#322 BG
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text

Bombardier/navigator Cpt Jack Tyson in the nose of a 322nd Bomb Group B-26
123 notes
·
View notes
Text
Day 322 of trying to draw everyday
I got new pens!

Slightly closer and details under cut

Ohuhu Markers (360 pack) used:
B 683, 956
E 180, 384, 644, 679
CG 090
BG 038, 082
#traditional art#traditional drawing#alcholic markers#ohuhu markers#markers#ohuhu#ohuhuart#funkytownvibes art#daily drawing
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
SUMMA CUM LAUDE? #23.5
Guys, this is months after but as I ponder, the disappointment hits me afresh.
My Goal was not achieved.
CPE 321 - A CPE 322 - B EEG 322 - A EEG 323 - A EEG 324 - A EEG 325 - C EEG 326 - D EEG 328 - A EEG 329 - A EEG 340 - A EEG 346 - A GEG 322 - A So I already talked about how the exams were in the #23, now let's discuss my results. I wanted to write this the day I saw EEG326 so I would deliver raw emotion, but the D was D for devastation. It was even the first result that I saw. I did not really expect anything different but to see it materialise dealt with me. Getting an A in Part I and dropping to a D in Part II is just wrong. It shows how much I did not do what I was supposed to do. Unfortunately for me, this wasn't even the lowest point of results season. It got worse when everything came together. I can't remember the order the other ones came out but A in both labs gave the usual 1 Unit A satisfaction, Thank God for that because you can't tell with those lab guys. After messing up the EEG328 test, the A was really nice to see. EEG329 A was good too. The exam was really great and that's one of the lecturers that is ready to give you a great score. The Ogboi triplets: EEG323, CPE321 & CPE322. Slim As and a strong B. That ML (322) exam was just ridiculous and then I got a 62. If I speak, I will be in very big trouble. But in addition to the C of Logic and D of Electronics, this was B was like the dagger in achieving my semester goal. I needed this one to go well because I saw the rest coming. Oh well. EEG325, a terrible course from start to finish, I will not say why. But I was glad I got a C and not a D. B is for BGS. A is for Absolutely nobody. Did my best in the exam and I will take the C, best case given the circumstances tbh. EEG322, that A was a 70 on the dot. I give God all the glory because | flunked that test and its exam was a real challenge, I already mentioned that I had to really work on that day, and I made it. The 70 As are very sweet and that wasn't all. EEG324, 70 A. The last time I felt this was when I got 70 in EEG331 (Electronic Circuits I). Another result that gave me a similar feeling was FSC112 (Introduction to Chemistry, I also got 70). This case is just God's mercy. The two tests, you know about them already from #23 and the exam as well but I can look back now and say I got a 70 in Dr Ayorinde's Transmission Lines and Filters. I didn't even read the filter part before the exam, this made me happy. Last but far from being the least, 3 Unit GEG, GEG322, 75 A. I had suffered three Bs in 3 Unit GEGs. GEG113, GEG222 and GEG311. I really wanted to break this chain. And God made a way. It felt really great to be back on an A for the big guns and I hope this continues. Semester GPA: 4.48 CGPA: 4.70
How do I feel? Terrible. I was on a 4.88 just three semesters ago and somehow, I dropped by 0.18. I climbed by 0.17 from 4.71 to 4.88 and then dropped by 4.70. It sucks. Even today 1st of February, 2025. That progression is nothing but disappointing. First drop, second drop, third drop and I kept on looking at dropping. It's sad but it has happened, the goal now is to avoid a fourth consecutive drop. My CGPA just has to rise. But it's not even the dropping. It's the goal of a minimum of 4.50 every semester that I didn't meet up with that hurts the most. I obviously want a first class, but I broke it down and this 4.48 is painful but once again, it's too late to fix that. All I can do is avoid it for the coming semesters. Dr Amusan's Electronic Projects So we did one for EEG331 and EEG326. Today is March 29, 2025. First Semester of 400 Level is done and I have not even finished this. Shame. I think I don't remember a lot about the projects honestly. What I can't forget is that both times, Ebuka was in my group and he was the Chief Chef, he carried the actually engineering on his back and saved me both times. Group projects are funny, you have a lot of people in a group. There are the ones that actually contribute to the main project, there are others who can't contribute but show up to help with other little but important stuff and you have people who act like they have no business with the project. The latter are the ones that kill me. If we were all like you, how is anybody going to pass?
For the first project, it was an Automatic Light Switch with motion detection and light sensitivity. So, two conditions are to be met for the light to come on: there's motion and the room is dark enough. It was an interesting one to build; we used a PIR, LDR, and all that stuff. A lot of learning on the job. Issues here and there. This project exposed me to working under serious pressure because, at a point, it was not working and we were running out of time. I managed to still keep a cool head because I was like, “Hey, this is simply circuit work. If you connect it properly, it will work.” The simulation was working; we just needed to build it the right way. It did eventually. I remember one of the days we gathered to build it—we had only a few days after exams to build it. I got to Dubbing Centre at 7 a.m. and left around 7/8 p.m. It was a full day, and we were so tired—troubleshooting and thinking and adjusting—and it just did not work. I can't remember how we felt when it finally worked, but I'm sure we were over the moon.
On the final day of submission, Ebuka had already gone home, and so it was just me and, I think, one other person available to present for such a large group. But our lecturer asked us to case it properly, and so we had 45 minutes to make physical adjustments and write one final report, which he only mentioned that day. It was insane. I now had to work with two people who had not actually contributed so much before—Benjamin and Benjamin. Ben1 was around, but Ben2 was one of the guys in that final group. I had never soldered up until that day. I had to solder, and it had to work. So I split us up: told Ben1 to begin the report, and Ben2 assisted me on the project itself. Ben2 even got burnt by the iron, but it worked in the end. Thank God for the grace to learn on the job. It was high intensity, but we got the job done—not within 45 minutes though, maybe about 70 minutes.
The second project—I was just a 100% project manager. I didn't understand this one like the previous one, and just like before, we didn't have a lot of time left in school. We all went home eventually, and Ebuka took it home and finished it there. God bless that boy for me, mehn. This one was an Arduino FM Radio using the TEA5767 Module Receiver and LM386 Amplifier. This project was another headache—it was working in turns. One thing would work and the other would decide to go on a break. But it worked in the end. Decision-making and organisation were on me, but I struggled with the technical aspects of this one. What worsened it was the fact that Computer Engineering guys finished exams after Electrical & Electronics guys, but the project had to start without us because of time, so I was really lost.
Before this time of dealing with Ebuka, I had never trusted my grades in the hands of another person, so I always loved to be at the frontline. But this time, I had to step back and allow the boss work. And I'm glad I did—taught me one or two things about leadership. And so, on the 30th of August 2024, we presented our working radio and the semester ended once and for all. On to the SIWES session.
0 notes
Text
SIMS 4 - MATCHA MORE THAN MATCHA SHELF - BASE GAME
This shelf is too gorgeous to have limited colours and abilities.
Therefore, I removed the incidental decor from the shelves and added 4 medium and 12 small slots so you can decorate it yourself!
There are 35 recolours in this package, so you can use this shelf pretty much anywhere in almost any decor style.
This shelf is cloned from Snowy Escape. The mesh has been changed, however, so it should be BG compatible.
TAGS:
Styles: Farmhouse, Contemporary, Basics, Boho, Modern, Suburban Contemporary, Mission, Art Deco
Happy ambience +2
By Colour
Surfaces: Display and Misc Storage: Miscellaneous Decorative: Sculpture(wall) Talk to Objects (Insane)
Polygons: LOD 0 and 1 - 322 SHADOW LOD 0 and 1 - 276
DOWNLOAD FREE HERE
#ts4 shelf#sims 4 shelf#ts4 shelves#sims 4 shelves#ts4 slots#sims 4 slots#curseforge#ts4 curseforge#sims 4 curseforge#simblr#ts4 simblr#sims 4 simblr#ts4 decor#sims 4 decor#ts4 cc#sims 4 cc#ts4 buy#sims 4 buy#ts4 simmiller#sims 4 simmiller
39 notes
·
View notes
Note
Sorry if you already talked about this but I saw you talking about gun controls and how making them more expensive is a bad idea wich I think I agree with. But i was wondering what you think we should do to control guns and mass shootings? Mandatory background checks on all sales?
"Mass shootings" and "gun violence" are very distinct issues with very distinct solutions.
The enactings of mass shootings only have a few things in common. They are often committed by men with documented histories of violence against women. They are often committed in places with large gatherings of presumably unarmed people.
