#Evan Bryer
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Photo
@ anon from yesterday. I caved and made one lol. Got inspired at work so have these pen doodles. Don't know much about him other than he comes off as bad and evil, but he's more of a chaotic neutral. Anyways :Y
106 notes
·
View notes
Text
Queer Rep in Null/Void
Title: Null/Void
Status: Complete
Creator and Director: Cole Burkhardt
Cast: Winona Wyatt, Danyelle Ellett, Azul Nova, Evan Saft, Sena Bryer,
PJ Kanis, Marcie Hobbs, Kara Bruntz, Jona Lune, JV Hampton-VanSant,
Queer Creators: Yes
Accessibility: Content warnings in episode descriptions and in transcripts. Transcripts available on their website here.
Summary: Null/Void is a science fiction audio drama about a young woman, Piper Lee, whose life is saved by a mysterious voice named Adelaide. After uncovering a malicious plot, Piper and her friends must defend their small town from a family of ruthless billionaires who wish to exploit and destroy it. Piper must fight to save her home and discover the true identity of Adelaide.
This entry could use information about which characters are queer.
Check out our other queer podcast recommendations here.
Please feel free to offer suggestions and updates!
#oots#queerdigitalmedia#queerpodcastrecommendations#queerpodcast#queerpodcastrecommendation#queer fantasy#queer sci fi#sci fi podcast#null/void#null/void pod#null/void podcast#Cole Burkhardt#piper lee#accessible podcasts
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Meleager’s Four Cast and Crew
CAST (in order of first appearance)
NARRATOR Q Dyer (they/them)
ASA Brad (they/he / Twitter)
DAYE Tal Minear (they/them / Website / Twitter)
KODEN Hollis Beck (she/her / Website / Twitter)
ZI Kylan Byrd (they/she / Twitter / @bring-us-back-light)
RYLAN VORK Kirsty Woolven (she/her / Personal Twitter / Arrivals Podcast)
KARN Alicia Atkins (she/her / Twitter)
SIEDI Daniel Santoy (he/him / Twitter)
ALDISSI Becca Marcus (she/her / Twitter)
MONOLA Evan Tess Murray (they/them / Twitter)
TIVA Cass McPhee (he/they / Website / Twitter)
VEN CATARIN Sena Bryer (she/her / Website / Twitter)
RILA Morgan Metcalf (she/her / Twitter / @merganfm)
PEB Hazel Stapp (she/her / Website / Twitter)
CREW
DIRECTOR, WRITER, SOUND ENGINEER Arizona Jonson (she/her / Twitter)
SOUND ENGINEERS Ella (they/them / Twitter) Joshua Sands (any pronouns)
SCRIPT EDITORS Perry P. (they/them) Kiana Triana (she/her / Website / Instagram)
#meleager's four podcast#meleager's four#cast and crew#cast#crew#MF cast#MF crew#meta#important#announcement#search for the missing leader#podcast#update#updates#podcasts#sci-fi#science fiction#scifi#queer#lgbt#lgbtq#lgbtq+#lgbt+
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cheap Fake Yeezys
ja morant signs endorsement deal with nike Tuesday stop was the 27th at the airport checkpoint this year, according to the TSA. Bursitis of the knee commonly fake yeezys for kids occurs on the inside of the knee (anserine bursitis) and the front of the kneecap (patellar bursitis, or "housemaid's knee"). Rock the Bells, please welcome to the stage A Tribe Called Quest!" Except Tribe wasn't ready yet, and when a rushed Ali Shaheed Muhammad emerged from the wings and quickly started the intro to Midnight Marauders on the turntables, he shot Rosenberg an icy stare. They showcased the elegance of his body and his staggering athleticism, but they did not explore the type of person he was, whether he was someone you'd only want to watch play or someone you'd also invite over for dinner after the game.. With neither ties nor buttons, it is tied left over right across the chest and secured at the waist with a broad sash called an an obi.. US local law enforcement organizations and infrastructure operators have grown to rely on drones in recent years.. Tatum's childhood idol, retired Lakers legend Kobe Bryant, was also present.. Ban on importing tusks and other elephant body parts as hunting trophies. Random violence born of ennui was unproductive, as a tangent