#Cameron Rozell

[hurstbb-blog]

There are other nonmonetary gains from Newton's fame

You can choose a stylish groom s suit with a perfect jacket, tie, jewelry and stylish shoes. Everybody knows the importance of quality, fitting and cut of a suit. The reason behind the popularity of Italian suits is that these are especially made in a way that hides the flaws in a body and accentuates its good points making the individual look his optimum best.

wholesale jerseys from china In the mid 1990s, Logan Square native and restaurateur Rich Mehlman tried to revive the feel of the Windy City League by organizing the championship Lettuce team and airing games on local television stations (my first introduction to 16 inch). Cheap Jerseys china There are still a few pockets of activity, too: Forest Park hosts a prestigious No Glove National Tournament each summer and the Chicago Public Schools run a moderately popular 16 inch varsity program in the fall. But for every sign of hope, there are several corresponding signs of doom.  wholesale jerseys from china

Cheap Jerseys china The 105 derailleur has more flair than the Tiagra and is available in black. The Tiagra is available only in silver. If you prize the look of high end bikes, the 105 is designed to appear similar to that of Shimano's more expensive derailleurs. Carlow's massed defence wan't easy on the eye but understandable given the gulf in class. The win over Wexford was their first in the championship in six years. wholesale nfl jerseys In contrast, since Gavin took over as manager Dublin had an average winning margin of 15 points over 12 Leinster Championship games played before last night's opening defence of their provincial and All Ireland titles.  Cheap Jerseys china

Cheap Jerseys from china Real Madrid join the all time greats but their legacy. Birthday girls Timea Bacsinszky and Jelena Ostapenko to. All Blacks sweating on the fitness of Dane Coles as Steve. In Ferris Bueller's Day Off, Ferris persuades Cameron to steal his father's rare 1961 Ferrari, and they both must deal with the consequences of this serious action: the best day of their lives! Sure, Cameron does end up having to take responsibility for his actions. But only because of a freak accident that comes about because you guessed it two other best friends steal the car, Cheap Jerseys from china roll up the miles on the odometer and have what appears to be the single most enjoyable joyride in the history of Ferraris. In sum, Ferris Bueller's Day Off plays like a PSA about car theft, where the message is, Everyone's doing it, and it's so fun that even if you get caught, it'll be worth it!.  Cheap Jerseys from china

nfl jerseys That memory made Monday all the more special for Pestano, who was fairly giddy to see his friend in the clubhouse. Wilhite watched the game from the Angels dugout, talking with Albert Pujols and Matt Joyce and his friend Vinnie. After the Angels won, Wilhite hopped out of the dugout to join players and coaches in the line for handshakes..  nfl jerseys

Cheap Jerseys free shipping "NHL 08," EA Sports 5. "Skate," EA Games 6. "Stuntman Ignition," THQ 7. As Wholesale Jerseys news said that the Artificially radionuclide iodine 131 was detected in some places of the earthquake and the nuclear explosion of Japan. www.cheapjerseyschinatrade.com If the environment get the radiation, their hearth will be effected. If the football players inhale the air or drink the water with radiation, do you think that will effect their perform on the ground?? I don think so..  Cheap Jerseys free shipping

cheap jerseys  combines with calcium to form a compound called hydroxypeptide. Hydroxypeptide provides the structure that gives bones and teeth their strength www.cheapjerseyschina8.com. also plays a role in storing energy from carbohydrates, protein and fat and helps maintain the pH of your blood, according to "Nutrition and You" by Joan Salge Blake..  cheap jerseys

cheap nfl jerseys Related readings: Roadside bomb kills 21 in S Afghanistan Roadside bomb kills 10 in west Afghanistan Bomb kills 7 civilians in E Afghanistan Bomb blast kills 3 policemen in Afghanistan The blast took place inside a shop Wednesday in Nadir Shahkot district left one innocent civilian dead and injured two others, Nasiri told Xinhua. Dustin Brown Authentic Jersey. Hes not off to a bad start, though.  cheap nfl jerseys

