tirado - Tumblr blog

[tirado]

http://bit.ly/NahuatlBasico

[tirado]

Fürstlich Waldecksche Hofbibliothek.

Scrapbook, Vol. 2. Detail. [x]

> Engraver: Jacob von Sandrart.

[tirado]

Desire is not form, but a procedure, a process.

Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka; Toward a Minor Literature (8)

[tirado]

If repetition is possible, it is due to miracle rather than to law. It is against the law: against the similar form and the equivalent content of law. If repetition can be found, even in nature, it is in the name of a power which affirms itself against the law, which works underneath laws, perhaps superior to laws. If repetition exists, it expresses at once a singularity opposed to the general, a universality opposed to the particular, a distinctive opposed to the ordinary, an instantaneity opposed to variation and an eternity opposed to permanence. In every respect, repetition is a transgression. It puts law into question, it denounces its nominal or general character in favour of a more profound and more artistic reality.

Gilles Deleuze /Difference and Repetition, 1968 / p2. 3 (via archivedfever)

[tirado]

Full colour pictures of Dr. King.

[tirado]

Writing has nothing to do with signifying. It has to do with surveying, mapping, even realms that are yet to come.

Gilles Deleuze. Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia  (via ptdeux)

[tirado]

❤🔥 #Puebla #Anahuac 🔥❤

[tirado]

We are wrong to believe that the true and false can only be brought to bear on solutions, that they only begin with solutions. This prejudice is social, for society and the language that transmits its order-words [mots d'ordre], “set up” [donnent] ready made problems, as if they were drawn out of the “city’s administrative filing cabinets,” and force us to “solve” them, leaving us only a thin margin of freedom. Moreover, this prejudice goes back to childhood, to the classroom: It is the school teacher who “poses” the problems; the pupil’s task is to discover the solutions. In this way we are kept in a kind of slavery. True freedom lies in a power to decide, to constitute the problems themselves. And this “semi-divine” power entails the disappearance of false problems, as much as the creative upsurge of true new ones.

Gilles Deleuze, Bergsonism (via syntheticphilosophy)

[tirado]

Trump’s Plan to Neuter the White House Press Corps, and Neuter Our Democracy

Tyrants don’t allow open questioning, and they hate the free press. They want total control.

That’s why, according to three senior officials on the transition team, the incoming Trump administration is considering evicting the White House press corps from the press room inside the White House and moving them – and news conferences – to a conference center or to the Old Executive Office Building.

This may sound like a small logistic matter. It’s not. The White House “press room” contains work stations and broadcast booths, and the briefing area for presidential news conferences. Reporters have had workspace at the White House since Teddy Roosevelt was president, in 1901. 

But we’re in a new era, the reign of King Trump.

Sean Spicer, Trump’s press secretary, acknowledges “there has been some discussion about how” to move the press out of the White House. Spicer says it’s because the new administration would like a larger room to allow more members of the press to attend press conferences.

Rubbish. It’s because a larger room would allow the administration to fill seats with “alt-right” fringe journalists, rightwing social media, Trump supporters and paid staffers. They’d be there to ask the questions Trump wants to answer, and to jeer at reporters who ask critical questions and applaud Trump’s answers.

The move would allow Trump to play the crowd.

That’s exactly what happened at Trump’s so-called “news conference” on January 11 – the first he’s held in six months.

It wasn’t really a press conference at all, and shouldn’t have been characterized as one. It was a fake news conference that took place in a large auditorium. 

In the audience were paid staffers who jeered and snickered when reporters asked critical questions, and cheered every time Trump delivered one of his campaign zingers. It could easily have been one of his rallies.  

In this carnival atmosphere it was easy for Trump to refuse to answer questions from reporters who have run stories he doesn’t like, and from news outlets that have criticized him.

He slammed CNN for dispensing “fake news,” called Buzzfeed “a pile of garbage,” and sarcastically called the BBC “another beauty.” The audience loved it. 

Just as he did in his rallies, Trump continued calling the press “dishonest” – part of his ongoing effort to discredit the press and to reduce public confidence in it. 

And he repeatedly lied. But the media in attendance weren’t allowed to follow up or to question him on his lies.

For example, Trump wrongly stated that “the Democratic National Committee was totally open to be hacked. They did a very poor job. … And they tried to hack the Republican National Committee, and they were unable to break through.” 

Baloney. FBI Director James B. Comey said there was evidence that Republican National Committee computers were also targeted. The critical difference, according to Comey, was that none of the information obtained from the RNC was leaked. Also, according to Comey, the Russians “got far deeper and wider into the [DNC] than the RNC,” adding that “similar techniques were used in both cases.”

Trump further asserted at his fake news conference that “I have no deals that could happen in Russia, because we’ve stayed away. And I have no loans with Russia.”

