#also men in this context but unrelated.

[jouster-ari]

God I'm so fucking angry

[tiny-vermin]

my new favourite way of talking about people i dont like is calling them abnormal.... like why you gotta be so abnormal bro.....

[evilkitten3]

#Tsunade after learning that Orochimaru found Madara's DNA on her grandfather's office's desk which was where she played as a child: 💀

tsunade: i hid under that desk sometimes as a child....

orochimaru: apparently so did uchiha madara. as an adult

tsunade: is this why great uncle tobirama had a new desk made when he became hokage????

orochimaru: i could try to summon him and ask but i feel like we've both already figured out the answer to that one. he WAS a talented sensor after all

tsunade: please stop talking

au where orochimaru manages to use edo tensei to summon madara at some point pre-canon

tsunade: where'd you even get his dna?

orochimaru: oh the senju mansion

tsunade: ...why was uchiha madara's dna in my grandfather's house?

orochimaru: ...are you in the right headspace to receive information that could possibly hurt you

[thefudge]

Advice for writing smut???

gonna do bullet-points of things i tend to live by when it comes to smut (this is just my opinion):

don't switch styles: the way you write the smut has to be consistent with the way you write the rest of the story, so if your story is more comedic or romcom-y in nature, the way you write the smut should have those stylings. i personally find it very jarring when authors decide to break the format for the smut, almost like the story has to stop for the sex intermission; if you're writing a horror story, the smut must be informed and influenced by that genre, and if you are breaking genre for the smut portion, tell us why you're suddenly switching gears (it has to be an aesthetic choice you're making on purpose). likewise, if your style in that story is more lyrical, the smut has to be somewhat lyrical too, or if your story is more cormac mccarthy-esque-cut-and-dry, the smut can't suddenly involve an effluvia of purple, sappy prose. integrating the smut in the story and treating it like any other part of the story is key to me. too often i've seen ppl switch to this anonymous pornified style when they get to the smut

which brings me to specificity. i'll talk about het sex, since that's what i tend to write most: not all men are going to be fingering or eating pussy the same way, not all dicks are big and they shouldn't be, not all women immediately get excited by fingering, not everyone moans the same way or makes the same sounds. you're writing about particular characters so it has to be particular to them. i know this is very old advice, but i think it bears repeating

there isn't an exact formula or sequence you have to follow, there aren't precise steps, you don't have to go "well, first he has to kiss down her neck, then reach the boob area, then play with the nipples, then put the nipple in his mouth, then slowly go down on her, then prepare her for entering her etc. etc. etc." this can get boring and repetitive and you start thinking of your characters as these mechanical dolls who have to fuck for your audience. and that can be a vibe too, if you do it on purpose. but sometimes you can get stuck in a porn routine (and ofc, having only the guy show initiative can also get boring)

in order to break that, insert some character moments. what are the characters thinking during this? sometimes they might be thinking of something completely unrelated on the surface, but which has a thematic relevance that can make the scene hotter. likewise, maybe they're doing smth that seems unsexy on the surface, but which, within the context of the story might be really hot. sex doesn't just involve, well, sex, but so much weirdness and humanity and creativity. two bodies (usually) are trying to do this really awkward thing together and they might have a lot of baggage and history to inform it. there's a lot you can do with that.

don't make it glossy and clean, where everyone smells of strawberry shampoo and there is never anything out of sync. the most boring smut tends to be the kind where no one makes any mistakes and everything is super efficient. i imagine it feels like using an industrial pump to milk various farm animals.

and you know what? you can make that hot too. you CAN write a kind of robotic efficient smut and make it really interesting based on the context. let's say you're writing a 1984 AU fic where ppl are forced into intimacy only to procreate and their sex drive is diminished. you can play with that premise and lean into the dehumanizing industrialization of sex, but you have to mean it, aka your narratorial voice must be conscious of these factors.

if you're writing dubcon, make the dubious part present, make sure you draw out the ambivalence and ambiguity. if you're writing noncon, the character whose consent is being violated has to be transformed by this in some way. it can be forced pleasure, for instance, but not only. it has to be a journey for them too, some kind of spiritual pit, or a form of access to terrible knowledge. i know this is a personal thing, but noncon doesn't work for me if the character being noncon'd is just sort of *there*, suffering passively. i think that sort of dead passivity can be done very well too, but the narratorial voice has to persuade me.

that being said, don't be afraid of fear in consensual sex. terror and vulnerability are a part of consensual sex too, imo, and again, depending on the story and the characters, there's a lot you can explore there

i personally find it really hot when the narratorial voice starts discussing some of the ideas that the story wants to convey during the smut. so like, you can characterize person A and outline their worldview and their plans while they're ramming person B, and the thinking & fucking are thus entwined. idk, i dig that

speaking of which, smut can convey world-building details and social/philosophical ideas, not just emotions and character beats

not all smut has to end with mutual orgasm or even one-sided orgasm, it depends what you want to do or where you want to go. again, you don't have to follow a sequence. plus, it's fun (and hot) to write about frustration and failure too.

if you want to mix up the descriptions, resort to the story & characters. you'll find it's easier to describe someone fondling a boob in a new or at least interesting way if you're thinking about that particular character in that particular story, and not just Man X from planet porn (sorry to be snarky, but mainstream erotica is soooo guilty of this)

screaming & really intense reactions are cool but they have to match the characters and the situations

sometimes, it's hotter if an effect is mild or negated, if the usual outcome doesn't happen; mix up the order of events, toy with the usual reactions. it's not about being original, it's about finding out what works for your characters. writing about sex is, in a way, a performance of it, an attempt to go through the sexual motions, to find out what works and doesn't, to engage with the erotics of text (roland barthes entered the chat)

if you are bored by your own smut, that's a problem. i know we all talk about how hard we find writing smut, and IT IS hard, and sometimes it's not enjoyable, because writing itself is often not enjoyable, but even when it's painful and annoying, it gives you that little intellectual kick like "huh, i'm creating this and making these people do this, and ohh look, i can maybe put this unnamable thing into words". but if you become bored, that's a sign you have to look at the language & characters and figure out what's not working for you

last thing i'll underline: pay attention to your narratorial voice. in this ordeal, you are the seducer. not the characters. you have to seduce us with words and context. your voice matters the most. you can persuade us of anything. but you have to be confident in your weirdness and particularity. this is your bedroom (so to speak), so invite us in.

[twelve-forfend]

Well, I did say this was a multi-fandom blog... Alright, let's do this.

The Qing Jing Peak Lord's Bamboo House

(and the symbolism therein, as recorded in the donghua)

I was snooping through the establishing shots of the Qing Jing Peak Lord's Bamboo House, and had to laugh as I always do at all the gay symbolism that managed to sneak its way inside. But then I looked a little closer, and was floored by just how much passive storytelling was packed into background assets. I talked about it at length over discord, and at the urging of others decided to make a shareable post on social media as well.

First, the shots which first piqued my interest in this topic years ago:

Shen Yuan transmigrates into the stallion-genre webnovel entitled 狂傲仙魔途 (translated as Proud Immortal Demon Way). The author's and his own usernames are dick jokes.

Notice the chrysanthemum vase, the cock vase, and the stallion statuette.

The stallion and cock are obvious nods to these jokes on their own, but for the uninitiated, the chrysanthemum is a symbol of gay sex between men, as the asshole itself is often euphemistically referred to as a chrysanthemum. This should have been Shen Yuan's first clue that not all is as it seems here! These are the personal quarters of Shen Jiu — the original Shen Qingqiu!

But let's move to the main room you first walk into upon entering the bamboo house.

There it is: the writing on the wall.

As the Peak Lord of strategy and the scholarly arts, Shen Qingqiu would naturally have calligraphy and paintings hanging everywhere! So let's break it down.

On the top we have 道㳒自然 ("Dao Follows Nature"), which comes from a Dao teaching by Laozi (founder of Daoism) meaning that life, death, the entire universe, the heavens and earth and everything outside and inbetween, all follow a set of laws referred to as the nature of things. Although unrelated to the Buddhist couplet below, it's certainly relevant!

