#hormonal contraceptives and stroke

[todayworldnews2k21]

World Stroke Day: Study Reveals Why Women Face Higher Stroke Risks Than Men

New Delhi: Hormonal changes caused due to pregnancy, or the use of oral contraceptives, and the longer life expectancy are some of the reasons that explain the higher incidences of strokes among women than men, said experts on World Stroke Day on Tuesday.  Stroke is a major cause of disability and death for all people worldwide. But, it is the third leading cause of death in women and kills more…

[probablyasocialecologist]

The methodology for the Cass review was established by a team from the University of York including Tilly Langdon, who has previously been involved in promoting Gender Exploratory Therapy – an approach which, despite its neutral-sounding name, discourages children from identifying as trans and has been likened to conversion therapy. Her approach included setting a very high bar for evidence to be considered in the review, ruling out 100 of the existing 103 studies into the use of puberty blockers and hormones to treat trans children. The reason given for excluding all these studies was that they did not incorporate a double blind approach – in other words, they did not involve giving puberty blockers to some patients and placebos to others. This might sound like a reasonable objection on the face of it – until one considers that puberty is a dramatic physical and psychological process, and people can easily tell when it’s happening to them, so a double blind simply wouldn’t work in practice. The Cass review called for more research and, again, few would disagree with this. The suggestion that treatment should be withheld in the process, however, is not neutral. It presupposes that the harm done by puberty blockers (demineralisation of bones, which is usually temporary in the short-term treatment recommended and is similar to what occurs in pregnancy) is more severe than the harm done to a trans child by going through the wrong sort of puberty. The latter is linked to high rates of self-harm and suicidal ideation, together with the need, in many cases, for extensive surgical procedures. Confusingly, the review states that children taking puberty blockers showed “no changes in gender dysphoria or body satisfaction”, which suggests that the author didn’t actually understand what puberty blockers do at all. They don’t make children feel better – they just delay a process that makes them feel worse. This is one of several oddities in a report that lacks internal consistency. It states that there is no established definition of social transition, for instance, and does not offer one, but goes on to talk about it as if there were. It also talks about autistic ‘girls’ identifying as trans in increasing numbers, treating this as mysterious and as cause for concern, despite acknowledging elsewhere that more and more girls are being diagnosed as autistic, so one would expect more diagnoses to be present within any subsection of the young female-assigned population.  Perhaps the most worrying of the review’s conclusions – which should concern people far beyond the trans community – is the suggestion that as far as NHS treatment is concerned, trans people should be treated as children until they are 25. The rational for this is that 25 is the age when (on average) the brain stops developing. As any neurologist will tell you, the brain is in fact never static, and within ten years or so of that age, it begins to shrink. Deciding who has the capacity to make decisions based on brain age could have unintended consequences for the likes of Cass (64).  That aside, what would setting the age of true adulthood at 25 mean for everybody else? If we couldn’t allow people to consent to medical treatment at 24, should we ask them to risk dying for us? If not, then at a stroke we could lose a quarter of our armed forces. Likewise, we would have to give serious thought to what to do about a third of parents who might not be considered competent to look after their newborn children.  And then there are issues like contraception. Right-wingers have long contended, on one pretext or another, that teenage girls shouldn’t have the right to take the pill without their parents’ consent. This is where the review’s suggestion starts to look less like a double standard and more like the thin end of a very nasty wedge.

[fascistsarefreefood]

So when I wanted birth control pills I went to my local pharmacy and asked for them, I'm very lucky I have this option to autonomy over my body however it's important to note that birth control pills can have a lot of side effects that aren't properly investigated because of how underfunded reproductive health research is. Side effects of the contraceptive pill include (according to the patient information leaflet):

Serious: blood clots (in leg or foot ie DVT, in a lung ie PE, heart attack, stroke, mini stroke, clots in eye liver stomach or intestine, allergic reaction, breast cancer, cervical cancer, severe liver problems

Less serious: feeling sick, stomach ache, putting on weight, headaches, depressive mood or mood swings, sore breasts, being sick, fluid retention, migraine, loss of interest in sex, breast enlargement, skin rash, poor tolerance of contact lenses, weight loss, increase interest in sex, vaginal or breast discharge, bleeding and spotting between periods, chloasma, occurrence or deterioration of movement disorder chorea, crones disease or ulcerative colitis

In the UK if you want birth control you can go directly to some pharmacies and get it or you go to one GP appointment and get it even if you are under 16

Alternatively you might want an iud. iud insertions are painful women are told to just take an ibuprofen (which some research shows is less effective in women but again that hasn't been fully investigated) during insertion women have reported crying and passing out due to pain levels but it is still not advised that GPS use local anaesthetic during insertion. And again since there is no age restriction for contraception in the UK people under 16 also have to go through this. But that's considered totally acceptable.

