#It is RIDICULOUS. The leak community is a circus. | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

joannerowling · 1 year ago

Note

How do you think the Johnny Depp situation got so toxic so quickly? Is it just because he’s so famous? I do think the anti metoo crowd saw Depp as a good person to use to discredit the metoo movement and used him accordingly considering how famous he is.

I mean I remember the level of hatred he got in 2016-18 then it just changed so dramatically during the trial with seemingly so little effort. It felt so suspicious to me. I went from being pretty indifferent to feeling genuinely quite sorry for Amber. She was treated awfully and I have never really been a fan of hers. I wonder if he employed bots to help start a conversation in his favour considering it really seemed like he had very little positive media coverage before the trial. Although there were plenty of real people on his side on TikTok and Twitter etc.

I just wish he was never cast as Grindelwald. Jo and the crew got so much hate for keeping him as Grindelwald for CoG after allegations then got so much backlash for getting rid of him after a judge literally deemed him guilty. I do think it really damaged the fantastic Beasts films. I have a feeling it would have received a little more goodwill if another actor played Grindelwald from the beginning. Plus as a Grindeldore fan I really didn’t like him as Grindelwald at all and I’m genuinely sad now that anyone who plays Grindelwald will be tainted by the Depp fans who’ll always act like the character belongs to Johnny. No Grindelwald belongs to Jo!

Prefacing this with: i'm not really the best to ask about the Depp/Heard case, or actors in general tbh. I'm not the most knowledgeable and found the whole circus around the trial grotesque.

That being said, how did the situation get so toxic? First of all, the heavy involvement of Depp's legal team (as well as either well paid or very motivated third parties) in building his "defence" online in the years preceding the trials and weaponising the Internet against Heard. This is well known by now and includes falsifying evidence before leaking it to fans, use of bots to build a momentum, etc. But it doesn't explain how the sauce took so well, does it? Imo and in no particular order:

Social context online. Check out the first comment on this reddit thread i've found about the Netflix documentary that came out about the case recently: "The appeal of getting in deep with the case wasn’t so much to learn about law and defamation, it was the fun of joining in with others as a community and sharing reactions and emotions." Based on this alone you could have told this was never going to be about justice, but the internet equivalent of a rave party in post-Covid times.

Fashion. It was trendy to be pro-Heard, now it's trendy to be pro-Depp. "Don't you know new info came out that she actually was the abusive one all along?? Keep up!" is a much better story to gossip about than "yeah, Depp, that known abuser, we've known since 2016"

Reactionary response to the brief #MeToo era, or as we call it, the classic pendulum of misogyny coming back in full swing.

The extremely ridiculous American legal system allowing for trials to be filmed and justice to be made a spectacle of, under the very thin veil of education and "transparency". The only thing that's transparent here is that the US fucking suck but we knew this.

Neo capitalism. See this article : the real winners of the case are media content creators who "went all in".

I too wish Depp was never cast as Grindelwald, first because he's such an obviously poor choice for the role independently of his behaviour. But WB in general has a problem with casting the worst possibly individuals known to man (or rather women) in lead roles. See fucking Ezra Miller and the Flash disaster. But i think what actually damaged the movies much more than any celebrity business (least of all JKR's own controversy which the general public knows shit about) is that they weren't all that good.

#replies #anon #fb #hp cast

8 notes · View notes

cynthiabryanuk · 6 years ago

Text

The Sadiq Khan audit: Mayors transport headache is a revenue great void

ES News Email

A week ago arriving on schedule this year.

A “nationwide humiliation” was the decision of service leaders. Labour peer Lord Adonis, a former transport secretary, questioned whether the project had actually had the necessary oversight.The timing could barely be worse for a Mayor who is hanging on to a cat’s cradle of monetary problems that will be worsened by the loss of Crossrail ticket incomes and a rise in construction costs.< a href =https://www.standard.co.uk/topic/transport-for-london > Transportation for London, the authority he chairs, is struggling with falling traveler numbers, federal government funding being slashed and the unpredictability of Brexit.In spring this year, TfL forecast a thumping deficit

of practically ₤ 1 billion, up from ₤ 458 million in his very first year in workplace, 2016/17. The financial bind is worsened by Mr Khan’s own flagship pledge to freeze fares, which drew ₤ 640 million from profits, and by the loss of ₤ 700 million in subsidy this year under federal government lowerings. < amp-img src= https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/03/29/10/police2a.jpg

width =1500 height= 1000 design= responsive srcset =” https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/03/29/10/police2a.jpg?w1000 1000w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/03/29/10/police2a.jpg?w770 770w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/03/29/10/police2a.jpg?w600 600w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/03/29/10/police2a.jpg?w480 480w” i-amphtml-layout= responsive >

Learn more Sadiq Khan’ has no plan’ to eliminate criminal offense in London Mike Brown, the Transport for London commissioner, has likewise disagreed with that not a penny of the ₤ 500 million paid in vehicle excise task by London drivers is invested in the capital’s roads.