Originally hanging in right-to-left order, I've arranged them to read left to right here to make things easier to keep track of. The calligraphy reads 西方竹葉千年翠；南海蓮九品香 and is a couplet commonly found in Guanyin temples. My classical chinese is not as strong as I'd like, but this translates roughly to "The bamboo leaves in Paradise are green for a thousand years / The fragrance of lotus flowers in the South China Sea is as thick as 9 sticks of incense."

The character 西 for West is used to denote the destination of enlightenment/purity: the buddhist Paradise (think Journey to the West). The South China Sea is where Guanyin was born. Upon the Lotus flowers is where Guanyin is commonly depicted as sitting. The "9 sticks of incense" though literal can also refer to the 9 tiers/grades of reincarnation lotuses with the 9th tier being the lowest, meant for those who in life committed the most evil of crimes — the 4 parajikas — and who can only manage a sincere Amitabha recitation 10 times and no more than this.

To put this in context with Shen Jiu (the same jiu as in 9/九), the 4 parajikas committed by the 9th Tier Lotuses Reborn (officially entitled the Lowest of the Low) are:

Sexual Intercourse

Stealing

Murder

Claiming attainments of stages of pure mental concentration that have not been achieved (in other words, rushing or lying about your cultivation/enlightenment, or maybe even becoming a Peak Lord without having formed a golden core beforehand).

From what we know in the context of the novel, Shen Jiu is innocent of at least the first of this parajikas, but the overall view of Shen Jiu in the eyes of others in the story is that he is guilty of them all. This calligraphy can be seen as a condemnation or a reminder for the character Shen Jiu, who even as the Peak Lord Shen Qingqiu is widely thought of as a scum villain and the lowest of the low.

Phew! That's a lot to unpack.

But if you turn your gaze to the original screenshot, you'll see to the right that there's a vase painted with a blue bird. This vase appears in several rooms of the bamboo house, and seems to be the image of a qingniao (青鸟; lit: Qing bird, wherein 青 can mean blue/green/clear-but-brackish black).

These qing-coloured birds are messengers and foragers of the Goddess-Mother of Paradise (Xiwang-mu 西王母, the "west/paradise" character from before, lit West-King(unisex)-Mother). They're a highly intelligent species who are exceptional in song (a good representative for Qing Jing's scholarly arts and pursuit of qin!), and the older ones might learn to speak human tongue. As a subspecies of luanniao (鸾鸟 lit: luan bird), they're thought to be related to The Phoenix and indeed thought to be the lifetime/samsara just before being reborn as a Phoenix.

If given to a "master" they don't like, the qingniao may refuse to pass messages or sing until they're set free, but if they do get along with you then they're loyal to the end.

As a point of interest, the Qing generation of Peak Lords uses the character 清, which is 青 ("colour of nature; brackish black, blue, green; young) + the radical for "water," resulting in the meaning of clear (as in water or heart; see-through); distinct; quiet (as in still); just and honest; pure; to settle or clear up; to clean up, expunge, or purge.

And as a bit of trivia, Liu Qingge's sword Cheng Luan 乘鸾 means "to ride the luan, take flight on the back of a luan." (Relevant, because the qingniao is considered a subspecies of luanniao).

With the Lords of both Qing Jing and Bai Zhan referencing this bird, I really wonder about its significance! It's spawning plenty of theories and headcanons for me.

Heading back outside for a moment, you'll find that in the Quiet Pool (清静小池 qingjing xiaochi (yes, the same Qing Jing the peak is named for)), there are lotuses, and on land there are flower shrubs which are either wide-petaled chrysanthemums (gay bottom jokes ahoy), or a type of peony, the king of flowers demarcating wealth and prosperity. Either way, a blossom fitting of our Qing Jing Peak Lord Shen Qingqiu!

My one regret is that I cannot get a clear shot of the fan hanging on the wall to try and translate the calligraphy on it. If anyone can snag one, please tag me! I also couldn't translate the paintings with poems hanging in Shen Qingqiu's bedroom (it's just too small and blurry for my bad eyes to make out). If I make another post attempting these things, I'll append them to this initial post in an edit afterwards.

[yuurei20]

Received a request for more information about personal pronouns! (Thank you very much to @/irafuwas for help with this post! ♡)

Personal Pronouns in Twst (1/3): Ore

Foreword: Pronouns can vary by person depending on age, gender and context, but they also vary based on personal preference and how a person wishes to present themselves! In casual situations there is not really such a thing as using the “wrong” personal pronoun. Outside of those situations it is all about being polite!

Q: Someone’s preferred personal pronoun can be interpreted as “rude” by unrelated third parties?

A: Yes! For example:

Ore: Used by Trey, Cater, Floyd, Ace, Kalim, Deuce (sometimes), Jamil, General Lilia, Leona, Silver, Ruggie, Jack, Epel (sometimes).

The vibes of pronouns change drastically depending upon whether or not you are in a casual situation:

School/Work/New People/Anywhere That Isn’t a Casual Situation with Close Friends

“Ore” is not a personal pronoun that one should use outside of very casual situations, such as when you are around friends or family, or it can be perceived as sounding haughty.

It can be described as a more “masculine” pronoun, but you can also say that it is just more casual!

Women can (and do!) use this pronoun and it does not mean that they identify as male—language is not black and white! It can even vary by region: the graph above shows how it is common for men and women equally to use “ore” in places like Akita, Iwate, Nara, etc., for example.

So does someone using “ore” with you mean that they’re looking down on you? 

That depends on context! 

If you are meeting for the first time, you do not want to use ore or you might put across that vibe. It is also rude to say it to people like teachers at school, bosses/customers at work, etc.

Casual Situations

If you are close friends or family members with a person, then it will not be unusual to hear “ore”!

Deuce, for example, uses “Boku” when he is around upperclassmen, but will use “Ore” when he is alone with Ace.

I prefer to avoid Wikipedia, but I liked this graph very much:

It shows percentages of university-age men using “ore” with their friends, switching to “watashi” in class, and to “boku” when speaking with someone they do not know.

(This information is, however, from nearly 20 years ago, and language is always evolving. Just like speakers of English do not talk the same now as they did in 2009, the same is true in Japan!)

It is not uncommon for men to decide they do not like the sound of “ore” and go with “boku” or “watashi” instead, or maybe they don’t like “boku” either and “watashi” is too formal for friends, so they go with “jibun,” etc. Casual situations are flexible!

Personal Anecdote: At my previous job I would often visit a senpai who worked the front desk downstairs, and he would rotate through three different pronouns depending who he was talking to: Watashi for customers, Boku for coworkers, and Ore for when his friends came to visit. And this was how I learned that he and our newest hire had started dating in secret: one day he accidentally used “Ore” with her instead of his usual “Boku.” After they realized that I knew, they would use casual pronouns/speech patterns with each other in front of me, but whenever someone else came in the room they would switch to senpai/kouhai speech. Drama drama~

Written Language

In the case of Twst, we have additional personalization taking place: while Trey, Deuce, Epel, Jamil, General Lilia, Leona, Silver and Jack use “Ore” in kanji, Cater, Floyd, Ace, Kalim, and Ruggie use it in katakana.

This is a stylistic choice to reflect the different personalities!

Kanji can be used to make something seem more serious/mature/traditional (re: Trey/Jamil/Silver) or confident/assertive (re: Deuce/Epel/General Lilia/Leona/Jack).

Katakana is being used to add personal flair to reflect the characters who are more laid back and emphasize differences in attitude. Both Leona and Kalim say “Ore,” for example, and while it is technically the same word, the atmosphere/tone between the two could not be more different!

(To be continued!)