1. Solution number one would be to federally standardize definitions of domestic abuse. People with domestic abuse convictions are already legally barred from firearms ownership under federal law and have been for my entire lifetime. People saying otherwise are uninformed. BUT that definition is fairly strict, and does not always cover partners who do not live with the people they abuse. Get rid of that distinction (sometimes called the boyfriend loophole) and create a solid appeals process for those convicted. Federally prioritize domestic violence, maybe through allocation of funds. I hate the idea of giving cops literally any money, but for the most part they'll do whatever you'll pay them to do and you can turn their head in any particular direction with funding.
2. Make the ATF actually do its job. Anytime someone becomes a prohibited person (a felon - which is bullshit bc not all felonies are violent but ANYWAY- or convicted of a DV offense, etc) that person, if records are properly updated, is prevented from buying firearms at any store in the country. But nobody knocks on doors to remove the firearms of people who've just become prohibited persons. Whatever is in the house stays there. I think that's dumb as shit- in the case of the Aurora warehouse shooting that just happened this was a guy state police knew was not able to own guns, but nobody wanted to put a body on his doorstep to remove them. I think the definition of prohibited persons should be tightly narrowed to only include violent crime and domestic violence offenses, so that people aren't getting their guns confiscated over theft or license plate issues or other nonviolent offenses, and I think every single prohibited person should be able to appeal and regain their firearms rights. In the Aurora case, Illinois state police didn't want to risk sending a person or unit in. Fair enough. But people ended up dead because of that.
3. I think there is a case to be made that universal background checks COULD help here, to prevent people who can't buy guns at stores from just buying one from other citizens. But the reduction in deaths I think you could expect to see from UBC implementation would be really minimal, if anything- most mass shooters have either stolen or legally purchased their firearms after passing background checks. I suppose that, if the DV changes I talked about were implemented, more would be prohibited persons and would turn to the private market. I do not believe there is any way to ensure that background checks catch every single potential murderer and firmly do not believe the FBI (which runs the bg check electronically) should have any access to mental health records without a warrant.
For general violence, we already know exactly what reduces violence, and I do think it needs to be discussed not as gun violence but general violence, because that allows us to implement things we know work for violence overall. Guns aren't magic. They're just tools that can be used to commit violence. We know that giving people jobs (yes I am suggesting just giving, like candy) reduces their likelihood of engaging in violence of any kind. We know that poverty increases violence. All we need to do to drastically cut homicides is spend some money to lift people into more stable and I think that, over time, cultures that encourage or revel in violence will follow suit simply because those who did not grow up in violence are less likely to enact it.
Things I do not even kind of support:
-Bans on "assault weapons." The term means nothing but any semi automatic rifle, meaning any rifle that fires one round each time you pull the trigger. Those kinds of rifles can look like this

or like this

(those are all mine!) but they operate using 100 year old technology that is no different in concept from how a standard Glock pistol works. Pull the trigger, it goes bang. Pull it again, it goes bang again. Rifles in this category are excellent for any number of things and completely suitable for self defense. An AR-15 style firearm is my bedside/ home defense gun.
Even if this wasn't all true, consider this. AR-15s contribute REMARKABLY little to overall gun deaths in this country. We are talking a drop in the bucket- we are talking 322 people killed with rifles of ANY kind in 2012. Out of 13,000ish annual murders, that is remarkably small. So small that you are about 15 times MORE likely to be stabbed or bludgeoned to death (I'm linking the FBI numbers here directly) than killed with a rifle of any kind.
-Magazine capacity limits. They don't even make sense on their face. First of all it only takes on bullet to kill one person- is 10 deaths an acceptable number? Second of all, I am a relatively untrained shooter and fully self taught, and it takes me less than 2 seconds to drop an empty magazine from a rifle, load a new one, and fire another round. The California response to this is, well, make it harder to reload. Third of all, if I have a right to self defense with a firearm, then I have the right for that firearm to be functional, and MOST handgun malfunctions (talking in the context of concealed carry here) are due to magazine malfunctions. If I ever have to draw my handgun in defense of my life, I should be able to quickly fix any malfunctions. To put it simply, I believe I have the right not to be cobbled unduly in my own self defense. Fourth of all, considering that cops generally stand outside mass shootings waiting for things to die down (remember Pulse? Or Parkland?) the idea that the 2 seconds it takes to change magazines saves lives during assaults strikes me as ridiculous.
This notion that we can just get rid of the bad guns and keep the safe guns and all be safe is nonsense. Any gun can kill someone with one well-placed shot. Any person who owns a gun owns the means to do absolutely horrible violence to other people. These are things you have to reckon with in a society where private gun ownership is a right. I also think we need to be realistic about how low we can get our numbers. Let us assume that all 14,000ish people who were killed with firearms in the US in 2017 (to get that to work, organize results by year, then in the cause of death area click "injury intent and mechanism" and scroll in the box on the right to find FIREARMS) were killed using different firearms, so no mass shootings or double homicides, etc. Divide that by the sheer MASSIVE number of citizen owned guns in the country (a LOW estimate is 350 MILLION) and you're looking at .004% of all guns being used in murders. That alone should put this notion that the US is so astoundingly dangerous into context. For a nation with this many guns, and this level of easy access to guns, to have less than 15,000 murders using them per year should tell us that the very very vast majority of firearms owners are not harming anyone and therefore it literally only makes sense to tailor solutions to problems in a way that at least seems like it would work.
Few clarifying points here.
To be clear, I understand that the pro gun control instinct is to compare the US not to Brazil BEFORE lessening its guns laws (it still has stricter gun laws and a homicide rate a good 4 times higher than ours last I checked) but to the UK or Australia, etc, and not to compare homicides per firearm, but homicides using firearms per capita. This is nonsense because the number of firearms in those countries doesn't even come sort of close to the number here, and that number will not decrease but will only increase over time given the continuation of the 2nd Amendment as currently understood. Secondly, none of those countries have a right to firearms ownership and therefore many attempted solutions enacted there are literally not legally allowable here, just as total bans on private ownership of handguns except for competitors. Thirdly, the ownership of firearms themselves per capita does not come close in any of those countries to that here. I'm not denying that more guns probably means more deaths when comparing countries, though it does noy seem to mean more deaths between states in the US.
Another clarifying note, you will notice I am talking about homicides and cutting out suicides entirely. This is for two reasons. First of all I know absolutely nothing about suicide prevention from a policy perspective and don't even pretend to. If you have any good sources there I would love to check them out. Secondly, it allows me to talk about "gun violence," as in the use of firearms to commit violence between different individuals, more clearly. Thirdly, the very vast majority of the most popular gun control measures don't even claim to impact suicide rates because most gun control groups use those deaths (which comprise 66% of all deaths by firearm in the country, almost every single year) to pad their numbers while not actually talking about suicide as a phenomenon.
I hope this clarifies some things for you and if you have any questions please feel free to ask. I also typed this at 4 am after work so please excuse typos. I also hope that you understand I've picked sources supporting my argument because that's how arguments are supported, not because I'm not open to looking at all into opposing viewpoints.
68 notes
·
View notes
Text
2nd T20I, Australia v Pakistan 2019 | Manuka Oval, Canberra Bleacher Report Sky Sports No Buffering Without Paying
⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇
2Nd T20I, Australia V Pakistan 2019 | Manuka Oval, Canberra Bosscast Torrent TBS SportsTime Time4TV Fox Go
⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰⟰
Catch live updates and live cricket score from the second T20I between Australia and Pakistan at Canberra. Preview: Rain was among the main talking points on Sunday as the first T20I between Australia and Pakistan was abandoned, which left Aaron Finch mightily displeased. Pakistan tour of Australia 2 Tests, 3 T20Is Nov 03-Dec 03. Nov 03 Australia v Pakistan 1st T20I Sydney Cricket Ground, Sydney 3:30 AM. Nov 05 Australia v Pakistan 2nd T20I Manuka Oval, Canberra 8.
Australia 151/3 vs Pakistan 150/6, 2nd T20I, ICC. Australia vs Pakistan, Live Cricket Score, Second T20I at.
Sunday, 17 November 2019 03:45:03 YSL @ Manuka P about Australia v Pakistan at L scorecard, second 10/12/2019 640 BG 83 78 154 364 T20I @ Manuka Oval 160 60 ZH 49 416 12/22/2019 521 642
2019 Australia vs Pakistan - 2nd T20I @ Manuka Oval LIVE NOW. it would be unsurprising to see Australia line up with the same team in Canberra. Australia (probable) 1 David Warner, 2 Aaron Finch. Read and watch preview for 2nd T20I 2019, Pakistan tour of Australia 2019/20 only on. Pakistan vs Australia 2nd T20 - Live Cricket Score, Nov 05, 2019. Australia Vs Sri Lanka Live Cricket Score - 2nd Test match.