” That is nuts, it’s definitely crazy,” a frustrated Mr Brown told an audience of 200 industry leaders previously this summertime. He included, “It’s neither sustainable nor reasonable,” referring to the “ridiculous situation” where Tube and bus passengers were efficiently subsidising, through their fares, repair work to London’s significant roadway network.The numbers are indeed bleak. TfL’s overall income was down ₤ 189 million, 3 percent below budget plan. Tube fares were ₤ 121 million listed below budget plan, and ₤ 37 million lower than the previous year. Bus fares were down ₤ 21 million (but ₤ 17 million ahead of budget). Rail earnings was up ₤ 4 million, however ₤ 34 million listed below budget. Guest journeys across the network were down– the second succeeding yearly decrease. There were 21 million fewer Tube journeys (though TfL confesses rush-hour services were as crowded as ever )and 15 million less bus trips. TfL intends to eliminate the deficit, currently ₤ 968 million, by 2021 through effectiveness. Transport is the field where the Mayor’s choices straight affect more individuals than any other and every saving is unpleasant and risks a backlash.A review of bus services recently leaked out, exposing some paths in main London are likely to be pruned back,

with cars rerouted to increase outer London services. This fight for cash, midway through Mr Khan’s four-year term, is a core issue of his mayoralty. Practically 3 quarters of TfL’s income originates from fares. What can be done to get the money rolling back in to provide on services and take a legacy? Boris Johnson, speaking among buddies, has dubbed him” Sadiq Khan’t”. Some experts think the only method to solve the problem is for Mr Khan to drastically overhaul the< a href =https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/sadiq-khan-launches-bid-to-crackdown-on-rocketing-number-of-minicabs-in-congestion-charge-zone-a3881026.html > blockage charge to bring in more money and motivate more walking, cycling and riding on public transport. The idea is backed by the Centre for London believe tank, which states the C-charge, presented by Ken Livingstone in 2003, is “not fit for function”. Nicole Badstuber, a researcher at the Centre for Transport Studies at UCL, told the Requirement: “If we can price using your automobile on the length of time you are driving or how far you are travelling or how crowded it is, we can encourage individuals to use public transport. That will produce more ticket sales for TfL– or increased revenues for the congestion charge itself.”” With the elimination of direct federal government aid we have actually got to find new methods of funding transportation in London “Deputy mayor Heidi Alexander Mr Khan’s very first challenge is to comprehend whether the fall in guests is a blip or a long-lasting pattern. Shashi Verma, TfL’s ticketing guru, said the fall in passenger numbers was due to a decline in off-peak leisure journeys instead of less commuters.” Television is

the maximum it has ever been at peak times,” he stated.” The question is whether it is down to individuals living their lives in a different way or down to the truth there has actually been a wage capture of unmatched proportions.” Mr Khan’s 2nd obstacle is to discover ₤ 1 billion of savings and, third, to grow earnings from non-transport schemes, such as property. In his 2016 mayoral manifesto, Mr Khan made it sound simple. He would squeeze waste from an “inefficient and flabby” TfL without cutting services. However investment in new Northern and Jubilee trains has actually been shelved. Pits are going unrepaired. Bus services will be cut by 7 per cent. After the Mayor axed the Metropolitan line extension from Croxley to Watford Junction previously this year, the Federal government demanded the return of about ₤ 80 million in grants. The 2 sides are “in discussion”, says TfL.He has actually kept a pledge to cut the ₤ 383 million TfL spent on specialists and on agency personnel, down by ₤ 175 million. Average headcount has actually fallen by just 137 out of an army of 26,994 workers. 617 TfL personnel now earn ₤ 100,000 or more. Last year it paid a record ₤ 51.4 million in “golden farewells” to 704 leaving executives, triggering Mr Khan to release an investigation.Highlights of the Mayor’s time in Town hall to date consist of a four-year fare freeze and the Hopper recompense, which permits one hour’s unlimited switching between buses for ₤ 1.50. TfL officials have taken to scrutinising fares income on a weekly basis. Financial projections are now ultra-cautious. Tube delays are falling, and there has actually been a dramatic reduction in strikes.Mr Khan has been radical and tough in tackling pollution: introducing the T-charge– an additional levy on top of the blockage charge for older contaminating cars– and bringing forward the Ultra Low Emission Zone to next year. Mr Khan took advantage of some plans inherited from his predecessor, releasing the Night Tube. But his desire to part-pedestrianise Oxford Street was shelved after Westminster council objected.On the roadways, traffic speeds have continued to fall. The typical daytime speed is 8 miles per hour in main London and 17.6 mph throughout Greater London, partly due to the growth in Uber minicabs