[witherhusbandsislife]

For context: I am Arabic and Muslim-raised, I'm not just pulling this out of my ass, this is my own culture so don't accuse me of cultural appropriation please-

~~~

In Islam, there's this concept, Mahram, which is basically the men that a specific women can be uncovered (without hijab/modesty) in front of or around. 

Mahram also means the men that a woman cannot marry, because they are family to her, people that can see her without hijab. 

For any woman, her brothers, father, sons, uncles, and grandfathers are all mahram- she cannot marry them because they are blood, and so she can be uncovered in front of them. If she gets married, the husband would be added in as a mahram as well.

I bring this up because I came up with a super lore headcanon that doesn't exactly fit very well with anything but whatever, i wanna toss my own culture in and so i shall-

The only way a person can be made mahram to someone without being related by blood or marriage is through breastfeeding- basically, if an unrelated baby boy and girl were breastfed by the same person, regardless of whether that person is their parent or not, then those two babies are now siblings and mahram to each other; in Islam, they cannot marry each other, because they are siblings. 

A lot of people headcanon Sausage, Fwhip, and Gem as siblings- I ship wither husbands, so im not much of a roseblings follower, but i can make it work-

Mythland and Pixandria fought a lot in canon- we can make pre-canon lore for this that makes the two empires have a long history of battling each other-

and when two places fight each other so much, theres the inevitability of the two picking up customs and culture from each other from so much interaction, from soldiers living in the other empire for so long they learn new things and bring them back home-

And Pixandria is a desert empire, adding in Arabic culture with them makes sense, to a certain extent- 

Mythland picks up the cultural habit of, not of mahram, but of the method of making two unrelated children related for adoption purposes.

Years later, when the Grimlands/Crystal Cliffs, in their still combined-into-one-empire glory, come to make an alliance with Mythland, they propose an alliance of adoption, instead of marriage.

The newly-born heir of Mythland and the newly born heirs of Grimlands-Crystal Cliffs are breastfed by the same nurses, and are raised together as siblings, ensuring that the three empires would have a strong alliance bound by kin and family for years to come. 

Thoughtsss? I'm quite proud of it :> 

[enlitment]

Camille Desmoulins and Maximilien Robespierre – doomed by the Revolution?

a second part of the answer to the ask kindly sent by @iron--and--blood - first part can be found here

Okay, so I tried to follow the sources and I ended up missing what is arguably the key question. I think that there is enough evidence that warrants seeing Camille and Maximilien’s relationship as a ‘friendship torn apart but the revolution’, but could it in fact be something more that the chain of events of the mid-1790s ended up destroying?

(aka the good old “were they gay?” question)

It’s probably not surprising to anyone that there is no conclusive evidence that would suggest that either of them was definitely queer or that they were involved in some kind of a relationship. For context, the French Constitutional Assembly did decriminalise homosexuality, since there was simply no mention of private same-sex relationships it in the penal code of 1791.

Of course, there would still be a stigma surrounding queerness, seeing how France was a Catholic country – well, up to that point. On the other hand, it is also important to remember that anyone who received a higher education at that time would be well versed in classical authors (Greek and Roman that is), so they would have a framework for a positively viewed queer attraction/relationship (I'm mostly thinking of a kind of Alcibiades/Socrates vibes here. I think it sort of fits? Well it does in my headcanon anyway...). Camille especially seemed to be really into classics, making references to classical authors, history or mythology in approximately every other sentence.

CAMILLE – VICES HONTEUX AND A POSSIBILE BICON

If we consider Camille, I think it is clear that he was attracted to women. I think that the historical sources show that he genuinely did love his wife - Lucile - although it may also be true he was bit of a cad. There is a whole deal with him and Lucile’s mother with whom he apparently exchanged some flirty letters? I honestly need to look into it more at some point.

That said, attraction to women of course doesn’t exclude attraction to men. The one thing that would suggest Camille might have pursued a same-sex relationships is the reference to “vices honteux“ (shameful vices), which Saint-Just claims were attributed to Camille by Danton. We also learn from Robespierre’s note that this refered to something that was ‘totally unrelated to the revolution’.

So we know it’s something that would be seen as ‘shameful’ behaviour, but nonetheless a private matter. Could it be interest in same-sex relationships? It’s of course hard to say, but the theory is not completely implausible. For a discussion about this, I recommend this article.

MAXIMILIEN – A CONFIRMED BACHELOR?

With Maximilien Robespierre, it gets a little more complicated. He was essentially a confirmed bachelor, living with a family that adored him but that was not his own (and also a dog. He had a dog.) Talk about a found family trope!

Some sources claim that he was engaged to Éléonore Duplay, but Robespierre’s sister for one vehemently denies this. It’s true that he could probably easily have married her – I can’t imagine her family being opposed to it, far from it probably – but the fact is that for one reason or another, he did not.

He also didn’t really seem to capitalise on his massive popularity among the Parisian women. (Though, to be fair, neither did Rousseau and he was… well I guess he was his own version of heterosexual.)

Sure, one can interpret that as Robespierre being a workaholic or putting the revolution above everything else, but I personally think it is very possible that he would be considered to be on the asexual spectrum by today’s standards.

That said, although France was moving away from institutionalised religion at that point, Catholic guilt could certainly play a role, especially in someone who prided himself in his moral conduct and was told to be rigid about the rules. So the possibility of him being closeted as an explanation for his lack of interest in women would also not be completely off the table.

As to Camille and Maximilien being together in some way? I think there is certainly a precedence for this type of relationship in adolescence. Seeing that they have studied together (and shared enthusiasm for classics probably), it is not impossible, though of course, it is highly speculative.

I think it is also fair to say that Robespierre went above and beyond for Camille until the last few months. That is something he probably would have not done for many other people. He actually said as much himself:

“Learn, Camille, that if you were not Camille, one could not have so much indulgence for you.“

Was it because Camille was universally liked by the revolutionaries for all the good he has done? Possibly, but I think one can also read more into it. It certainly suggests that Camille was special in some way, and the fact that Robespierre uses ‚one‘ instead of ‚I‘ does not necessarily mean he is not speaking about himself here.

CAMILLE AND MAXIMILIEN IN THE MEDIA

When it comes to media portrayal, the relationship often comes across as queer-coded - to an extent.

In La Révolution française, this aspect is more prominent between Robespierre and Saint-Just, but with some well-timed smiles and glances, it almost reads as a tragic love triangle between the three. There are some unfortunate implications however, mainly that the hints of Robespierre's queerness in the movie are implicitly associated with his descent to tyrany. Ugh. (And let's face it, a kind of effeminacy linked to villainy as well. Honestly, who thought that kind of portrayal would be a good idea? Kudos for making a historical movie about the French Revolution come across as homophobic I guess.)

Hilary Mantel straight-up makes Camille Desmoulins bisexual (ish?) in A Place of Greater Safety, though there are <a lot of> issues with that portrayal, as discussed here (watch me linking another mutual's great post! Frevblr is truly the best). Not sure how the relationship with Robespierre is presented here since it’s one of the books I’ve been in the middle of for months.

And then there’s Stanisława Przybyszewska of course. She would honestly warrant a separate post, but long story short: in her works, there is no doubt about the fact that she portrays the relationship between them as queer. She invokes the Erastes/eromenos dynamic between them (quite explicitly, referring to Camille as an ephebe at one point) and makes the attraction between the two seem palpable. There is plenty of queer (under)tones to be found in The Danton Case, but in Last Nights of Ventôse , she straight up interprets the fall of the Dantonists as Camille running into Danton’s arms to spite Robespierre for snubbing him and rejecting his devotion (romantic advances?). And it gets quite physical – not in a way that would warrant an E rating, but it would certainly deserve one for the sheer emotional intensity.

[vaguely-concerned]

Down Among the Dead Men Reread thoughts!

The Mourn Watch continue to be my faves. What a bunch of absolute Fifth House style freaks. The description of Myrna taking control over Karn's possessed and enraged corpse like she's 'walking a small but wilful dog' fhkdsafhash amazing. I can't believe bioware is giving me the ability to roleplay as essentially a magical janitor. a good-natured magical corpse janitor slash gentleperson scholar. what more could I ask

the only time Emmrich is the least bit brought out of balance in the whole story is when he gets flustered at the way audric/curiosity kneels to take myrna's hand when they create their spirit/watcher bond. which. fdjfaks okay. we might perhaps read some stuff into that. 'let the poor fellow up' alright okay uh-huh. just taking some notes don't mind me. he genuinely seems so sweet and like such a comforting presence, though, I really can't wait to get to know him better

