#(oK BUT. THESE ARE NOT. FOR. PPL WHO CAN'T READ MY FAQ. READ IT. READ IT BEFORE INTERACTING AT ALL OR DO NOT USE. PLEASE.)

[ruegarding]

hi!! i was just reading your faq??? thing about your blog and i noticed the bit that was like ‘i would run fanon percabeth over with my car’ (also fanon nico which is so fucking real) and i was wondering if you wanted to talk about anything that specifically annoys you?? not like in an ‘I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK SO I CAN TELL YOU YOU’RE WRONG’ type of way but like an ‘i also would like to run over some parts of fanon percabeth but there’s such a diverse range of takes that idk if we’re running the same ppl over’ type of way. sorry of this made no sense 😭😭

hi! dw u make sense. many of my issues w fanon overlap w criticism i have w rick's writing, so u can find some of them in my rr crit tag if u want elaboration. the disclaimer is mostly there so that hardcore shippers don't follow me bc i'm definitely not the blog for them lol

anyway, here's a list

the inability to treat percy and annabeth as two separate characters. every one of these takes sucks no matter what it is.

anything that thinks hoo is a good representation of their dynamic and uses hoo moments to contradict pjo characterization. u might notice that most of these takes are based on this.

percy does not have a six-pack. he is not suave. who is this guy u are talking abt

"percy is the cynic and annabeth is the idealist."

"percy is the dumb bf who can't do anything without his competent gf." bonus points if it includes annabeth needing to "control" percy.

the whole rachel thing. also ppl apparently think percy needs to be punished for talking to rachel or something idk. this take is so stupid it's unreal.

"annabeth hurting percy is ok bc it's written to be funny/romantic" rick had piper wear feathers in her hair as a fun quirk.

i've literally never gone in the percabeth tag, so these are popular enough takes that i'm seeing them anyway.