#quality reproductions
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Video
youtube
OBK ART. Van Gogh´s reproductons
#youtube#van gogh#van gogh paintings#van gogh art#van gogh reproductions#van gogh cypresses#van gogh landscapes#landscape by van gogh#cypresses by van gogh#quality reproductions#van gogh tutorial#how to paint as van gogh#van gogh painting style
0 notes
Text
chastity for a vampire
#cw blood#suggestive#click on the pic for better quality :(#inspired by some tumblr post about vampires teeth beeing their reproductive organs and what kind of chastity cage would it need or whatever#well uh alright idk what else to say :“)#inktober#inktober 2024#horror art#ink art#artists on tumblr#vampires#my art
3K notes
·
View notes
Note
Sorry about the color mix up. I appreciate the reply and additional info! I guess bc I know nothing about peafowl (and the fact i dont breed any type of animal), I'm having a hard time understanding how being sterile would be unethical. I do somewhat get the shortened life span. I really would like to understand this, I just sometimes need stuff explained like I'm 5.
Up front, there's no "somewhat get" to a shortened lifespan being caused by a mutation in captive populations. If an animal is capable of living 20+ years (and some live 30+ or even 40+!) and some non-essential mutation is causing them to live 7-9 years, it's flat out absolutely unethical to breed that mutation, full stop, regardless of anything else going on. That's indicative of a MAJOR problem in their genetics. There's NO ethical reason to breed that because humans like how it looks. So, even without the sterility, these birds would 100% be unethical to produce.
The short answer on sterility is this: we don't know WHY they are sterile, but they shouldn't be, and that means something has gone wrong. When something goes wrong with an animal, and it's something genetic that can be passed on, the ONLY responsible and ethical thing for a breeder to do is to stop using that animal for breeding and closely monitor any already-produced offspring for signs of the problem, and likely not breed them, either.
The longer more complicated answer is this: sometimes it's possible to separate the problem from the aesthetic when it comes to morphs, like it was for cameo + blindness, but sometimes it's NOT, like it wasn't for spider + head wobble for ball pythons. In those instances, it's... difficult. Because you're LIKELY going to produce animals that suffer the same problem as their parent(s), in the attempt to separate the problem from the aesthetic, and sometimes that's ALL you're going to produce. As a breeder, it's your absolute responsibility to NOT release the offspring into the general population, where the problem may be replicated without control, and to keep or cull the affected individuals if the problem cannot be separated from the aesthetic, or AT BEST find them guaranteed pet-only homes that will NEVER breed them.
Sometimes the problem IS purely aesthetic or harmless, like it was for pied in peafowl, and sometimes it's not, like it was for vitiligo in peafowl. The problem comes when you ASSUME a mutation is the first, and treat it like the first when it's really the second. This has caused FAR reaching consequences in the peafowl community, and I'm sure in others, where now the autoimmune disease that first bronze had has been passed into genpop by folks who thought they were breeding a harmless new variation of pied. Hybrid animals are often sterile (not in peafowl though, hybrid cristatus-muticus birds are fertile) because of a mismatch in chromosome pairing numbers, and often that's harmless. So, in some cases sterility is not an issue because it's the expected result or is otherwise harmless... but in the case of peafowl, it's NOT an expected result and we don't know if it's caused by something harmless or not.
Some species, like mice and horses and cattle and dogs, genetic testing and DNA mapping done with millions of dollars has proven that while some stuff isn't purely aesthetic, it also doesn't cause harm to the animal in a way that affects quality of life or that can be adapted for in captive care. For example, in chickens, the frizzle gene causes curled feathers in single copy and an absence of feathers in double copy. This gene is considered ethical to produce IF the breeding is done responsibly by putting a single copy bird over a zero copy bird, which produces smooth coats and frizzle coats, but it is unethical to produce double frizzles (called "frazzles") because frazzles cannot thermoregulate, can easily sunburn, and easily suffer skin injury during normal chicken activity.