What isn't acceptable according to the labour party, are puberty blockers which were obtained by first having a referral to a GP followed by appointments with a multidisciplinary team including a clinical psychologist, child psychotherapist, child and adolescent psychiatrist, family therapist and social worker over three to six months where their then mainly offered psychological treatment finally if your very lucky and also haven't already finished puberty by the time you get to this stage (because NHS waitlist are crazy) you might be sent to a hormone specialist where you might have been given puberty blockers which yes are indeed reversible (the onse that cause irreversible change are oestrogen and testosterone) you can read more about this topic here but this is no longer a possibility because puberty blockers are now considered too dangerous and why is this? What side effects could be worse than the ones caused by contraception that is also available to understand sixteens well apparently puberty blockers are oh so dangerous because they affect bone density. So AFAB people both adults and minors have to suffer from lots of side effects from birth control and no one ever once thought to try create a better version of the pill or they suffer large amounts of pain during iud insertion where again hardly anyone will get anaesthetic however puberty blockers are these terrible things because they may cause bone density issues if that were the case for contraceptives we'd be told to take some calcium and stop whining. Both contraceptives and puberty blockers perform essential functions that save lives and both deserve to be made as safe as possible but this is not about safety this is about hoping trans people will just disappear.

[hatkuu]

okay kylar waiting til your ovulating to steal your panties because they smell better to him. nasty little freak -propertyofkylar

NOOOO AAAUGAGSHS THE KYLAR SMELL AGENDA IS HAUNTING ME BAHAHSHSAJ @propertyofkylar

he would. he most definitely would.

tw utc: AFAB READER, OVULATION, STALKER BEHAVIOUR, SCENT KINK, SMUT UTC!!!

- if you complain about him being gross he'll pout and whine and stomp his feet because why are you denying him the very thing he loves the most in the whole wide world???!?!?

- he still steals them though. even if you tell him not to because it's creepy and weird!!(kylar gonna kylar)

- he laps at the seat of your panties like it's the finest of delicacies, huffing and stroking his cock frantically trying to commit the taste of you to memory.

- and after he's done fisting his cock for the first time, his whimpers muffled by the fabric in his mouth. he goes for round 2. straight after. no breaks. wraps your panties around his cock and goes to town until he has friction burns. doesn't regret a thing even after he's awkwardly shifting in his seat during english class.

- but even if he swears up and down that the perfect flavour of you still lingers on his tongue as he goes about his day - he always comes back for more of your panties. always.

- purposefully doesn't replace the clothing he steals because he so so desperately wants you to confront him about it (he is gross like that and yes he wants you to call him disgusting and demand him to apologise (he will)(preferably by kissing and licking at your cunt until you're satisfied))

anyways back to the ovulation agenda;

- most definitely can smell the difference. demands you show him your pussy so he can smell you better. if you don't show him he's just gonna snatch all of your underwear and force you to come to school bare. (sure he gets mad at the thought of other people seeing but he's DESPERATE.)

- really really likes to give you head when you're ovulating, obviously he knows that it's peak breeding time and all but he just. really really loves how you smell. he drools all over your folds while he smells you. it's weird. you physically have to tug him away or push his mouth up against your clit to snap him out of his hormone induced haze.

- panties are nothing compared to the real thing, and he happily informs you that!! But he still takes them anyways because... what if you're busy and you don't want him to fuck you :( what if you decide to go on birth control :(

- actually don't tell him that you're on any contraceptives bc. it won't end well. either he's going to be drugging you with a drug that cancels out the effects or snatching you up and lovingly tying you up in his basement so you're persuaded to stop taking them!! It's so mean that you'd deny him the pleasure of fucking you at peak fertility :(

- i know this is horny posting buuut i think he'd be weirdly sweet and affectionate when you're ovulating - burying his face in your hair and just breathing you in, he's very grabby (he HAS to be touching you 24/7 otherwise he gets upset.), walks you home after school, and gives you lots of kisses all throughout the day. he's very sweet. but still creepy. don't forget that.

