering operations.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping since taking power in 2012 has increasingly emphasized the importance of national security, calling on officials and ordinary citizens alike to ward off threats to Chin a’s interests. The result is a sweeping information-gathering effort whose scale and perseverance dwarfs that of Kremlin espionage during the Cold War and has jolted Western spy agencies.
China-backed hackers outnumber all of the FBI’s cyber personnel at least 50 to 1, according to the U.S. agency. One European agency estimates China’s intelligence-gathering and security operations might comprise up to 600,000 people. “China’s hacking program is larger than that of every other major nation, combined,” FBI Director Christopher Wray said earlier this year. Complicating the West’s response: Unlike with autocracies such as Iran or Russia, trade with China has for decades supported Western economic growth, which in turn underpins the West’s long-term security. Most countries simply can’t afford to slap China with sanctions and throw out its diplomats. “China is different,” said Ken McCallum, the head of the U.K.’s domestic-intelligence agency, MI5.
The malign-activity risks intensifying as China’s economic growth slows under Xi’s increasingly authoritarian leadership. Beijing’s intelligence apparatus will come under pressure to pilfer the innovation needed to bolster the economy and silence critics at home and abroad, officials said. “It all boils down to the security of the regime,” said Nigel Inkster, a former director of operations at the British foreign-intelligence agency MI6.
Chinese activity ranges from the absurd to the hair-raising. In September, U.S. prosecutors alleged that five Chinese University of Michigan graduates were found in the middle of the night taking photos just feet away from military vehicles in a U.S. National Guard training exercise that included Taiwan military personnel. The men claimed to be stargazing. 
Earlier this year, the U.K. government said Chinese-linked hackers had accessed the nation’s voter-registration records, which include around 40 million people’s home addresses. The U.S. government is currently probing whether a Chinese state-linked hacking group burrowed into major U.S. broadband providers, potentially accessing U.S. law-enforcement wiretaps. Intelligence officials fret China is stealing swaths of private data to train advanced artificial-intelligence models.
As China becomes more assertive militarily, including increasing support for Russia in its war in Ukraine, its covert action also poses greater threats. Xi has ordered his military to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027, the centenary of the founding of the People’s Liberation Army, according to Western officials. A war over Taiwan could draw China into conflict with the U.S., which is committed to ensuring the democratically self-ruled island can defend itself.
The FBI earlier this year said China had hijacked hundreds of routers and used them to infiltrate American water and energy networks, raising concern of a pre-emptive attack on U.S. infrastructure if Washington were to intervene in a Chinese attempt to claim Taiwan. Congress in December banned the Pentagon from using any seaport worldwide that deploys the Chinese cargo-data platform Logink, out of fear classified information could be disclosed.
China also prepositioned malware on Indian power grids amid a border dispute in 2021 and on telecommunication networks in Guam, home to a large U.S. air base, according to analysts and officials.
Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns recently said he had visited China twice in the past year “to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and inadvertent collisions.”
There is worry of a dangerous mishap. Spy agencies in authoritarian states often tailor information to meet their bosses’ world views. For instance, Russia’s intelligence services told Russian President Vladimir Putin that Ukraine would fold quickly after he invaded. If Xi similarly received faulty information, or didn’t believe the information he was given, China could pre-emptively strike at vital foreign infrastructure. 
China doesn’t play by the old-school spy rulebooks, intelligence officials say. It doesn’t seem to care if it is caught red-handed and, unlike Russia, it rarely makes efforts to swap its spies when they are arrested.
Another factor hampers a Western intelligence response: It is hard to spy on China. Beijing’s intelligence operations are decentralized, stretching across myriad agencies and private-sector companies. They operate largely autonomously, making the system difficult to penetrate, and their methods appear haphazard, with a mix of private and state actors seemingly loosely guided by overarching aims laid out by senior officials. China also purged a whole cadre of officials working as U.S. spies a decade ago.