to the hustle: predators killed for food, not to kill time. 9,999 plan that offers 120GB per day at 100Mbps internet speed, and after the data cap is reached the speed is reduced to 8Mbps.. Styling is similar to elder sibling RC 390 and there is a striking similarity in the design as well as the size of fairing used on 200. The companyannounced that it was working on a Harry Potter project in 2017, and partnered with Warner Bros. Among the other features, the new Mojo UT300 comes with 320 mm petal front disc brake and a 240 mm unit at the rear, 17 inch tubeless tyres from MRF and a gas charged monoshock rear suspension. The driver said he picked up a fare on the 500 block of Howard Ave. Must call for change, he tweeted afterward along with a photo. Internet explorer allows users to download lists that blow or allow specific companies from cheap yeezy shoes conducting behavioural advertising. The key then is looking at the future that's happening now. Guess that means they're fast fashion. "I couldn't do it without them. A case manager will talk with the veteran to find out what their three biggest needs are and perform a screening to see Cheap Fake Yeezys what kind of programs they may qualify for that include financial assistance or other aid.. In peace, Bryer. He was wearing a white jumper, black pants and grey Nike shoes and had his face covered with a blue shirt. There will also be limited quantities of the specialty shoes. I acutally dig these. Leicester City FC10:07, 11 SEP 2019BBCGary Lineker's son Harry almost killed in brutal football riot attack while filming in AfricaLineker, aged 58, revealed Harry, 25, was brutally attacked during a football riot in Africa while filming a World Cup qualifier between Sierra Leone and Liberia on Sunday September 8Wolverhampton Wanderers FCWolves and Liverpool battle for England youth international transfer reportsWolves transfer news A number of clubs are chasing the signing of 17 year old, With Chelsea, Everton, Leicester City also interested.Wolverhampton Wanderers FC'Different animal' How Manchester United, Everton the rest rate WolvesWolverhampton Wanderers So far Wolves have played Leicester,Man United, Burnley and Everton. Think you probably see some limitations of hours, saying, it off at this or that point. The scary guys from the city were black. So how do we get the good connected things and avoid the ones that are going to end up on the Internet of S list? Nike says it has now fixed its shoes, but we can learn a few things about staying in control from how it bricked them in the first place.. Ultimately, everything that was done has resulted into a positive change to IKEA as a whole.. The announcement comes days after the family of Carlos Solis filed a lawsuit against Takata. We'll forgive his gift to the Golden State Warriors of otherwise acceptable high end Stumptown cold brew coffee. For a report of a burglary and found the home on the 300 block of Crawford Avenue had been forced into and items were missing. Le souhait est que les gnrations futures soient informes de l'antriorit et de la dimension de la traite transsaharienne et orientale. He sounded off a time or two himself, as when he called Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton liars. Then (he) came up with a fancy theory that there is no loss because coal is in the womb of Mother Earth," he said. The rising talent, described as of the best defensive centres I seen by analyst Corey Evans, was out in full force over the weekend and cemented himself in the eyes of many as a future NBA superstar.. He invited his former coach, the Hurricanes' Don Soldinger, along to Hawaii for the Pro Bowl. Gemstones are real fascinating elements. The doll, which is sold in stores, is Pennywise from Stephen King books and the movie It had blood around its mouth and strange black marks on its forehead. You use them to get your employees to work harder, to get buy in on your latest initiative, and even to get your kids to do their homework.