the way the mourn watch interact with spirits is fascinating. of the human cultures we've seen they may be the closest to conceptualizing them as equals (within clear limits -- there's still a leash, and a hand that holds it, at the end of the day).

the city watch exasperatedly bringing possessed corpses to the mourn watch like someone taking stray cats to a shelter or something is wild and hilarious within the context of the rest of thedas

audric taking a moment to drag outdated orlesian fashion my beloved

the big 'uncatalogued' self-animating skeleton monstrosity seems like it could be connected to the huge high lord vollnir-ass skeleton we've seen in the trailer no? tho honestly there's enough weird shit going on down there that it could be a completely unrelated skeleton monstrosity too lol

I love the way chantry beliefs and older cultural traditions meld in nevarra. the fact that audric finds the idea of cremation disturbing even though he isn't comfortable around the dead is really neat.

the necropolis is going to be SUCH a banger of a level I just know it. escher-ass house of horrors and casual comedy. (the corpse that sits up to scowl at audric and myrna accusingly for waking it before just lying back down😭). the fact that there must be actual architects who must spend their whole careers creating vast halls that will only ever be wandered by the restless dead...

also there are public gardens attached to the necropolis! now there's the space for a picnic if ever there was one

[genderkoolaid]

I don't know if you know blue eye Samurai, but I hate how people talk about the protagonist.

I'm a non binary Trans man, and I actually identify a lot with Mizu (the protagonist), but I go here on Tumblr and I see a lot of posts that say: "I know everyone can see Mizu however they like, but I want everyone to know that the right interpretation is that she is a woman pretending to be a man... but everyone can think whatever they want, not forgetting that she is a woman of course."

And it's a bit annoying because when I see explanations of why is "wrong" to see Mizu as a Trans man, I see people going "Why can't there be representation of gender non conforming women!?" And "she wouldn't pretend to be a man if it wasn't for the society she lives in!"

The last one makes me especially angry, because of how many Trans men get erased from history with that same argument.

I don't know, I think it makes me mad because that fandom feels like a micro cosmos of the anti Trans masculinity a lot of Trans men have to face.

And it's not like I think it's wrong to see Mizu as a woman, but when everyone goes "of course she is a woman, why would she want to be a man for anything other than necessity?" I don't know how to feel.

I'm gonna steal my own words from that post about jeanne d'arc:

And the best part is, we can say all of this and also see her as part of women's history! Because women's history, too, does not have to be exclusively about woman-born or woman-identified women. It can be about a larger cultural experience. And Jeanne d'Arc suffered because of transphobia which is always fundamentally misogynistic. I would argue it even makes sense to say her death involved transmisogyny in a very literal sense. The thing about transfeminism is that it can free us from the need to view personal identification with the role of "woman" as vital to feminism. Being a woman, in whatever sense, is certainly not unrelated to feminism, but one can be a feminist and have any kind of personal or communal relationship with womanhood. Anyone can be inspired by the story of Jeanne d'Arc and her bold defiance of both misogyny and transphobia, no matter how she may have personally understood her gender.

People have this idea where if a character or historical figure (or even currently living person) is anything but a woman, then any kind of Feminist Story falls apart. Especially when it comes to misogyny! People act like someone being a trans man means all their experiences with misogyny are like. gone? Or the story is now, essentially, about a cis man being mistaken for a woman, and thus women are Not Allowed to feel any connection at all.

All of this on top of the fun hypocrisy that is "we can't say this person/character is a trans man because they wouldn't have that concept, but we can say they are a cis woman because those are both the only options and ciswomanhood is a natural and universal concept we can apply regardless of any other context :)"

& with Mizu its like. you literally can see her as a GNC woman. people calling him a trans guy or transmasc or genderqueer or anything else are not taking away your experience of her as a GNC woman. Transmasculinity is not just Negative Womanhood, the idea that transmasculinity is something which saps away representation/power/dignity/identity/value from (cis) women is like ATM 101.

But the whole way people treat trans men and misogyny really annoys me, I guess because the assumption is that for women, having to dress as a man to get respect inspires anger at one's position in society, but trans men are incapable of having any complex feelings about that. Like trans men must fully enjoy not being able to have sex with others, or go to a doctor, and having to live in fear of being outed and facing the brunt of transphobia and misogyny, and trans men also couldn't possibly be angry about misogyny that they experienced, and also nonbinary people don't exist and no transmasculine person could possibly be anything but fully comfortable being seen as a cis man all the time. Sure, some trans men are perfectly happy passing as cis men, but like. there is more than one trans man. & ignoring all other transmasc experiences besides The One is a form of erasure, it just passes as something else because technically you are acknowledging A transmasc existence.

[evilkitten3]

i sorta like the lightheartedness of og naruto but i'm a gloom and doom guy to my core, it seems (which is kinda weird given that i'm. probably an optimist when it comes to my outlook on people? like what's going on there @ me)

i want to clarify though that most of that isn't stuff i just. happen to know off the top of my head. i would love to live in a universe where i could solidly remember real world history facts instead of stuff like which bleach character has which zanpakutou or whatever. alas, i am not that alternate version of me. most of that i got from briefly skimming japanese wikipedia pages on adult age (成年 seinen), the ounin era (応仁 ounin), coming of age ceremonies (成人式 seijinshiki), genpuku (元服), and child soldiers (少年兵 shounenhei). so credit to whoever wrote those, not me lol

(as for the fic, i unfortunately haven't written much of it yet, and nothing that's been posted. the current working title is "To Fan the Flames" but i'm not super happy with that just yet. moreover, i've found that i tend to be significantly better with meta and analysis or mostly feelings-based oneshots than actual longer stories so i'm probably not gonna be able to write much until i have a more solid grasp on pacing bc i get impatient too easily lol)

@narutobrainrotstuff @evilkitten3

mutuals what do you think it would happen if madara was the first hokage? excluding kurozetsu's whole plot ofc

[artbyblastweave]

So comic question - my Big 2-reading friend has been raving about the new Ultimates series, and also sworn up and down that it's actually easy to follow and you in no way need to read six different ongoing series in the correct order to understand what's going on or jump in halfway through a totally unrelated one for ten issues to get vital context.

Is he full of shit, or is it actually comprehensible and worth reading if my comics knowledge mostly boils down to pop culture osmosis and reading some posts?

He's kind of full of shit but also not. They did one four-issue miniseries called Ultimate Invasion- quite good in it's own right- that lays the groundwork/status quo/Big Ticking Two Year Countdown Clock Until All Hell Breaks Loose for the handful of ongoing series that launched afterwards. The fact that it's been largely easy to follow thus far is largely a function of it's currently limited scope- Only four largely separate ongoings (the two of which I've read are quite legible independent of the other ones) set in different parts of the world with very limited overlap, alongside a couple oneshots released as milestones. You can blow through the entire continuity in an afternoon. The Original Ultimate Marvel was, at it's inception, easy to follow for basically the same reason. This has the potential to metastasize in the same way that that did. They also might successfully tie a bow on it as a completed limited scope project. Time will tell. The other thing is that the Hickman and Camp's metatextual project is to create an imprint where the setting is so aggressively plugged into meta continuity porn bullshit that it would serve as a poison-pill to any attempted MCU adaption effort- In contrast to how the original Ultimate Universe was kind of visibily packaging itself for eventual adaptation to film, they wanted to do a story that can be a comic book and nothing else because of how much it's about comic books. A major theme thus far has been characters coming to terms with the lives they were supposed to lead, for better or for worse, and half of what's clever about this thing is banking on your ability to contextualize where the bit players are in life in this story versus where they wound up in other continuities. I also interpret the entire project as sort of a love letter to the phenomenon of trying to create revised, tightened reboots of long-running continuities that spiral out of control in their own right- the entire joke is that one of the two characters kept around by real-life editorial after the last, kinda-poorly-received attempt at a reboot universe like this is trying to make his own timeline with blackjack and hookers, only for it to spiral out of control in turn. (We Are Never Getting Out Of Here)