and vans delivering products purchased online.< a href= https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/so-sadiq-khan-where-are-all-those-new-homes-you-promised-a3926326.html data-vars-item-name =" find out more-/ news/london/so-sadiq-khan- where-are-all-those-new-homes-you-promised-a3926326. html "data-vars-event-id =c29 >< amp-img src= https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/09/03/11/sadiq-corbyn346.jpg width= 1324 height =882 design= responsive srcset=" https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/09/03/11/sadiq-corbyn346.jpg?w1000 1000w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/09/03/11/sadiq-corbyn346.jpg?w770 770w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/09/03/11/sadiq-corbyn346.jpg?w600 600w, https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/09/03/11/sadiq-corbyn346.jpg?w480 480w" i-amphtml-layout= responsive > Read more So Sadiq Khan, where are all those new houses you guaranteed? He authorized a new interstate under the Thames at Silvertown to relieve dire congestion at the Blackwall tunnel– however which campaigners say will increase pollution. No pledge has drawn in more sniping than his vow to” make London a byword for biking all over the world”. Mr Khan assured to spend an average of ₤ 169 million a year on cycling, beating the ₤ 913 million pledged by Mr Johnson over 10 years. But he has dealt with consistent barbs from the cycling community. No brand-new< a href= https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/city-hall-brands-westminster-council-a-disgrace-over-plans-to-block-new-cycle-superhighway-a3902341.html >

cycle superhighways have actually been

developed. Work has been limited to a northern extension of the north-south

superhighway and a filling-in of gaps on the east-west superhighway near Buckingham Palace. The CS11 route that would connect Swiss Cottage and Oxford Circus and the CS9 through Chiswick

are postponed after sparking vociferous minority opposition.The Mini-Hollands initiative, which shared ₤ 100 million between Waltham Forest, Enfield and Kingston to develop walking and cycling locations, has been replaced by the” liveable areas fund “, which provides

only ₤ 10 million. A straw survey of 1,000 cyclists in June asked whether Mr Khan had actually made London more secure to cycle in. Half responded to” no”. Danny Williams, who ran the poll on his Bicyclists in the City Twitter page, said:” He’s truly bucked taking any choices about bigger schemes so far.” Dr Rachel Aldred, a transportation professional at the University of Westminster, invited the Mayor’s” healthy streets” policy that looks for to decrease cars and truck dominance in boroughs such as Waltham Forest and Hackney.” However Londonwide, Sadiq’s aspirations seem stymied– high-profile walking and biking schemes blocked or postponed, regardless of the high expenses of failing to cut motor car use across the capital,” she said.One of Mr Khan’s boldest relocations might be the current consultation of former Labour frontbench MP Heidi Alexander as his deputy mayor for transportation. Three weeks into the task, she declared an intent to “turbo charge” the biking program and encourage more people from their cars. She claimed it was” unreasonable” to criticise his record on biking however promised far more was in shop.” I know that Sadiq desires to supercharge the shipment of biking infrastructure,” Ms Alexander informed the Requirement.” I think if people see brand-new cycling facilities it also serves as something of a motivation to begin changing behaviour. This problem about our roadways being safe and individuals feeling safe is truly important.” She said TfL’s finances were “under control”, including: “The elimination of the direct subsidy from government indicates that we are in a position where we have actually got to find brand-new methods of moneying the shipment of transportation in London.” Plainly if the Government do not get their