1 note
·
View note
Text
so im going through my characters and trying to figure out who im gonna make “mains” on my blog, bc i need pictures for the new theme im working on. cross outs i think im gonna make request only, normal text secondaries, and bolds main muses. this could change, and any bios im not deleting off of my page. i just am trying to make things pretty lol
cannon characters
marinette dupain-chang//ladybug - miraculous ( fc. cassady mcclincy)
adrien agreste//crimson beetle - miraculous ( fc. ross lynch)
chloé bourgeois//queen bee - miraculous ( fc. hunter schafer)
Nino Lahiffe//Carapace - Miraculous ( fc. Jordan Fisher) *
Kim Lê Chiến//King Monkey - Miraculous ( fc. Ross Butler) *
Rose Lavillant//Pigella - Miraculous ( fc. Jessie Paege) *
Zoé Lee//Vesperia - Miraculous ( fc. Chloe Lukasiak) *
Juleka Couffaine - Miraculous ( fc. Olivia Rodrigo)*
Evie Queen - Descendants ( fc. Sofia Carson)
Mal Faerie - Descendants ( fc. Dove Cameron)
Sugar Motta - Glee ( fc. Vanessa Lengies)
Lola Paccini - Degrassi ( fc. Amanda Arcuri)
Alli Bhandari - Degrassi ( fc. Melinda Shankar)
Maya Matlin - Degrassi ( fc. Olivia Scriven)
chrissy cunningham - stranger things ( fc. grace vandien)
max mayfield - stranger things ( fc. sadie sink)
oc characters
Cassie James - main verse(s): degrassi/glee/teen wolf ( fc. Mackenzie Ziegler)
Cassie Harrington - main verse: stranger things (steve’s lil sister) ( fc. Mackenzie Ziegler)
CJ King - main verse: degrassi ( fc. Kelli Berglund)
Elizabeth “Lizzy” Munson - main verse: stranger things (eddie’s lil sister) ( fc: haley lu richardson )
Janelle Puckerman - main verse: glee ( fc. Janessa Rose)
Leo Holmes - main verse: degrassi ( fc. Dominic Harrson)
Scarlett Cardinal - main verse: degrassi, younger sister of Grace Cardinal ( fc. India Eisley)
Skyla Evans - main verse: glee ( fc. Bea Miller)
Jessie Domer - main verse(s): degrassi/glee/teen wolf ( fc. Jade Pettyjohn)
Josh Bryers - main verse: degrassi ( fc. Jacob Sartorius)
Zac Moran - main verse(s): degrassi/glee ( fc. Devid Druid)
1 note
·
View note
Text
Chapter 2—Screening and Assessing Adults For Childhood Abuse and Neglect Part 1
Substance abuse is a chronic and relapsing condition. It is often associated with problems in physical, psychological, emotional, spiritual, and social functioning (Brown, 1998; Landry, 1994). These problems are not likely to be the result of one specific cause but rather the result of an accumulation of factors that clients have faced in their lives (Luthar and Walsh, 1995). Risk factors associated with substance abuse disorders include histories of childhood abuse and neglect (Carlson, 1997). In fact, a recent study found that adults with histories of child abuse have an increased likelihood of heart disease, cancer, and chronic lung disease, as well as greater risk for alcoholism, drug abuse, depression, and attempted suicide (Felitti et al., 1998). These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive screening and assessment for individuals with substance abuse disorders and client access to adequate health care.
Although childhood abuse and neglect disproportionately affect adult substance abusers and their families, clients' substance abuse disorders are not often examined within the context of past abuse or neglect experiences. The reasons for not considering or eliciting this kind of historical information vary. Treatment providers may not have comprehensive screening and assessment measures available. Often, counselors simply fail to ask, or the intake organization does not instruct them to ask, about childhood abuse. Yet in some instances disclosure rates have risen dramatically when substance abuse treatment clients were asked directly about their experience of child abuse.
Clients may be unable to address traumatic childhood events because of memory problems that, in the past, have helped them cope with the trauma (Brown et al., 1999). Clients' family members may not be available or appropriate as family historians, and it is not the counselor's role to independently investigate family histories. Sometimes the immediacy of other problems causes assessments of child abuse and neglect to be delayed. Yet without proper screening and assessment, treatment providers may wrongly attribute symptoms of childhood trauma-related disorders to consequences of current substance abuse. Mental health issues often precede, rather than follow from, substance dependence. Therefore, comprehensive screening for root causes of clients' presenting symptoms may greatly increase the effectiveness of treatment.