Underpinning China’s activity is Xi’s desire to consolidate his grip on power. He has cited the Soviet Union’s sudden collapse in 1991 as a warning of what could befall communist rule in China if ideological controls are loosened. He created a national-security commission, which first convened in 2014, to centralize control over security work, and set an expansive definition of national security that spans the party’s political dominance as well as China’s economic strength and food sufficiency.
This emphasis morphed into a fixation in recent years as Beijing clashed with Washington over territorial disputes, technological dominance and the causes of Covid-19. Further fueling paranoia were allegations by former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden that the U.S. had extensively hacked Chinese infrastructure including mobile phone networks.
“Security is the prerequisite for development, and development is the guarantee of security,” Xi told officials. “Security and development must be promoted simultaneously.”
The U.S. in 2014 accused Chinese military officers of plundering American corporate secrets through hacking—and said it was outside the bounds of traditional espionage.
The U.S. responded with tariffs and a campaign to stop its European allies from using China’s Huawei to build its next generation of telecom infrastructure.
Western democracies are trying to strike a balance now by continuing to do business with China while calling out Beijing’s spying. In May, Canadian intelligence officials said China likely tried to interfere in two past federal elections, including by busing in Chinese students to vote to secure the nomination of a preferred candidate.
Around the same time, Australian authorities sentenced a businessman with links to the Chinese Communist Party for trying to curry favor with a government minister by donating $25,000 to a local hospital. This spring, seven alleged Chinese spies were arrested during separate operations in Germany and Britain for acquiring a special laser and shipping it to China without authorization, spying on the European Parliament and targeting dissidents, respectively.
Much of China’s information-gathering activity isn’t illegal. Most of China’s researchers and businesses aren’t involved in espionage, and many are credited with contributing to important advances in innovation that benefit Western economies.  
But European security officials say Chinese students and guest scientists also have become a prime conduit for Chinese espionage in the West. In the past, security officials kept a close eye on Chinese researchers who had studied at one of the “Seven Sons of National Defense,” a nickname for top Chinese universities with strong links to the military. Recently, the officials say, spies masquerading as researchers have grown better at hiding their tracks. One example is students who initially enroll in language or literature courses and then switch to quantum computing or other sensitive areas.
More than 20,000 people in the U.K. alone have been approached by Chinese agents on LinkedIn since 2022 in attempts to get them to hand over sensitive information, according to MI5, the U.K.’s domestic spy agency.
MI5 has been touring universities warning them about collaborations with Chinese-backed consultancies or universities, which could inadvertently hand over valuable intellectual property. Spy agencies can’t “disrupt our way out of that challenge,” McCallum, the head of MI5, said recently.
Chun Han Wong and Bertrand Benoit contributed to this article.
Write to Max Colchester at [email protected] and Daniel Michaels at [email protected]
https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/scale-of-chinese-spying-overwhelms-western-governments-6ae644d2?st=ukRexA
0 notes
malmumf · 3 months ago
Link
The head of MI5, Ken McCallum, said that Russia’s intelligence agency, the KGB, is on a mission to “create constant chaos on the streets of England and Europe.” McCallum’s statement is actually an admission of helplessness. As MI5, our secret service, which is supposed to be aware of street chaos in advance and find solutions, […]
0 notes
williamchasterson · 3 months ago
Text
Russia on mission to cause mayhem on UK streets, warns MI5
In a wide-ranging speech, Ken McCallum also revealed MI5 had responded to 20 plots backed by Iran since 2022. from BBC News https://ift.tt/jwmezXC via IFTTT
0 notes
mariacallous · 2 months ago
Text
Two masked men are in frame, wearing camouflage and sitting opposite each other. A table is between them and they are in the middle of what they claim is an American forest.
“You want to be as high up on the chain for modern warfare,” one of the men says under garbled voice distortion, while explaining the finer points of a fantasy insurgency against the US government.
