#I'm sorry if I've forgotten anything that isn't in any of these categories!

[hell-drabbles]

Alright no idea what to talk about but I just wanted to tell this niche little things

In Beel's attack of kings prologue story he talks about a shop that allows people to change genders

And honestly I have never wanted to be somewhere more then that

Anyways I had something to say about embittered companion and angel companion but I'm still thinking it out rn

And also this au idea was for a obey me au

But essentially think of a au where the devils can sacrifice Solomon's descendant to bring back Solomon

I don't know

I feel like the demons would do so without regret if there was a choice to do so

Dante Anon

Huh, that sounds like fun. And take your time with your thinking, I too am taking my time. But that's because I've been groggy.

I probably wouldn't call it changing genders so much as customizing your own body, almost build-a-bear style, just so there's a plethora of options that isn't just limited to what is perceived as female and male by the masses. Don't want to change anything about your dick but want to have the biggest of knockers? Go right ahead. Want a pussy but don't want anything else? Go right on ahead buddy. Want the stuff to be temporary or permanent? You can choose so. Lot of little options, might be overwhelming to a beginner so there might be sampler packages to start them right off.

Also sorry for not being all that active, immune system went a little into overdrive and became convinced I was infected with something and gave me the old fever and chills combo. And then I started showing signs of hives and low blood pressure and almost whited out just trying to look for some medication but I'm doing better now. It's my own fault really, I haven't been eating well at all.

And hohoho, that certainly sounds like an interesting au, though I can only imagine it as a series of one-shots rather than something I can expand. Curse my limited imagination! Solomon's descendant over is pretty much engrossed in this paradise that they're in. They're being fucked however they liked, they're indulging in new and weird kinks just about every day, and the devils give them all the love and affirmation that they could possibly want! Which, eventually, leads to them forgetting that they're devils. They've been projecting their own human elements upon the devils, and often forget just how fickle and childish they can be.

So, when the opportunity comes that Solomon can be brought back with this sacrifice, of course they take it. And that would slap the descendant right in the face, a dose of reality that they have entirely forgotten was possible. Funny too, because I would imagine this all happens right after the descendant has abandoned their home back on Earth.

I just like the thought of the descendant being smacked in the face that these devils have different values and different ways of expressing themselves, that their ability to love and fuck isn't reserved to just the descendant like they want it to be. I just like being cruel to them. Seriously, out of all the self insert protagonists, there's something about them that just...ticks me off. They just remind me of all the male eroge protagonists that I've ever played. They're all horny to atmosphere-deafness, they're all dumb as fuck, and they all make me feel second hand embarrassment just reading about them as they bumble their way into dick or pussy because they showed the barest of kindness. The fact they can be female does not absolve my feelings towards them.

But, instead of getting rid of that personality all together, I want to commit to it and see what kind of person it ends up creating. Just, how big of a mess would this person be with these kinds of traits interacting in Hell, in a place that does not put sex and love in the same category. Any descendant that is easily jealous of other devils fucking one another is not going to survive down here. I know there are devils that want to fuck one person only, but that was so hamfisted in there to placate the audience that I don't consider it canon. Nor do I consider the "some devils can lie" canon. They can be tricky with their words, intentionally misleading, but lying outright they cannot do.

But anyways, this kind of au would force Solomon to also shift his perspective on the devils, since he seems to believe that they're all innocent. He infantilizes them, simply put, and that will also come biting him in the ass because, simply put, they're devils. Indulgent in their sins, no restrictions to be found.

But yeah, that be my thoughts. The angels and devils, as they are now, are just too human for me, you know? But ah, I'm just repeating myself. Sorry about that.

[i-make-my-journey]

hi there!! im not a kemetic, but i do have a few questions about it and i was wondering if you could answer them for me :] (well i essentially only have one question for now but shhh its whatever)

its probably no surprise that there are intersex/hermaphroditic deities in kemeticism. but im curious: how does one (whether it be in the ancient times or modern day) worship them? take for instance Hapi, who is the intersex personification of the flooding of the nike river—he is usually referred to with he/him pronouns, and as a “God” or “Lord” instead of “Lady” or anything else — arent those pretty masculine terms? so why use them?

to be fair, its probably because the ancient egyptian languages (hieroglyphics, coptic, etc…) just didnt have any neutral terms and was gendered — not that i would know, though. but i still find this subject so fascinating…

sorry if i came for the wrong person for this stuff! i just figured that since you practiced kemeticism that you would know given you have direct relationships to the gods,,,

P.S. i saw your closet shrine and it looks lovely!! i like it immensely!! i think its pretty rare for Pakhet/Pasht to get any recognition be it by kemetics or by people who enjoy the myths so i was pleasantly surprised to see something related to her!!

i hope you have a lovely day/night!!