wholesale nfl jerseys And then, the Chicago Bears. Harken back to "The Super Bowl Shuffle," Jim McMahon's running battle with Commissioner Pete Rozelle, Refrigerator Perry scoring a touchdown and not devouring the football on his way in www.cheapjerseysfromchinasale.com, and that utter shellacking of the New England Patriots for their first and only victory in the Title game. They were back four years ago, but a complete and embarrassing collapse that begin in the second quarter left Bears fans wishing George Wendt and Chris Farley were on the sidelines calling plays..  wholesale nfl jerseys

nfl jerseys There are other nonmonetary gains from Newton's fame. He could make it easier for his coaches to attract new players. The school may also see a temporary jump in the number of student applications. Just today I received a sales letter in the mail for which I had to send for free information. My physical act of commitment was to peel a nice red label marked "free" and place it in a designated spot on the mail back card. Now you know why they make you do this little silly stuff..  nfl jerseys

Cheap Jerseys from china Then air force I heard p90 someone outside shouting injured, ran uggs outlet out to rescue the injured. At vans that time the oakley station where ray ban sunglasses four people converse came here to engage in bcbg max scientific research and testing, is one swarovski canada of swarovski jewelry them and injured people air max 2015 to make michael kors mine. Coach outlet online I was mac cosmetics the man swarovski from jimmy choo the rain dragged into the house, the northface man hogan leg braved north face jackets the smoke, a pouring rain squeaky, but the giuseppe shoes mind is air max still clear Cheap Jerseys from china.

[yahoo-shutdown-corner-blog]

NFL Power Rankings: Amid the chaos, does any team deserve to be No. 1?

When the NBA season tips off on Tuesday night, we’ll have a good idea who will win the championship in June. Sorry to Oklahoma City, Houston, San Antonio, Boston or Cleveland (and clearly, nobody else even has a tiny bit of a chance), but the Golden State Warriors are going to win unless something weird happens.

That’s practically the opposite of the NFL right now.

Some fans like it when a league has a few great teams, or even one great team heading for a coronation. It will be entertaining to watch a fun Warriors club win it all. However, if you prefer parity, the NFL in 2017 is your league. Everything changes from week to week.

The term “parity” has been used ad nauseam to describe the NFL for decades now. It was commissioner Pete Rozelle’s dream and it has become a foundation of the league. The draft, free agency, revenue sharing and the salary cap have made sure teams from Green Bay can compete on an even playing field with teams from New York. Despite that, a few teams usually stand out. Who those teams are might change from year to year, but a few always rise to the top. That might not happen this season.

Of the 14 games in Week 6, nine of them were won straight up by the underdog. That included shocking upsets by the Bears, Dolphins and Giants. Even big underdogs like the Jets and 49ers came close to winning. The favorite covered three point spreads: the Saints over the Lions, the Titans over the Colts in a game that was close throughout, and the Texans over the Browns (the Browns have never gotten the invitation to the parity party). There’s no sure thing in the NFL this season. Whatever conclusions you came to about various teams Sunday probably won’t carry over. That’s not bad, necessarily.

Gregg Rosenthal of NFL.com pointed out, 25 teams either lead their division or are within one loss of the division leader. And we’re more than a third of the way through the season. The beauty of the NFL is that most teams’ fans are still engaged. Almost every team has some hope. Far more teams have at least a small shot of winning a Super Bowl than ever before at this point in a season. There are many good teams, and absolutely no favorite.

The NFL’s extreme parity this season leaves us without even one great team, at least to this point. That’s not a knock on the league. It’s great for the NFL’s product that so many teams are competitive. Every game has intrigue. But if you’re looking for your Golden State Warriors of this NFL season, you’ll be looking for a while.

Many thought the Patriots would be that dominant team (I definitely did; the Patriots’ ongoing mediocrity is baffling) but they haven’t been great yet. Neither have the Steelers, Falcons, Cowboys, Raiders, Seahawks or any other team that was considered a contender before the season. The Packers looked like they could reach that level, but then Aaron Rodgers broke his collarbone. So much for that.

