Tumgik
#also to use that to justify signing JACK MILLER of all people
aprilias · 2 months
Text
Reading from certain reliable journalists that Pramac Yamaha might pick Jack Miller over Sergio Garcia because of the whole passport debacle again and I’m annoyed for so many reasons if it’s true. Like I’m sorry if this is an unpopular opinion but if you’re fast enough to be wanted on the MotoGP grid, it really should not matter where you are from or which passport you have and i don’t really care if that means a full grid of Spanish-Italian riders.
13 notes · View notes
btrechak · 5 years
Text
Joker movie: some thoughts
Despite some hesitation, I decided to go see the Joker movie directed by Todd Philips in the theater.  I have many thoughts about it and they might be haphazard but bear with me.  Since I write this for my personal blog and not a professional one, I see no reason to organize my thoughts (but at least I’m checking for spelling and grammar).
Major spoilers follow, including the ending.  You have been warned.
I write this as a movie buff and a long time comics fan.
The central question I keep hearing about this movie is “is this movie a celebration or condemnation of American white terrorism and the feelings that give rise to it?”.  I am of the opinion that movies are not obligated to send a clear moral lesson and of course the best movies have moral ambiguity requiring thought on the part of the viewers (The Godfather involved mob leaders being the heroes and committing many murders).
The Joker movie did not seem to clearly side one way or the other on the issue.  I did notice certain, subtle forms of racism and mysogyny but I’ll get to that.
The plot is simple: mentally-ill wannabe-comedian Arthur Fleck (played by Joaquin Phoenix) has one bad day that turns him into the titular anarchic, psychotic super-villain.  In the movie, he is presented as a anti-hero.  His motives are purely selfish and self-centered and until he becomes the center of attention, he ignores all the happenings in the greater world around him.  Of course, his tragic backstory gives him reason for this (raised by a psychotic mother played by Frances Conroy and beaten by her ex-boyfriends in his youth).
Arthur Fleck is also, during the course of the movie, made to believe that his father was Thomas Wayne, making Bruce Wayne his half-brother.  In my opinion this could have been an awesome complication added to the Batman myth, but it was later revealed that he was adopted and therefore not the blood relative of anybody.  Truthfully, it’s left vague and that’s probably for the best.  Joker best serves as a villain when his history is unknown. Jack Napier, Jeremiah Valeska and Arthur Fleck are all pseudonyms for this unknown person.
Alfred and Bruce himself appear in a disturbing scene when Arthur was waiting outside the front gates of Wayne Manor.  No thoughts about it other than it was a creepy scene.
I did notice that everyone who seems to help Arthur and take care of him is a person of color or disability (who tend to know what it’s like to live near American society’s bottom):  the British little person who was part of his clown job, his two African-American female therapists in the movie as well as the African-American clerk who finds his mother’s historical file at Arkham Asylum.  Also the “girlfriend” they gave him was an African-American woman in his building.  I use the word in quotes because she’s almost a non-character in the story.  I’m amazed she didn’t end up in a refrigerator.
All the cops (who become more and more Arthur’s enemies by the end of the movie) are white males.  A child gang beats him and steals a sign he was carrying near the beginning of the movie.  I believe they were Hispanic but I don’t recall clearly.
It seems that Todd Philips and his crew was trying to say something about the race/class correlation and how the destitute are overwhelmingly people of color while the wealthy and powerful were majority white.  I did wonder why women (other than his mother.  Actually, maybe his mother as well) were reduced to caretakers or “girlfriends” in his story.  It’s subtle, but it’s something to think about.  Like Gene Roddenberry’s use of women as caretaker characters in the Next Generation, such as doctors and therapists.
One of the surprise endings of the movie is that the riots brought on by the Joker lead to the murder of Bruce Wayne’s parents.  Perhaps he’s trying to say that anarchic behavior leads to the pendulum swinging the other way.  To quote Frank Miller, “Joker, there’s nothing wrong with you that I can’t fix.  With my hands.”
The media plays a role in the movie too as represented by talk show host Murray Franklin as played by Robert Deniro.  The movie definitely highlights the media’s tendency for sensationalism and to spotlight mentally sick people.  That tendency even elects presidents.
Todd Philips intentionally used an old-school Warner Brothers introduction to the movie as well as going totally old-school cinema and having “The End” appear on screen at the end.  He did go for a 70′s cinema vibe in the movie.  I saw a lot of “Taxi Driver” and “The King Of Comedy” in this movie (both directed by Martin Scorsese.  Maybe that’s why he was speaking out against comic book movies).  Truthfully a lot of Batman shows have used that historical vibe, such as Gotham and Batman: The Animated Series.