[maaarine]

when delusional men claim that men's lives are harder than women's

it immediately gets invalidated by the amount of shit women have to deal with just by virtue of their biology

like I knew that the contraceptive pill increased the risk of breast cancer (and stroke, and heart disease, and depression, and and and)

but I was wondering if other hormonal contraceptives had the same effect, or if they worked differently

and guess what?

who knows!!!

next time a man whinges about condoms and the ~"mutilation"~ of vasectomy, it's straight to jail

[thescrumblingmidwife]

I'm 19 but I already decided some years ago that I never want to get pregnant, and I'm on birth control but I know that's not a garunteed protection. Am I too young to have my uterus removed? I don't really have any need for it

Hi Anon,

Good for you for being proactive with your reproductive goals!

The good news is that there are a number of birth control options (hormonal and nonhormonal) that offer protection as good or better than tubal ligation (getting tubes tied), and some last as long as 10 years at a time.

The bad news is that you are unlikely to find a provider willing to perform an elective hysterectomy on anyone under the age of 35 without medical reasoning. There are several justifications for this; some are reasonable, and some are stupid (NOTE: in my opinion).

Let's talk about these two things separately. (2 posts!).

HYSTERECTOMY

Removal of the uterus, while a very common surgical procedure, is still a surgical procedure that has significant costs, risks and potential life-long side effects (and I'm NOT talking about fertility). Risks include everything from acute problems (hemorrhage, perforation, etc.), to longer-term health problems (increased risk of stroke, loss of bone density, urinary problems, heart attack, etc.) and sexual functioning issues (vaginal atrophy and dryness). It's not just like snapping out a Lego piece.

So when it comes to the prevention of childbearing, with no other medical reason given, many doctors will be unwilling to take these risks when there are safer alternatives. Medical reasons can include persistent heavy menstrual bleeding, fibroids or other uterine growths, gender-affirming surgery, endometriosis, etc. Even for these conditions, a hysterectomy is usually the treatment of last resort, and those seeking one may still struggle to get one.

Now . . . here's where the (in my opinion) stupid part comes in. We live in a country where an 18-year-old can choose to get elective cosmetic surgery like breast implants. I think there is a marked inconsistency in logic when we say that that young adult can make an informed decision about that surgery, but not in this situation. I do think it's a holdover from patriarchal handwringing about the ability of people with uteruses to make decisions about those uteruses. And yes, some doctors are overly concerned with preserving people's fertility even when the patient is adamant they don't care about preserving it. I don't know what the "right" age is to let young adults make these decisions for themselves, but I do think it should be consistent at least!

---

So Anon - The TLDR is: I think you should be able to make this informed decision with the consultation of a gynecologist who gives you all the information you need, and who will take the time to verify that you do understand what you are consenting to, short- and long-term. But, you are also going to have a hard time finding that at this point in your life.

I hope you can get what you need (security from pregnancy) by using one of the long-acting reversible contraceptives I will mention in my other post.

[butchbarbieagainstterfs]

i call bullshit on all the people crying about how hrt (but especially t) is "experimental drugs being pushed onto poor gnc people" or whatever. contraception pills that every 3rd woman takes are literally hormone pills that regulate your period and ovulation and have, like any medicine, side effects or even risks like stroke, etc. but wildly no one ever wants to ban contraception (except for the off chance wild christian that thinks that sex is only for babies and nothing else bc god or whatever). on the contrary, when my gyno saw that my androgen levels were higher than "normal" she didn't even ask for my opinion before she pressed a prescriptiom for hormonal birth control into my hand and said that i should take them. cis (or closeted) people will get a drug handed to them within a blink of an eye if our hormones are even a little bit out of balance for a "normal male/female" ((whatever THAT means)) but trans people have to have references from 3 different doctors, do a series of mental and physical tests and then wait 5 years to even CONSIDER getting a prescription for hrt. it's so wild, it's honestly disgusting if you think about it.

To be fair, I have seen terfs express views against stuff like contraception too because of the side effects but…the energy just isn’t quite the same? They’re not trying to ban it, they’re not dedicating post after post to it.