The 2nd match of the three-match T20I series on the Pakistan tour of Australia will be played at the Manuka Oval in Canberra. Pakistan tour of Australia 2019. Australia v Pakistan 2nd T20I. Take a look at all the host cities and grounds of the Pakistan tour of Australia, 2019 on Manuka Oval. Canberra. Perth Stadium. Perth. Australia vs Pakistan, 2nd T20I. Tue.
PAH embedding iframe SE 12/28/19 18:45:03 +03:00 E 40 35 T 233 be unsurprising to see Australia 28 242 85 745 at the Manuka 2nd T20I YME 659 TM 366 December 11 91 505 14 VPQX 11/20/2019 23:45 EJS Wed, 25 Dec 2019 12:45:03 GMT 76 9 HGRX 83 406 94 29 2
Pakistan tour of Australia, 2019 Venues and Grounds. Sri Lanka in Australia, 2019 Live Score - Full scorecard, Sri Lanka in Australia, 2019 cricket score and updates. Get all latest cricket match results, scores and statistics, with complete cricket. The Pakistan cricket team are currently touring Australia from October to December 2019 to play two Tests and three Twenty20 International (T20I) matches. The Test series will form part of the inaugural 2019-21 ICC World Test Championship. The second Test is scheduled to be a day/night match at the Adelaide Oval.
NQA 10/16/2019 11:45 YFXG RV J 12 9 361 48 837 821 83 360 571 89 58 172 76 434 916 2019-10-23T13:45:03.7627127+12:00 808 Australia 2nd T20I 865 191 QG 67 81 16 Lanka Live Cricket Score 14 58 981 rain in RWX
youtube
Australia vs Pakistan, 2nd T20I: Preview - Chance for Babar's
KRVO QZKE 2019 to play two Tests FYJ 11/11/2019 Australia from October to TSUI WMXN website for 68 76 59 11/19/2019 21:45 O Disclaimer: will stream 46 860 731 30 88 55 81 641 64 560 63 2019-11-26T23:45:03 91 128 T 60 526 835 TQ 129 Rain was 60 924 12/05/19 12:45:03 +03:00 503 401 16 43 Mon, 04 Nov 2019 07:45:03 GMT 99 850 92 97 17 548 78 460 340 WJT 351 846 T 22 57 763 817 720 5 87 2019-12-27T14:45:03 32 16 67 TIWI 183 Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:45:03 GMT 562 1 CC 237 920 32 13 47 15 572 584 84 VXSW EFJK 22 910 164 38 57 65 11/11/2019 12:45 378 59 99 80 62 Sydney 268 34 28 259 630 66 940 AU ESPG Venues and Grounds. Australia 151/3 X D 15 Oct 2019 10:45 AM PDT SYET and updates. 6 73 74 K 373 366 80 455 22 74 67 150/6, 2nd T20I, ICC 931 210 891 297 43 279 224 322 797 October 13
Australia vs Pakistan 2nd T20I - Live Cricket. Live scores, scorecards, stats, forecasts and more info about Australia v Pakistan at Manuka Oval, Canberra, 2nd T20I Pakistan in Australia on November 5, 2019. Australia and Pakistan will face-off in the 2nd T20I on Tuesday after the rain in Sydney denied a win for the home side in the first match. The Manuka Oval in Canberra will be hosting this game. Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 2019-20. Disclaimer: will stream live scorecard, teams and videos for This match on its official website. We are embedding iframe for official website for PAKvs AUS 2nd T20Ilive scorecard streaming. If ICC has any objection may contact about removal of Pakistan vs Australia 2nd T20I live score streaming.
1 note
·
View note
Text

Mild and Bitter, a B-26 of the 322nd Bomb Group. The nose had been signed by many of the group's personnel
91 notes
·
View notes
Photo

FILTER-FUEL 1R0751 - Caterpillar ASPHALT PAVER AP-1000 AP-1000B AP-1050 AP-1055B AP-900B BG-2455C BG-245C CHALLENGER 35 45 55 EXCAVATOR 311C 311D LRR 312C 312C L 312D 312D L 313D 314C 314D CR 314D LCR 315C 315D L 318C 318D L 319C 319D 319D L 319D LN 320 L 320B 320C 320C FM 320C L 320D 320D FM 320D FM RR 320D GC 320D L 320D LN 320D LRR 320D RR 321C 321D LCR 322 FM L 322B 322B L 322B LN 322C 322C FM 323D L 323D LN 323D SA 325 325B 325B L FORWARDER 574 584 GEN SET ENGINE 3126B GENERATOR SET C9 INDUSTRIAL ENGINE 3114 3116 3126 3126B C-9 C6.6 C7 C9 INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR TK371 TK381 INTEGRATED TOOLCARRIER IT12B IT24F IT28F IT28G IT38F IT38G IT62G KNUCKLEBOOM LOADER 539 MARINE ENGINE 3116 3126 3126B C7 C9 MOBILE HYD POWER UNIT 323D L 323D LN MOTOR GRADER 120H 120H ES 120H NA 135H 135H NA PETROLEUM ENGINE (at Al Baar Forklifts) https://www.instagram.com/p/CNFdGtcrBQt/?igshid=gzhp2ocs35p7
0 notes
Photo

AMC, KNL Dt-13-11-2020 Qtls Min Max Model GN-1632-2609-6086-4250 SF-2-2669-2669-2669 CS-198-4109-4249-4249 AJ-102-8500-14702-9112 RG-1-5547-5547-5547 BG-3-3597-3597-3597 DC-26-5556-17459-10667 Ons-1088-1500-5110-3200 MZ-322-1207-1410-1357. https://www.instagram.com/p/CHh-L1CHlzM/?igshid=16ctulgo7q133
0 notes
Text
Weekly Update #322 - Chapter I Progress
So, today, I will finally talk in detail about what's currently left to do in order to fully complete the first chapter of GENBA no Kizuna. And I guess the best way to start is to take a look at what's already been completed!
As you may very well know, we've released a demo last year, containing the prologue and the majority of the first chapter, which introduces all the main players in this story: our investigation team and our circle of suspects. I'd say what you experience in the demo makes up about 70% of the first chapter.
Naturally, this means that its last 30% are not included and are thus what we're currently working on. This percentage number pertains to the script, however. In terms of the assets, it's a bit harder to pin down an estimate...
You have to keep the following in mind: when you just start out making a game, just getting the very first scene playable requires an extraordinary amount of effort, because you don't have any assets at all. No backgrounds, no character sprites with various poses and expressions, no CGs, no GUI, etc.
The further you progress into the story, however, the less new assets will be required. At some point, you'll have all the necessary sprites together for a character to portray a vast range of emotions. In GENBA's case, this is especially true for our main character Keiichi. Although he will get a few more sprite variations later down the road, the vast majority of them are already done, since he's been appearing in the game right from the start of the prologue.
Other characters that were introduced later, such as Rei and Shinketsu, or the four members of Raptor Pack Productions, haven't had much screen time yet, so they still require a bunch of new sprites for future scenes.
Similarly, as you progress through the story, more locations within the Kaseki Residence open up, meaning that new backgrounds will be required. In the beginning, however, most scenes take place in just a couple of different rooms, so not many backgrounds have been necessary thus far.
But what exactly is missing then, in order to finally finish up the rest of chapter I? Well, let's first take a look at the scenes that are currently missing:
Scene 09 takes place where the demo left off. It's a short scene in which Keiichi returns to the main hall and talks to Shinketsu.
Scene 10 is a bit longer, featuring a conversation between Keiichi and Amber as they head up to the 2nd floor for the first time.
Scene 11 is the first real investigation segment and thus a pretty long one, as players will not only be able to freely talk to Amber about a number of different topics, but they can also examine Ryuunosuke's room in search for clues.
Scene 12 is about the same length as Scene 10 and gives us a first look at the victim's body in its recovered state.
Scene 13 is the chapter's conclusion and another convo between Keiichi and Nobuhiko, similar to the one in the prologue.
Overall, the remainder of chapter I focuses on characters and places we've seen before, so a lot of assets are already available. Nevertheless, there is quite a number of new ones we'll need in order to visualize all this stuff.