act together and we get a bad Brexit, that might have possibly substantial ramifications on the economy.” Public transportation usage does not exist in a vacuum. There is this huge financial unpredictability that possibly Transport for London will be needing to manage. “A spokesperson for the Mayor stated the typical home would save ₤ 200 over 4 years from the fares freeze and Hopper ticket.” Sadiq is investing record quantities

in brand-new transportation infrastructure, while making sure more budget-friendly travel for millions of Londoners,” he said. “This includes the Mayor’s TfL fares freeze, and over 200 million bus journeys already benefiting from Sadiq’s brand-new Hopper fare. After yearly fare rises and interruption under the previous Mayor, Sadiq has actually overseen a 65 per cent decrease in strike action on television, enhancing journeys for commuters.” While cutting year-on-year operating expense at TfL, the Mayor is both doubling London’s investment in brand-new cycling and walking facilities, and

spending record amounts modernising London’s Tube network. “The Night Tube has surpassed all expectations given that it launched in August 2016, with 3 million more journeys than expected, and night services now working on the London Overground.”

Source

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-black-hole-a3928131.html

from http://taxi.nearme.host/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-great-void/

from NOVACAB - Blog http://novacabtaxi.weebly.com/blog/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-great-void

0 notes

kevingbakeruk · 6 years ago

Text

The Sadiq Khan audit: Mayor’s transport headache is a revenue great void

ES News Email

A week ago arriving on schedule this year.

A “nationwide humiliation” was the decision of service leaders. Labour peer Lord Adonis, a former transport secretary, questioned whether the project had actually had the necessary oversight.The timing could barely be worse for a Mayor who is hanging on to a cat’s cradle of monetary problems that will be worsened by the loss of Crossrail ticket incomes and a rise in construction costs. Transportation for London, the authority he chairs, is struggling with falling traveler numbers, federal government funding being slashed and the unpredictability of Brexit.In spring this year, TfL forecast a thumping deficit

with cars rerouted to increase outer London services. This fight for cash, midway through Mr Khan’s four-year term, is a core issue of his mayoralty. Practically 3 quarters of TfL’s income originates from fares. What can be done to get the money rolling back in to provide on services and take a legacy? Boris Johnson, speaking among buddies, has dubbed him” Sadiq Khan’t”. Some experts think the only method to solve the problem is for Mr Khan to drastically overhaul the blockage charge to bring in more money and motivate more walking, cycling and riding on public transport. The idea is backed by the Centre for London believe tank, which states the C-charge, presented by Ken Livingstone in 2003, is “not fit for function”. Nicole Badstuber, a researcher at the Centre for Transport Studies at UCL, told the Requirement: “If we can price using your automobile on the length of time you are driving or how far you are travelling or how crowded it is, we can encourage individuals to use public transport. That will produce more ticket sales for TfL– or increased revenues for the congestion charge itself.”” With the elimination of direct federal government aid we have actually got to find new methods of funding transportation in London “Deputy mayor Heidi Alexander Mr Khan’s very first challenge is to comprehend whether the fall in guests is a blip or a long-lasting pattern. Shashi Verma, TfL’s ticketing guru, said the fall in passenger numbers was due to a decline in off-peak leisure journeys instead of less commuters.” Television is

and vans delivering products purchased online. Read more So Sadiq Khan, where are all those new houses you guaranteed? He authorized a new interstate under the Thames at Silvertown to relieve dire congestion at the Blackwall tunnel– however which campaigners say will increase pollution. No pledge has drawn in more sniping than his vow to” make London a byword for biking all over the world”. Mr Khan assured to spend an average of ₤ 169 million a year on cycling, beating the ₤ 913 million pledged by Mr Johnson over 10 years. But he has dealt with consistent barbs from the cycling community. No brand-new

cycle superhighways have actually been

developed. Work has been limited to a northern extension of the north-south

superhighway and a filling-in of gaps on the east-west superhighway near Buckingham Palace. The CS11 route that would connect Swiss Cottage and Oxford Circus and the CS9 through Chiswick

Source

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-black-hole-a3928131.html

from TAXI NEAR ME http://taxi.nearme.host/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-great-void/

from NOVACAB https://novacabtaxi.tumblr.com/post/178017960951

0 notes

novacabtaxi · 6 years ago

Text

The Sadiq Khan audit: Mayor’s transport headache is a revenue great void

ES News Email

A week ago arriving on schedule this year.