And yeah when I was 16, because of my Turner’s syndrome I was given a HRT prescription basically right away too. They barely even asked. Which is fine, because I did want to take it and I am still on it now, but it deffo shows the difference in how open trans folk are treated.

[honeyblisss]

heat suppressant: trialan (hertriol)

(Hertriol- a luteal blocker used to manage heats in those with the active S3HU1 mutation of the gene RF1R. luteal blockers are partial agonists that block the receptor sites for the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR). as a partial agonist, luteal blockers bind to and occupy the LHCG receptor where luteinizing hormone would normally occupy, preventing the transduction of the LH signal to the ovaries to interrupt the start of heat. it will not interact with chorionic gonadotropin).

Trialan is a non-inovulatory luteal blocker for any adults classified under the secondary sex dynamic 𝛀.

Common side effects of Trialan include but are not limited to: nausea, headaches, breast tissue tenderness, gastrointestinal problems, mood swings, irritability, and low blood pressure. Other side effects include hematransudatia (presence of blood in slick), osteoporosis, blood clots, stroke, or cardiac arrest. If you notice an abnormally increased heart rate accompanied by chills, amnesia, or dysphagia, stop taking Trialan and call your doctor right away.

Do not take Trialan if you are allergic to Trialan or any of its ingredients. Trialan is a heat suppressant that will not prevent ovulation and is not a contraceptive. Do not take Trialan if you are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant. Ask a doctor before use if you are breastfeeding. Trialan does not prevent sexually transmitted diseases.

[fairycosmos]

Hi, i started taking the birth control pill five years ago because of severe acne. It has helped a lot but the quality of my life has definitely decreased because of it (depression, migraines, etc.) and I wanted to ask what you think about different kinds of contraceptives? Can you recommend one specific method? Doesn’t matter who I ask, everyone says there isn’t a perfect answer to this question and I don’t know what to do… Being a woman sucks ass tbh. I’d prefer not to have any artificial hormones involved but IUDs seem like a good choice? Don’t really trust those copper things idk. And condoms are pretty annoying when you’re in a long term relationship where you get tested and stuff. (Condoms should always be used when having casual sex with someone!!) Idk it’s so frustrating, why hasn’t modern medicine come up with something that doesn’t put women at a higher risk of strokes, embolisms or interrupting our natural hormones etc.

it's very annoying and unfair and i think ur frustration is totally justified!!! i think ppl really underestimate how much birth control can do a number on ur mental and physical health though obviously protecting yourself is important.......but the extent of the dangers of it is so rarely acknowledged.......unfortunately i have very little first hand experience with this so i can't give any true recommendations and i agree that there is no perfect answer (doctors do not care about us lmfao) - just wanted to offer some understanding and possibly the chance for others to chime in with some insight. regarding IUD's, my friend got one a few yrs back and she hasn't regretted it. i think it might really be worth looking into for you if the pill + condoms aren't working out. im sorry you're going through this and i hope you find a solution ASAP ❤️ it's insane to expect ppl to choose between like having sex and their physical health / sanity. sending a hug your way. X

[subiysu-chan]

Worldbuilding gender roles for fantasy

Biological differences between the sexes:

-In the human male, sexual pleasure and reproduction are closely linked.

-Maternity changes hormonal makeup drastically

-In a society before the invention of either reliable contraception and STD prevention, virginity would probably be ackowledged and even valued, mostly because abstaining from sex would reduce the amount of deseases carried.

-Victimisation would look different for both men and women since, because of Baitmen's principal, women have very little insentive to sexually control men, and men can't get pregnant in the first place. Plus, the above mention issues.

-In the current order of things, even in the most patriarcal societies, the vast majority of torturers and torture victims are male, simply because men are socially more likely to participate in activities that would increase the risk of torture.

-In persecution societies, the tendency might be inverted.

-Other than that, have fun ! Especially with your non-human fantasy races. Just...Please.

Also

Swamp/wetland goblins are stupid, from a physiological level, because of their humanoid body plan.

Wetlands are difficult to walk in, so in the case, goblins being smaller would be a bonus, since it would reduce their weight and lower the center of gravity. Being shorter means having shorter limbs, such as arms, and thus, even if they would push less water with each stroke, they could use more of the shoulder and back muscles, which have a lot more stamina than the forearms.