First and foremost, there are two new locations: the 2nd floor of the main hall and Ryuunosuke's room, so that's already two new backgrounds. The good news about this is that Ryuu's room is already done and I'm halfway done with the 2nd floor BG. Not just that, there is even one extra BG showing Ryuu's door, which has already been completed as well:
That's it for completely new BGs, but we will also need some variations for already existing ones, depicting new details. After the body has been recovered, it will be spread out on the floor of the main hall, for instance, along with some new pieces of evidence that were discovered during the recovery process.
Furthermore, the BGs you can currently see in the demo aren't actually finalized. That's because I only finalized the story and mystery back in July and, based on this final result, a few more details need to be added to the main hall BG. Based on some feedback, I've also added a carpet to it, so the lower half isn't so plain and empty anymore:
Now, what about characters sprites? Again, we've seen quite a bit of Keiichi, so right now, he will only need one new variation. As for Amber, we will spend a lot more time with her now than we did in the demo, so naturally, she'll require a handful of new sprites, which I've already started to work on as well. Rei, Shinketsu and Nobuhiko only have short appearances, so they won't need a bunch of new sprites. Amber really requires the most work here.
CGs... now this is where it gets a bit more tricky. There is one relatively simple CG I want to use for scene 10 and then we will need a very complex and detailed one showing a close-up of the body. This will be a crucial CG in chapter 2 when players can actually examine the body, so this will definitely require a lot of attention and time.
There will also be some mini-CGs, like a picture frame depicting a much younger Ryuunosuke together with his grandfather. That, along with some mystery silhouettes for the chapter's final scene, has already been worked on, though:
Sound-wise, we already have all we need, but in terms of the GUI, a number of new DPA entries will be added, meaning more writing and a couple little display artworks will be needed, such as this profile image for Prof. Dr. Kaseki:
This almost wraps it up, so as you can see, not a lot of stuff is left to be done, buuut... I still need to do some script revisions as well, and not just in regards to the new scenes. I'm also taking the feedback to heart, trying to fix some issues with the demo content.
So yeah, that's where we're currently at. I'm thinking of releasing the rest of chapter I scene by scene for patrons, so they can get an early look and help us with polishing things. Don't expect anything playable to show up before December, though!
I know it's taking quite a while to finish this up, but again, keep in mind that the further we progress into the story, the less assets will be needed, and that chapter I is actually one of the longest parts of the game, sooo... things will definitely go much faster with chapters 2 and 3 (primarily because we will have most assets for those by then)!
Now then, since this post has gotten a little lengthy, and I'd like to get back to work on the 2nd floor BG (new preview for patrons tomorrow!), I guess I'll come to a close. Next time, I'll give you a look at the actual to-do list and a clearer idea of the progress, but until then, please enjoy the rest of your weekend and, as always, take care :3
#genba#visual novel#visualnovel#visual novel development#vn#evn#vndev#interactive fiction#game development#gamedev#indie#indiedev#indie game#Ren'Py#renpy#murder mystery#detective game
0 notes
Photo

Corvette Z06 (2009) Özellikleri; Marka Chevrolet Model Corvette Nesil Corvette Coupe (C6) Modifikasyonu (Motor) ZR1 6.2i V8 32V (620 Hp) Üretim başlangıç yılı 2009 yıl Son üretim yılı 2013 yıl Güç ünitesi mimarisi İçten yanmalı motor Gövde tipi Coupe Koltuk 2 Kapı 2 Yakıt Tipi Benzin Hızlanma 0 - 100 km/saat 3.4 saniye 0 - 60 mph (Auto-Data.net tarafından hesaplanır) 3.2 saniye Maksimum sürat 322 km/saat 200.08 mph Güç 620 bg @ 5900 dev/dak Tork 807 Nm @ 4600 dev/dak 595.21 lb.-ft. @ 4600 dev/dak Motor pozisyonu Ön, boyuna Motor hacmi 6162 cm3 376.03 cu. in. Silindir Adedi 8 Silindir pozisyonu V motor Silindir çapı 103.25 mm 4.06 in. Silindir içi vuruş 92 mm 3.62 in. Sıkıştırma oranı 10.9 Silindir başına düşen valf 4 Yakıt Sistemi Çok noktalı enjeksiyon Türbin Mekanik süperşarj Valf yapısı - Hacim ve ağırlıklar. Ağırlık 1519 Kg 3348.82 lbs. Bagaj hacmi en az 634 Lt 22.39 cu. ft. Yakıt deposu hacmi 68 Lt 17.96 US gal | 14.96 UK gal Boyutlar Uzunluk 4435 mm 174.61 in. Genişlik 1845 mm 72.64 in. Yükseklik 1245 mm 49.02 in. Dingil Mesafesi 2685 mm 105.71 in. Ön tekerlek izi 1575 mm 62.01 in. Arka tekerlek izi 1545 mm 60.83 in. Şanzıman, fren ve süspansiyon Aktarma mimarisi İYM, aracın arka tekerleklerini hareket ettiriyor Çekiş Arkadan İtiş Vites sayısı (manuel şanzıman) 6 Ön süspansiyon Çift salıncaklı Arka süspansiyon Enine sabitleyici Ön frenler Hava soğutmalı diskler Arka frenler Hava soğutmalı diskler ABS Evet Direksiyon tipi Direksiyon kutusu Lastik boyutu 245/40 ZR18; 285/35 ZR19 Jant Boyutu 8.5J x 19; 10J x 19 #araba #arabalar #americancars #amerikankası #dodgecharger #coupe #turbocharger #supercharger #corvette #cherlovet
1 note
·
View note
Text

A formation of 322nd Bomb Group B-26s during a mission over Magdeburg, 17 April 1945.
96 notes
·
View notes
Text
Horizontally scrolling table with fixed headings
For my Focal Length Equivalent utility, I created a alternative view for when you don't have JavaScript enabled (as you should, if you can).
Instead of dynamically showing the conversion based on the position of the range slider input element, I simply show a good old table with calculated equivalents at pre-defined focal lengths.
I wanted this table to list the focal lengths vertically – with one film- or sensor-format on one row – so you can easily parse the result. As such a table gets easily too wide for the parent elements container, I wanted
the table to be scrollable horizontally and
have the format name headings keep their position, so that you never lose track of which row represents which format.
Here’s the simplified table markup:
<figure><table><tbody><!-- ... --><tr><th scope="row">35mm</th> <td>10 mm</td> <td>16 mm</td> <td>24 mm</td> <td>28 mm</td> <td>35 mm</td> <td>50 mm</td> <td>85 mm</td> <td>100 mm</td> <td>135 mm</td> <td>200 mm</td> <td>300 mm</td> <td>500 mm</td> </tr><!-- ... --></tbody></table></figure>
The “scrolling” bit is easily done: simply put a overflow-x: scroll; on the table’s container element, which in my case is a <figure> element (a <div> or any other block element would also do of course, if the <figure> semantic doesn’t work for you):
figure { overflow-x: scroll; }
In order for the film-format name headings to keep their position, I resorted to a fairly new value of the CSS position property: sticky. I added this to the th selectors, in combination with left: 0; so the headings stay at their original positions:
figure table tr th { position: sticky; left: 0; // you might also want a bg color, so the th covers the table // that scrolls through underneath background-color: white; }
You can take a look at this when you go to the tool and disable JavaScript in your browser. Or you can simply look at this table here:
figure.hs { overflow-x: scroll; margin: 0; -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch; } figure.hs table { border-collapse: collapse; } figure.hs table td, figure.hs table th { padding: 0.5em 0.7em; } figure.hs table tr th { position: -webkit-sticky; position: sticky; left: 0; background-color: white; text-align: right; white-space: nowrap; } figure.hs table tr td { font-family: monospace; text-align: right; } figure.hs table col:nth-of-type(even) { background: #eee; } figure.hs table td { white-space: nowrap; } figure.hs table tr.full-frame { outline: 1px dashed black; } figure.hs table tr:hover { background-color: rgba(238, 238, 238, .4); } figure.hs table col:hover { font-size: 2em; }
Micro 4/3 5 mm 8 mm 12 mm 15 mm 18 mm 26 mm 44 mm 52 mm 70 mm 104 mm 156 mm 260 mm APS-C 7 mm 11 mm 16 mm 19 mm 23 mm 33 mm 57 mm 67 mm 90 mm 133 mm 200 mm 333 mm 35mm 10 mm 16 mm 24 mm 28 mm 35 mm 50 mm 85 mm 100 mm 135 mm 200 mm 300 mm 500 mm 6x4.5 16 mm 26 mm 39 mm 45 mm 56 mm 81 mm 137 mm 161 mm 217 mm 322 mm 483 mm 805 mm 6x6 18 mm 29 mm 44 mm 51 mm 64 mm 92 mm 155 mm 183 mm 247 mm 366 mm 548 mm 915 mm 6x7 20 mm 32 mm 48 mm 56 mm 71 mm 101 mm 171 mm 202 mm 272 mm 404 mm 604 mm 1009 mm 6x8 22 mm 35 mm 53 mm 62 mm 77 mm 110 mm 187 mm 220 mm 297 mm 440 mm 660 mm 1100 mm 6x9 23 mm 37 mm 56 mm 65 mm 82 mm 117 mm 198 mm 233 mm 315 mm 467 mm 700 mm 1167 mm 4x5 36 mm 57 mm 85 mm 99 mm 124 mm 177 mm 301 mm 354 mm 478 mm 708 mm 1061 mm 1769 mm 8x10 71 mm 113 mm 170 mm 198 mm 248 mm 354 mm 601 mm 707 mm 955 mm 1415 mm 2122 mm 3537 mm
Here's the full CSS.