A “nationwide humiliation” was the decision of service leaders. Labour peer Lord Adonis, a former transport secretary, questioned whether the project had actually had the necessary oversight.The timing could barely be worse for a Mayor who is hanging on to a cat’s cradle of monetary problems that will be worsened by the loss of Crossrail ticket incomes and a rise in construction costs. Transportation for London, the authority he chairs, is struggling with falling traveler numbers, federal government funding being slashed and the unpredictability of Brexit.In spring this year, TfL forecast a thumping deficit

with cars rerouted to increase outer London services. This fight for cash, midway through Mr Khan’s four-year term, is a core issue of his mayoralty. Practically 3 quarters of TfL’s income originates from fares. What can be done to get the money rolling back in to provide on services and take a legacy? Boris Johnson, speaking among buddies, has dubbed him” Sadiq Khan’t”. Some experts think the only method to solve the problem is for Mr Khan to drastically overhaul the blockage charge to bring in more money and motivate more walking, cycling and riding on public transport. The idea is backed by the Centre for London believe tank, which states the C-charge, presented by Ken Livingstone in 2003, is “not fit for function”. Nicole Badstuber, a researcher at the Centre for Transport Studies at UCL, told the Requirement: “If we can price using your automobile on the length of time you are driving or how far you are travelling or how crowded it is, we can encourage individuals to use public transport. That will produce more ticket sales for TfL– or increased revenues for the congestion charge itself.”” With the elimination of direct federal government aid we have actually got to find new methods of funding transportation in London “Deputy mayor Heidi Alexander Mr Khan’s very first challenge is to comprehend whether the fall in guests is a blip or a long-lasting pattern. Shashi Verma, TfL’s ticketing guru, said the fall in passenger numbers was due to a decline in off-peak leisure journeys instead of less commuters.” Television is

cycle superhighways have actually been

developed. Work has been limited to a northern extension of the north-south

superhighway and a filling-in of gaps on the east-west superhighway near Buckingham Palace. The CS11 route that would connect Swiss Cottage and Oxford Circus and the CS9 through Chiswick

Source

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-black-hole-a3928131.html

from TAXI NEAR ME http://taxi.nearme.host/the-sadiq-khan-audit-mayors-transport-headache-is-a-revenue-great-void/

0 notes

ahnenerbe0704 · 8 years ago

Text

“ Oranges and lemons, say the bells of St. Clement’s”

Aestheticism writers like Oscar Wilde claimed that writing is pure art which should not be spoiled by political ideas. I wonder, if Wilde had lived 40 years longer, and fortunately read some pieces of work from George Orwell, what remarks he would have given by using his tart pens.

Although Wilde’s works were beautifully written, and the metaphors he used were full of imagination and aesthetic principles. Politics is still haunted every word that human beings write, including his. It’s just simply because, as a member of civilized society, beginning from the time that the first hierarchy structure emerged, no one can escape from the clutch of politics. Politics is man himself.

Still, some teenagers (like my middle school classmates) believe politics is aloof, and far from their everyday lives. They haven’t realized that even the movies they watched, songs they listened, books they read, money they paid for food, are the results of politics. I think politics is more like a macro-interpersonal relationship, if you want to tell a story about people, you certainly cannot avoid describing the relationships of them. If you want to tell a story about a massive number of people, and that is the show time of politics.

George Orwell must know this very well, for he coincidentally lived in the age when the diversity of politics was much more significant than ever before. Nationalism, Liberalism, Communism, Nazism, Fascism, like clowns in a circus, took control of the stage one by one. Orwell picked out one of them which he hated most, the Totalitarianism. People know him through his magnificent dystopia novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He pictured a world where “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” Sounds ridiculous. That’s true. But what more ridiculous is, you can find the ghost of his theory in every Totalitarianism regime of his time and even after his time. It seems that people treat his book not as an alarm, but as a textbook.

When everything came to reality, the mask of ridiculous was teared down, and tyranny revealed its ugly essence. When the Gestapos and Nazi thought polices smashed doors open and dragged people out of their houses, when the terror of political persecution enveloped the soil of the Soviet Union, and leaked through the iron bars of Gulags, when Khmer Rouge orchestrated the Cambodian genocide and massacred millions of its own citizens, when children denounced their parents, students denounced their teachers because of the brain-washing propaganda during the Cultural Revolution, people suddenly realized that “there is nothing new under the sun.” Just like Mark Twain putted,” History doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes.”