But, swamps are so that the liquidy mud can be quite deep, sometimes a few meters deep, sometimes in random spots, and once you're stuck in there, the chances of survival are close to none. Being shorter would heighten their chances of drowning if they get stuck.

Also, the kind of physical labour that living, harvesting, travelling and farming in wetlands with random death traps would require some sort of embarcation, not necessarely because the water is deep, but because the harvesting spot would be too dangerous to consider walking. Some parts of Eurasia dating to the neolithic even have female skeletons with an atrophied lower body because of how much time they spent sitting to grind grains. Many wetland edible plants, such as wild rice, would require a sitting position, exellent coordination.

Plus, all these exercises are easier to do if one has narrow hips, and most girls I've seen doing competitive boating have hips that are quite narrow.

So, basically, these little creaturse have a body plan that would make the physilogical traits that ease reproduction make environmental adaptations more difficult.

If they don't reproduce sexually and are hermaphordites that use the females of other species as incubators, and are roughly one meter tall humanoids less technologically advanced than the surrounding humans (in a usually medieval-inspired setting) and are around a meter tall. Okay, so they can go with hosts smaller than themselves, but then there is no garentee the host would survive long enough for the fetus to be viable our would have to try and do that to species that will probably kill them if they attempt to do so. Also, given how numerous they are usually portrayed, they won't even have surprise on their side. Not to mention the hit it would be to their genetic diversity.

Also, making them quadrupedal would solve the above issues, but it would limit tool use, for creatures that are portrayed as tool users.

So please, move the goblins out of the swamps unless your fantasy world have weaker gravity than Earth, so that you don't have creatures living in an environment to which adaptations would greately limit their reproductive capabilities thanks to their body plans.

That's not even going after all the various parasites that specialise in this environment.

However, that doesn't mean you can't have the fairies and lutins, since their small bodies and ability to fly would make the risk of sinking in those swamp death traps a lot more limited. For animals, either shallow swim such as ducks, have long narrow legs that are easy to pull out, are amphibians or are quadrupedal such as moose and certain bovines.

So, out of the swamps, about fantasy gender roles...

Just, super-human badass chicks are...Quite annoying. Like, a few of them are well-written, or passably written but, please don't make your characters killing machines with boobs.

[stevenwilliam12]

Hypercoagulability: Market Insights, Competitive Landscape, and Forecast to 2032

Market Insights

The global hypercoagulability market is projected to grow significantly by 2032, fueled by rising awareness of coagulation disorders and increasing cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, and pulmonary embolism (PE). Hypercoagulability refers to a heightened tendency for blood clot formation, which can result from genetic mutations, chronic diseases, cancer, immobility, or medication use, such as oral contraceptives and hormone therapy.

Key market drivers include the rising prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and diabetes, along with the expanding elderly population. Additionally, the development of more effective diagnostics and safer anticoagulant drugs has increased the demand for preventive care. Increased adoption of personalized medicine and telehealth is also supporting patient monitoring and treatment compliance, further expanding the market potential.

Competitive Landscape

The hypercoagulability market features significant competition, with several global and regional pharmaceutical companies focusing on anticoagulant drug development, diagnostics, and treatment solutions. Key players include:

Pfizer Inc.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Sanofi S.A.

Bayer AG

Daiichi Sankyo Company

These companies offer both traditional therapies like warfarin and newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Innovations focus on reducing bleeding risks, a common side effect of anticoagulation therapies while maintaining efficacy. Diagnostic providers are also advancing screening tools like D-dimer tests and thromboelastography to enable early detection and more precise risk assessments.

Collaborations between pharmaceutical firms and healthcare providers are increasing to promote clinical trials and real-world studies that demonstrate the safety and efficiency of newer drugs. Moreover, regulatory bodies are streamlining approvals for therapies that reduce thrombotic events without compromising patient safety.

Forecast to 2032

By 2032, the hypercoagulability market is expected to expand at a steady compound annual growth rate (CAGR). North America and Europe will continue to lead due to established healthcare systems and early adoption of innovative solutions. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is projected to experience the fastest growth, driven by expanding healthcare access, rising awareness campaigns, and the increasing burden of chronic diseases.

Advances in diagnostics and personalized anticoagulants will remain central to market growth, with digital health technologies further enhancing treatment adherence. Governments and public health bodies are also expected to intensify screening programs, reducing complications associated with clotting disorders.