Every team in the NFL is competent, except the Browns. The 49ers are 0-6, but they have lost their past five games by 13 combined points. The Giants were getting slammed all last week after an 0-5 start, and they beat a tough Broncos team in Denver. The Chargers were 0-4, but they’ve won two straight road games. Everyone says the Bears are awful, but they have wins over the Steelers and Ravens, and should have beat the Falcons if not for some dropped passes in the end. Nobody is that bad.

There are no pseudo bye weeks against Rutgers or Kansas in the NFL. Don’t bemoan the lack of a great team without acknowledging that the “bad” teams in the league are still good – except, of course, the Browns. And even the Browns lost by only three points to a Steelers team that just won a road game at the Chiefs, who were the last undefeated team in the NFL.

This is the NFL in 2017. It’s no more predictable than a spin of the roulette wheel.

Steelers defensive end Cameron Heyward (97) and outside linebacker T.J. Watt celebrate during their win over the Chiefs. (AP)

Having so little separation from the first to 31st team in the NFL makes it a challenge to rank them – and an even bigger challenge to find a de facto No. 1 team – but let’s try anyway. Here are the power rankings following Week 6 of the NFL season:

32. Cleveland Browns (0-6, Last week: 32) The NFL is set up so every team shouldn’t be that good or that bad for too long. That makes the Patriots’ dynasty so impressive. It also makes the Browns’ futility impressive too, in a different way. I look at how the Jets are competitive every week, how the 49ers are fighting, and it makes it a lot harder to defend Hue Jackson. The Browns’ roster is bad, but it’s not that much worse than some of these other teams’ rosters. Yet they’ve lost 21 of 22 under Jackson and they’ve lost by double digits in 13 of Jackson’s 22 games. They have been outscored by 251 points in those 22 games. That’s not supposed to happen in today’s NFL. I’ve gone from thinking the Browns had to keep Jackson around for four years no matter what to wondering how the Browns could justify bringing Jackson back for a third season.

31. San Francisco 49ers (0-6, LW: 31) This is the most competitive 0-6 team in NFL history. According to Josh Dubow of the Associated Press, the 49ers have been outscored by 33 points, and the second lowest total for an 0-6 team is the 2000 Chargers at minus-84. It’s hard to believe the 49ers’ luck in close games will continue to be this bad. It also sums up the parity of the league: Any team from 31 on down can point to a few plays here or there making a big difference in their record.

30. New York Giants (1-5, LW: 30) There was no guarantee Jason Pierre-Paul would come back this well from that fireworks accident. He showed on Sunday night that he’s still one of the best defensive ends in the NFL. (And the story of how he did the sack dance he practiced last week with a boy battling cancer is fantastic.)

29. Indianapolis Colts (2-4, LW: 28) I don’t understand how a player like T.Y. Hilton finishes a game with one catch for 19 yards. I don’t care how the Titans covered him. That’s on the coaching staff for not getting their best player the ball more often.

28. Chicago Bears (2-4, LW: 29) Mitchell Trubisky’s development will be the story of the season. He hasn’t been very consistent, and didn’t play well Sunday, but then he makes a few big plays and reminds you why he’s on the field. His completion to Kendall Wright on third down in overtime set up the game-winning field goal, and was a play you want to see from a top-end quarterback. Now, he needs to do that consistently.

27. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (2-3, LW: 20) It’s hard to be good when you can’t stop the pass. Opponents are completing 70.9 percent of passes and it seems every completion comes way too easy. But let’s be real: There are a number of concerning issues here. This isn’t the breakout team a lot of folks expected.

26. New York Jets (3-3, LW: 26) I’m still not sure how that Austin Seferian-Jenkins play wasn’t a touchdown. There’s no room for moral victories in the NFL, but I’m more impressed with the Jets after they gave the Patriots all they could handle.

25. Arizona Cardinals (3-3, LW: 27) Everyone forgot that Adrian Peterson was the NFL’s rushing champ in 2015. That wasn’t too long ago. Just when we thought Peterson was finished, he looks like his vintage self on Sunday. This could end up being one of the best stories of this NFL season if it continues.