DC has pretty much abandoned the concept of continuity in its movies (as has Marvel), but with some minor changes this could have been a good prequel to any of the Batman movies.  But there’s a multiverse now so there’s no need.
While the “one bad day” concept from the movie was inspired by the Alan Moore / Brian Bolland Joker story “The Killing Joke”, I note that only Bolland’s name are in the end credits.  That’s a pity.  I think this is one of the few comics-related movies that Alan Moore would enjoy.
I think whatever you feel about this movie depends on you.  If you feel that a failure to clearly condemn the white terrorism that results from angry white folks, then this probably isn’t the movie for you.  But again, it doesn’t justify it either.  It tells a story.  Only a Sith thinks in absolutes.
On a personal note, I’m of the belief that we should punch Nazis.  If we tolerate intolerance then some day tolerance would be gone.
There’s a line from a Batman comic from ages ago that stuck with me.  I think it was written by Denny O’Neil.  Some cop was trying to blame Batman for the actions of a criminal that was inspired by him and he responded.  “No.  If I didn’t exist, he’d find some other reason to do what he does.”
In conclusion, if anybody uses this movie as an excuse to commit violence, they’re an asshole and if the movie didn’t exist, they’d find another reason to commit violence and therefore be an asshole.
1 note · View note
flauntpage · 7 years
Text
DGB Grab Bag: Free Agency, Contract Announcements, and Draft Busts
Welcome to Sean McIndoe's weekly grab bag, where he writes on a variety of NHL topics. You can follow him on Twitter. Check out the Biscuits podcast with Sean and Dave Lozo as they discuss the events of the week.
Three stars of comedy
The third star: Justin Williams' hair. The winger's legendary salad was in fine form when it came time to sign with the Hurricanes, as former teammate Mike Commodore made sure to point out.
The second star: Jaromir Jagr. I'm still not quite sure what to make of Jagr's social media presence. People seem to like it, even if it sometimes has that whole "Grandpa doesn't totally get the internet, but we're just impressed he figured how to log on" vibe. But this was funny. I think. I'm honestly not sure.
The first star: The Benn brothers. With the Habs and the Stars reportedly going down to wire on bidding for Alexander Radulov, Jamie and Jordie decided to settle things the Canadian way.
Even better, the joke eventually turned into an official announcement of Radulov's signing.
Outrage of the week
The issue: Somebody signed an unrestricted free agent. The outrage: The contract seems kind of terrible. Is it justified: Probably, since almost every UFA deal ends up being a huge mistake. But since we've now made it through the first week of the open market, let's take this opportunity to do a quick summary of some of the major moves. (As always with this sort of thing, "good" and "bad" are from the perspective of the team and not the players, because in the end we all turn our backs on the noble working class.)
The Good
This is always the shorter list this time of year, but there were some decent signings to be found.
Kevin Shattenkirk. The Rangers get a bargain and kept the term short enough that there's minimal risk. Shattenkirk gets to play for his hometown team and could still have time for one more nice contract four years down the road. Hard to argue with any of it.
Justin Williams. He got good money, but nothing crazy. And while you can make your jokes about Mr. Game Seven choosing a team that hasn't been to the playoffs in eight years, you'd better get them in now—the Hurricanes are going to be good soon.
Pretty much everyone who signed for less than $1.5 million. Hell, lump in Brian Elliott and Ryan Miller, too. These guys are the bargains, and almost always represent low-risk signings. This year, it was interesting to see so many get done right out of the gate rather than waiting a few weeks for desperation to kick in.
The Bad
In the interest of time, we'll limit this section to five names. It could be a lot more.
Karl Azner. This is the annual "not as bad as everyone thought it was going to be, but still bad" contract. Or, as I like to call it, the Matt Beleskey Memorial Award.
T.J. Oshie. The cap hit isn't disastrous, but going to maximum eight years might be. The Capitals sure seem to have made a mess of their off-season, and already had to give away Marcus Johansson. Letting decent but aging wingers walk away for nothing is painful, but it's the sort of tough call a smart team has to be willing to make.
Patrick Marleau. Sure, the Leafs have a ton of cap space, so overpaying isn't the end of the world, but they have a two-year window before the cap gets crazy, and they just gave three years to a 37-year-old who plays the one position that's already a team strength. Even assuming they wiggle out of the deal after two years, it's still iffy. If they don't, it could be a disaster when they're a contender facing a cap crunch in 2019 and Marleau is a $6 million 40-year-old coming off a 12-goal season.
Nick Bonino. The good news is that this year's Dave Bolland cost less than the actual Dave Bolland. So… progress?