In conclusion, the hypercoagulability market offers strong growth potential over the next decade, shaped by technological innovation, evolving patient needs, and collaborative efforts among key industry stakeholders.

Latest Reports Offered By DelveInsight:

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Market | Angelman Syndrome Market | Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis Market | Cardiovascular Calcification Market | Charcot Marie Tooth Disease Market | Chronic Focal Epilepsy Market | Crispr Therapies- Pipeline Insights Market | Cytokine Release Syndrome Market | Frontotemporal Dementia Market | Glabellar Frown Lines Market | Graves Ophthalmopathy Market | Icos-next Generation Immunotherapy Market | Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Market | Lipodystrophy Market | Nasolabial Fold Market | Natural Killer T Cell Lymphoma Market | Nrg1 Fusion Cancer Market | Osteochondrodysplasias Market | Pachyonychia Congenita Market | Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar Insight | Salivary Gland Infection Market | Scedosporium Infection Market | Shoulder Replacement Devices Market | Single Ventricle Heart Disease Market | Spinal Decompression/traction Devices Market | Stuttering Market | Tenosynovitis Market

[star-ayurveda]

Ayurvedic Treatment for Hair fall

https://starayurveda.com/ayurvedic-treatment-for-hair-fall.php

Today the market is flooded with different types of medicines, shampoos, hair oils, lotions and what not as solutions for hair loss. But most of these do not work and actually make the young men and women poorer by few dollors exploiting their psychology.

In allopathy minoxidil, hormone therapy and steroids are used with limited success though the side effects are abundant like skin irritation, palpitations, scarring of the scalp, weight gain, metabolic abnormalities, acne and menstrual problems.

What is Alopecia (Hair Loss)?

All of us have hair on top and back of our heads. When this hair starts disappearing it is called alopecia, hair loss or baldness.

Usually the hair grows at the rate of 6 inches per year. Hair which we see are composed of dead keratin cells which are pushed outwards by the new cells produced by the hair follicles.

An adult head has around 100,000 hairs. We naturally loose around 100 hairs per day which are naturally replaced all the time. So, if we find some hairs on the pillow or hairbrush it does not mean that we suffer from alopecia or baldness.

Causes of Alopecia (Hair Loss)

Genetic predisposition: Genes from our parents influence our tendency to have male or female pattern baldness.

Severe illness.

Iron deficiency.

Following child birth.

Extreme stress.

General anesthesia.

High fever and typhoid.

Thyroid dysfunction.

Hormonal imbalance.

Medical treatments like chemotherapy used in cancer, anticoagulants, beta-adrenergic blockers used to control blood pressure, oral contraceptives and retinoids used in treatment of acne and skin diseases.

Burns.

X-rays.

scalp injuries.

Chemicals used in products to dye hair, bleach, perm hair, purify swimming pools.

Home Remedies and Alopecia (Hair Loss)

Shampoos and conditioners do not treat baldness but overusing them actually causes dryness of scalp and hair. All shampoos are just scented detergents with lathering agent; even the ones which are called natural, herbal or vitamin enhanced. One should not shampoo every day because they dry up the natural oil of the hair which is very important. Washing hair twice a week is more than enough. Also dilute the shampoo before using because they are too concentrated. Shampoos and conditioners just clean the hair and nothing more; they do not treat alopecia or baldness.

Proper brushing is very important as it distribute the hair's natural oil . It would do more for the long-term health of your hair and scalp than wasting money on haircare products. Start with 10 to 20 strokes a day and try to work up to 100. Be gentle and avoid brushing when your hair are wet.

Yoga helps in relaxation of stress which may be a factor in some cases of hair loss.

A balanced diet including fruits and vegetables should be a norm.

Try to avoid hot curlers, hair dryers, hair straightening, bleaches and cosmetics filled with chemicals eventually result in broken, dry and thinning of hair. People who leave their hair in natural texture and color are better off. Why put stress on your in pursuit of beauty.