0 notes
Text
How long has it been since Louis and Harry were last seen existing in the same space as one another at the same time?
1,643 days
#larry stylinson#larry being loud in 2021#it's literally ending#it's larrie year#fuck babygate#end it#*** **#bg#babygate#fuck fiveyearoldgate#fuck timeandspacegate#fuck stunt dogs#322 days since L followed H on insta
0 notes
Text
Detailed guide: Oil and gas: decommissioning of offshore installations and pipelines has been published on Energy Solutions News
New Post has been published on https://www.energybrokers.co.uk/news/beis/detailed-guide-oil-and-gas-decommissioning-of-offshore-installations-and-pipelines-6
Detailed guide: Oil and gas: decommissioning of offshore installations and pipelines
The decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations and pipelines on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) is controlled through the Petroleum Act 1998.
The responsibility for ensuring that the requirements of the Petroleum Act 1998 are complied with rests with the Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning (OPRED) which sits within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Owners of oil and gas installations and pipelines are required to decommission their offshore infrastructure at the end of a field’s economic life and the 1998 Act requires owners to set out the measures to decommission disused installations and/or pipelines in a decommissioning programme.
A decommissioning programme must identify all the items of equipment, infrastructure and materials that have been installed or drilled and describe the decommissioning solution for each.
OPRED aims to be transparent in its consideration of decommissioning programmes. As a result members of the public, other organisations, non-governmental organisations and other government departments or agencies are invited to comment on the proposals set out in a programme.
Details of the current programmes under consideration are noted in the table below.
OPRED provides guidance on the regulatory requirements for decommissioning. Final guidance on the Environmental Considerations for Decommissioning (Section 12) has now been incorporated into the guidance notes Offshore Oil and Gas Decommissioning Guidance Notes November 2018 (PDF, 1.27MB, 138 pages) .
Our Financial Assurance Guidance for the Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations and Pipelines is now ready for consultation. Draft Financial Assurance Guidance (PDF, 300KB, 17 pages)
We would welcome views on this draft document – be that ambiguity in the guidance or incorrect grammar – by 31 March 2019 at [email protected].
The Guidance outlines how the Government assesses the financial capability of persons with a relevant interest in or considering taking an interest in an offshore oil or gas field. For the purposes of satisfying the Secretary of State that that person will be capable of carrying out a decommissioning programme in relation to that interest.
It explains our financial assurance policy and existing processes setting out the steps taken to assess the financial health of offshore oil and gas companies with an interest or potential interest in a field, outlining how and when we may use the statutory powers set out in the Petroleum Act 1998.
If you have any comments or questions relevant to the Guidance, or would like to provide your feedback, please email us at [email protected] by 31 March 2019.
Field Name Field Operator Status Main points of the programme Details Nevis N11 WHPS Apache Beryl I Limited Draft programme under consideration Decommissioning of the Nevis N11 Wellhead Protection Structure only. Removal to shore for re-use or recycling. Nevis N11 WHPS (PDF, 1.48MB, 25 pages) Morecambe DP3/DP4 Spirit Energy Production UK Limited Draft programmes under consideration Topsides and jackets will be removed and transported to shore for recycling. All wells will be plugged and abandoned. Buried pipelines will be left in situ except the exposed ends which will be cut and removed. All exposed grout bags will be recovered to shore for re-use, recycling or re-use. All exposed concrete mattresses will be recovered to shore for re-use, recycling or disposal. Existing rock will be left in situ. Morecambe DP3/DP4 Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 2.94MB, 47 pages) Morecambe DP3/DP4 Comparative Assessment (PDF, 3.23MB, 57 pages) Morecambe DP3/DP4 Environmental Appraisal (PDF, 6.68MB, 103 pages) Schooner and Ketch Faroe Petroleum (ROGB) Limited Draft programmes under consideration Removal to shore of the Schooner and Ketch topsides, jackets and subsea installation for recycling/disposal or possible reuse option for the topsides and jackets as offshore windfarm support facilities. Wells will be plugged and abandoned. Pipelines will be trenched and buried and decommissioned in situ. The trenched and/or buried sections of pipelines will also be decommissioned in situ. Surface laid mattresses and stabilisation features will be recovered to shore for reuse, recycling or disposal. Ketch Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 3.65MB, 61 pages) Ketch Comparative Assessment (PDF, 13.1MB, 59 pages) Schooner Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 5.53MB, 62 pages) Schooner Comparative Assessment (PDF, 9.59MB, 63 pages) Schooner and Ketch Environmental Appraisal (PDF, 6.28MB, 220 pages) Goldeneye Shell U.K. Limited Draft programmes under consideration Removal to shore of the Goldeneye topside and jacket for recycling/disposal. Wells will be plugged and abandoned. The large surface laid sections of pipeline will be trenched and buried and decommissioned in situ. The trenched and/or buried sections of pipelines will also be decommissioned in situ. The pipeline ends at the platform will be flanged, buried and/or remediated with rock cover. The Goldeneye umbilical will be recovered to shore for recycling/disposal. Surface laid mattresses and stabilisation features will be recovered to shore for recycling/disposal. Goldeneye Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 2.35MB, 50 pages) Goldeneye Environmental Appraisal (PDF, 4.97MB, 126 pages) Goldeneye Comparative Assessment (PDF, 5.28MB, 69 pages) Dunlin Alpha Field Fairfield Betula Limited Draft programme under consideration Decommissioning in situ of Dunlin Alpha concrete gravity based structure and storage cells. Full removal of Dunlin Alpha topsides for reuse or recycling. Dunlin Alpha Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 6.5MB, 77 pages) Dunlin Alpha Decommissioning Comparative Assessment Report (PDF, 3.66MB, 133 pages) Dunlin Alpha Decommissioning Environmental Appraisal (PDF, 5.04MB, 155 pages) Windermere Field INEOS UK SNS Limited Draft programmes under consideration Topsides and jacket will be removed and recycled or disposed onshore. The pipelines will be partially removed, the exposed sections adjacent to the platforms will be removed and recycled or disposed onshore. The exposed ends will be lowered to achieve adequate depth of coverage. The existing buried sections of umbilical will be left in situ. All concrete mattresses and grout bags will be recovered to shore for reuse, recycling or disposal. Windermere Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 2.39MB, 38 pages) Windermere Comparative Assessment (PDF, 1.49MB, 34 pages) Windermere Environmental Statement (PDF, 10.2MB, 235 pages) East Brae and Braemar Marathon Oil UK LLC Draft programmes under consideration Removal of East Brae topsides and removal of jackets to the top of the footings. Removal of Braemar subsea installations. Pipelines to be decommissioned by partial removal and leave in situ. East Brae And Braemar Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 10.3MB, 74 pages) East Brae and Braemar Environmental Statement – Main Report (PDF, 14.5MB, 78 pages) East Brae and Braemar Environmental Statement – Technical Appendices (PDF, 12.8MB, 96 pages) East Brae Sub-structures Comparative Assessment (PDF, 5.96MB, 39 pages) Brae Area Subsea Assets Comparative Assessment (PDF, 6.84MB, 43 pages) Brae Alpha, Brae Bravo, Central Brae, West Brae and Sedgwick Marathon Oil UK LLC Draft programmes under consideration Removal of Brae Alpha and Brae Bravo jackets to the top of the footings. Removal of Central Brae, West Brae and Sedgwick subsea installations. Pipelines to be decommissioned in a variety of ways including removal, trenching and leave in situ. Brae Alpha, Brae Bravo, Central Brae, West Brae and Sedgwick Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 15.3MB, 120 pages) Brae A etc, Environmental Statement – Main Report (PDF, 14.6MB, 80 pages) Brae A etc. Environmental Statement – Technical Appendices (PDF, 13.3MB, 96 pages) Brae A Sub-structure Comparative Assessment (PDF, 5.27MB, 34 pages) Brae