#I didn't really talk about g2 so I won't tag that
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
I was watching Peace Petal's video on what might happen with MLP G6 (you should watch it, it's good).
Because I mostly agree with points raised, I want to instead focus on the fact that I find it rather funny that fans get up in arms at the idea of a new gen where the character names and colour schemes etc are re-used but with new personalities, with the argument that "that's not XYZ, they're changing the character etc"
Funny because I felt like that when I first saw g4. I was so upset to see Rainbow Dash was no longer the elegant and stylish mare she used to be, and how Pinkie went from being the voice of reason to essentially the opposite. And so on and so on.
But I happened to watch g4 in 2013 and I liked it and then I came to love it. The realisation that helped was the fact that Hasbro recycles characters all the time. It's most notable in g4, partly because the show had so many named characters while in g3 most repeated names would've been toy-exclusive and so you didn't explore their personality as much. It's a weird concept, since I can't think of many series that do this. Shows/toylines often either reboot the series with almost exactly the same characters (e.g. transformers has had the same Optimus Prime every time), or they start from scratch.
This is also why I don't feel too bad about Monster high's changes to the characters between generations. They're mostly using the names and stylistic elements to act as a springboard for a new series.
A similar thing could even be said about bionicle's g2. OK I'm finding a lot of examples, but these are all the ones I can really think of right now.
I do agree with Peace Petal that it would be wiser to distance itself completely from g4 and thus use inspiration from characters that aren't the mane 6, but if they do re-use Rainbow Dash's name for the third time (or Applejack for the forth) and make her a completely different pony, I really would not care. They're not the same character; it's not the same universe. They just happen to share a name and design influences.
But yes, the key thing is it needs to be a complete separation from g4. g5 was quite an outlier by retaining ties to the previous gen and I think that missed the opportunity for a fresh start, a blank slate with none of the complicated lore that had built up and complete freedom to do as they pleased.
I also really want them to bring back Wysteria. She could be the Rainbow Dash (g4) equivalent and I would not be mad I just want my first pony to get speaking roles and toys.
#my little pony#mlp g4#mlp g5#mlp g6#should I just list all the generations?#mlp g1#mlp g3#I didn't really talk about g2 so I won't tag that#Wysteria#saying all this it's worth pointing out that repeated names of key characters will leave a sour taste in a lot of people's mouths#even if from a logical perspective it shouldn't#but their target audience is children#a lot of whom are probably like 2 and so have no attachment to g4 names#(I mean they'll be their customers by the time g6 comes out)#(when they're 3-4)#(which was when I first got my ponies)#I don't think I've seen anyone complaining that Applejack's personality changed from g1 to g4#hence why I think Hasbro might still do it#mlp fim
12 notes
·
View notes