#dna statesecrets ancestralknowledge conspiracy hiddenknowledge
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
The DNA goldmine no one is talking about.
Although scientists have been telling us for decades that most (90%+) of our DNA is ‘junk’, the sections of DNA which do not code proteins actually have a number of important (but to date unpublished) functions. One theory why these have not been made public by 2020 is that the discovering government agency is still working on how to remotely decode the contents of DNA (to unencrypt its archive so to speak - see 2 below). They are concerned that if people know what is there to be read, others may rush to decode before them. After alll having read the below, imagine what you could work out about someone by having just a strand of their hair or by shaking their hand.
1. Purposeful Mutation - Science tells us that DNA randomly mutates and only when a mutation is, by coincidence, helpful does it create a competitive advantage. This, we are told, randomness leads to the development of distinct species. Many people find this unbelievable and when they see millions of species designed perectly for their environment, they attribute the variation to a god-like designer. In fact, neither the random mutation or designer theory is true. A large amount of DNA is dedicated to reading and processing inputs from the host’s physical and mental experience and coding (with the brain) planned genetic alterations which are expected to prrovide a competitive advantage. These alterations take place in the father’s sperm or the grandmother’s egg cells, to pass to the next generation (or third generation in the case of egg cells).
This is how, even within a few generations, a species can develop a camoflague for its natural environment which would, by random chance, have a one in a trillion chance of occurring. It’s the genetic equivalent of a chess computer, working through inputs (sight, hearing, emotions, food intake etc.) and selecting optimal code change responses. Of course the traditional binary theories can still apply to supplment purposeful mutation. For example, a change which seems beneficial will also be aided (in its spread) by natural selection. Also, if you believe god created the earth and everything in it, it is an easy step to say he created them in a corporeal (real, tangible) form; which necessitates DNA, just like a tree requires water, and that requirement does not make it any less real.
2. Ancestral Archivation - Another important function of DNA is to act like a database of critical memories from prevous generations. It’s like the original encrypted USB key, working with the brain as the hardware. Basically, when you experience things in life, your brain processes them all and forgets most. But if something is important for good or bad reasons, your brain will convert it from short term to long-term memory. There is a secondary phase to this, where if a long-term memory stimulates the right parts of the brain emotionally, the recollection will be converted and store in DNA to be passed to future generations. This is why a sall portion of DNA is actually still ‘junk’ or unallocated to use a more appropriate word. It’s like the space which is available for writing future memories.
Take for example a child who has never seen or been exposed to the idea of a snake, who is suddely presented with one. Generally, they instinctively fear it and know to move away. The same is true for most dangerous situations, because an ancestor has been bitten and so painful or distressing was the experience that the key points of the incident are burned into the DNA for future generations. And of course because everyone’s life is different, variations wil occur in the genetic archives of different people. One person may have had an ancestor who was bitten by a poisonous spider, and their ancestors may have a phobia of spiders; whereas another absent that ancestral archive may not have the same aversion.
The same is true of animals. Take a migrating bird or animal, which can move hundreds or thousands of miles to reach an ancient nesting site or watering hole. Some can even find a second one in a time where their main one is inaccessible or unproductive. Or take even the humble chicken. Many plants are poisonous to chickens, but they simply avoid them; even where a chicken is raised in isolation it will generally not eat any of the hundreds of plants which are poisonous to it. It’s like they are born with a copy of numerous botanical encyclopedias and pictoral guides.
The code can also, like long-term memory, be overwritten if not in use. As humans have evolved and have for thousands of years learnt to record information, specialised in roles within larger groups of other humans, moved away from their native habitats etc. knowing genetically which mushrooms are safe to eat or how to kill a wild boar, for example, has not been important code to pass on. Replacing such primal archives in the DNA vault of modern humans are how to work well in teams, strategies for resolving conflict, and how to recognise serious threats to life; which could go some way to explaining why some people appear to be borne with a dislike of people they may associate as coming from another tirbe, whereas others have no such aversion.
1 note
·
View note