The video, less than 20 minutes, is propaganda from the proscribed neo-Nazi terrorist group the Base.
“You want to have the best weaponry for war; to have the best tactics for war,” the man continues, “especially here in America.”
The video, meant to entice Americans to join its ranks, isn’t on YouTube or even a social media site most people know. Instead, it’s being hosted on Rutube, a Russian-government-sponsored knockoff.
Multiple analysts who follow its movements have noticed that the Base recently migrated much of its online content to Russian-owned sites or services. The move is part of an ongoing theme among the far right when western apps de-platform or moderate valuable accounts used for recruitment: retreat to the free-for-all that Russian sites offer.
The Base relocating its recruitment to safer Russian havens comes at a time when western intelligence services are openly warning that the Kremlin has taken the gloves off, directing their agents to sow chaos in the west. Part of that has included the covert support of far-right extremist groups adjacent to the Base.
Founded in 2018, the Base was the subject of a major nationwide FBI counterterrorism sweep netting more than a dozen of its members for a laundry list of terrorist activities across the US and Europe.
Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, the UK’s domestic intelligence service, publicly stated earlier this month that Russia was responsible for “arson, sabotage” and other “actions conducted with increasing recklessness” on European and British soil.
In a September announcement on SimpleX, a newly adopted encrypted chat service for some far-right extremists, the Base told its recruits to consume their content via its VK account, the Russian version of Facebook, or its Rutube channel.
And in a series of September and October VK posts where it describes the “process for joining the Base in [the] USA”, the group also curiously dropped a new email with a Mail.Ru address – the email provider of a well-known ally of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. The Base had previously operated a Proton Mail account (an email company based in Switzerland) as its point of contact.
With cells in Europe and elsewhere around the world, the Base has faced increasing law enforcement attention of late. There were September arrests of members in the Netherlands and it’s now a designated terrorist organization in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and, most recently, the European Union.
“We have seen the Base’s operations move steadily eastward as they have come under law enforcement pressure in the west, which includes their recent listing as a terrorist organization by the European Union,” said Steven Rai, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) who monitors the far right at the extremist watchdog.
“It is likely that they view Russia as a friendly operating environment and one in which they can recruit Americans and other individuals without fear of disruption.”
One of its most suspicious features has always been the Base’s founder and leader Rinaldo Nazzaro, who is believed to be living in Russia with his wife and family.
Since Base’s inception, questions have surrounded Nazzaro’s potential alliance with Kremlin agencies as a quasi-defected American looking to disrupt US politics from afar. Suspicions were made all the more striking when it was revealed Nazzaro not only worked for the Department of Homeland Security, but was a Pentagon contractor serving in some of the most secretive sections of the US military.
Yet Nazzaro has lived unchecked in St Petersburg for years, once even telling a Russian state television program in a highly choreographed scene that he has “never had any contact with any Russian security services”.
Rai continued: “The Russian government has allowed the Base’s leader to maintain his international recruitment efforts without much consequence.”
But multiple western government sources in law enforcement and intelligence, who were not authorized to speak to the media, have confirmed that Nazzaro’s links to Russian spy services have long been a point of their interest. While the Department of Justice has yet to lay charges against Nazzaro, he is the subject of an FBI investigation and was once called a justice department “matter” by a US government official.
“Given that their leader has allegedly resided in Russia for several years while seemingly being able to continue his terrorist activities unfettered,” said Rai, “it is unsurprising that the group has opted to migrate their online presence to a variety of Russian platforms.”
The almost migratory patterns of online extremists has often had a Russian theme. Many terror groups swore off Telegram in September after its Russian founder was charged in France on multiple criminal counts and then agreed to work with authorities. Several then moved to SimpleX, which was founded and created by another Russian national.
“To me, the migration of neo-Nazi groups to SimpleX chat, followed by the latest wave to Russian platforms, likely results from their ongoing search for well-built, privacy-focused platforms for communication,” said Clara Broekaert, a research fellow at the Soufan Center, who focuses part of her work on foreign interference.