Go to: Challenges to Accurate Screening and Assessment Counselors face great challenges when screening for and assessing childhood abuse or neglect. Few adults are comfortable with a history of violation and neglect. Many abuse survivors are ashamed of having been victims of childhood physical, emotional, or sexual abuse and may feel that the abuse was self-induced. Screening and assessment, therefore, should be designed to reduce the threat of humiliation and blame and should be done in a safe, nonthreatening environment. Although family members can be an important part of a comprehensive assessment (with the client's consent), treatment providers should be aware of what impact their involvement may have on the client's safety (or the safety of the client's children) and which family members the client considers nonthreatening.The following sections illustrate the challenges that treatment staff should anticipate and prepare for when screening for a history of childhood abuse or neglect and when assessing its impact on clients with substance abuse disorders. Underreporting Trauma History or SymptomsWhen screening for and assessing a history of childhood trauma, the counselor should ask clients to recall and indirectly reexperience abuse-related events (Briere, 1997). This process can trigger defense mechanisms--such as denial, minimization, repression, amnesia, and dissociation (Bernstein et al., 1994; Briere, 1992a; Cornell and Olio, 1991)--that diminish the distress associated with these events and memories (Fink et al., 1995). These mechanisms may cause a client to withhold or ignore information that is important for the assessment. Adult survivors of childhood trauma commonly suppress memories of certain traumatic events or minimize, either consciously or unconsciously, their symptoms (Brown et al., 1999; Whitfield, 1997a). Frequently, such defense mechanisms relate to the shame and stigma of the events. Clients may fear retribution from perpetrators or family members or loss of contact with people on whom they are emotionally dependent. Minimizing has often served to protect family members from having to deal with the criminal justice system (including the possible arrest of the perpetrator). Also, clients may fear that treatment staff will assume that they are abusive to their own children and report them to the police or child protective services (CPS) agencies. Still others may have never perceived their experiences as abusive or harmful but rather as normal and deserved.Certain sociocultural factors may encourage denial and minimization. For example, there is a social imperative among males to be strong and silent and unaffected by abuse. Physical abuse is difficult to evaluate because most males see their abuse as normal punishment for their behaviors (Langeland and Hartgers, 1998). Men may self-report child abuse and neglect less than women because their occurrence implies weakness and an inability to protect themselves (Evans and Sullivan, 1995; Holmes et al., 1997). Recent studies have concluded that sexual abuse of boys is underreported and undertreated (Holmes and Slap, 1998).Issues of confidentiality, mandated reporting, and trust may influence responses to interviews and questionnaires by making some clients less inclined to reveal personal histories of abuse or neglect. Reporting requirements may vary from State to State (see Chapter 6 for more information on reporting child abuse and neglect). Maryland law, for example, requires that treatment providers report incidents of childhood abuse disclosed by adults in substance abuse treatment programs. Repressed MemoriesAn important limitation of most of the research on childhood abuse is that it relies on retrospective recall of personal events that usually are not independently corroborated. This is a standard problem in many areas of
research, but particular concerns have been raised about the retrospective recall of childhood sexual abuse. The primary concerns have revolved around the "false memory syndrome" and child sexual abuse that has been forgotten and later remembered in the context of counseling (Loftus, 1996). Laboratory research on memory indicates that people may be led to remember events that did not actually happen to them (Loftus, 1993). These findings have raised the concern that suggestible clients may be led by therapists to believe that they were sexually abused as children when they were not. Other research indicates, however, that people can only be led to believe that nontraumatic events happened to them and that they are much more impervious to suggestions that false traumatic events occurred (Bowman, 1996). See Farrants, 1998, for a review of the research on this subject. Overreporting Trauma History or SymptomsRecently, research has suggested that some individuals may overreport or misrepresent abuse histories or abuse-related symptomatology, although this does not normally happen (Briere, 1997). In such cases, the client's conscious or unconscious should be viewed as having significant pathology that may contaminate the screening and assessment processes. For example, some clients may report inaccurate abuse histories or symptoms so that they may receive treatment rather than be incarcerated, may receive inpatient instead of outpatient treatment, or may qualify for disability-related entitlements, such as Supplemental Security Income (LaCoursiere, 1993). Others