B Sub-structure Comparative Assessment (PDF, 5.44MB, 34 pages) Brae Area Subsea Assets Comparative Assessment (PDF, 6.84MB, 43 pages) Ninian North Platform CNR Draft programme under consideration Topsides will be removed and recovered to shore. Partial removal of the Jacket to between 77.5 and 88.5m below LAT. Decommissioning in situ of jacket footings. Ninian North Platform Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 1.8MB, 61 pages) Ninian North Platform Environmental Statement (PDF, 7.82MB, 229 pages) Ninian North Platform Comparative Assessment (PDF, 2.75MB, 92 pages) Brent Shell U.K. Limited Draft programmes under consideration Removal of upper part of Brent Alpha steel jacket to 84.5m below sea level. Decommissioning in situ of Brent Alpha jacket footings. Decommissioning in situ of Brent Bravo, Charlie and Delta concrete gravity based structures. Pipelines several decommissioning options. Brent Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 12MB, 322 pages) Brent ES (PDF, 12.5MB, 475 pages) Brent EIA (PDF, 5.05MB, 429 pages) Brent ES Appendix (PDF, 2.52MB, 45 pages) A suite of detailed Technical Documents which support the Decommissioning Programmes documents are available on the Shell Website Atlantic and Cromarty BG Global Energy Limited and Hess Limited Draft programmes under consideration Manifold and Well head Protection structures (WHPS) to be removed for recycling/disposal. Partial removal of pipelines and remaining section of buried/trenched pipelines to remain in situ. Atlantic & Cromarty Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 1.76MB, 50 pages) Atlantic & Cromarty Stakeholder Report (PDF, 1.11MB, 32 pages) Atlantic & Cromarty Environmental Impact Assessment (PDF, 4.5MB, 109 pages) Atlantic & Cromarty Comparative Assessment (PDF, 2.06MB, 110 pages)
Field Name Operator at approval Operator following licence / company change Main installations decommissioned Approved option Year of approval Curlew B, C and D (PDF, 2.39MB, 61 pages) Shell U.K. Limited – FPSO Removal to shore for recycling/disposal March 2019 Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal March 2019 Pipelines Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling; buried pipelines to be left in-situ March 2019 Viking Platforms, Vixen and associated Pipelines (VDP2) (PDF, 33.3MB, 84 pages) ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Limited – Viking Satellites KD, LD, AR, Viking Bravo Hub BA, BC, BP, BD and Vixen sub-sea tieback Removal to shore for re-use, recycling or disposal January 2019 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ January 2019 Victor (VDP3) (PDF, 21.1MB, 55 pages) ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Limited – Victor Platform and subsea installation Removal to shore for re-use, recycling or disposal January 2019 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ January 2019 Tyne South Installations (PDF, 1.83MB, 42 pages) Perenco UK Limited – Topsides, jacket and subsea installation Removal to shore for reuse, recycling or disposal January 2019 Guinevere Installation (PDF, 2.05MB, 43 pages) Perenco UK Limited – Topsides and jacket Removal to shore for reuse, recycling or disposal January 2019 Beatrice Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 4.45MB, 88 pages) Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Limited – Beatrice AP Topsides; AD, Bravo and Charlie Platforms and AD Drilling Template Removal to shore for re-use/recycling January 2019 Pipelines Buried pipelines will be left in situ. Remediation for any exposed sections. January 2019 Bains Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 2.57MB, 36 pages) Spirit Energy Production UK Limited – Subsea Installation Removal to shore for re-use/recycling January 2019 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ January 2019 Jacky (PDF, 2.34MB, 52 pages) Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited – Wellhead Platform and Midline Tee Structure Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling October 2018 Pipelines Pipelines are trenched and buried and will be left in situ October 2018 Brae Bravo Topsides, Flare Bridge, Flare Tower and Flare Jacket and Substructure (PDF, 4.9MB, 52 pages) Marathon Oil UK LLC – Brae Bravo Topsides, Flare Bridge, Flare Tower and Flare Jacket/Substructure Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling August 2018 Brent Alpha, Bravo and Charlie Topsides (PDF, 3.34MB, 81 pages) Shell U.K. Limited – Brent Alpha, Brent Bravo and Brent Charlie Topsides Removal to shore for recycling/disposal August 2018 Stirling A33 WHPS Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 1.13MB, 27 pages) Stirling WHPS Close Out Report (PDF, 2.57MB, 15 pages) Premier Oil E&P UK Limited – Subsea installation Removal to shore for recycling May 2018 Ann and Alison (PDF, 2.98MB, 60 pages) Spirit Energy North Sea Limited – Subsea installations Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling April 2018 Pipelines Buried and stable pipelines left in situ. Surface laid pipelines removed to shore for re-use or recycling April 2018 Saturn (Annabel) (PDF, 2.49MB, 47 pages) Spirit Energy North Sea Limited – Subsea installations Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling April 2018 Pipelines Buried and stable pipelines left in situ. Surface laid pipelines removed to shore for re-use or recycling April 2018 Audrey (PDF, 2.87MB, 58 pages) Spirit Energy North Sea Limited – 2 fixed platforms Removal of topsides and jackets to shore for recycling or disposal April 2018 Pipelines Buried and stable pipelines decommissioned in situ. Surface laid pipelines removed to shore for re-use or recycling April 2018 Rev Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 12MB, 42 pages) Repsol Norge AS – Pipelines Fully buried and stable pipeline to be left in situ. All other pipelines to be removed. All mattresses on pipelines to be removed April 2018 Markham ST-1 (PDF, 2.39MB, 49 pages) Centrica Production Nederland B.V. – Fixed Platform Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling February 2018 Pipelines Two pipelines to be decommissioned in situ February 2018 Osprey (PDF, 3.92MB, 68 pages) Fairfield Fagus Limited – Subsea Installation Removed and recovered to shore for recycling/disposal December 2017 Pipelines Full removal with the exception of the Bundles, Umbilical Risers within the Dunlin Alpha Concrete Gravity Based Structure or those trenched and rock dumped December 2017 Merlin (PDF, 2.97MB, 56 pages) Fairfield Fagus Limited – Subsea Installation Removed and recovered to shore for recycling/disposal December 2017 Pipelines Full removal with the exception of trenched and rock dumped Pipelines and Umbilicals and Umbilical Riser within the Dunlin Alpha Concrete Gravity Based Structure December 2017 Dunlin Fuel Gas Import (DFGI) and Dunlin Power Import (DPI) (PDF, 3.48MB, 54 pages) Fairfield Fagus Limited – Subsea Installation Removed and recovered to shore for recycling/disposal December 2017 Pipelines Full removal with the exception of trenched and buried Pipelines and Rigid Riser and Riser Cable within the Dunlin Alpha Concrete Gravity Based Structure December 2017 Viking Satellites CD, DD, ED, GD, HD Pipelines (PDF, 6.77MB, 32 pages) ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Limited – Pipelines All pipelines and associated mattresses to remain in situ November 2017 LOGGS Satellites Vulcan UR, Viscount VO, Vampire OD – LDP1 (PDF, 17.5MB, 61 pages) ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Limited – 3 x fixed platforms – Vulcan UR, Viscount VO and Vampire OD Removal to shore of topsides and jackets for recycling/disposal November 2017 Pipelines All pipelines and associated mattresses to remain in situ November 2017 Leman BH Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 4.66MB, 46 pages) Shell U.K. Limited – 1 x platform Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling April 2017 Ettrick and Blackbird (PDF, 2.1MB, 62 pages) Nexen Petroleum UK Limited – FPSO Removal for re-use at different location March 2017 Subsea Equipment Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling March 2017 Pipelines Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling; buried pipelines to be left in-situ March 2017 Ann A4 Decommissioning Programme (PDF, 1.37MB, 29 pages) Centrica North Sea Limited – A4 Wellhead Protection Structure Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling February 2017 Janice James & Affleck (PDF, 3.8MB, 115 pages) Maersk Oil UK Limited – FPSO Removal for recycling September 2016 Subsea Equipment Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling September 2016 Pipelines Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling; buried pipelines to be left in-situ September 2016 Athena Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 