Wrong again. Trump repeatedly sought deals in Russia. In a 2008 speech, Donald Trump Jr. said “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets,” and “we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”

Trump’s statements at his fake news conference were, and are, big lies. They influence public understanding and opinion about two critically important issues: Did the Russians help Trump win the election, and, if so, why might they have done so?

At the very least, they should have been followed up with questions from the White House press corps. That would have happened at a real news conference in the White House press room, holding 45 correspondents from major media outlets who are assigned full-time to report on the president.  

Which is the danger of evicting the press from the White House and putting press conferences into a large auditorium: Trump won’t be called on his lies, and the White House press corps will lose the leverage they have by being together in one rather small room.  

And that’s precisely why Trump wants to evict the press from the White House. 

A senior official admitted the move was a reaction to hostile press coverage. The view at the highest reaches of the incoming administration is that the press is the enemy. "They are the opposition party,” said the senior official. “I want ‘em out of the building. We are taking back the press room.”

The incoming Trump administration is intent on neutering the White House press corps. If it happens it will be another step toward neutering our  democracy.

[tirado]

MÉXICO

© Medusczka

“Mexicanos, al grito de guerra

El acero aprestad y el bridón,

y retiemble en sus centros la tierra

Al sonoro rugir del cañón.”

[tirado]

Behold the new high priest of capitalism.

The post New Art Prints by Aesthetic Apparatus appeared first on OMG Posters!.

[tirado]

Fog is a vital response to the imperative of clarity, transparency, which is the first imprint of imperial power on bodies. To become foglike means that I finally take up the part of the shadows that command me and prevent me from believing all the fictions of direct democracy insofar as they intend to ritualize the transparency of each person in their own interests, and of all persons in the interests of all. To become opaque like fog means recognizing that we don’t represent anything, that we aren’t identifiable; it means taking on the untotalizable character of the physical body as a political body; it means opening yourself up to still-unknown possibilities. It means resisting with all your power any struggle for recognition.

Tiqqun, The Cybernetic Hypothesis (via poeticsofdissolution)

[tirado]

There are no individual statements, there never are. Every statement is the product of a machinic assemblage, in other words, of collective agents of enunciation (take “collective agents” to mean not peoples or societies but multiplicities). The proper name (nom propre) does not designate an individual: it is on the contrary when the individual opens up to the multiplicities pervading him or her, at the outcome of the most severe operation of depersonalization, that he or she acquires his or her true proper name. The proper name is the instantaneous apprehension of a multiplicity. The proper name is the subject of a pure infinitive comprehended as such in a field of intensity.

Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia   (via mothwood)

Thank you. I so needed this.

[tirado]

“Retreating from Obamacare, as imperfect as it is, would represent a failure to demonstrate care for the most vulnerable amongst us. It is indeed bitterly ironic that the people empowered with making decisions for the powerless are those who are abundantly supplied with resources, including generous health insurance. That they would take away something that so many have grown to rely upon to keep them healthy and out of abject poverty from medical debt, seems both unfair and cruel. While we have a long history in this country of blaming the poor for being poor, assuming their impoverishment is a sign of personal moral failing, it is more often than not simply bad luck, including the kind of being born into the wrong family or the wrong state, or having the wrong color skin or the wrong ethnic heritage.”

Despite the plan’s imperfections, Dr. Philip M. Rosoff discuses why Donald Trump should avoid repealing Obamacare.

Image credit: Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at the White House (2010) by Pete Souza. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

[tirado]

Gah!!! Fuck Nickelodeon.

Apparently Nickelodeon wants to build an attraction in Palawan, Philippines . 

This might seem fun for some people, but for us it’s not. 

You see, Palawan is known for its non-commercialized islands and untouched beaches. There are only a few resorts in there, and the government limits tourism population there. Here are some pictures of our beautiful islands:

Nickelodeon, however, wants to capitalize the island of Coron, Palawan. They’re going to build a resort and theme park there. They claim that they want to “spread environmental awareness” but they’re really not. Building this resort will disrupt the marine ecosystem; thus destroying the environment there. Also, Palawan is our last ecological frontier in the Philippines. If they’re going to continue to do this, more and more big companies will cash-in to commercialize Palawan- and I really do not want that to happen.

I know petitions won’t do much, but at least we can prove a point that Palawan should not be disrupted. Please sign this petition, so that it will not only show that us Filipinxs don’t want this, but people from different countries as well. Please spread it around as well, so that people from different countries can be aware of what Nickelodeon is doing.

Ang aming kalikasan ay hindi dapat sirain. Maraming salamat po.

[tirado]

Behind the Myth of Benevolence by Titus Kaphar (2014)

[tirado]

Dyre Vaa, Kvitebjørn Kong Valemon, 1937 Photo: Tore Sætre