[mirandamckenni1]

Influencers cannot stop regurgitating birth control misinformation...feat. Brett Cooper At least Candace Owens let me debunk something uniquely incorrect. Brett Cooper of the Daily Wire decided she would share some...t h o u g h t s....she had about birth control. Interestingly, none of these are *unique* thoughts, because these people simply cannot stop themselves from vomiting out the same exact misinformation as their equally unqualified comrades every time they open their mouths. Can the influencers just go back to pushing MLMs and crying about Disney movies being too woke? I'm bored. 00:00 Intro 00:22 How Influencers Demonize BC 3:30 Doctors "Pushing" BC As a Fix-All 5:22 "Big Pharma" 6:45 Danish BC Suicide Study 10:32 Misinfo: Blood Clots/Strokes 13:18 Misinfo: Cancer Risk 14:20 Misinfo: Autoimmune Conditions 14:41 Misinfo: Fertility Issues 14:52 Misinfo: Risk of Depression 15:34 Misinfo: Suicide Risk 17:30 Long Side Effect Lists 21:29 NFP and Cycle-Tracking 23:25 Typical vs. Perfect Use of Contraception 28:36 Abstinence is NOT BC 30:08 Male BC Studies 32:52 Closing Nonsense Become a channel Membryo to connect & access perks! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrPhcbDwqWRc-3tteE2BS6g/join MDJ Secret Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAkrMPc856DvoxX99IyGYmw I stream on Twitch weekly (usually Sundays): https://ift.tt/mLrHXIY - Playlist of full-length Twitch streams for channel membryos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVH2Gpf8wKeRO7TL3vfzJkfsF9eHmQGkP Watch next: Debunking viral birth control lies: https://youtu.be/Eb4-MOubIyM?si=BLBrBfL_Zy0FV-ml Candace Owen's GBS Nonsense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=HLoURg-Rbrs Hormone-balancing hoax: https://youtu.be/LJUxL5uytW4?si=xu3bWYk0e_w9PpIZ Male birth control: https://youtu.be/pd8sLF02W1w?si=HjpvYpg3OgnNz-ui Over-the-counter birth control: https://youtu.be/UFXs1QtUnZE?si=5Xb02vsopB5gK3jh Resources: Contraception & Suicide Risk, Danish Study: https://ift.tt/Hr8Ptp0 Contraception & Suicide Risk, US Study: https://ift.tt/kPUAGfM Side Effects & Discontinuation Reasons: https://ift.tt/JTuVmtc Class 1 Carcinogen: https://ift.tt/1Asz0jC Conception after cessation of OCPs: https://ift.tt/Fl2qwsn OCPs and Infertility: https://ift.tt/r3lknqF Long-Term Safety of Ovulatory Suppression with OCPs: https://ift.tt/CjgnrOQ Randomized Study of Continuous Ovulatory Suppression with OCPs: https://ift.tt/diXZpn4 Birth control worsening depressive symptoms: https://ift.tt/fh1AC9F Birth control improving depressive symptoms: https://ift.tt/0MjE8KS FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL: Instagram: https://ift.tt/r9CApuw Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/mamadoctorjones TikTok: https://ift.tt/Jah7XS6 ** The information in this video is intended to serve as educational information and is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained in this video is for general information purposes only and does not replace a consultation with your own doctor/advanced practice provider. ** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg4Cg9GmoZg

[meghanester]

Estrogen Receptor Agonist Market Size Market to Grow with a CAGR of ~7% During 2023-2035 and Attain ~USD 9 Billion

Research Nester’s recent market research analysis on “Estrogen Receptor Agonist Market: Global Demand Analysis & Opportunity Outlook 2035” delivers a detailed competitors analysis and a detailed overview of the global estrogen receptor agonist market in terms of market segmentation by product type, indication type, route of administration, distribution channel, and by region.

Rising Prevalence of Osteoporosis to Boost the Global Estrogen Receptor Agonist

The global market for estrogen receptor agonist is projected to grow on account of the rising prevalence of osteoporosis. In 2021, osteoporosis was predicted to affect 18.3% of persons globally. Hence, the demand for estrogen receptor agonist is on boost. Moreover, the drug raloxifene is the most common drug used for the treatment of osteoporosis approved by the FDA. Moreover, osteoporosis in postmenopausal women could be prevented and treated with raloxifene. It belongs to a class of medications known as estrogen agonists/antagonists that have been created to deliver the advantageous effects of estrogens without all of the potential negative effects. Neither estrogen nor a hormone, it is neither. A selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) is another name for raloxifene.

