𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐁𝐈𝐑𝐓𝐇 . grievous drabble one .
The Elder’s finger drew slowly down the warrior’s mask.
The Wise One’s pointed finger bore two, blood - red streaks — made of residue from a pestle, and a mortar filled with crushed herbs and minerals — down the warrior’s face, bisecting each of his wetted, yellow eyes. The streaks passed over the bandage - like wrappings wound about his head, then down upon the plate — carved of mumuu bone — protecting his face.
‘ Our appeals have been ignored, ’ the Wise One crooned. ‘ The Republic and their monks favour our enemy. ’ He rose from the bowed warrior, and closed up his scaled hand around his carved staff. ‘ Our last hopes rest heavily upon your shoulders, Khagan.
‘ May the spirits of our ancestors watch over you, and your Izvoshra. ’
Qymaen, knelt atop the summit of Shrupak, placed his hand upon the mossy stone ground, as if to draw the last of the Temple’s spirit into himself; to set a great zeal coursing though his hot, swelling veins.
‘ By your grace, Holy One, ’ he spoke, his coarse voice muffled by the carved tusks upon his mask.
The Khagan rose, taking his rifle by its grip, and moved with the elite Izvoshra in tow.
He ascended into their vessel — a clunky, labouring thing — and once the Eight joined him, sealed them on their course for Oben.
The vessel’s engines spat and crackled with disuse, coughing hot air over the sacred grounds.
The ship ascended, whirring off into the bloody Kalee horizon, over the Ausez Steppes, and across the expanding sea.
They had travelled a great distance, passing beyond the threshold of monitored Kalee airspace.
It was then that the vessel began to heave, staggering with a sourceless current.
The monitor grew blurred, fizzed in and out of definition, before a great surge of crackling electricity enveloped the vessel, sapping its life.
Qymaen became frantic — prying aggressively at anything, and everything that he could use to save the ship from its ruin.
Sheelal, in what he believed to be his final moments, closed his eyes, and dreamed of the abstract past: of his Izvoshra, and their unerring fidelity. Of the mumuu hunt, and of Ronderu, that had completed his soul. He longed to return there, if only for a moment, and would covet such a wish as he passed into the beyond.
The vessel began to burn.
Its smouldering components snapped from its hull, and it descended indefinitely towards the water.
His eyes fell into slits, and he breathed a final breath.
And then, abruptly, the fires — that had already taken to the blistering of his body — dissipated, and a great wind passed over him.
He had thought it to be the heralding of his Pilgrimage, but when his scolded eyes opened, he felt it to be the wind of the sea, as he fell, plummeting from the sky.
Wetted, burned flesh marred the air with its scent.
It was dark, and the Moon cast its reflection in the billowing sea.
He was hoisted from the water, blinded by spotlights, and laid limply upon a durasteel platform.
He tried to move — his arms, his legs — but the effort wrought nothing. His eyes twitched, spasming in effort, but the images were watercolours, and few and far between.
breathing, but unconscious —
The words were but a messy, bloated, electronic sound.
A silhouette split the Moon above him — hooded and unkind — a visage of Death.
Death held out its hand, and a great bolt of spitting, red electricity struck him.
Sheelal laid in rigor mortis, as Death reached down to strip him of his face. He could feel the cold — his mask unbearably absent, though he could do naught of it.
He was taken by what remained of his upper arms, held by cold, and metal things — things that glared a terrible red.
His organs convulsed and sputtered, and with the last of his consciousness, he looked on as he ascended a metal ramp, into the blinding and frightening unknown.
2 notes
·
View notes
Grim History
The Dred Scott Case and the Supreme Court’s Lowest Moment Eve
The United States of America has never been without divisive and contentious political issues that that threatened to tear the nation apart. By 1857, the abolition vs. slavery debate was exactly that. Northern Abolitionists were ramping up their attacks on slave-holders and the southerners were pressuring the government to permanently make slavery a legal institution. As America expanded into the territories further west, the debate became more heated since both northerners and southerners wanted to claim them as their own. The Missouri Compromise allowed that states below the 40th parallel were allowed to be slave states and those above that line were not, with the exception of Missouri where slavery was legal but some African-Americans were also allowed to be free. Missouri is where the Dred Scott vs. Sandford case started and escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. To this day, the judgment in that case is considered to be one of the biggest legal disasters in the history of the USA.
The man named Dred Scott was born a slave in 1795 in Virginia. His owner, plantation manager Peter Blow, moved to Alabama and brought Scott with him. Later he moved to St. Louis and decided to give up farming so he sold his slaves and the ownership of Dred Scott was transferred to a doctor named John Emerson. Dred Scott’s legal status as a slave became complicated when Emerson moved to Illinois while retaining ownership of him. Slavery was illegal in Illinois. They later went on to Wisconsin, then part of Minnesota, yet another state where slavery was illegal. While there, Dred Scott married a woman named Harriet Robinson, complicating his legal status ever further since slave marriages were not recognized by law in slave states. The married couple went on to have a daughter. Emerson, being an army doctor, was ordered back to St. Louis so he brought Dred Scott and Harriet Robinson with him. During the journey by steamboat down the Mississippi River, Ms. Robinson gave birth to their daughter, Eliza; she was born while they were still traveling in the northern territories so technically she was a free citizen. Emerson was then reassigned to a post in Louisiana so the Scott family again were taken along. Under Louisiana law, Harriet Robinson and Eliza were slaves simply because they were African-American and were thereby considered Emerson’s property. Dred Scott’s marriage was considered null and void since slave marriages were not recognized in southern courts.