24. Cincinnati Bengals (2-3, LW: 23) Rookie receiver John Ross returned to practice. If he can stay healthy and contribute, the Bengals offense might not be all that bad the rest of the way. It has looked much better since the change at coordinator.

23. Baltimore Ravens (3-3, LW: 21) The Ravens got a punt return for a touchdown, a kickoff return for a touchdown and still lost to the Bears at home. They’ll win games because they’re well coached and tough, but every win will be ugly.

22. Los Angeles Chargers (2-4, LW: 25) They lost Week 1 after a potential game-tying field goal was blocked in the final seconds. In Week 2, they missed a game-winning field goal in the final seconds. Give the Chargers either one of those games, or even both, and we’re talking about a much different outlook.

21. Oakland Raiders (2-4, LW: 18) NaVorro Bowman isn’t what he was in his prime, but he’s an upgrade over what the Raiders had at inside linebacker. They need help right away because a 2-5 start would be a huge hole to dig out of.

20. Miami Dolphins (3-2, LW: 24) It’s amazing they’re 3-2 because with all the angst about their offense it feels so much worse. Still, a team that averages an NFL-worst 155.4 passing yards per game isn’t going to keep winning much, you’d have to think.

19. Tennessee Titans (3-3, LW: 22) Monday night was the kind of game you need to see before you crown someone a franchise quarterback. The Titans desperately needed Marcus Mariota to play through injury. He did, and played well. The Titans needed that badly.

18. Jacksonville Jaguars (3-3, LW: 14) What will be lost from Sunday’s loss to the Rams is that the Jaguars defense was quite good. It allowed 124 passing yards and just 12 first downs. But the Jaguars gave up a kickoff return touchdown and a touchdown on a blocked punt. It has to be disheartening for the Jaguars defense to be just 3-3 right now.

17. Buffalo Bills (3-2, LW: 16) The next four games: vs. Tampa Bay, vs. Oakland, at N.Y. Jets, vs. New Orleans. None of those games seem too daunting. The Bills could make a nice statement over the next month if they play well.

16. Green Bay Packers (4-2, LW: 2) Let’s get this out of the way: Anyone clamoring for someone other than Brett Hundley to start isn’t thinking clearly. Hundley might be good, he might be bad, but it would be crazy for the Packers to not see what they have. I’m optimistic Hundley can keep the Packers competitive. Any time he has gotten a shot in the preseason, he has played well. You owe it to yourself to find out what he can do in the regular season, after getting the first-team reps in practice. The Packers are no longer Super Bowl contenders, but grabbing a playoff spot isn’t crazy. But the combination of Aaron Rodgers‘ injury and the seemingly endless injuries at other positions certainly makes it tougher.

15. Detroit Lions (3-3, LW: 9) That was a bad loss to the Saints. The Lions tried their typical rally after falling way behind, but then started turning it over again in the fourth quarter. They’re your typical NFL team in 2017: After four weeks people (rightfully) said they were a few inches against the Falcons from being 4-0. Now they’re 3-3 and look to be backsliding badly going into their bye week with a game against the Steelers on deck. The good news is their schedule after that, with the Aaron Rodgers-less Packers still to come twice, is pretty easy.

14. Dallas Cowboys (2-3, LW: 13) The Cowboys weren’t good with Ezekiel Elliott, their best player last season. Now we have to assume Dallas will be without him for six games. This isn’t the same Cowboys offensive line, and you can’t just plug and play Darren McFadden or Alfred Morris and expect big numbers. This is on Dak Prescott to keep the Cowboys in the playoff race. Big spot for the young quarterback.

13. New Orleans Saints (3-2, LW: 19) There might be no better example of an NFL team taking a U-turn out of nowhere and changing who it is. Through the first two weeks the Saints’ pass defense, which has been terrible for years, was allowing an astonishing 141.4 passer rating. In the three games since then, they’ve allowed a 69 rating. No warning, they just did a 180. Now go figure out if they’ll sustain that.