All in all, I've mentioned in other posts on this project that I've kind of lost the objectivity necessary to know whether this is at all good, legible or enjoyable if you aren't plugged into the big-two comic-book torment nexus. This shit is my Feldspar and Quartz. If you want to roll the dice, the reading order is Ultimate Invasion, Ultimate Universe, and then as far as I know Ultimate Spider-Man, The Ultimates, Ultimate Black Panther and Ultimate X-Men can be read in any order. The fact that I had to give you a reading order probably on some level answers your original question, though

[ifuckingloveryoshu]

I said Id keep all murder on the warp express spoilers till 8/31 but. *BIG Spoilers FOR MURDER ON THE WARP TRAIN EXPRESS AND DISTORTION DETECTIVE*

I originally just wanted to make a horny post but here we are now, Don post. And keep in mind, all of this is speculation all hearsay and I have not read Don's book.

I might redesign and just redo my self insert oc for one if Bloodfeinds have a thing with masks and if the Pinky Finger has blood feinds? Its only heavy spectulation on my end given the scrapes and blood on the finer from Ryoshu's art. Unrelated but the mask make me thing about Jojo and the Pillar Men. Uhh, more speculation actually, maybe all Kindred in their culture, take the mantel of another role or face? For Don, its the valiant hero. With blood being part of their image, their goal is extending their influnce.

Go further, maybe the Mask and Rocinante can be related in the roles they want to play. The Barber was mentioned and I heard the original Don took the shaving thing used to collect hair from the barber and used it as a hat. I'm thinking for Casstti at least, the technology of that mask after getting enough blood would make him look all human.

From Distortion Detective Chapters 41 and 42 before they axed the series, here we have:

For context: Moses is talking to an older Bloodfeind in this fancy hotel because she wants Moses to murder her. For one, yeah they do feed on human but their not overtly evil? It's a hidden evil but tame for City standards. Elena was just a big exception but popular enough to give the whole species a bad reputation.

From Distortion Detective, we get the information that Bloodfeinds like keeping their numbers low.

There honestly must be cultural diffrences between blood feind populations of diffrent Districts. Don might actually be an Elder.

Also, it's not a new plot point with a bloodfeind who doesn't conciously know their a blood feind.

So does the Distortion inside bloodfeinds have to be awaken? I have no idea, but Rocinante seems to be Don's anchor.

When we meet another Bloodfeind, perhaps an elder one, it doesn't seem in the norm for Bloodfeinds in general to do giant blood bag and conversion things. This is a very hopeful reading of what can easily get retconed but my guess is Elder Bloodfeinds just drink a little bit and then normally let their victims go. But again, we never found out if this person was reliable or not because Project Moon discontinued Distortion Detective. Elena is an outliar among bloodfeinds and Casstti is put into a warp train as a blood feind, in an enviornment that gives as much blood as you want.

Wherever Casstti's from, he was running away to make his own 'kingdom' because where hes from was awful. He had no idea how the Warp Train would opperate. None of this was planned, everything was incidental.

My theory on the events: Cassetti hides in the freightcar to escape wherever he is from and hes been hiding there eversince to get enough blood to make his mask so he can blend in with the City residents, hide his bloodfeind features, maybe fuse with his mask. But, the bus woke him up and maybe he was spotted by the multi-armed fixers where he feels compelled to make Sasha a Kindred after her helplessness. Then our gang comes and fights him. Yeah. So many things to look forward to. And if the connection of the Barber in Don's story, a one off thing, Cassetti might be coming from P Corp. Two things i've just seen from Lob Corp's Shelter from the 27th of March and the Library Of Ruina Wiki:

We're off for a ride next Canto, that is certain. Thank you to anyone who decides to read this. If anyone else would love to build off this or correct me, that would be heavily appreciated.

[myfairkatiecat]

I think you're misunderstanding my point a bit, the problem is not "accidentally agreeing with someone when they also disagree with you on other points". I agree that worrying about that is silly. However both my hypothetical post and the actual post, in my opinion, have the problem of presenting a false dichotomy which is indicative of bias. "We need more single mothers in media" is a point which is completely unrelated to the much stupider point of "there are TOO MANY women with jobs in media", and the fact of the matter is that being bothered by seeing women in media who have jobs is, not inherently sexist, but certainly something you would expect more from a misogynist than a non misogynist.

Similarly the original post pairs a point that many agree with - "more fandoms/media should portray close brotherly friendships" - with an unrelated (and in my opinion, very entitled) complaint about fandoms being too gay, as if it's not possible for both gay relationships and brotherly ones to both be respected and given validity without choosing one as the correct or more valid interpretation. Or as if, as the person who responded to that post was alleging, the post was trying to imply that interpreting characters as gay is inherently worse than interpreting them as brotherly. Given that that's a very bold claim, I think supporting that claim with "btw this same person has said this on the topic of gay people irl" is quite normal?

The reason context matters is not because valid points become gross and wrong when said by the wrong person, but because valid sentiments can be used to mask other, less valid sentiments. If you agree with both points, that's one thing, but if you think complaining that fandom is just too gay is indicative of homophobia, "the person who said that has also publicly stated that they don't support the LGBT community" is relevant information in that discussion. And I frankly think that "actually, my friend thinking that fandom is too gay is completely unrelated to that same friend thinking being gay irl is sinful" is a very strange claim that I struggle to believe, in the same way I would not believe it if someone said "the fact that I get mad when I see women on TV with jobs is completely unrelated to me thinking women shouldn't have jobs because then I could sleep with them more easily".

Ok so this is the post in question by @gracefulchristiangirl:

why aren't guys allowed to have strong brotherly friendships anymore without being queer headcannoned anymore. like- not all strong relationships are because of romantic or sexual desire??? some people have life-long friendships with other guys who are literally their brothers???

Reading comprehension check: “NOT ALL strong relationships are because of romantic or sexual desire.” This post is a response to the frequent sexualization of male friendship, which feeds a culture of toxic masculinity. If showing affection is consistently interpreted as inherently gay (like posting a gif of Sam and Frodo with the caption “there is NO heterosexual explanation for this” which does happen quite frequently) then straight men are going to be discouraged from being affectionate with their friends because, understandably, they don’t want people unanimously agreeing that they must therefore be a sexuality that they aren’t.

This post is about people erasing the possibility of friendship between two men when they see a certain type of behavior, usually expressions of care or love. This isn’t a response to “I think it would be cool if Merlin and Arthur were gay so I’m going to write a fic where they’re gay,” it’s a response to “look at the way Merlin is looking at Arthur in this scene with so much love in his eyes. Look at the way he holds him tenderly ad he dies. They’re literally so gay, like wdym they aren’t lovers??” One such statement owns that it is something made up by the person with the headcanon, while the other statement makes affection between two men seem inherently romantic! I used the merlin fandom as an example because I have seen that second statement made, almost word for word, and it’s sentiments like those that make me glad for posts like the one we are discussing.

The post is not about gay people. The post is about viewing close male friendships as inherently romantic or sexual in fandom spaces, which is unfortunately very common.

This post is also not about fandom spaces being “too gay,” as you said in your ask. *wags finger like an aunt* mm-mm-mm, that’s not what OP said! She didn’t say fandom spaces were too gay!

[spiralingthoughtpost]

Vedic Astrology Observations

Mars Dominant Men

(GIF context: The gif shows Mars Dominant Jim Carrey [Mrigashira Moon and Dhanishta Ketu] being extra, which is what he is known for. The other video is just shear chaos that I think is demonstrative of Mars energy at its most energetic and undeveloped. Just... watch it, and you will see.)

Mars, known as "Mangal" in Vedic astrology, is the general of the army of gods. It is a symbol of dynamism and excitability, embodying the essential forces of ambition, anger, and action. In Vedic astrology, Mars plays an important role in reinforcing principles related to assertiveness and drive. The placement of Mars in an individual's kundli (birth chart) is indicative of where energy is most actively expressed and channeled, often linked to pursuits involving motivation, courage, combat, and conquest. Additionally, Mars governs the domains of passion and sexuality, overseeing primal instincts of desire and attraction, thereby significantly influencing sexual drive, romantic pursuits, and the broader expression of fervor, which includes violence and cruelty. In the context of relationships and sexuality, Mars' placement in the birth chart can reveal an individual's approach to sexual matters, assertiveness in romantic endeavors, and physical intimacy. The influence of Mars also extends beyond physical exertion as well, as it similarly encapsulates broader concepts of mental initiative and the cognitive drive necessary to achieve goals and overcome obstacles. Mars is not a one-dimensional force; while it represents the essential pursuit we all need to get things done, it also signifies potential conflict, impulsivity, and a propensity for brashness. Like fire, Mars's energy can both forge and destroy, serving as a tool for constructive purposes or leading to destruction if not properly managed. This complex nature of Mars highlights the importance of balance and control in harnessing its power. The journey of Mars in one's life is that of a warrior's path, necessitating not only the wielding of power but also an understanding of its consequences and the judicious use of such force. The process of learning to balance and direct one's energies appropriately is central to the teachings of Mars, making its influence important for personal growth, self-understanding, and the realization of one's potential.