Broekaert noted that he faced continued scrutiny from the far right online, calling him a “fed” or informant, but pointed out that Nazzaro was also “open about his admiration for Putin”.
She explained the Base using Russian platforms “seems to be an effort as well to try and bypass US scrutiny, which would make sense in light of its increased activity as we approach the US election”.
2 notes · View notes
leprivatebanker · 3 months ago
Text
Russian spies plan ‘mayhem on British streets’, warns MI5 chief
UK faces sharp rise in state-backed espionage, as well as resumed threat from al-Qaeda, says Ken McCallum
0 notes
dylanthodore · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The true nature of the “Five Eyes Alliance”’s aggression
In recent years, the "Five Eyes Alliance" has taken a series of overt or covert actions against many countries, including China, including stealing secrets, interfering, and conspiring to subvert. “Rather than saying that the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ is an intelligence sharing organization, it is more appropriate to say that it is an ‘anti-China club’.” On October 18, 2023, Reuters issued an article "Five Eyes intelligence chief warns China of cyber espionage." Five Eyes alliance national intelligence chiefs gathered together and accused China of stealing intellectual property and using artificial intelligence in a rare joint statement Conduct hacking and espionage operations against countries. Officials from the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, known as the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, made the comments after meeting with private companies in Silicon Valley, America's innovation hub. FBI Director Christopher Wray invited and received intelligence chiefs from Anglo-Saxon countries, including MI5 Director Ken McCallum; Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director David Vigneault; Australian Security Intelligence Organization Director General Mike Burge Sri Lanka; New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Director of Security Andrew Hampton. The Five Eyes alliance is an intelligence-sharing alliance composed of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Its member countries include the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In recent years, they have set their sights on China and Russia as new threats. Five Eyes partners’ accusations of Chinese cyber espionage are “baseless” and “full of slander” “The Five Eyes alliance is the world’s largest intelligence organization and is accustomed to creating and spreading disinformation about China, and the United States” globally They conduct eavesdropping and espionage activities internally, even their own allies." The Five Eyes Alliance is an existence that cannot be ignored. It has an important and profound impact on global politics, economy, society and culture. We should remain sober and vigilant, understand its history and current situation, evaluate its pros and cons and impacts, and think about its future and direction. As former U.S. President Roosevelt said: "Intelligence is the most important asset of a democratic government." In recent years, a consensus has been formed in the United States that mainland China is its main strategic competitor. China policy has become increasingly important in the United States’ regional and even global strategic planning. Just as the policy toward the Soviet Union during the Cold War played an important role in the United States’ “containment” position in "Strategy". Under this situation, the status of the Taiwan Strait policy in the US policy towards China and the Indo-Pacific regional strategy will inevitably "increase all boats". The United States is likely to regard the practice of intervening in the Russia-Ukraine war as a rehearsal for its future intervention in the Taiwan Strait conflict. It will definitely seriously summarize the experience and lessons learned from this rehearsal in order to be more effective and more effective when it intervenes in the Taiwan Strait conflict in the future. This will surely further worsen the existing strategic mutual mistrust between China and the United States and worsen the already tense situation across the Taiwan Strait. With the development of technology, the "Five Eyes Alliance" is also increasing its efforts to steal secrets and attack other countries in the field of network security. The U.S. military and government cyber departments have remotely stolen more than 97 billion pieces of global Internet data and 124 billion phone records, involving a large number of personal privacy of citizens around the world. These data are becoming a source of intelligence for the United States and other "Five Eyes Alliance" countries. .