Dr. Emerson was further transferred to another state, this time to Florida to serve in the Seminole War. He gave Dred Scott and his family over to his wife Irene in St. Louis where she hired them out for her own financial gain. Emerson died and Irene inherited the estate which included the Dred Scott family as part of the possessions. She continued to rent them out but Dred Scott was tired of slavery; after having tasted freedom in Illinois and Wisconsin, he decided he wanted to be free. He offered to buy his way out of ownership but Irene Emerson thought renting the family out for hire was too lucrative and she refused. Since slavery was only partially legal in Missouri, Dred Scott took the matter to court.
Missouri, in precedent cases, had a history of freeing slaves who had been transported into free states or territories. Therefore, when Dred Scott went to trial he was optimistic of an easy victory. Unfortunately, he lost the case due to an absurd minor technicality; the prosecuting attorneys had failed to establish that Irene Emerson had enslaved Dred Scott. The judge did, however, grant Dred Scott the right to a retrial.
It took three years for the next trial to begin due to a cholera outbreak, a fire in the courthouse, and delays on the part of the legal teams. During that time, Dred Scott and his family were temporarily transferred to ownership under the sheriff who continued to rent them out for work, thereby holding the wages he earned in escrow to be delivered to the winner of the case at the end of the trial. This time the jury ruled in favor of Dred Scott but Irene Emerson did not accept defeat. She complained that losing three slaves and the escrow attached to them was too much of a financial loss so she took the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri. Before the case went to trial, Irene Emerson transferred ownership of Dred Scott’s family to her brother, John Sandford since she had moved to Massachusetts, ironically, to marry an abolitionist senator. The Supreme Court of Missouri overturned the previous verdict on the grounds that, times having changed, setting slaves free would cause a major disruption and upheaval in society; in order to keep the state in a condition of peace, there were to be no more emancipations of slaves from then on.
Dred Scott was again granted a retrial. By this point he was without any financial backers so an abolitionist lawyer agreed to represent him in exchange for janitorial work in his office building. The jury ruled in favor of Sandford because the Supreme Court of Missouri ruled that Scott was to remain a slave and slaves had no legal right to sue their owners.
After the fourth trial, John Sandford moved to New York and continued to rent out Dred Scott and his family as an absentee owner. During this time, Scott continued to plead for a retrial but since Sandford was living out of state, the case had to be taken to the Supreme Court of the United States. In March of 1857, the Supreme Court ruled 7 – 2 in favor of John Sandford. In a 200 page explanation of the ruling, Supreme Court justice Roger Taney explained that the writers of the Constitution had never intended for African-American people to be considered citizens of the United States; they were brought to America to act as laborers with the same legal rights as domesticated farm animals and other forms of property for white people. He reasoned that since it was impossible for African-Americans to be citizens, it was impossible for them to take a case to court. Therefore, John Sandford was found innocent. The two dissenting Supreme Court justices countered this by saying that if Dred Scottt, as an African-American, could not legally take a slave owner to court, then there was no logical ground for accepting the verdict of the case anyhow. But the emotions of the other Supreme Court judges overruled their ability to think sensibly. Dred Scott had lost again but his life was not over.
In addition to the absurd verdict, the justices of the Supreme Court had made another terrible miscalculation. Since slavery was such a divisive issue, they mistakenly thought that their judgment in the Dred Scott case would put the controversy behind so the nation could move on to other matters. But the Abolitionists reacted to their verdict with rage. In response to their fury, the southern secessionist movement began to grow and plans to initiate the Confederacy began. Instead of uniting the nation, the Supreme Court divided the nation further. Hostility between the two sides exploded and soon the Civil War would begin. Meanwhile, the status of the Supreme Court sank so low that they were unable to regain respectability until much later in American history.
John Sandford soon died and ownership of Dred Scott, Harriet Robinson, and their daughter Eliza was transferred to Taylor Blow, the son of Scott’s first owner. Feeling sympathetic to Dred Scott’s plight, Blow filed manumission papers with the state court in Missouri and Dred Scott, along with his family, were emancipated in 1857. The Abolitionists were ecstatic and Dred Scott became a celebrity. He went to work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel. Sadly his freedom was short-lived and he died of tuberculosis less than two years after being set free and living the greatest eighteen months of his life.
Reference
Kelly, Alfred H. and Harbison, Winfred A. The American Constitution: Its Origins and Development. W.W. Norton and Company, 1946.
https://grimhistory.blogspot.com/
5 notes
·
View notes