Dan Girardi. Steve Yzerman burns an entire season trading away useful players while missing the playoffs by one point, all in the name of creating cap room which he then uses on… Dan Girardi. I mean, I know I've spent the last year completely alone on the "maybe Yzerman is merely a good GM and not the all-knowing Jedi we all agreed he was" bandwagon, but I can make room if anyone wants on board.
The Contrarian Hot Take
The one team everyone else is ripping that I'll kind of, sort of defend.
Dmitry Kulikov and Steve Mason. Both are coming off bad seasons and might, in fact, be bad players. And both got over $4 million a season on multi-year deals. But here's the thing: They got them from Winnipeg. Nobody wants to go to Winnipeg. So if the Jets are going to sign free agents, it's going to cost too much money. Call it the Winnipeg Tax.
I'm always piling on the Jets because their GM never makes trades and their owner never fires anyone, and they just seem happy to repeatedly miss the playoffs by ten points while mumbling about the future. I can't exactly turn around now and burn them for at least trying to get a little better. Ideally, they'd be a franchise that uses all the tools in the toolbox, but until that day comes, paying too much for so-so free agents is marginally better than nothing.
Obscure former player of the week
Now that July has arrived, restricted free agents can sign offer sheets. They won't, because this is the NHL and all that talk about doing everything possible to win is for players laying their bodies on the line, not GMs who don't want to mess up their golf schedule by making a colleague angry. But in theory, it could happen.
There's a reasonably long history of NHL offer sheets, most of which were matched. Not many of those players would be considered obscure. After all, why target another team's player if they're not already an established star? You wouldn't… unless you were a vengeful Harry Sinden, which leads us to this week's obscure player: winger Dave Thomlinson.
Thomlinson has two claims to fame: not being Dave Tomlinson (that was another early 90s forward), and being the most obscure RFA offer sheet signing in NHL history.
He was a third-round pick by the Maple Leafs in 1985, a draft that most Toronto fans remember for other things. He never played for the Leafs, signed with the Blues in 1987, and finally made his NHL debut in St. Louis during the 1989-90 season. He played 19 games, scoring once, and followed that up with three games and zero points in 1990-91. He did manage three goals in that year's playoffs, but by the end of the season he was 24 years old and had never played close to a full season. All in all, not much to get excited about.
Then something weird happened. Ron Caron and the Blues went a little crazy targeting other teams' restricted free agents, signing Scott Stevens away from Washington in 1990 and Brendan Shanahan from New Jersey in 1991. In between, they went after Boston's Dave Christian. That didn't sit well with Sinden and the Bruins, who didn't even believe Christian qualified for free agency in the first place. Sinden retaliated by apparently signing any Blues RFAs he could find. That ended up being tough guy Glenn Featherstone, plus Thomlinson.
Under the old NHL system, the two teams were allowed to negotiate a compensation package, and they ended up just agreeing to swap Thomlinson, Featherstone, and draft picks for Christian. Thomlinson played 12 games for the Bruins before heading to the Rangers and later the Kings as a free agent. He ended up playing a total of 42 NHL games, scoring just that one regular-season goal.
Just think: The NHL is a league where nobody will offer sheet Leon Draisaitl, but somebody once went after Dave Thomlinson. Consider it further proof that everything was more fun in the 90s.
Be It Resolved
Connor McDavid signed his new contract this week, and it carried the highest full-season cap hit in NHL history. That's fine, because as we discussed last week, he's more than worth it. Besides, his deal came in at $12.5 million a season, which was slightly lower than the $13 million that had been rumored.
So sure, all of that was fine, but here's the problem: The Oilers just announced the deal with a boring old media event and press release. The Canadiens did the same for Carey Price, as did the Sharks with Marc-Edouard Vlasic.
Come on, guys. If you're going to be giving out eight- or nine-figure deals, then let's at least make the announcement interesting.
So be it resolved: From now on, NHL teams signing major extensions are only allowed to announce the length of the deal. Then, when it comes to the cap hit, they have to reveal it the way any important numerical value should always be revealed: by using the little mountain climber guy from Price Is Right.
youtube
Just imagine the Oilers having a press conference to announce that McDavid has signed for eight more years, then breaking out the Price Is Right mountain with "$0" at the bottom and "$15 million" at the very top. You're telling me you wouldn't be screaming at your TV once that yodeling started and you had to see how high the little dude with the pickax, lederhosen, and #97 Oilers jersey would get?
You could even have custom price ranges for different players. Jack Eichel's could go from $0 to $10 million. John Tavares could be $0 to $12 million. Dan Giradri's could go from $0 to "literally anything that isn't $0," and the little guy could go shooting off the edge like a skateboarder at the X Games.