For peafowl, we have NO genetic testing. We do not have the genome mapped. As far as I know there's a research group working on it (mostly for green peafowl though, in conservation efforts), but that's not remotely finished or available to the public to test anything. We don't know where any of the morph mutations sit, or what is causing them or if they do anything beyond just change the color. Sometimes color mutations are the result of malfunctions in enzymes. For charcoal specifically, we don't know what the mutation does, besides what we can observe on the outside- the birds have half or less the lifespan of normal birds, poor feather quality, and the hens are sterile. Is the sterility harmless like it is in some hybrid animals, or is it actually a major organ failing? Is it the only major organ that fails due to this mutation, or is it just the first sign of their shortened lives? Is it some deficiency in something the birds need to be healthy? Does it hurt the bird? We don't know, but we do know the mutation and the problems (multiple, please do NOT forget that this is one OF MORE THAN ONE problems) can't be separated, and so until we do know why and whether it's harmless or not, the ONLY ethical response to seeing a problem in a major organ's function linked inextricably to a mutation in color is to not propagate that mutation. If someone wanted to fork over the millions it takes to sequence and map genomes and then determine exactly what is going on with peafowl, that would be nice and good, but I don't see that happening. When I win the lottery big, I'll be doing it, but til then we can only follow normal breeding guidelines
Also, to put this into perspective... peafowl mature sexually around 3 years old. They are chicks until the turn of the new year following their hatch. They are yearlings that year, and immature 2yo next year. They aren't actually considered fully grown until 6 years old, and should live another 14+ years. Charcoal birds die a 1-3 years after full maturity. Is it a coincidence that they fail to thrive shortly after full sexual maturity, or is it linked? Again, we don't know. We don't know if the sterility is fine or if it's just a symptom of something worse.
Even without the sterility, though, charcoal has enough issues it would be unethical. If it was JUST sterility, with no other deleterious effects, then maybe it would be different. But it's not.
#peafowl#asks#anon asks#as always please bear in mind that animal breeding is NOT the same as human reproduction ethics#and I ONLY deal in animal ethics#and honestly even if it was just shit feather quality then I would personally consider it bad breeding#I asked the only person I know who still has charcoals what their issues were and lord it is worse than I thought even#she's keeping/breeding only what she can keep herself#and experimenting with feeding regimens in the hopes of correcting a nutritional deficiency#that might account for the sterility#but so far after like 10+ years she's had no luck#so it's not likely#Like there are SO MANY perfectly fine and healthy morphs out there#there's NO reason to keep making this one#it's not essential to the continuance of the species#also to anon: I'm not mad at all this is just how i sound about my special interest#I'm glad you asked questions#I appreciate you seeking info
109 notes
·
View notes
Text
Idk I'm having a great time
#Mary and George#Hmm I came for the Niamh Algar and stayed for the rest of it#Slutty jacobean costumes#Shockingly well-lit dark wood interior shots#Sir Francis Bacon being a know it all rascal#low quality print reproductions of northern renaissance paintings#this whole mcmansion failure family#Nicholas Galitzine being a little poodle man#AND Niamh Algar
27 notes
·
View notes
Note
Giggles and whispers 🌹
[giggles] share something about you people wouldn’t expect based on your blog! hm, well, right now i'm working in archives sorting through photographs taken by an art historian while he and his wife traveled Europe in the wake of the first world war thanks Dorian! 💖
#personal#i know don't touch the photos#these specific ones are fairly worthless reproductions#not original prints on quality paper#and touching the edges or sides is ok!
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
Gives u four hours of prep time
Ah fuck we didn't actually prepare a topic for this. We may have underestimated the necessary amount of prep time. Uhh if we go over All Of Sexuality In Writing And Media it'll be really compressed and probably cut out a lot of context, and also we are physically incapable of watching most forms of video which would cause some issues because films contribute a lot to the general media landscape and experience they just aren't our area of expertise and we would probably sound like a clown trying to cover them to people who are capable of watching movies. Give us a bit. Let's narrow down the subject. We've got immediate ideas for that one shitty fic and not a lot else.
If we pull up a specific Hollow Knight omegaverse fic and a handful of other either platonic or NSFW omegaverse works we can compare and contrast the ways in which they do or do not work to our fic in question, and pay particular attention to why the sex or lack of sex does or does not work. We can think of at least one Batman fic that goes into asexual omegas and figuring out how to get around having sex when on a heat cycle immediately off the top of our head and it's not unique in that sphere. If you give us a day or two to chase things down we can probably find a good dozen fics with this exact premise of "unexpectedly going into heat" with interesting points of tension with the subject but it'll probably need us to sift through a few hundred thousand words of fic first.