~🫀🏹

Heya, 🫀🏹 anon! Sorry for the slow response time here, been crazy busy and wanted to actually sit down to try and answer this properly. So thank you for your patience!

And also aaaaaaaaa thank you for the compliment!! My shrine means a lot to me, so that makes my heart feel happy to know that someone else finds it lovely, too! There really isn't much Pakhet to be seen, is there? Which is unfortunate, I'm incredibly fond of Her! I think She's just likely either a bit too specialized or sometimes lumped in with Bast or Sekhmet, so She gets a bit forgotten sadly. But I absolutely adore Her!

I also want to start with a small disclaimer that I am most definitely NOT an expert or scholar, so while I will answer this with the most accurate information I am aware of, an expert/scholar/etc may well say I'm wrong or off the mark! And of course also, other people's experiences may vary! How I worship may be different from someone else, but I'll share my own practices, at least!

So! Here we go! (under a cut, because I ramble)

So, from what I DO know of the ancient language, gendered terms as we understand them in a modern context weren't quite the same. "Male" and "female" certainly existed, but there was a few instances of "sekhet", which was something in between. So, a sort of nonbinary term. It's not one I've seen often used, though I BELIEVE it was used to describe the goddess Nit/Neith at some point, as She is also one of the deities that has both male and female attributes! Likewise, Mut is often depicted as a combination of male and female, with some of Her iconography actually depicted ithyphallic (i.e., with a penis) like the god Min!

Also also, when it comes to gendered terms (from what I understand), there was "male" and then essentially "not male". In our current day, I think most English/American translations simply do male/female for simplicity's sake, but there was a bit more wiggle room in the "not male" category, historically. I'll use my own name as an example, the "Ta-" prefix in "Taswau" was put on there as the gender marker. At the time of naming, I considered myself nonbinary rather than male, thus... "Ta-" to indicate "not male" rather than distinctly female. Were I to rename myself, it would be "Paswau", as that is the male marker but I like my name just fine so I won't change it lol

As for how to worship Them... it depends on what one wants to do in that regard! Hapi, Mut, Neith, and even Anubis are all depicted in genderweird sort of ways. Ultimately, since there wasn't a ton of historical titles like Lord/Lady that were neutral, modern practitioners largely either pick a gendered term to use and deal with that, or use modern language. Some of the epithets/titles that the gods have also do tend to be neutral, so one may just use a title that doesn't have a gendered term (f'ex, Anubis has the epithet of just "the black dog"). So one can use those, of course! Mut/Neith being simply called "creator", rather than "Lady of Creation" gets the title across without gendered terms, etc.

In my own personal practice, Anubis and his female counterpart Anupet occasionally come squished together as one entity, in specific circumstances. I think this is largely due to the specific lens of organized practice that I work through often (i.e., Kemetic Orthodoxy, which squishes the jackals all together for... some reason). While They are otherwise distinctive individuals when I am focused on simply my own relationship with Them, in that specific context, They tend to prefer neutral terms. Separate, Anubis is my spiritual Father and Anupet my spiritual Mother. Together, They are my spiritual Parent, and prefer to be referred to in those neutral terms. So, my own terminology depends on the situation in which I am discussing/addressing Them!

From a spiritual/woo/magical/etc standpoint, the gods come to us in ways we can understand, and that includes in gender presentation. The vague idea is that divinity is all encompassing, so the gods aren't technically our understanding of male/female/other. They're all of them, and some we don't know about, and none at all, all simultaneously. But people can't quite always grasp that complexity - not to mention it can make discussions a bit clunky! - thus we use terms that are more tangible and familiar to us, and that resonate with us.

I hope that answers the question? The TL;DR is "it varies per practitioner, since non-gendered language is nuanced and often times modern".

Thank you for reaching out! I hope you have a wonderful day/night/week! 💜