may overreport their history of trauma or current trauma-related symptoms in an effort, consciously or unconsciously, to deny or minimize their substance abuse disorder. Although overreporting is probably a less frequent phenomenon than underreporting, staff should be aware of the possibility that clients may receive secondary gains from overreporting symptoms or the severity of past abuse. Just as many clients with substance abuse disorders tell "war stories," some, with a great deal of experience in treatment settings, have become experts at giving psychiatric labels to all their problems. Coexisting Psychiatric DisordersA number of studies have found that childhood maltreatment and trauma are significant risk factors for later psychiatric problems (Beitchman et al., 1992; Neumann et al., 1996; Polusny and Follette, 1995; Trickett and McBride-Chang, 1995). Indeed, individuals with a history of childhood trauma--such as being sexually abused, being physically assaulted, or repeatedly witnessing violence--often develop psychopathology during adulthood (Beitchman et al., 1992; Bryer et al., 1987; Malinosky-Rummell and Hansen, 1993; Pollock et al., 1990; Roesler and Dafler, 1993). Thus, many adults receiving treatment for substance abuse who have a history of childhood abuse and neglect will have a coexisting psychiatric disorder (seeFigure 2-1 ). As mentioned in Chapter 1, abuse and neglect during childhood are particularly associated with major depression, suicidal thoughts, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and dissociative symptoms (Briere and Runtz, 1990a; Craine et al., 1988; Felitti et al., 1998; Rowan and Foy, 1993; Rowan et al., 1994). In treatment programs for veterans, where PTSD symptoms are often assumed to be occupation related, a history of childhood abuse can be particularly difficult to identify. Childhood abuse also has been associated with borderline personality disorders (Herman et al., 1989), as well as dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder (Brown et al., 1999; Briere, 1997; Briere and Conte, 1993; Ross et al., 1990). Given the potential for coexisting psychiatric disorders in this population, treatment providers should not rely only on self-assessment tools and
patient feedback. 📷 BoxFigure 2-1: Symptoms and Syndromes Associated With Childhood Abuse and Neglect. Most Common Responses Helplessness Low self-esteem Guilt Shame Anxiety Depression (more...) Neuropsychological Consequences Of Childhood AbuseClients will benefit from understanding how severe and chronic physical, emotional, and sexual abuse in childhood can affect their memory and emotions long after the abuse has ceased. The long-term consequences of physical battering, for example, might include minimal or severe brain damage (from learning disabilities to mental retardation), aggressive behavior and lack of impulse control, and physical limitations. Childhood abuse or neglect also may hinder the development of a mature personality, because it becomes difficult for the abused person to develop a healthy sense of self. These effects have the potential to seriously complicate substance abuse treatment.New neuroimaging techniques--such as positron emission tomography (PET) scans or functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)--have revealed that chronic abuse may actually affect pathways in the brain and alter thinking processes. Some studies show reductions in the volume of the hippocampus, the seat of long-term memory, in both combat veterans with PTSD and women with PTSD who experienced severe sexual abuse during childhood (Bremner et al., 1995; Gurvitz et al., 1995; Stein et al., 1997). In another study (Rauch et al., 1996), individuals reliving abusive episodes had marked decreases in blood flow to the left brain--most notably to Broca's area, which governs language capacity--and increased blood flow to the amygdala and limbic system, believed to be the site of emotion and long-term memory. These findings suggest that remembering trauma can produce intense emotional states while at the same time it inhibits individuals' capacity to verbalize their experiences (van der Kolk, 1996).Counselors should be aware that clients may not be able to verbalize feelings when experiencing intense emotional states. Behavioral treatments such as exposure and desensitization in a safe therapeutic environment should help clients progressively manage these states without losing the ability to communicate. In this way, clients will be able to verbalize feelings instead of experiencing upsetting symptoms in response to traumatic triggers. DissociationMany researchers and counselors now believe that dissociation is a common and readily available defense against childhood trauma, since children dissociate more easily than adults (Turkus, 1998). To defend against abuse, the child psychologically flees (dissociates) from full awareness. Under severe trauma, especially if inflicted at a young age, parts of the self may split off, in some cases creating a compartmentalized way of experiencing the world, with strong or painful emotions and memories shut off from consciousness. These emotions may surface as intense fear or anger when the client is under stress or is in situations that trigger memories of the abuse. In extreme cases, parts of the self may assume separate identities.Dissociation serves many purposes. It provides a way out of an intolerable situation, it numbs pain, and it can erect barriers (i.e., amnesia) to keep traumatic events and memories out of awareness. The child may begin by using the dissociative mechanism spontaneously and sporadically (Courtois, 1988). With repeated victimization, it may become a chronic defensive pattern that persists into adulthood, resulting in a dissociative disorder. Arising as a survival mechanism to protect the child, over time dissociation changes into a pattern of behavior that interferes with the individual's daily functioning and ability to interact with others. Sometimes these