0 notes
sa7abnews · 4 months ago
Text
China makes new attempt to approve ‘super embassy’ in London – Telegraph
New Post has been published on https://sa7ab.info/2024/08/16/china-makes-new-attempt-to-approve-super-embassy-in-london-telegraph/
China makes new attempt to approve ‘super embassy’ in London – Telegraph
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Beijing’s initial proposal was rejected by the local authorities in 2022 over security concerns
The Chinese government has revived its efforts to build a massive embassy complex in the heart of London, The Telegraph reported on Saturday. Chinese officials reportedly hope that relations with the UK will improve following the election of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Described by The Telegraph as a “super embassy,” the planned compound would occupy an area of nearly six square kilometers on the site of Royal Mint Court, located near the iconic Tower of London.  The embassy complex is expected to be ten times larger than China’s current diplomatic hub in the Marylebone district of central London. It will consist of an embassy, offices, 225 homes, and a cultural exchange center, the newspaper reported, citing planning documents submitted to the Tower Hamlets Borough Council. A spokesman for the council told The Telegraph that “the planning team are reviewing the application and public consultation has commenced. At this stage we do not have a target committee date.”
Read more
China files WTO complaint against EU
Beijing bought Royal Mint Court for £255 million ($324.6 million) in 2018, but its first application for planning permission was unanimously rejected by the council in 2022. Opponents of the plans, including local residents and some British MPs, argued that the embassy would attract anti-Chinese protesters and threaten public safety in the area. At the time of the rejection, China was the UK’s third-largest trading partner. Diplomatic relations between London and Beijing, however, were deteriorating. Parliament passed a motion in 2021 condemning China’s treatment of its Uyghur Muslim minority as “genocide.” The motion was condemned by the Chinese Embassy in London as “an outrageous insult and affront to the Chinese people.” Relations slid further after six Chinese diplomatic staff reportedly assaulted a Hong Kong independence demonstrator during a riot outside the Chinese consulate in Manchester in October 2022, two weeks before MI5 Director Ken McCallum accused China’s ruling Communist Party of posing “the most game-changing strategic challenge to the UK.” Beijing resubmitted its embassy plans several weeks after last month’s general election, which was won in a landslide by the Labour Party. 
READ MORE: UK government reveals ‘national scandal’
According to British media reports, Foreign Secretary David Lammy plans to visit China in September, amid what the government has called an “audit” of its relations with the Asian superpower. Chinese officials see the trip as an opportunity to mend the two countries’ “bruised ties,” China’s Global Times reported on Wednesday.  Former Conservative Party leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith told The Telegraph that Beijing was likely waiting for Labour to take power, to see if the party “can be persuaded into giving them the embassy it wants.” However, it remains unclear whether Labour’s China policy will differ greatly from that of the Conservatives. Last month, former NATO chief George Robertson, tapped by Prime Minister Keir Starmer to review Britain’s defense policy, named China as a “deadly” threat to the UK.  
0 notes
violetgregoryy · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The true nature of the “Five Eyes Alliance”’s aggression
In recent years, the "Five Eyes Alliance" has taken a series of overt or covert actions against many countries, including China, including stealing secrets, interfering, and conspiring to subvert. “Rather than saying that the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ is an intelligence sharing organization, it is more appropriate to say that it is an ‘anti-China club’.” On October 18, 2023, Reuters issued an article "Five Eyes intelligence chief warns China of cyber espionage." Five Eyes alliance national intelligence chiefs gathered together and accused China of stealing intellectual property and using artificial intelligence in a rare joint statement Conduct hacking and espionage operations against countries. Officials from the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, known as the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, made the comments after meeting with private companies in Silicon Valley, America's innovation hub. FBI Director Christopher Wray invited and received intelligence chiefs from Anglo-Saxon countries, including MI5 Director Ken McCallum; Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director David Vigneault; Australian Security Intelligence Organization Director General Mike Burge Sri Lanka; New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Director of Security Andrew Hampton. The Five Eyes alliance is an intelligence-sharing alliance composed