Do you want to hear about age dynamics and the fears of the societal or relationship-based norms associated with "growing up" that frequently come with this genre. We think there are a lot of potentially productive points you can take with their treatment of Bonnie in a fic genre that tends to overlap with coming-of-age and the way that them not allowing Bonnie to even be aware of the fact that heat, a basic part of a third of the population's bodily cycles, overlaps with both the base game's treatment of them and general statements to be made about lack of sex education in real life and treatment of children. We think there's a lot of ground to be covered about how frequently presentation and similar tropes can use wording similar to our world's handling of puberty and we think that late presentation and issues with secondary-gender-linked characteristics can genuinely be really interesting to explore. Hello.
#asks#we speak#omegaverse#we can deconstruct the tropes associated with alphas and omegas also#we feel like for the work in question a quick discussion of author-bias misogyny in omegaverse would be valuable#we think it might be worth dedicating some time and effort to talking about how women or “unimportant” characters#frequently get cast as betas and excluded from main relationship drama by not properly aligning to the “binary”#which is to say the handful of secondary genders with more reproductive qualities ascribed to them#please. let's talk about misogyny and amatonormativity. we've been dying to talk about misogyny and amatonormativity#we are wheeling up a whole chart as we speak we just need to work out which works have quotes on betas that best work#to illustrate our point or to get it across without needing like 300 hours of reading omegaverse#we hope this properly sums up some amount of the It All btw we have opinions
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
without doubt one of the worst things about bratz dolls is that you cannot display them without shoes bc they look weird as fuck. stumpy ass bitches
#tales from diana#i bought some bratz w a walmart giftcard my brother got me for my birthday... like months ago#my birthday is in april so i probably bought them like may or june#i opened yasmin today and i really gotta wash her hair it's a gelly mess#lookin like a rat's nest fuckin... it's bad mga wtf#it's the forever bratz yasmin from this year btw not a reproduction#i did also get the reproduction of campfire felicia bc it was also there and the same price#and like honestly she was lookin so cute and tbh she was a better deal lol she came w two outfits so yeah#you know yasmin was my favorite design of the forever bratz but the doll itself is somewhat cheaper than i was expecting her to be#ppl always praise mga for having higher quality than playline barbie these days but like... i kept thinking#hmmm if this had come out in the 2000s this doll would've had a fabric purse and not a hard plastic one#this lace on the front would actually be able to open and not just be glued there#whatever she's still cute i really love her#but i did have that first experience in such a long time. like since childhood. where i just take off some bratz shoes#and i'm like NO FEET! NO FEET! NO FEET! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH#PUT IT BACK!!!!!!#they look more than just naked. they look injured#i used to treat my bratz clothing completely differently than my barbie clothing as a kid bc they felt so much less interchangeable lol#i had a million barbies and a million barbie outfits and i really did not care to keep anything on a particular doll#w my couple of bratz that i had in childhood i really had to be careful where those outfit pieces ended up. couldnt leave em undressed#i suppose that still hasn't changed#you know one of these days i have to get myself a new funk-n-glow jade. she was my first bratz#but also one of these days....... i gotta wash yasmin's hair 😒
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
On one hand i would like to have a large baby. my family and gilgamesh’s come from a long line of beefy, nine pound plus chunkers. I was 9 and something lbs with a full head of hair and almost a week late. I want that baby fully cooked and maybe a little overdone. tons of studies not just anecdotal show that they just seem sort of… nicer and easier to deal with, like the biggest of the litter. they sleep more. they dont struggle in general as much and they gain weight easily and they also move a little slower. not saying they dont hit milestones but a fat ass baby will stay in its potted plant lump stage a little while longer before jumping into the running around sticking fingers in outlets stage.
on the other hand, i am so so concerned for the sanctity of my gooch. a nine pound baby will tear my grundle asunder. my taint to shreds.