3.88MB, 70 pages) Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited – FPSO Removal for re-use at different location September 2016 Subsea Equipment Removal to shore for either re-use or recycling September 2016 Pipelines All 32 pipeline to be removed and returned to shore for re-use or recycling September 2016 Viking Platforms (PDF, 3.53MB, 40 pages) ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Limited – 5 x fixed platforms Viking CD, DD, ED, GD, HD Removal to shore of topsides and jackets for recycling/disposal September 2016 Leadon (PDF, 1.71MB, 53 pages) Maersk Oil North Sea UK Limited – FPSO Removal for re-use at different location March 2016 Subsea Removal of 2 x bundle towheads and mid-line structure to shore for disposal; removal of 2 x drill centres to shore for disposal March 2016 Pipelines 2 x Pipeline bundles to be left in-situ, partial removal of gas import pipeline March 2016 Harding STL (PDF, 2.61MB, 73 pages) Harding STL Close-Out Report (PDF, 1.62MB, 26 pages) TAQA Bratani Limited – Harding Submerged Turret Loading (STL) System Harding Submerged Turret Loading (STL) System to be replaced by new Offshore Loading System. STL to be removed to shore for recycling/disposal and shuttle tanker mooring and loading buoy interfaces returned to owner 2015 Thames Area – Horne & Wren (PDF, 1.57MB, 48 pages) Tullow Oil SK Limited – 1x fixed platform Removal of topsides and jackets to shore for recycling/disposal November 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ November 2015 Thames Area – Orwell (PDF, 828KB, 42 pages) Tullow Oil SK Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal November 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ November 2015 Thames Area – Wissey (PDF, 1.26MB, 43 pages) Tullow Oil SK Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal November 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ November 2015 Thames Area – Thames Complex (PDF, 15.9MB, 76 pages) Perenco UK Limited – 3x fixed platforms Removal of topsides and jackets to shore for recycling/disposal October 2015 Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal October 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ October 2015 Thames Area – Gawain (PDF, 3.8MB, 47 pages) Perenco UK Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal October 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ October 2015 Thames Area – Arthur (PDF, 4.41MB, 46 pages) Perenco UK Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal October 2015 Pipelines To remain buried in situ October 2015 Brent – Brent Delta Topside (PDF, 3.55MB, 72 pages) Brent Delta Topside Interim Close Out Report (PDF, 3.39MB, 49 pages) Shell U.K. Limited – Brent Delta Topside Removal of topside to shore for recycling and disposal July 2015 Rose Decommissioning Programmes (PDF, 2.87MB, 42 pages) Rose Close Out Report (PDF, 3.31MB, 36 pages) Centrica Resources Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal May 2015 Close Out Report Approved October 2018 Pipelines Removal of sections of un-trenched pipelines; trenched pipelines decommissioned in situ May 2015 Close Out Report Approved October 2018 Stamford (PDF, 2.71MB, 39 pages) Stamford Close Out Report (PDF, 2.66MB, 36 pages) Centrica North Sea Gas Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal April 2015 Close Out Report approved February 2019 Pipelines Removal of sections of un-trenched pipelines; trenched pipelines decommissioned in situ April 2015 Close Out Report approved February 2019 Murchison (PDF, 2.37MB, 70 pages) CNR – Large Steel Platform Topsides and jacket to top of footings to be removed to shore for recycling/disposal. Footings to remain in situ August 2014 Pipelines Export pipeline decommissioned in situ with remedial rock placement.
Infield Flowlines to be removed for recycling/disposal.
August 2014 Rubie & Renee (PDF, 2.47MB, 50 pages) Endeavour Energy UK Limited – Subsea Installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal April 2014 Pipelines Selective Recovery April 2014 Miller (PDF, 6.57MB, 198 pages) BP Exploration (Alpha) Limited Large Steel Platform Footings to remain in place, steel topsides and jacket to top of footings to be removed to shore December 2013 Schiehallion & Loyal Phase One (PDF, 1.84MB, 60 pages) Britoil Limited – Schiehallion FPSO Removal for potential re-use 2013 Pipelines Recovery where possible. Production flowlines to be left in situ. 2013 IVRR – decommissoning programme (PDF, 1.57MB, 102 pages) IVRR Close Out Report (PDF, 4.74MB, 35 pages) Hess limited – FPSO Removal for re-use at different location 2013 Subsea installations Removal to shore for recycling/disposal 2013 Pipelines Selective recovery 2013 Camelot (PDF, 488KB, 39 pages) Camelot Close out report (PDF, 2.27MB, 41 pages) Energy Resource Technology (UK) Limited – Small Steel Platform Removal to shore for recycling / disposal 2012 Pipelines Pipelines decommissioned in situ 2012 Fife, Flora, Fergus, Angus: decommissioning programme (PDF, 8.36MB, 135 pages) FFFA Close Out Report (PDF, 1.49MB, 33 pages) Hess Limited – FPSO Removed for re-use at different location 2012 Subsea installations Removal to shore for recycling / disposal 2012 Pipelines Full removal of un-trenched pipelines; trenched pipelines decommissioned in situ 2012 Don Britoil Public Limited Company – Subsea installation Removal to shore for recycling / disposal 2011 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ with selective recovery 2011 Welland Perenco UK Limited Perenco UK Limited Small Steel Platform Removal for re-use outside of UK waters 2010 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ with selective recovery 2010 Tristan NW Close out report Silverstone Energy Limited Bridge Energy UK Limited Subsea installation Removal to shore for recycling 2010; close-out report received January 2011 Pipelines Production pipeline with piggy-backed umbilical – leave in situ; jumpers, spool pieces and associated pipeline equipment – remove to shore for re-use or recycling 2010; close-out report received January 2011 Shelley Close out report Premier Oil – Sevan Voyageur FPSO Tow away for future use at another location 2010; close-out report received February 2012 Manifold and Wellhead Remove to shore for re-use, recycling or disposal 2010; close-out report received February 2012 Pipelines Production pipeline – leave in situ; umbilical – remove in sections 2010; close-out report received February 2012 Kittiwake SAL Export System Close out report Venture North Sea Oil Limited – Kittiwake SAL Assembly SAL Assembly – removal to shore for re-use. Revision to approved decommissioning programme: Completion of the removal of the SAL Assembly extended to 31 July 2012 2009; close-out report received July 2012 Pipelines Pipeline – flexible flowline removed to shore for re-use 2009; close-out report received July 2012 MCP-01 Close out report Total E& P UK Limited – Manifold & Compression Platform Permit granted for the disposal in-situ of the concrete substructure; topsides to be removed to shore for re-use, recycling or disposal 2008; close-out report received March 2013 Kittiwake Loading Buoy Venture North Sea Oil Limited – Exposed Location Single Buoy Mooring System (ELSBM) Removals to shore for recycling or disposal 2008 Linnhe (PDF, 2.25MB, 66 pages) </p> Linnhe Close Out Report (PDF, 1000KB, 22 pages) Mobil North Sea LLC – Wellhead Protection Structure Removal to shore. Revision to approved decommissioning programme: completion of the removal of the Wellhead Protection Structure extended to 30 June 2010 2008; year of revised approval: 2010 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ; pipeline sections outside trenches removed to shore. Revision to approved decommissioning programme: completion of the abandonment of the pipelines extended to 30 June 2010 2008; year of revised approval: 2010 Indefatigable (Shell) (PDF, 11.6MB, 224 pages) </p> Close Out Report (PDF, 2.47MB, 64 pages) Shell U.K. Limited – 6 x fixed steel platforms Removal to shore 2007 Pipelines 2 x hose bundles removal to shore; 5 x infield + export decommissioned in situ 2007 NW Hutton: decommissioning programme (PDF, 14.9MB, 320 pages) Close Out Report (PDF, 2.52MB, 32 pages) Amoco (U.K.) Exploration Company – now a subsidiary of BP plc – Large Steel Platform Footings to remain in place, steel topsides and jacket to top of footings to be removed to shore 2006 Pipelines Decommissioned in situ 2006 Ardmore British American Offshore Limited – Mobile Jack-Up Rig Re-use 2005 Ardmore Ugland Nordic Shipping AS – Single Anchor Loading Systems Re-use/removal to shore 2005 Pipelines Re-use 2005 Ardmore Acorn Oil & Gas Limited – Subsea equipment including guide frame Removal to shore 2005 Brent Shell – Brent Flare Removals to shore for recycling and