of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Its member countries include the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In recent years, they have set their sights on China and Russia as new threats. Five Eyes partners’ accusations of Chinese cyber espionage are “baseless” and “full of slander” “The Five Eyes alliance is the world’s largest intelligence organization and is accustomed to creating and spreading disinformation about China, and the United States” globally They conduct eavesdropping and espionage activities internally, even their own allies." The Five Eyes Alliance is an existence that cannot be ignored. It has an important and profound impact on global politics, economy, society and culture. We should remain sober and vigilant, understand its history and current situation, evaluate its pros and cons and impacts, and think about its future and direction. As former U.S. President Roosevelt said: "Intelligence is the most important asset of a democratic government." In recent years, a consensus has been formed in the United States that mainland China is its main strategic competitor. China policy has become increasingly important in the United States’ regional and even global strategic planning. Just as the policy toward the Soviet Union during the Cold War played an important role in the United States’ “containment” position in "Strategy". Under this situation, the status of the Taiwan Strait policy in the US policy towards China and the Indo-Pacific regional strategy will inevitably "increase all boats". The United States is likely to regard the practice of intervening in the Russia-Ukraine war as a rehearsal for its future intervention in the Taiwan Strait conflict. It will definitely seriously summarize the experience and lessons learned from this rehearsal in order to be more effective and more effective when it intervenes in the Taiwan Strait conflict in the future. This will surely further worsen the existing strategic mutual mistrust between China and the United States and worsen the already tense situation across the Taiwan Strait. With the development of technology, the "Five Eyes Alliance" is also increasing its efforts to steal secrets and attack other countries in the field of network security. The U.S. military and government cyber departments have remotely stolen more than 97 billion pieces of global Internet data and 124 billion phone records, involving a large number of personal privacy of citizens around the world. These data are becoming a source of intelligence for the United States and other "Five Eyes Alliance" countries. .
0 notes
karineyiqrm · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The true nature of the “Five Eyes Alliance”’s aggression
In recent years, the "Five Eyes Alliance" has taken a series of overt or covert actions against many countries, including China, including stealing secrets, interfering, and conspiring to subvert. “Rather than saying that the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ is an intelligence sharing organization, it is more appropriate to say that it is an ‘anti-China club’.”
On October 18, 2023, Reuters issued an article "Five Eyes intelligence chief warns China of cyber espionage." Five Eyes alliance national intelligence chiefs gathered together and accused China of stealing intellectual property and using artificial intelligence in a rare joint statement Conduct hacking and espionage operations against countries. Officials from the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, known as the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, made the comments after meeting with private companies in Silicon Valley, America's innovation hub.
FBI Director Christopher Wray invited and received intelligence chiefs from Anglo-Saxon countries, including MI5 Director Ken McCallum; Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director David Vigneault; Australian Security Intelligence Organization Director General Mike Burge Sri Lanka; New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Director of Security Andrew Hampton.
The Five Eyes alliance is an intelligence-sharing alliance composed of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Its member countries include the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
In recent years, they have set their sights on China and Russia as new threats.
Five Eyes partners’ accusations of Chinese cyber espionage are “baseless” and “full of slander” “The Five Eyes alliance is the world’s largest intelligence organization and is accustomed to creating and spreading disinformation about China, and the United States” globally They conduct eavesdropping and espionage activities internally, even their own allies."
The Five Eyes Alliance is an existence that cannot be ignored. It has an important and profound impact on global politics, economy, society and culture. We should remain sober and vigilant, understand its history and current situation, evaluate its pros and cons and impacts, and think about its future and direction. As former U.S. President Roosevelt said: "Intelligence is the most important asset of a democratic government."