12. Minnesota Vikings (4-2, LW: 17) This team stands to gain the most from Aaron Rodgers’ injury. The Vikings got a key win Sunday against Brett Hundley coming in off the bench, so they’ve already benefited. If the Vikings don’t take advantage of this and win the NFC North, it’ll be a big disappointment.

11. Houston Texans (3-3, LW: 15) Houston has a bye, and then a date at Seattle. That’s a tough place to play. If Deshaun Watson plays well there, then it’ll be clear he’s going to be a star. That might be obvious already.

10. Denver Broncos (3-2, LW: 6) Sunday’s debacle against the Giants brought on another round of some Broncos fans griping about Trevor Siemian. It’s fairly useless. The Broncos aren’t acquiring anyone better during this season. It’ll be hard for them to draft anyone who’s not a gamble, considering they won’t have a high pick. They already gambled once with Paxton Lynch, and that hasn’t worked out yet. Maybe they could go all-in on Kirk Cousins if he becomes a free agent, but there is going to be a lot of sticker shock with his contract. It’s probably best if Broncos fans get used to having Siemian as their quarterback.

9. Los Angeles Rams (4-2, LW: 12) On a day when the Rams’ passing offense didn’t do much, Todd Gurley was huge. He had 116 rushing yards against a tough defense. That’s what you need out of a foundation running back.

8. Atlanta Falcons (3-2, LW: 3) That Packers win looks like an outlier now. In the Falcons’ other four games …

– Held on to beat Chicago when the Bears dropped passes in a goal-to-go situation in the final minute. – Beat the Lions when Golden Tate was ruled inches short of a touchdown on replay review and a 10-second runoff ended the game. – Lost at home to the Bills. – Lost at home to the Dolphins after leading 17-0 at halftime.

All of a sudden it looks like the Super Bowl loser hangover got to them, after all.

7. Washington Redskins (3-2, LW: 11) Chris Thompson finally got a chance to get significant carries. He turned 16 carries into … 33 rushing yards (he did have 105 receiving yards). That will be the last time Jay Gruden gives him that many carries.

6. Seattle Seahawks (3-2, LW: 8) The most interesting story line leading up to the trade deadline on Nov. 1 might be if the Seahawks make any moves to improve a bad offensive line. They talked to Branden Albert but haven’t signed him. You get the sense the Seahawks need to do something.

5. New England Patriots (4-2, LW: 7) I don’t understand coaches who bench a player who fumbles once, unless there’s some history of fumbling. Mike Gillislee had one fumble in 28 career games before Sunday. After he fumbled, he was benched and played just 13 snaps. I’m not really sure the point of that. Letting a guy with one fumble in 28 games know that he shouldn’t fumble?

4. Carolina Panthers (4-2, LW: 5) There’s some question if Luke Kuechly suffered a concussion last week, according to the Charlotte Observer. ESPN’s Adam Schefter said Sunday the team didn’t think he suffered a concussion, but a Panthers spokesman said later Sunday that Kuechly was still in the concussion protocol and hasn’t been cleared. Hopefully Kuechly is cleared or gets cleared and we never have to worry about another concussion with him.

3. Pittsburgh Steelers (4-2, LW: 10) The Steelers tweeted out Martatis Bryant talking to the media after a game about a reported trade request. They commented, “Martavis Bryant says he is happy to stay in Pittsburgh.” Go ahead and watch this video and tell me if it seems like he’s really happy. There is a surprising amount of discord surrounding the Steelers lately.

Martavis Bryant says he is happy to stay in Pittsburgh. pic.twitter.com/cnqVutVMDe

— Pittsburgh Steelers (@steelers) October 16, 2017

2. Philadelphia Eagles (5-1, LW: 4) A good argument can be made for them being No. 1. However, they played the No. 1 team and lost. It was a competitive game in Kansas City, but it’s still part of the resumes.