Mars, within the framework of Vedic astrology, wields a significant influence on an individual's personality and life direction, something that becomes especially pronounced in natives with prominent placements in Mars-ruled nakshatras like Mrigashira, Chitra, and Dhanishta. Investigating Mars' astrological impact provides an opportuned look into the inherent characteristics, life paths, and challenges of those under its primary influence, particularly regarding its astrological significations as they manifest in the real world. The presence of a dominant Mars in an astrological chart typically results in a personality distinguished by ambition, assertiveness, and a pronounced expression of will. Although these traits can be observed in both genders, they tend to be more conspicuous in Mars-dominant men. This is a bit unrelated, but I would recommend that, for all astrological endeavors, you should be able to see the influence of astrology in people's' lives, and that should roughly align with the significations of the energy behind the different signs, planets, houses etc. Astrology is true beyond self-reflection. It is the essence of life and the universe itself and establishes a oneness to all things that can be observed even in and beyond material world.

Anyway, Mrigashira Nakshatra, often referred to as the birthplace of Mars, is where the planet's energy is expressed most vibrantly and potently. Symbolized by a deer, this nakshatra embodies an inherent restlessness and a relentless quest for chasing after something. It represents qualities like agility and grace, mirroring the inherent qualities of Mrigashira individuals, such as quick intellect, adaptability, and a certain delicateness in their approach to life and relationships. The ruling deity of Mrigashira, Soma, the Moon God, adds to this Nakshatra a layer of emotional depth and intuitive insight that complements its inherent restlessness and quest for knowledge. Soma's influence brings a nurturing and reflective quality to the vibrant and potent energy of Mars, softening the aggressive pursuit with a touch of gentleness. When Mrigashira falls in Taurus, co-ruled by Venus, this brings in elements of sensuality, aesthetics, and a deeper connection to the material and sensual world. The influence of Venus enhances the allure and charm inherent in the deer symbolism, adding a dimension of beauty and attraction to the restlessness and curiosity driven by Mars. Conversely, when Mrigashira is in Gemini, co-ruled by Mercury, the focus shifts more towards communication, intellect, and a mercurial nature of being skilled. The deer's symbolism here aligns with agility not just in physical movement but in mental acuity as well. The connection of Mar's and Mercury's influence on this Nakshatra infuses these individuals with a sharp wit, a capacity for rapid intellectual processing, and an insatiable curiosity about the world around them. Together, the influence of both Taurus and Gemini are combined to make up this cusp Nakshatra as a whole, blending qualities of each for those born under it. Individuals with significant placements in Mrigashira are marked by intense curiosity and a dynamic spirit, leading to a restlessness that transcends the physical, spurring a constant pursuit of knowledge and unfettered thoughts. Their minds are agile and adaptable, producing a versatile and energetic approach to life. However, this can sometimes result in an overwhelming influx of thoughts, necessitating continuous physical/mental stimulation and a penchant for novelty to keep them quiet. In relationships, their charismatic and dynamic nature is alluring, yet their constant craving for change can challenge the stability and depth of these connections. Professionally, they excel in roles that demand innovation, quick thinking, and adaptability. Additionally, with Mars' association with sex and desire, the birth of Mars in this nakshatra intertwines with the genesis of desire and the inherent chase in seduction, shown in its natives as being either "hard to get" or relentless in their pursuit of another. The symbolism of the deer in this nakshatra resonates with this quality of desire and chase as it relates to innocence and allure, reflecting the dual aspects of seduction as both a playful and deeply carnal force.

(GIF contexts: The first gif shows Hugh Jackman [Mrigashira Moon, Chitra Sun and Chitra Mercury – I also thought I should mention he has Shravana ascendant {moon and saturn-ruled nak, while not moon dominant, the aspects in my moon-dominant post will still somewhat apply to him, since ascendant is a very important placement}, which introduces an aspect of discipline that I talk about a little later]. He is dancing while sitting. The second shows Armie Hammer who is jointly Ketu and Mars Dominant [Mrigashira Moon, Chitra Venus and Ketu / Magha Sun and Mercury]. As a side note, Armie Hammer played in Call Me By Your Name with Timothee Chalamet who is Joint dominant with Ketu and Jupiter, which is interesting considering Mars is one of the most compatible with Jupiter. The third shows Lionel Messi who is mix of Mars and Moon again [Mrigashira Moon, Chitra Midheaven / Shravana Asc and Rohini Venus])

Chitra Nakshatra, symbolized by a bright jewel, epitomizes the fusion of creativity and allure. This nakshatra, much like a finely cut gem, reflects the qualities of precision, intricacy, and brilliance. Chitra Nakshatra, under the guardianship of Tvashtar or Vishwakarma, the divine architect and cosmic craftsman, radiates the essence of creative brilliance and aesthetic perfection. The influence of this deity gives Chitra natives a blend of artistic talent and a keen eye for details, mirroring Tvashtar's role in shaping the universe with precision and creativity. They can be some of the most expansive when it comes to world-building, almost to the point where it becomes disturbing how far into detail they will go. The symbol of Chitra being a bright jewel perfectly encapsulates the splendor and allure that Tvashtar imparts to these individuals, fostering an affinity for harmony, design, and the finer things in life. When Chitra falls in Virgo, co-ruled by Mercury (possibly Ceres), the focus is on the meticulous and analytical aspects, mirroring the precise and careful crafting of a jewel. This placement accentuates the intellectual and detailed-oriented facets of creativity, similar to the skilled artisanship in gem cutting. Conversely, in Libra, co-ruled by Venus, Chitra's energy shifts towards the aesthetic, the harmonious, and the beautiful aspects of a jewel's allure. In this sign, the emphasis is on artistic expression, sensory appreciation, and the creation of visual harmony, aligning with Venus's influence on Chitra's inherent Mars-driven dynamism. The symbolism of the jewel in Chitra thus resonates with the attributes of detail, thoughtfulness craftsmanship, and aestheticism, making this cusp Nakshatra very similar but different to its less developed predecessor. Individuals with significant placements in Chitra are known for their artistic sensibility and charm, often drawn to professions where creativity and aesthetics hold sway. Their pursuit of beauty drives them towards perfectionism in various life aspects, from art and design to personal expression, much like a jewel being chiseled to display harmony and beauty. However, this pursuit can sometimes lead to a performative aspect in their expressions, prioritizing appearance over substance. The fiery energy of Mars in this nakshatra can manifest as a combative trait, fueling their dynamic approach to life but also leading to conflicts when ideals of perfection meet less polished realities. The symbolism of the jewel in Chitra reflects a balance between brilliance and fragility, much like a precious stone: captivating, yet susceptible to cracking under pressure. Additionally, Mars adds a layer of passion to their artistic endeavors and romantic pursuits, modifying the expression of Mercury and Venus with an added layer of intensity. This might extend to all Mars men, but Chitra tends to really emphasize the smile.

(GIF contexts: First one shows Joseph Morgan [Chitra Moon]. The second shows Jude Law [Chitra Moon]. The third is John Krasinski [Chitra Sun and Moon with Mrigashira Ascendant])