I have read Nineteen Eighty-Four, and I’ve also read Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. If Orwell and Huxley knew the horrible descriptions in their books came to life again and again, I dare not to imagine how desperate they would be. Lu Xun believed people cannot be saved by only using surgical knife. Now Orwell is valid to say that people cannot be saved by using pen, either.

But I still trust that one more person read George Orwell, there is one more guarantee for freedom. Everyone should bear the words of Nineteen Eighty-Four in mind,

"'Oh--Oranges and lemons, say the bells of St. Clement's.……Here comes a candle to light you to bed, Here comes a chopper to chop off your head.”

Because we never know when the crazy idea of Totalitarianism will back to life again.

0 notes

aulunthe · 8 years ago

Link

The #EUKremlinConnection? #ConnectTheDots #RussiaGate #TrumpDossier Putin interferes in as many ways as possible to break up NATO, European Union, any Western democratic solidarity in his revenge for the fall of the USSR and his attempts to again weaken and gobble up his neighbors and strengthen his geopolitical influence. TRUMP, PUTIN, AND THE NEW COLD WAR

Donald Trump praises Putin and cozies up to him, and it is becoming more and more evident that he may have been involved in the Kremlin interference in the U.S. 2016 election, putting Trump into the White House. New Facts On Russia Influence On GOP Platform | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Nigel Farage also praises Putin and criticizes Obama and Western centrist or leftist leaders, following more of a Nationalist and fringe right Conservative stance, like self proclaimed Marxist-Leninist Steve Bannon. Nigel Farage has in recent weeks been rubbing elbows with Trump and certain US Republicans, another dot to connect.

Brilliant Putin is the leader I most admire, says Nigel Farage

Brexit Leader Nigel Farage: Putin ‘Behaved in a More Statesmanlike Manner Than’ Obama Following EU Vote

Nigel Farage is another of Moscow’s darlings as Putin backs Right

There are those in the Media or with celebrity or resistance notoriety who seem to have moved over to the Moscow circus tent with the RT label on it. RT-Russian Television, Kremlin controlled propaganda media. The Kremlin’s CandidateIn the 2016 election, Putin’s propaganda network is picking sides.

Meeting of minds? Nigel Farage to share platform with Donald Trump

Recent laughable claims by Donald Trump that #POTUS44 wire tapped his phones in Trump Tower is an attempt to deflect attention away from growing evidence that his campaign had/has Russian ties and that many of the claims in Christopher Steele’s #TrumpDossier are being corroborated, including a former Trump campaign official, J.D. Gordon, who convinced the Republican National Committee to change the original GOP platform’s call to support the Ukraine in their conflict with Russia and Russian separatists, including supplying them with weapons. Trump and his campaign manager at the time Paul Manafort both denied having any involvement in softening the support for Ukraine. J.D. Gordon although has recently come forward and has admitted that he was the one who interceded in the Republican Party Platform, and he said he did it specifically at Donald Trump’s request. According to the Dossier this was in exchange for the DNC hacked information distributed through wikileaks.

Another interesting development is the leaks of CIA information, at a very interesting timeline, following Donald Trump’s rediculous claims based on a right wing conspiracy theorist’s report about the wiretap, Mark Levin, and Breitbart News, and Infowars, and of course supporting the nonsense, FOX News and Sean Hannity. All of this after Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort, Jeff Sessions, Carter Page, Roger Stone, and now J.D. Gordon all more or less being confirmed as having communication with Russian officials during the campaign. Add to that list Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, Sheriff David Clarke, Ivana Trump, Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen whose wife is Russian and her father a prominent property developer in Moscow, and no doubt many more will be exposed.

Most Republican politicians have been reluctant to support or even acknowledge the possibility of Trump’s Kremlin Connections and a call for an independent investigation. Some have even spoken out calling it ridiculous, but they are more than accomodating to investigate Trump’s ridiculous wiretapping claims that he will not corroborate with any proof. What are the Republicans trying to prevent from being discovered? It has always been my feeling that there are lawmakers on Capitol Hill that were also involved, especially those involved in the Benghazi and Clinton email investigations; if not directly then at least in coverups and corroboration with Trump surrogates and the alt-right networks. There was a lot of misinformation propagated by them from the hearings through vast networks of conservative sites, alt-right sites and throughout all social networks, Youtube, and FOX News.

0 notes