dissociative periods can last hours and require emergency psychiatric treatment.The counselor may see symptoms of dissociation but be unaware of the cause. For example, the client may "space out" when talking to the counselor, appearing disoriented or forgetful in order to avoid an intimate (and seemingly threatening) situation. The client may be temporarily unresponsive to conversation or questions, although he may reengage if the counselor persists in seeking his attention (Briere, 1989). These periods of disengagement usually last only a few seconds or minutes. However, they may cause the client to miss important insights or opportunities for self-examination.The client may also report or exhibit intense moods that are out of proportion to the present situation. Rage, terror, overwhelming sadness, or self-destructive impulses may take hold of the client as a result of what may appear to be minor issues, and the client may seem unable to respond to the counselor's attempts to reason with the client.Because there can be many causes of such extreme emotional reactions, it is important to isolate the symptoms of dependency or withdrawal from those caused by trauma resulting from childhood abuse.Dissociative symptoms can mimic the effects of drugs or of withdrawal from drugs, making it difficult to determine the type of problem being presented. In victims of trauma, substance abuse itself can be seen as a method of dissociating for those who cannot do it successfully through other means. For this reason, it is common for survivors of child abuse to self-medicate with substances, thus beginning a process that often leads to substance abuse and dependence. Counselor IssuesAny counselor or treatment provider who might be screening for and assessing histories of child abuse or neglect must receive specific training in these issues. The screening process and followup sessions will invariably involve listening to traumatic stories. Not all treatment providers will be comfortable hearing about their clients' experiences of abuse. Some may experience vicarious trauma or feel overwhelmed by these painful personal accounts. This may be especially true among counselors whose own traumatic childhood experiences were not addressed therapeutically. The counselor's biases from these experiences, regardless of their similarity to a client's, could have a harmful impact. If counselors experience intense discomfort and anxiety when conducting screenings and assessments, the Consensus Panel recommends that they receive guidance and support from a clinical supervisor and consider whether they could benefit from therapeutic assistance to explore the reasons for their discomfort. (For a more detailed discussion on counselor issues, see Chapter 4.)Prior training on handling abuse issues can help counselors "screen" themselves to recognize if they are unprepared to work with clients who have experienced childhood abuse or neglect. It is better to find out ahead of time than for the counselor to risk damaging the therapeutic process by having to confront personal issues in the middle of it--possibly even ending the session prematurely, leaving the client confused, feeling abandoned, or wondering "What's wrong with me?" Many counselors avoid issues of childhood abuse simply from lack of experience. They need assurance that the proverbial can of worms that has been opened can be closed in a reasonable length of time. Proper training can help counselors better deal with trauma and with secondary PTSD, sometimes known as "compassion fatigue."
Go to: Screening for a History of Child Abuse or Neglect Because adults who were abused or neglected during childhood can experience significant trauma-related consequences that require clinical intervention, the Consensus Panel suggests using child abuse and neglect screening (1) to identify individuals who exhibit certain signs and symptoms associated with child abuse and neglect (such as PTSD, major depression, or mood disorders) and (2) to identify who may benefit from a comprehensive clinical assessment. Consequently, treatment staff should Learn and understand ways in which childhood abuse and neglect can affect adult feelings and behaviors Identify those individuals who appear to exhibit these symptoms Identify the trauma-related treatment needs of these clients Provide or coordinate appropriate treatment services that will help to meet clients' treatment needs The Need for ScreeningAdults who were abused as children are more likely to use drugs or alcohol (Dembo et al., 1989; Singer et al., 1989; Zierler et al., 1991); therefore, they are more likely to be in treatment for substance abuse.The consequences of childhood abuse and neglect can dramatically affect a client's treatment needs. For instance, as noted in Chapter 1, a history of childhood trauma can