1. Kansas City Chiefs (5-1, LW: 1) I’m not a fan of pollsters automatically moving the No. 1 team down due to a loss. Let’s examine the full body of work. The Chiefs have a fine set of quality wins (at New England, vs. Philadelphia, at L.A. Chargers, vs. Washington, at Houston). The loss against Pittsburgh wasn’t a bad one. Despite a rough day Sunday, they’re second in yards gained this season. The overall defense has given up a lot of yards, but the pass defense is solid and capable of making plays. If you take all six weeks together and don’t get caught up in recency bias, they still deserve the top spot.

– – – – – – –

Frank Schwab is the editor of Shutdown Corner on Yahoo Sports. Have a tip? Email him at shutdown.corner@yahoo.com or follow him on Twitter! Follow @YahooSchwab

More from Yahoo Sports: • Kaepernick question sets off Green Bay coach • Popovich: Trump is a ‘soulless coward’ • Dan Wetzel: Why it’s time to end the ‘one-and-done’ rule • The one mistake that led to the Aaron Judge of old

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[lawfultruth]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana syndicated from http://ift.tt/2qyreAv

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp

[centuryassociates]

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana

Co-author Brooke Sizer

Rozel Operating v. Crown Point Holdings, LLC, et al., reminds one of the need to understand and apply the meaning of terms used in a statute one is attempting to enforce. And imaginative theories don’t work without evidence to support them.

Rozel hired Crown Point to salvage a barge, the JMC 109.  Rozel determined that Crown Point wasn’t going to be able to salvage the JMC 109 and terminated their agreement.

Crown Point hired IMR to perform work related to the operation. Reeling from this treachery, Rozel sued Crown Point and IMR.  IMR counterclaimed seeking payment of $876,000 for maritime salvage activities in connection with the barge and filed an oil and gas lien on two wells in Cameron Parish under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act.

Rozel argued that IMR had no claim for a money damages because any rights under LOWLA are strictly in rem and that IMR didn’t have a LOWLA privilege.The court agreed; claim for money dismissed.

Whether IMR would have a privilege depended on the meanings of “contractor”, “operator”, and “operations” under LOWLA.

To have a valid lien under LOWLA the lien affidavit must:

be in writing,

signed on behalf of IMR,

provide the claimant’s name and address,

set forth the amount owed and the nature of the obligation,

identify the debtor, and

identify the operator, as listed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

LOWLA Privilege? No

The court found that IMR did not have a privilege under LOWLA because:

IMR produced no evidence that Rozel was an operator, lessee, or possessed an operating interest in the two wells listed in its lien affidavit at the time IMR attempted salvage operations.  Rozel produced evidence that it transferred operatorship and ownership in the wells prior to the relevant time.

There was evidence that the JMC 109 was used as a breakwater for a well that wasn’t listed on the lien affidavit.

IMR failed to adequately identify the well to which the lien would apply.  A well is “adequately identified” if the statement of privilege gives the name and serial or other identification number of the well; and the name of the field where the well is located as designated by the Commissioner of Conservation.

Naming wells that Rozel used to own didn’t count.

Judicial estoppel

IMR argued that judicial estoppel prevented Rozel from asserting some of its claims. Two requirements had to be satisfied:

the party’s position to be estopped must be clearly inconsistent with its previous one; and

the party must have convinced the court to accept the previous position.

Good theory, except that IMR failed to carry its burden. Moreover, the court couldn’t find a single case in which this doctrine was used to hold a party personally liable for an unpaid debt. Claim dismissed.

Mandatary who exceeds authority

Next claim: Crown Point was Rozel’s mandatary who exceeded its authority by entering into an agreement with IMR to retrieve the JMC 109, but Rozel ratified the act. A mandatary who exceeds his authority is personally bound to the third person with whom he contracts unless that person knew at the time of the contract that the mandatary had exceeded his authority, or unless the principal ratifies the contract.

Good theory, except that there was no evidence that Rozel had conferred authority on Crown Point to transact one or more affairs for Rozel.  Claim dismissed without further support.

In short: IMR had no privilege and IMR had 30 days to remove the liens on the wells.

D. L. Menard RIP

How Not to Secure an Oil Well Lien in Louisiana posted first on http://ift.tt/2lnEzMp