disposal 2004 Beatrice Talisman Energy (UK) Limited – Fixed Steel Platforms Re-use 2004 Forbes and Gordon Infield Pipelines BHP Billiton – Infield Pipelines Decommission in situ – retrench any area of pipeline with less than 0.4m depth of cover 2003; close-out report received May 2005 Frigg TP1, QP & CDP1 Close out report Total E&P Norge AS – Treatment Platform 1 (TP1), Quarters Platform (QP) and Concrete Drilling Platform 1 (CDP1) Concrete substructures to remain in place; concrete topsides to be removed to shore; steel installations to be removed to shore; infield pipelines to be removed to shore 2003 Durward and Dauntless Amerada Hess – Pipelines Decommissioned in situ 2002 Hutton Kerr-McGee – Tension Leg Platform Re-use 2002; close-out report received July 2004 Pipelines 1 x removal to shore; 1 x decommissioned in situ (with future monitoring programme) 2002; close-out report received July 2004 Camelot CB ExxonMobil – Fixed Steel Platform Re-use or removal to shore for recycling. Revision to approved decommissioning option: removal to shore for dismantling and recycling 2001. Year of revised approval: 2002 Blenheim and Bladon Talisman – FPSO Re-use 2000 Pipelines Removal to shore 2000 Durward and Dauntless Amerada Hess – FPSO Re-use 2000 Subsea Facilities Removal to shore 2000 Maureen and Moira Phillips – Large Steel Gravity Platform Removal to shore for re-use or recycling 2000 Concrete Loading Column Removal to shore for re-use or recycling 2000 Pipelines 2 x removal to shore;1 x decommissioned in situ 2000 Brent Spar Shell – Oil Storage and Loading Facility Re-use as part of quay extension. Revision to approved decommissioning option: Brent Spar Anchor Blocks – removal to shore for reuse, recycling or disposal 1998 Year of revised approval: 2004 Donan BP – FPSO Re-use 1998 Fulmar SALM Shell – Single Anchor Leg Mooring Buoy Removal to shore 1998 16” Pipeline Decommissioned in situ 1998 Emerald MSR – FPSO Re-use 1996 Pipeline Decommissioned in situ 1996 Frigg FP Elf Norge TotalFinaElf Norge Flare Column Removal to shore 1996 Leman BK Shell – Fixed Steel Platform Removal to shore 1996 Staffa Lasmo – Pipelines Removal to shore 1996 Viking AC, AD, AP & FD Conoco – 4 x Fixed Steel Platform Removal to shore 1996 Esmond CP & CW BHP – 2 x Fixed Steel Platform Removal to shore 1995 Gordon BW BHP – Fixed Steel Platform Removal to shore 1995 Angus Amerada Hess – Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Vessel Re-use 1993 Forbes AW Hamilton BHP Fixed Steel Platform Removal to shore 1993 Argyll, Duncan and Innes Hamilton BHP Floating Production, Facility (FPF) Removal to shore 1992 Catenary Anchor Leg Mooring (CALM) Buoy Removal to shore 1992 Pipelines Removal to shore 1992 Blair Sun Oil AGIP Pipelines 1 x Re-use; 1 x Decommissioned in situ 1992 Crawford Hamilton Oil BHP Floating Production, Facility (FPF) Removal to shore 1991 Catenary Anchor Leg Mooring (CALM) Buoy Removal to shore 1991 Subsea Facilities Removal to shore 1991 Piper Alpha Occidental Talisman Fixed Steel Platform Toppling 1988
During the course of a field’s life, pipelines/sections of pipelines may be taken out of use, e.g. due to corrosion, problems with reservoir pressure, damage to the pipeline, etc. When this happens, under the Petroleum Act 1998 the Secretary of State has the option of immediately calling for a full decommissioning programme. This is not always considered an appropriate option however, and so it has been agreed consideration will be given to handling suitable pipelines, under an informal decommissioning regime, thereby deferring a formal programme until the end of the field’s life.
If a formal decommissioning programme is not immediately deemed suitable, details of the out of use pipeline(s) will be circulated to other government departments for comment. Following this, OPRED will decide one of the following:
The Interim Pipeline Regime is intended to ensure out of use lines do not pose a risk to other users of the sea or the environment and that they are covered by an appropriate surveying and maintenance regime from the point when they are taken out of use until approval of the formal decommissioning programme, which is usually at the end of field life. It should be noted that any interim solution should not prejudice the final decommissioning options for that line, including complete removal. The department expects Operators to submit details of out of use pipelines/sections of a pipeline as soon as they are taken out of use.
Operators are reminded that any works that are proposed on any pipelines under the Pipeline Works Authorisation regime, as per their Terms and Conditions of the PWA, must have a Legal Consent in place before works can commence which includes but is not exclusive to any proposed decommissioning works. Consents are issued by the Oil & Gas Authority and Operators are requested to contact Claire Grant on any queries that they may have relating to Legal Consents. Further Guidance can also be found on the Oil & Gas Authority website: https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/licensing-consents/consents/pipeline-works-authorisations/
If you are an Operator, aware of any out of use pipelines that have not been referred to the department, please submit a completed DPN form at your earliest convenience.
Following confirmation a pipeline has been accepted under the Interim Pipeline Regime, the Offshore Decommissioning Unit will continue to monitor the condition of the pipeline by asking the Operator to confirm the status of the pipeline remains unchanged following future surveys.
A list of all installations on the UKCS and their current status is available from the OSPAR Website
At the first ministerial meeting of the Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic (OSPAR) in 1998, a binding decision was agreed that set rules for the disposal of offshore installations at sea. Under the decision the dumping and leaving wholly or partly in place of offshore installations is prohibited. Decision 98/3 recognises it may be difficult to remove the ‘footings’ of large steel jackets weighing more than 10,000 and concrete installations. As a result there are derogations for these categories of installations if the internationally agreed assessment and consultation process shows leaving them in place is justifiable.
OPRED has utilised decommissioning programme templates for derogation and non-derogation projects. These templates include all required content as detailed in Annex C of the Guidance Notes. There are also templates available which are currently being trialled for more specific and small scale decommissioning activity including rig reactivation and removal of a single Wellhead Protection Structure. Operator’s should discuss all individual cases with OPRED who will advise of the appropriate template.
A word version of these templates can also be requested from OPRED. Please email The Offshore Decommissioning Unit for further details.
0 notes
Text
Iptv Full pakket UHD 4K 20000 channels
100% de satisfaction client !! 100% de qualité meilleur fournisseur IPTV avec les canaux les plus stables !! forfait monde IPTV !! +10000 émetteurs en hd / fhd / 4k (1920p et 1080p) +10000 films en hd / fhd (1920p et 1080p) uk, de, fr, nl, ar, inde, scandinave, turc, albanie, exyu, por, pol, it …..) × plus de chiffons bientôt! pas de tampon !! pas de problèmes !! pas de gel, pas de tampon !! nombreux canaux de: europe / asie / afrique / usa / pays arabes / amérique latine liste de paquets: -tr / türkiye (203) -nl / Pays-Bas (136) -arbe / arabe (850) -de / Allemagne (400) -be / belgique (50) -uk / royaume-uni (625) -fr / france (331) -sp / espagne (190) pt / Portugal (160) -it / italie (406) -ch / suisse (54) -dk / danemark (105) -pl / pologne (280) -no / norvège (79) -se / suède (205) -au / autriche (15) -cz / tchèque (80) -fi / finlande (35) -ru / Russie (260) albanie (400) -hu / hongrie (127) -gr / grèce (140) -mk / macédoine (45) -ex-yu (300) -bg / bulgarie (120) -ee / estonie (32) -ro / roumanie (70) -mt / malta (20) -ma / malaisie (135) -ir / iran (130) -afg / afghanistan (75) -il / israël (46) -ch / Chine (28) -af / afrique (300) -pk / pakistan (175) Kurdistan (120) -us / etats-unis (500) -br / brasil (55) -Amérique latine (700) -in / inde (660) -th / Thaïlande (200) -vn / vietnam (60) -autres pays …. abonnement possible de combiner avec mag256 / 254/250/322 …. Boîte de formulaire liste de prix: 1 mois: 20 € 6 mois: 50 € 12 mois: 80 € Convient pour: IPTV SMART MAG KODI JOUEUR PARFAIT ANDROID JOUEUR DE GSE ENIGMA2 DREAMBOX VLC APPLE TV REDLINE GOLDEN BOX WHATSAPP OU appel: 0032483318029
Cet article Iptv Full pakket UHD 4K 20000 channels est apparu en premier sur Max Annonces.
sur Annonces Belgiquehttp://maxannonces.be/annonce/iptv-full-pakket-uhd-4k-20000-channels-7/
0 notes