increase the number and intensity of treatment services required, lengthen the time needed for treatment, and increase the number of sessions, particularly for male clients (Downs and Miller, 1996; Felitti, 1991; Felitti et al., 1998; Steinglass, 1987; Young, 1995). The consequences of childhood abuse and neglect can also affect the psychosocial supports that such clients may need following treatment (Steinglass, 1987). Screening for childhood abuse or neglect can set in motion a proactive plan with the following benefits: Stopping the cycle. Although not all adults who were abused or neglected during childhood abuse their own children, they are at greater risk of doing so (Kaufman and Zigler, 1987). Thus, screening for abuse and neglect can be an important step in stopping the cycle of abuse in many families. Decreasing the probability of relapse. Many substance abusers use alcohol and illicit drugs to self-medicate posttraumatic stress symptoms related to past physical or sexual abuse or trauma (Price et al., 1998); clients may abuse substances to deal with hyperarousal or stress (Clark et al., 1997; De Bellis, 1997). Since these are important causes of continued substance-abusing behavior, addressing them may facilitate treatment and reduce relapse. Improving a client's overall psychological and interpersonal functioning. Childhood sexual abuse and neglect may affect the individual's self-concept, sense of self-esteem, and ability to self-actualize. They also affect a person's ability to trust, be intimate, and set limits with others. Identifying a history of abuse or neglect enables the client to address these issues as they relate to overall functioning as well as to recovery. The ability to trust is especially important; difficulties with trust can impede the client's ability to utilize treatment to its fullest. Improving program outcome. Screening for a history of child abuse or neglect helps to determine the percentage of abused and neglected individuals who are in a substance abuse treatment program. Furthermore, screening, combined with assessment, helps to determine the trauma-related treatment needs of clients. With this information, programs can make informed decisions about providing the treatment services that can best meet their clients' needs. https://whateveryparentshouldknowaboutcps.blogspot.com/2020/07/chapter-2screening-and-assessing-adults.html
0 notes
Text
New music in old bottles -Bailey and Rowe together
Ben Watson’s Derek Bailey discography at the end of his biography of the Sheffield giant seemed fairly exhaustive, when it first came out in 2004 (although it is now considerably expanded by subsequent releases). Brain Olewnick did a similar ambitious job with Keith Rowe’s recorded work(him being British free improv’s other landmark guitarist. As far as I knew, these very different stylists never played together, although Fred Frith has done a good job of melding their styles in his playing at various times. Bailey passed at Xmas time 2005, and Rowe rarely plays on these shores nowadays, having been based in France (Nantes) since 1992. Frith is, however, due to undertake a 3-day residency at Cafe Oto at the end of this month.
I was thus truly both surprised and pleased to find, on pages 184-5, of Olewnick’s biog (now on a second reading), a description of a significant recording. from as early as 1969. featuring both Bailey and Rowe. At this point in time, Incus Records had yet to be born (1970 saw to this), and Rowe was still playing in AMM 1,0, which had recently made the epochal The Crypt live sessions, to which this recording, called Gracility , can best be compared (yes, it’s that good). The track ‘Gracility’ itself features Bailey and Rowe, with Gavin Bryers on electric bass and its composer, Laurie Scott Baker, on double bass. It extends to the AMM -like length of 71 minutes, and forms part of a 2-CD set, along with an early (1975) Evan Parker solo soprano sax feature, a 1970 piece by the Scratch Orchestra, and a 1972 trio of Baker, John Tilbury and Jamie Muir (a very unusual grouping again, especially given the contrast of Tilbury and Muir). All in all, a most unusual and fascinating combination of very early British free improv/composition, which only saw the light of day in 2009, on Music Now (MNCD012). It’s an essential addition to the collections of folk who love this period.
To quote Olewnick: “Though improvised, there is one restraint - “The amps are set on the edge of feedback, but the playing is very gentle. The text calls for feedback to be avoided, a bit like trying to contain a genie in a bottle!” (from the liner notes by Baker)” This sounds a bit like a John Stevens instruction from ‘Search and Reflect’still , but it needs saying that the result is not as quiescent as might be expected -”When they do let loose, and they do several times, the resulting sound storm is quite as violent as anything on The Crypt” (Olwenick again), Rowe’s sound appears to be the most dominant, although it is very hard to distinguish who is playing what (another very AMM-like feature). Although Olewnick opines that “his (Rowe’s) playing sounds rather different than it did with AMM, more transparent and lucent”, the meta-music group remains the most obvious point of reference.
It’s an only-fairly-recently opened bottle, but the contents still sound fresh, and made even more enjoyable by previously not knowing of its existence, Slainte!