Let's make this happen, NHL teams. There's still time before next summer's Austin Matthews contract.
Classic YouTube clip breakdown
In terms of cap hit, the biggest UFA signing so far has been Joe Thornton, who got an $8 million deal to return to the Sharks for one season. That's a big number, but it's fitting for a former first overall pick in the draft.
Of course, Thornton wasn't the only former top pick to hit the open market this week. Nail Yakupov was also available to the highest bidder, and that turned to be the Colorado Avalanche, who gave him, um, not quite $8 million. The Avs will be Yakupov's third team.
Yakupov's already widely considered one of the bigger draft busts in recent memory, so today let's travel back five years to the days leading up to the 2012 draft and see if we can piece together where it all went wrong.
It's June 20, 2012, and we're just 48 hours away from the first round of the draft. The NHL has decided to put together a few video packages on the top prospects to get you hyped up, including one for the presumptive No. 1 pick.
It goes without saying that the Oilers own the No. 1 overall pick thanks to a lottery win. This would be the third straight year they'd have it, which prompted the NHL to create a new rule to prevent lottery winners from winning the top pick again for a period of several years. The new rule was hailed as "completely fair" and "just common sense" and passed unanimously.
Sorry, none of that is true. I just wanted to try to retroactively make Connor McDavid happy for a few seconds.
Our clip starts with Yakupov doing that thing where he threateningly points his stick at you like he's Westley from the Princess Bride. Hockey video people love this pose so much. It's their favorite thing, slightly ahead of the "stick over the shoulders" pose, which we also get from Yakupov a few seconds later. Please note that neither of these poses ever actually happen in a hockey game. Do other sports do this? Do NFL draft picks have to pose like they're going to do a Karate Kid crane kick? I feel like this is just hockey.
"You want skill? Check. You want hands? Check. You want game-breaking offensive ability? Check." And after you're done checking, you will see that Nail Yakupov does not have any of those things.
Wait, is it possible the guy was actually saying "Czech"? Was he trying to tell the Oilers to pick Tomas Hertl instead? He knew! The narrator guy knew!
Next up we get the director of NHL Central Scouting, Dan Marr, who tells us that Yakupov is the sort of player who "just jumps at you." He then presumably adds, "You know, assuming 'you' are a defenseman on the other team trying to stop him from going to your net."
"I'm not like Bure, or someone like Ovechkin," says Yakupov. Wait, he knew, too! Why didn't the Oilers watch this clip before they made their pick? One two-minute video would have saved them millions of dollars. That's inexcusable. (Unless it had an unskippable 30-second ad at the front, because literally nobody has ever waited until the end of one of those.)
All kidding aside, Yakupov was really good in junior. When you're shattering Steven Stamkos records, you've got something. I make fun of him now, but five years ago I was 100 percent sure he was going to score 60 goals in the NHL. I'm still maybe 20 percent convinced it might happen, especially if can turn things around in Colorado and make it back to the NHL someday.
Next we meet Yakupov's friend and teammate, Alex Galchenyuk. He's introduced to us with a shot of him making the same face every Montreal fan makes now when they're told that the Habs might have to trade him because mumble mumble they have too much scoring?
"Like his Russian idol Pavel Bure, Nail is also a game-breaker." No, see, he just told us he wasn't like Bure. I thought you were cool, narrator guy.
We close with Yakupov telling us how much he loves to celebrate goals. That part, at least, turned out to be accurate. Remember when he got a little too excited against the Kings and all the old-school guys lost their minds? That was really Yakupov's first memorable NHL moment. Also, as it turns out, his only one.
"Sometimes it's crazy, and it's stupid." Man, he's not even an Oiler yet and he's already memorized the team's front-office slogan.
That ends our clip. If you'd like to live more of the Nail Yakupov experience, here's a clip of him being drafted first overall and being showered with can't-miss praise. And here's a far better one of him immediately afterward, as some poor rep from Upper Deck tries to get him to do some post-draft marketing that he has less than zero interest in. Seriously, I can't recommend that clip enough. I don't know what kind of day you're having at work, but I guarantee it's not "guy who has to get Nail Yakupov to look up and make eye contact long enough to open a pack of hockey cards" bad.
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them. When someone tells you they are not Pavel Bure or Alex Ovechkin, really really believe them." —Maya Angelou, failed NHL scout.
Have a question, suggestion, old YouTube clip, or anything else you'd like to see included in this column? Email Sean at [email protected].
DGB Grab Bag: Free Agency, Contract Announcements, and Draft Busts published first on http://ift.tt/2pLTmlv
0 notes