#i really dont get the girlbossification she's gone through in fandom over the last few years
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
easy,
she's a domestic terrorist
i hope that helps ๐๐ผ
Satine Kryze should not be a sympathetic character.
A complex and tragic one? Sure. Every day of the week.
But she did not 'have a point', neither in-universe, not outside of the sw framework. She isn't a hero, neither of her own story, nor of someone else's. There is no way she wasn't a tool. You should not look at her and think 'this woman has done nothing wrong and what ultimately happened to Mandalore was to no part her fault'.
Because guys. Friends. Strangers on the interwebs.
Pacifism doesn't work.
And it certainly wouldn't have worked in motherfucking Star Wars โ the 'wars' is literally in the title โ for a system or series of systems who wanted to stay neutral.
YOU DON'T STAY NEUTRAL FOR LONG BY JUST SAYING 'YEAH, NO THANKS <3' TO A LARGE-SCALE CONFLICT.
source: I am Swiss, we've looked at this in history class. Extensively.
Satine was a dreamer (thanks Obi-Wan) who was allowed to keep her delusions because they actively benefitted Palpatine's plans. And that's something you can quote me on. There is literally no other reason (apart from supremely bad writing but we'll leave that aside here) for her and her little friends' 'Alliance of Neutral Systems' or whatever to be allowed to exist.
Not that they were neutral in any way, shape or form, by the way.
So yeah sorry to the Satine stans, but you're idolizing a character that was written exclusively and specifically for Obi-Wan's manpain and who, in-universe, was a supremely bad politician. Because the level of mental dissonace needed to factually be a Republic System, have a seat in the fucking Republic Senate, rely upon their military for aid while actively proclaiming that All Violence Is Bad And Barbaric one sentence later AND THEN CLAIM TO BE NEUTRAL IN THE WHOLE CONFLICT โ it's just mind-blowing. Even moreso that people actually look at this character and see something aspirational in her.
Again, I'll gladly dissect her character any day of the week. She is fascinating because of all the implications her existence as a head of state carries with it, as well as her deeply complicated family history and her relation to mandalorian culture.
But it just grates on me personally that that all gets ignored in favor of her being some sort of icon of white american saviorism (bc that's literally what she is) and her objectively bad political takes being treated like they are the only correct stance to be taken during the Clone Wars/Mandalorian Civil Wars.
If you think pacifism works and actually lets you stay neutral, I desperately urge you to open a history book. Because those two are mutually exclusive. Especially in the scenario that Star Wars paints.
#i really dont get the girlbossification she's gone through in fandom over the last few years#literally all we saw of her in tcw was her actively working towards killing her sister and working for pre#and when that plot succeeded and the results were Not Good (surprise surprise) she suddenly did a 180?#i've stopped watching the mandalorian the moment i heard she was gonna get the saber#bo-katan is a character i do not enjoy and do not see the point of bringing back#any if you say 'oh but maybe she's changed since mandalore was destroyed'#has she?#has she really?#bc all i see is that she keeps stalking a guy with Bigger Problems to get a symbol of rulership *coined* by the terrorist organization#that she was working with to AGAIN I CANNOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH kill her own sister#just bc that sister was satine does not make that a good motive#i could have enjoyed her in mando if she'd be treated differently. but like that she's come true by all the kryze entitlement#and the complete disregard for common sense#random boli thoughts#i must say though that the *idea* of 1 pacifist sister and 1 terrorist sister is very fun#just like always sw canon did not follow through on the implications#star wars#bo katan kryze
554 notes
ยท
View notes