0 notes
Text
Your Super Likes might be making you super-disliked on Tinder
Image: vicky leta / mashable
Swiping right on Tinder might be the fastest way to get yourself a date in this day and age. But if you dare to swipe up for a Super Like, you could be fast-tracking yourself to eternal singledom.
You can “Super Like” people you are ~SUPER~ into to encourage them to swipe right on you. While the idea sounds flattering in theory, the reality of being Super Liked can be deeply off-putting for some users.
SEE ALSO: Confessions of a Tinder Tourist: The rules of right-swiping abroad
When the Super Like function first launched in September 2015, I thought it sounded kinda cool. Who knows, maybe I’d be Super Liked by someone that I also happened to like, and it’d be a lovely ego boost?
But, no. The more Super Likes I received on Tinder, the more convinced I became that Super Likers were just way, way too keen.
Now, when I swipe, that blue bar and star on a profile elicits a silent “eww” as I swipe hard left on the guy. Sorry, but that Super Like just killed any chance of us ever being together.
Swipe up to Super Like.
Image: haley hamblin / mashable
I’ve given my super dislike of the Super Like button some thought in effort to ascertain what it is about this feature that turns me off so much. It should be flattering to know that someone liked me enough to make a big show of it, but I always feel slightly uncomfortable about someone deciding they really like me based on a few photos of me and my bio (a unicorn emoji).
It seems that, even on Tinder, playing it cool and not showing your hand too soon was how I preferred it.
Pamela Evans seems to think so, too. She says that when she’s been Super Liked she gets a feeling of “excited curiosity,” but that feeling soon wears off.
“The Super Like seems too needy.”
“The majority [of Super Likers] areby definition life’s losers,” says Evans. “They are desperate for attention which is why they use [the feature]. I’ve never had to use it, but the majority of people I swipe right on match with me!”
She chooses not to use the Super Like function because she feels it has “an element of eeriness” and “desperation.”
“The Super Like seems too needy,” says Evans.
PR executive Helen Parkinson says that receiving a Super Like gives her an ego boost at first, but she feels a little uneasy about the concept. “Often (and I hate generalising) the sort of guys who Super Like me are a little on the creepy side,” says Parkinson.
The all-too-familiar blue bar and star.
Image: haley hamblin / mashable
“Its a bit weird. I get a bit suspicious as to how you can decide to Super Like someone based on just a few images and a line of text,” Parkinson said.
She’s not alone in this. Social media creative Gemma Clapp says it “seems too desperate” and web comic author Neil Bryer says he’s only ever Super Liked by accident.
Tinder’s VP of Communications Rosette Pamakian says the Super Like is designed to give users “a way to express a deeper level of interest” as well as providing more “context” for matches when they’re deciding their swipe direction. And, according to Pamakian, the Super Like function isn’t creeping everyone out.
“We’ve consistently received positive feedback on Super Like. In fact, users are three times more likely to match with someone they Super Like and conversations initiated by a Super Like last 70 percent longer,” says Pamakian.
Apparently there are some people who aren’t creeped out by the Super Like function.
“When you Super Like a profile, it shows that you are not shy about wanting to match with the person you Super Liked,” she continues. Pamakian says that since Tinder users only get to send one Super Like each day for free, receiving one “feels special.”
PR manager Jerome Foucart is one of the Tinderers benefitting from the Super Like function. “I must say I really like it because if you see a girl that you fancy more than you do others, it’s kind of a way to let her know and grab her attention,” says Foucart.
He says that by Super Liking a profile, he knows that potential matches will see his profile; which might not necessarily happen if he only swipes right on them.
“As a guy who’s not super confident, I also find it particularly pleasing when a girl Super Likes me,” says Foucart. “I don’t let it get to my head, but yeah it’s a nice feeling that someone would spend their one Super Like they get each day on you.”
For many, the Super Like is a bridge too far in expressing your appreciation for a potential match. But Tinder’s data suggests that there may well be people out there who find the tool pretty useful.
Perhaps we could all benefit from taking our Super Likes as a compliment, even if we don’t wish to pursue them. After all, it’s always nice to know when someone’s super into you.
BONUS: 20 British sex terms to you can totally use in America
Read more: http://on.mash.to/2lzkAaG
from Your Super Likes might be making you super-disliked on Tinder
0 notes