Dhanishta Nakshatra shows Mars in its most sophisticated, refined form, particularly dominating in aspects of masculine sexuality and spirituality. Presided over by the Vasus, the eight elemental gods in Vedic mythology, this nakshatra emulates the virtues of wealth, generosity, and musicality. This celestial domain gives its natives the essence of resourcefulness, resilience, and a connection to the natural and cosmic elements as symbolized by the drum, encapsulating rhythm, charisma, and the very pulse of life. Co-ruled by Saturn and straddling the cusp of Capricorn and Aquarius, Dhanishta harmonizes the discipline of Saturn with the vigor of Mars, captivating others with its endurance, charisma, and a refined spiritual power. The significance of Mars being exalted in Capricorn plays an important role in the expression of Dhanishta Nakshatra. Mars' exaltation in this Nakshatra at the 28º of Carpcorn signifies the planet's optimal expression of discipline, determination, and the ability to achieve goals with focused energy. This exaltation enhances Dhanishta's traits, giving individuals a formidable ability to channel Mars' dynamic force constructively and with purpose. The balance of Mars' raw energy and Saturn's structured approach in Dhanishta translates to a sophisticated handling of power, a relentless drive for achievement, and an alignment with a sense of purpose. This blend of Mars' exalted qualities in tandem with saturn leads to a unique amalgamation of strength, resilience, and responsibility, albeit with the potential for emotional extremes and a tendency toward depressive states. While Dhanishta engenders purpose and strength, it can cause emotional fluctuations and a tendency towards depressive as well as over-excitable states. The highs of Mars' fiery energy can swiftly transition to the lows of Saturn's cold and somber disposition, creating a challenging oscillation between the two extremes. In their personal lives, the Dhanishta native's need for energy and control, amplified by intense sexual energy, can complicate relationships, leading to a cycle of passionate engagements followed by phases of solitude and detachment. This pattern, often observable in the lives of many Dhanishta natives, can result in a disconnect from one's authentic self and meaningful relationships. Furthermore, the Saturnine influence in Dhanishta brings an enhanced sense of duty, which, coupled with Mars' ambition and focus on male sexuality, often culminates in a relentless pursuit of success and a desire to satisfy the male ego, sometimes at the cost of personal health and well-being. Acknowledging the features of Mars in this Nakshatra is especially important as it reaches its maturity at age 28, when these themes become more pronounced for those under its strong influence. Individuals with prominent placements in Dhanishta often have a lustrous personality and a commanding presence, qualities that often thrust them into the public sphere. Their charisma and appeal are rooted not just in external factors but emerge from a deep sense of self-assuredness and a vigorous inner life. These people may also become overly-involved with their work to the point where it adversely affects their health, so that is another thing to keep in mind.

(GIF contexts: The first one shows Ashton Kutcher [Dhanishta Sun, Moon, and Venus -- possibly also Mrigashira Asc]. The second one shows Aaron Taylor Johnson [Dhanishta Sun and Mrigashira Moon.] The third shows Nicholas Cage [Chitra Moon and Dhanishta Saturn with Venus])

Mars-dominant men are characterized by their complex and intense personalities, significantly shaped by the dynamic energy of Mars. This influence is evident in a range of behaviors, including assertiveness, vitality, and notable physical expressiveness, which are often juxtaposed with a distinctive emotional sensitivity and a tendency towards irritability. Such a combination frequently leads to a heightened level of emotional reactivity, predisposing them to sudden outbursts or intense responses to both physical and emotional stimuli. These reactions can sometimes seem erratic or disproportionate, emerging unexpectedly and potentially being perceived as a lack of emotional regulation. This aspect of their personality may come across as somewhat childish, marked by a lack of control in emotional expression. For example, they might exhibit an exaggerated reaction to minor annoyances, such as becoming excessively upset when disturbed, demonstrating an almost melodramatic response to scenarios that others might approach with greater composure. However, this same intensity of emotion can also manifest as a form of strength and fervor. Their copious energy often channels itself into various activities that capture their interest, leading to deep immersion in these pursuits. For instance, their engagement with a book might become so absorbing that they forsake any plans they have for the day, opting instead to consume the entire thing in a single session. This characteristic illustrates their capacity for exaggerated involvement in activities they find are passionately interested in, reflecting the significant impact of Mars' energy on their concentration and enthusiasm. This deep involvement can be both a source of fulfillment and, at times, a challenge, as their intense focus might lead them to overlook other aspects of their lives. Understanding and managing this potent Mars influence is key to harnessing its strengths while mitigating its potential downsides.

Mars-dominant men, driven by this planet's passionate and energetic influence, often gravitate towards activities that demand physical exertion and pose a challenge. This preference can take various forms, from athletic activities to spontaneous physical actions, some of which may be seen as unconventional or particularly intense. These men are typically drawn to extreme sports or activities that stimulate adrenaline, reflecting their desire for excitement and a drive to test their limits. Their approach to these activities is characterized by an intensity and a readiness to embrace risks, mirroring the unrestrained energy of Mars. While they generally may not favor disciplines like weightlifting or bodybuilding, which require a level of sustained discipline that contrasts with their inclination for sporadic bursts of energy more familiar to mars, a more refined expression of Mars, such as through Dhanishta Nakshatra, might lead them to engage in physical activities that incorporate a more structured approach. In addition to these pursuits, Mars-dominant men might also find a strong interest in the military or related fields, aligning with Mars' traditional association with warfare and combat. The disciplined structure, physical demands, and the inherent challenges of military life resonate with the Mars-driven need for a dynamic environment and the opportunity to demonstrate courage and strength. This attraction to the military or tactical fields can be seen as an extension of their adventurous spirit and their propensity to engage in activities that test their physical and mental fortitude. The discipline and order of military life provide a constructive outlet for their Mars-driven energy, channeling their inclination for risk-taking and physical exertion into a structured and purposeful framework. This interest in military pursuits or related activities not only aligns with the martial qualities of Mars but also allows these individuals to find a sense of fulfillment and accomplishment in an environment that values and nurtures their inherent traits and abilities. In daily life, their spontaneous physical behavior is also noticeable. Mars-dominant men might exhibit impulsive reactions, such as sprinting to catch a bus, suddenly engaging in a random dance, or displaying various forms of physical restlessness like tapping or bouncing their legs. These actions, although demonstrating their physical vitality, can sometimes be surprising or even disconcerting to others due to their intensity and the unexpected nature of these bursts of energy. This unpredictability, coupled with their physical prowess, can sometimes induce apprehension in those around them, stemming from a perception of a lack of control. This physical expressiveness is integral to their nature, providing a means to manifest Mars' fiery energy in a visible and impactful way that is hard to temper. Whether through structured sports or in spontaneous acts, their physicality is a crucial channel for their passion and energy, significantly shaping their interactions with and experiences of the world around them.

(GIF context: The first shows Charles LeClerc [Chitra Sun and Mercury – He also has prominent Ketu but not enough for me to consider that a joint-dominant.] The second shows Antony Starr [Chitra Sun and Mrigashira Moon.] The third is Aaron Paul [Chitra Moon.])

In social settings, Mars-dominant men often exhibit a dichotomous behavior. Outwardly, they may present a reserved and polite persona because they wish to carefully curate their public image driven by a desire to be liked and admired and experience anxiety surrounding their inability to control their energy. However, this external calmness often conceals an inner whirlwind of energy and a combative intensity. Despite their efforts to appear controlled and composed, their interactions can unpredictably shift into provocative realms, especially in environments where they feel supported or defended by their social circle, or where they are otherwise at east. They may engage in boundary-pushing behaviors, rule-breaking, or ignite debates, just to elicit reactions that energize them and test the limits of others. This inclination to provoke and challenge is deeply ingrained in their nature, influenced by Mars' inherent provocativeness, which can be both physical and mental. When in the company of those they are comfortable with, their behavior can vary dramatically, shifting from polite and composed to passionately arguing about a complex political issue, for instance. This stark contrast between their almost shy, reticent demeanor and a more tumultuous, uninhibited side (which they often try to conceal) is a direct reflection of their internal struggle to reconcile Mars' fiery influence with societal norms and expectations. This struggle is alike to the effects of an imbalance in testosterone – rather than a balanced hormonal state that encourages virility and self-control, the Mars energy resembles the effects of excessive energy, where increased strength and irritability are coupled with unpredictability and a paradoxically stunted yet uninhibited sexual nature. Their social journey is thus characterized by navigating the fine line between innate Mars-driven impulses and the external social dynamics they aim to navigate. This ongoing internal conflict shapes their social interactions, influencing not only how they are perceived by others but also their self-perception. The challenge for Mars-dominant men lies in finding a way to harness their intense Mars energy constructively, without succumbing to its more disruptive tendencies. This balancing act is central to their personal growth and their ability to form meaningful and stable relationships in their social environments.