Moreover, PCOS could also be treated with estrogen receptor agonist. PCOS has a severe negative effect on women, leading to irregular periods and acne. Consequently, it needs to be treated. Oral contraceptives (OCs; with combined estrogen and progestin) are thus the most frequently utilized type of drug to manage menstrual cycles in PCOS patients.

Get a Sample PDF Brochure: https://www.researchnester.com/sample-request-4982

Some of the major growth factors and challenges that are associated with the growth of the global estrogen receptor agonist market are:

Growth Drivers:

Rise in the Application of Estrogen in Asthma

Surge in Geriatric Population

Challenges:

Some of the partial agonists have estrogen agonist effects on the endometrium, causing aberrant cell proliferation. This may show up as a rise in endometrial thickness, endometrial polyps, leiomyomas, or even endometrial cancer. Moreover, large studies have shown a rise in the risk of thromboembolic events, including pulmonary embolism. Additionally, in many other studies, it was observed that it could also cause stroke. Hence, this is estimated to hinder the growth of the market. Furthermore, research is still being carried out on the potential benefits of using estrogen receptor agonists as a new kind of treatment for a variety of disorders. Consequently, there are not a large number of people who are aware of this treatment. Additionally, there are not adequate professionals, particularly in rural areas, owing to its lack of popularity. Thus, it is expected that this factor would impede market expansion.

Request for customization @ https://www.researchnester.com/customized-reports-4982

By indication type, the market for estrogen receptor agonist is segmented into cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. Amongst which, the cardiovascular diseases segment is poised to garner the highest revenue by the end of 2035, owing to the growing cardiovascular cases worldwide. There is a lot of evidence to support the notion that estrogen affects cardiovascular physiology and function in both health and sickness, and that it may even act as a cardioprotective agent.

By region, the Europe market for estrogen receptor agonist is projected to grow by the end of 2035. Rising government activities to raise public knowledge about estrogen receptor agonists and joint drug development are expected to have an impact on this market growth in this region. Also, the geriatric population in this region which would also contribute to the rise of the market. The older population is more vulnerable to a number of illnesses, including asthma, cardiovascular disease, and others. Consequently, it is poised that the market would expand in order to treat or stop the spread of disease.

Obtain this Report @ https://www.researchnester.com/reports/estrogen-receptor-agonist-market/4982

This report also provides the existing competitive scenario of some of the key players of the global estrogen receptor agonist market which includes company profiling of AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, ESTRIGENIX, Karo Healthcare AB, Merck KGaA, Vivesto AB, Oncternal Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc., Tocris Bioscience, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd, and others.

About Us

Research Nester is a leading service provider for strategic market research and consulting. We aim to provide unbiased, unparalleled market insights and industry analysis to help industries, conglomerates and executives to take wise decisions for their future marketing strategy, expansion and investment etc. We believe every business can expand to its new horizon, provided a right guidance at a right time is available through strategic minds. Our out of box thinking helps our clients to take wise decision in order to avoid future uncertainties.

Contact for more Info:

AJ Daniel

Email: info@researchnester.com

U.S. Phone: +1 646 586 9123

U.K. Phone: +44 203 608 5919

[tedkaczynskiofficial]

Obviously I don't know the details of your medical history, so it's still possible that the doctor made a decision they had evidence was the wrong one, but hormonal birth control for migraines is evidence-based, not just doctors throwing hormones at you and hoping it sticks. For a lot of people, hormonal birth control effectively treats their migraines.

For some people it doesn't work and can make it worse, and for some people with certain types of migraines there is concern about stroke/DVT (although this is less of a concern now that the doses in birth control are much lower), but that is the case for basically every treatment we have for every condition--it doesn't work for some people, and there are risks.

You can read this review here if you're interested, but they have a summary of hormonal treatments:

There's also an RCT going on right now that should finish sometime this year that will give additional insight into using oral contraceptives to treat migraine.

she believed in you, buddy 🫃

[polsocmartikhoras]

https://youtu.be/nvCOCXU_EuA

Birth control pill side effects

Possibly teen prescribed contraceptives have negative brain effects

Blunted cortisol, estrogen and high you pregnant hormones that withdrawal from makes,bleed and use can up risk of clots, acne, stroke, depression, even suicide

Possibly even moodiness which hooks you on a ...maze or attempting to regulate self to..."normal" for life