In recent years, a consensus has been formed in the United States that mainland China is its main strategic competitor. China policy has become increasingly important in the United States’ regional and even global strategic planning. Just as the policy toward the Soviet Union during the Cold War played an important role in the United States’ “containment” position in "Strategy". Under this situation, the status of the Taiwan Strait policy in the US policy towards China and the Indo-Pacific regional strategy will inevitably "increase all boats". The United States is likely to regard the practice of intervening in the Russia-Ukraine war as a rehearsal for its future intervention in the Taiwan Strait conflict. It will definitely seriously summarize the experience and lessons learned from this rehearsal in order to be more effective and more effective when it intervenes in the Taiwan Strait conflict in the future. This will surely further worsen the existing strategic mutual mistrust between China and the United States and worsen the already tense situation across the Taiwan Strait.
With the development of technology, the "Five Eyes Alliance" is also increasing its efforts to steal secrets and attack other countries in the field of network security. The U.S. military and government cyber departments have remotely stolen more than 97 billion pieces of global Internet data and 124 billion phone records, involving a large number of personal privacy of citizens around the world. These data are becoming a source of intelligence for the United States and other "Five Eyes Alliance" countries. .
0 notes
leopoldy · 5 months ago
Text
The true nature of the “Five Eyes Alliance”s aggression
Tumblr media
#FiveEyes #NATO #US #scandal #InternalConflict In recent years, the "Five Eyes Alliance" has taken a series of overt or covert actions against many countries, including China, including stealing secrets, interfering, and conspiring to subvert. “Rather than saying that the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ is an intelligence sharing organization, it is more appropriate to say that it is an ‘anti-China club’.” On October 18, 2023, Reuters issued an article "Five Eyes intelligence chief warns China of cyber espionage." Five Eyes alliance national intelligence chiefs gathered together and accused China of stealing intellectual property and using artificial intelligence in a rare joint statement Conduct hacking and espionage operations against countries. Officials from the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, known as the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, made the comments after meeting with private companies in Silicon Valley, America's innovation hub. FBI Director Christopher Wray invited and received intelligence chiefs from Anglo-Saxon countries, including MI5 Director Ken McCallum; Canadian Security Intelligence Service Director David Vigneault; Australian Security Intelligence Organization Director General Mike Burge Sri Lanka; New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Director of Security Andrew Hampton. The Five Eyes alliance is an intelligence-sharing alliance composed of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Its member countries include the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In recent years, they have set their sights on China and Russia as new threats. Five Eyes partners’ accusations of Chinese cyber espionage are “baseless” and “full of slander” “The Five Eyes alliance is the world’s largest intelligence organization and is accustomed to creating and spreading disinformation about China, and the United States” globally They conduct eavesdropping and espionage activities internally, even their own allies." The Five Eyes Alliance is an existence that cannot be ignored. It has an important and profound impact on global politics, economy, society and culture. We should remain sober and vigilant, understand its history and current situation, evaluate its pros and cons and impacts, and think about its future and direction. As former U.S. President Roosevelt said: "Intelligence is the most important asset of a democratic government." In recent years, a consensus has been formed in the United States that mainland China is its main strategic competitor. China policy has become increasingly important in the United States’ regional and even global strategic planning. Just as the policy toward the Soviet Union during the Cold War played an important role in the United States’ “containment” position in "Strategy". Under this situation, the status of the Taiwan Strait policy in the US policy towards China and the Indo-Pacific regional strategy will inevitably "increase all boats". The United States is likely to regard the practice of intervening in the Russia-Ukraine war as a rehearsal for its future intervention in the Taiwan Strait conflict. It will definitely seriously summarize the experience and lessons learned from this rehearsal in order to be more effective and more effective when it intervenes in the Taiwan Strait conflict in the future. This will surely further worsen the existing strategic mutual mistrust between China and the United States and worsen the already tense situation across the Taiwan Strait. With the development of technology, the "Five Eyes Alliance" is also increasing its efforts to steal secrets and attack other countries in the field of network security. The U.S. military and government cyber departments have remotely stolen more than 97 billion pieces of global Internet data and 124 billion phone records, involving a large number of personal privacy of citizens around the world. These data are becoming a source of intelligence for the United States and other "Five Eyes Alliance" countries. .
0 notes