Mars-dominant men often exhibit an accentuated display of traditional masculine traits, influenced in part by their internalization of Mars' energy, which they frequently associate with conventional notions of masculinity and male sexuality. This can lead to an overemphasis on attributes such as stoicism and dominance, which are viewed as ideals to be aspired to. At the same time, there is often a tendency to devalue or even disdain traits traditionally considered feminine, such as emotional expressiveness, vulnerability, or gentleness. This behavior, albeit somewhat paradoxical given their own emotional intensity/sensitivity, reflects their struggle to balance their intense Mars-driven energy with societal perceptions of gender roles. It's important to note that these tendencies can be moderated by more feminine influences in their astrological chart, but generally, this is a prevalent pattern that is based on their usual harsh dealings with women. In terms of physical contact, Mars-dominant men typically exhibit a guarded approach. They are intensely protective of their personal space and can react strongly to unsolicited physical interactions. This protective stance is not merely a preference but part of their personality, rooted in a need to maintain control over their physical boundaries to avoid lashing out. However, this respect for personal space may not consistently apply to others. Their occasional disregard for others' personal boundaries can manifest in social settings, though this is often mediated by their desire to be perceived positively. This contradiction highlights another aspect of their complex nature, where the desire for personal autonomy coexists with a less pronounced respect for the autonomy of others. The challenge for Mars-dominant men exists in understanding and respecting the balance between asserting their own boundaries and acknowledging those of the people around them, navigating this aspect of their personality with awareness and sensitivity without compromising their values.

The complexity inherent in Mars-dominant men extends from their personal attributes into their intellectual and relational domains. They often hold complicated perspectives on various subjects, stemming from their willingness to engage with initially challenging ideas to gain a more objective perspective. This intellectual curiosity leads them to explore different sides of an argument, not just for the sake of learning how to refute the side they disagree with, but to substantiate their viewpoints with well-rounded research, reveling in the satisfaction of being "right" with multiple sources to back their claims (keep in mind, that is just one expression of mars. Sometime's mars individuals will just argue for the sake of arguing because it makes them feel good from the adrenaline). This love for intellectual depth is also evident in their approach to relationships. Mars-dominant men are attracted to partners who provide mental stimulation and wish to engage them on various levels – intellectually, emotionally, and physically. They value complexity and depth in their partners, seeking out relationships that offer open, thought-provoking dialogue. But beyond that, they want to be the center of attention in their relationships. These men desire a partner who can take charge and perhaps even educate them, not in a sense of having to be taken care of, but in a dynamic of expecting to be the better one in the relationship to guarantee their security. They enjoy delving into philosophical or abstract discussions, finding pleasure in the mental gymnastics such conversations provide. Consequently, they often avoid relationships that appear superficial or lack intellectual substance. The exception can be found in individuals with a strong Chitra influence, who might seek a balance that includes both depth and external perfection, sometimes even at the cost of authenticity. Regarding their relationship dynamics in terms of expression, Mars-dominant individuals can be either passive or dominant, influenced by their partner's disposition. A more assertive partner tends to bring out their passive side, whereas a more submissive partner tends to elicit a more dominant aspect in them. This adaptability is partly due to Mars' gender-neutral nature in its birth nakshatra, Mrigashira, which allows for a fluidity in their relational interactions but an adherence to traditional gender roles. This flexibility enables them to harmonize with various partner dynamics, adjusting their approach based on the energy and personality of their counterpart, ultimately seeking a balance that satisfies their complex nature, which can be a challenge for most of them.

GIF contexts: The first shows Eminem [Dhanishta Moon and Chitra Sun]. The second shows Ben Shapiro [Mrigashira Moon.] The third shows Alex Jones [Chitra Moon and Dhanishta Sun with Jupiter.])

I think it is necessary to include that, while exhibiting behaviors that align with traditional masculinity and occasionally underappreciating feminine traits, Mars men are not typically overt misogynists. Their inclination towards activities and behaviors often seen as masculine can inadvertently draw in those with more extreme views on gender roles, such as certain friends or fans. However, this association should not be seen as a direct reflection of the personal beliefs or attitudes of Mars-dominant men themselves (One could argue guild by association, but that is not my call). In fact, contrary to subscribing to misogynistic views, many Mars-dominant men possess a deep respect and admiration for strong, independent women. They often challenge patriarchal norms that subjugate women, such as the notion that women's desirability diminishes with age or that women should be perceived as delicate and in need of male protection. Instead, they find strength, intelligence, and maturity in women attractive, indicating a more progressive and equitable view of gender. This perspective on gender highlights the complex influence of Mars in shaping their personalities. Just because Mars-dominant men may naturally gravitate towards pursuits traditionally labeled as "masculine" and may struggle at times with the expression of various traits, their core beliefs about gender often embrace a more nuanced understanding, appreciating strength and assertiveness regardless of gender. Recognizing this aspect of their personality is key to gaining a clearer understanding of Mars-dominant individuals, revealing a facet of these individuals that goes beyond surface-level interpretations of their actions and associations.

[rei-ismyname]

X-Men/Mutant Dynasties

Something I've always felt uneasy about is when offspring of Marvel mutants basically inherit their mutant gift 1:1. The X Gene (though I don't love that either) is supposed to be a naturally but randomly occurring thing in humans that causes them to develop a strong mutation. In many cases, a superpower as opposed to six toes. I'm sure people experience such minor mutations as well but it's not due to the X Gene.

A character that exemplifies the my dislike of this is Raze, the alternate reality/'future' child of Wolverine and Mystique. Them existing in a pretty ridiculous era with a constant nostalgia recycling is a factor too.

This idiot. He literally just has both parents gifts - shapeshifting, claws, and a healing factor. Keep in mind those are metal claws too - something Logan doesn't have biologically. Maybe it's a Mystique thing and she's like a ditto in Pokémon breeding because her kid with Xavier is this chump.

It's just Charles Xavier again! I'll admit part of the dislike is them featuring in such mediocre, unimaginative stories, and they're pretty transparent Nostalgia bait. Has it lead to good stories? I don't think so, not as a critical element. Could you honestly tell me what either of these idiots' motivation is without looking it up?

Also, I think taking the randomness out of it just leads to eugenics and bioessentialism - a place the x books should not go, or at least not have nominal heroes doing it. Leave it to Mr Sinister.

Mutant trait inheritance has been around since almost the beginning. Polaris has Magneto's powers but weaker, Siryn has *similar* powers to Banshee, Nightcrawler looks like Mystique (though that makes sense through retcon. Shit, maybe she IS a Ditto.) On the flip side, there's even more Mutants that inherited none of their parents' mutation.

IRL Mutation is supposed to be, well not random per se, but the result of damage to genes. In our universe it's neither a good thing nor bad thing. In 616 it's pretty muddled tbh. I'm not a scientist - I'm a writer, so I'm not going deep on something that doesn't have internal consistency. I'm always going to dislike thin characters trying to evoke familiarity through mashing two iconic ones together, but it's more than that. What's the source of my discomfort then?

Yeah, it's the eugenics. HoxPoX actually took it further, revealing that Moira and Charles intentionally sought to breed reality warpers, to the point of researching partners that would give the desired result. They were successful too, resulting in Proteus and Legion, two of the most powerful mutants alive. The ethics of these actions aren't editorialised but I think they're meant to be read as horrifying - especially when you consider the context of the 'pairings' and the lives these poor kids have had. Maybe it's not so surprising Xavier views David as a weapon and Moira seems to hate Kevin. It makes Chuck and Moira look terrible.

Pic unrelated, I just wanted to break up the text and what better than Beatnik Namor?

The superbaby schemes never come to light and they're not really punished for being shit parents. Certainly not socially. I'd love a book where they were, but the time has kinda passed. Maybe the fairy tale morality of big two comics doesn't have the framework or the desire to explore it, though I think that if you're going to put eugenics in your fiction you probably should.

I've been sitting on this draft for months because I feel like I don't have the knowledge or vocabulary to explore it properly. I'm probably missing something. I've decided it's been edited and rewritten enough and I'm posting it as is, so if you have any thoughts on this I'd love to hear them. Join the conversation!