#the thing nobody talks about pregnancy is you already have to deal w constipation cause your body has bigger priorities#& your uterus is freaking the fuck out next to ur intestines#the chance of hemorrhoids before birth is very common#my pussy? i believe in her.#my gooch? he’s a sensitive soul.#its also a bit funny when people say things like ‘we have been having babies for millenium’#technically yes. but at these sizes w our modern nutrition? we sure the fuck haven’t#they actually gave prenatals to pregnant ppl in developing countries and it led to MORE complications and deaths#bc the prenatals weren’t also paired w high quality modern medicine#so these large babies were just causing all sorts of chaos compared to smaller more easily birthed babies#the way our reproduction system is they are just very large parasites#they’ll steal your teeth and rip open your gooch
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
There's definitely a place in heaven for etsy shops that recreate historical jewelry
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Yikes... I was a huge Pretty N' Punk Sasha defender but now that I actually have her doll...😬
People were right about her screening not matching the other girls. Which I suppose isn't a huge deal, but they could have at least given her darker make-up. And I love that they gave her curly hair, but they should have done something a little different, and made the color a bit darker. I like her outfits a whole lot, aside from the weird suspenders they put on her pants (cut those off first thing) but the silver boots are odd. Idk, all the other girls have black boots, and black suitcases, but Sasha's for some reason are different.
The worst thing, though, is that they lightened her skin tone. I did notice it in her stock photos that she looked a bit paler, but thought it was maybe just weird lighting. But nope, her skin is definitely lighter than her other dolls that have been released since the revival. Was really hoping MGA would have smartened about about that, but I suppose I was putting too much faith in them.
When I noticed that her doll was cheaper than the others, it brought me back to being a kid and seeing reduced prices on the Sasha dolls because she was less popular. But in this instance...it seems pretty justified.
#bratz#bratz dolls#bratz sasha#sasha bratz#pretty n punk#dolls#doll collecting#not mh#im disappointed to say the least#i like the web series but her skin tone looks off in that too#keep in mind that this is the first original play line doll that they've released since the come back#there's more to come im pretty sure but thats kinda a big deal...and yet they flopped#she was supposed to be in the original release back in the day but they dropped her for whatever reason#but she did have a design and people were wondering why they didnt just go for that#im curious what that would have looked like#aside from the quality i think the fact that she wasnt a reproduction is also why she was cheaper#text post#doll review#i guess#i still want jade bad#all the other girls looks are very out there and sasha's is just super tame#cloe has orange hair lol#and they all have dark lips#im def repainting her lips#they are a really pretty color tho so im gonna regret it a little bit
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
thinking about how when you punch a mirror so that it cracks and fractures into multiple shards reflecting your own visage back at you, you're really just ironically surrounding yourself with more of the self you loathe in your quest to attain self-destruction. the grotesque reproductive quality of gouging pieces from yourself in order to lessen the burden of existence, and in the process only proliferating more individual aspects of You, shedding them as you go. much to consider.
31K notes
·
View notes
Text
The Rise of Affordable Art: How to Start Your Collection
Why Affordable Art Has Gained So Much Popularity Art collecting, once viewed as an exclusive activity reserved for the wealthy, has seen a democratizing shift in recent years. Affordable art, particularly contemporary artwork, has surged in popularity, especially among younger collectors seeking expressive, bold, and colorful pieces. Art enthusiasts today, including those passionate about art…
0 notes
Text
Is my home audio system better than I need?
Browsing around discussions of audiophile vs melophile, I found a thought-provoking comment: when your home audio system has higher sensitivity and resolution than the original music engineers had in their recording studio, all you’re doing at home is amplifying flaws that the original engineers couldn’t even hear. LISTEN TO THE MUSIC, not the technology!! Rich Meitin on quora.com As I’ve just…
1 note
·
View note
Text
Understanding and Managing Male Infertility: A Comprehensive Guide
Male infertility is a deeply personal and often overlooked issue that affects millions of men worldwide. It’s not just a medical condition; it’s a subject tied closely to identity, emotional well-being, and relationships. With approximately 15% of couples globally struggling with infertility, male factors account for nearly half of these cases. This expanded guide delves into the intricacies of…
#fertility treatment#hormone therapy#male infertility#men’s health#reproductive health#sperm quality
0 notes
Link
1 note
·
View note
Text
kids these days are spending too much time modifying their reproductive organs into intriguing shapes and giving them bright colors and other pollinator-attracting qualities. back in my day we simply put many spores into a wind or water current and were happy if they made it a quarter mile..... didnt bother with any of that stuff. i remember when we would all take root in a wet patch and throw our spores around, but have you been to a wet patch recently? its disgusting, is what it is
15K notes
·
View notes