#0.339

[pokemonblog]

Niantic confirms the issue in Pokémon GO where Morpeko doesn’t change from full belly into hangry form or vice versa if Aura Wheel knocks out its opponent has been resolved in release 0.339.0

Niantic is continuing to announce new events and content for Pokémon GO. Read on below to learn more: Morpeko sometimes doesn’t change form in battle Issue Description: When used in battles, sometimes Morpeko doesn’t change from full belly into hangry form or vice versa if using the attack Aura Wheel knocks out its opponent. Issue status: Resolved in release 0.339.0. Source: Official Pokémon…

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Factors associated with outcome in a national cohort of rhinovirus hospitalized patients in Brazil in 2022

The common cold is the primary cause of illness in the community, with over 200 viral strains identified, and rhinovirus infections being the most prevalent. Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) is also a significant cause of severe illness. The burden of acute respiratory infections has a significant impact on the economy, resulting in absenteeism from work and school. Rhinovirus infections can exacerbate asthma and other chronic diseases, leading to hospitalization. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors associated with death and survival in patients hospitalized for rhinovirus in Brazil in 2022. This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the national surveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2022 in Brazil, with all the norrifications. We analysed and compared clinical and epidemiological factors and outcomes between survivors and deaths in patients hospitalised for rhinovirus. The absolute and relative frequencies were calculated according to the states. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test, while multivariate analysis was performed using COX regression. Out of 8,130 cases of SARS caused by rhinovirus, 291 (3.58%) resulted in death while 7839 (96.47%) patients survived. The factors associated with death were invasive ventilation (p- < 0.001 HR 4.888 CI 95% 3.816–6.262), bocavirus (p- < 0.001 HR 4.204 CI 95% 2.595–6.812), immunodepression/Immunosuppression (p- < 0.001 HR 2.417 CI 95% 1. 544–3, 786), COVID-19 (p- < 0.001 HR 2.167 CI 95% 1.495–3.142), chronic neurological diseases (p-0.007 HR 1.610 CI 95% 1.137–2.280), abdominal pain (p-0.005 HR 1.734 CI 95% 1.186–2.537), age (p- < 0.001 HR 1.038 CI 95% 1.034–1.042). The survival factors identified in this study were dyspnea (p = 0.005; HR 0.683; CI 95% 0.524–0.889), cough (p < 0.001; HR 0.603; CI 95% 0.472–0.769), and asthma (p = 0.052; HR 0.583; CI 95% 0.339–1.004). Additionally, the study found that receiving a COVID-19 booster dose was also a significant survival factor (p = 0.001; HR 0.570; CI 95% 0.415–0.784). The factors associated with death were similar to those in the literature, and the factors associated with survival were also similar, except for the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, which we didn’t find in any studies. Our study is the first to associate the full course of the COVID-19 vaccine with survival in those hospitalized for rhinovirus, regardless of COVID-19 and rhinovirus co-detection.

Read the paper.

[okaydyke]

I decided to track some Halt and Catch Fire stats for no reason whatsoever.

Most watched episode: 1.01 I/O 1.19 million viewers IMDb rating: 8/10 A.V. Club rating: B

Least watched episode: 4.03 Miscellaneous 270 thousand viewers IMDb rating: 8.2/10 A.V. Club rating: A-

Season 1 Average IMDb rating: 8.07 Average A.V. Club rating: C+ Average U.S. viewers (millions): 0.764

Season 2 Average IMDb rating: 8.07 Average A.V. Club rating: B+ Average U.S. viewers (millions): 0.522

Season 3 Average IMDb rating: 8.12 Average A.V. Club rating: A- Average U.S. viewers (millions): 0.338

Season 4 Average IMDb rating: 8.42 Average A.V. Club rating: A- Average U.S. viewers (millions): 0.339

[threebodybot]

m1=139.4 m2=76.0 m3=27.4 (solar masses) v1x=-5.464 v1y=6.02 v2x=-0.834 v2y=2.913 v3x=-6.647 v3y=-0.339 (km/s) x1=34.0 y1=-32.0 x2=-22.0 y2=34.0 x3=22.0 y3=15.0 (AU from center) Music: Memories of Green – Vangelis

[shuriken-n]

You wouldn't dare going on desmos, set the graph on degrees, and copy paste this:

-\left(x+2.25\right)^{3}\ \left{-3.75433<x<-3.115\right}

\left(\frac{2.6}{1+e^{-5\left(x+3.3336\right)}}\right)-1.3\ \left{-3.9<x<-2.2\right}

\sqrt[3]{-x}+1.85\ \ \ \left{-3.75433<x<-0.339\right}

-\left(x+1.3\right)^{4}+3.4\ \left{-0.8208<x<-0.308\right}

\sqrt[2.5]{-x+0.2}+2.339\ \left{-0.8208<x<0.2\right}

\frac{0.9}{1+e^{-1.5\left(x+1.5\right)}}+1.661\ \left{-2.826<x<-0.308\right}

\left(x+1.7\right)^{2}+0.5\ \left{-2.826<x<-2.563\right}

\sqrt{-x-1.6}+1.85\ \left{-3<x<-1.645\right}

0.2x+3.33\ \left{-3.1<x<-2.543\right}

-0.6x+0.85\ \left{-3.1<x<-2.547\right}

0.35x+3.27\ \left{-2.84<x<-2.547\right}

-0.6x+0.575\ \left{-2.84<x<-2.199188\right}

\sqrt[3]{x}+1.78\ \left{0.2<x<1.5\right}

\sqrt{x-0.5}+1.9\ \left{x<1.5\right}

-\frac{0.7}{0.5+111e^{-\left(1.75x+2\right)}}+2.4\ \left{0.638<x<2.7709\right}

0.165x^{2}\ \left{2.26<x<2.7709\right}

\sqrt{0.75x}+1.4\ \left{0.879<x<4.114\right}

\left(x-2.8\right)^{5}-0.75\ \left{3.605<x<4.114\right}

-\frac{2}{1+e^{-5\left(x-3.4\right)}}+1.06\ \left{2.507<x<3.7341\right}

\sqrt[1.5]{x-2.5}+1.38418492\ \left{2.5<x<3.62\right}

-0.05x+2.35\ \left{3.222<x<3.64\right}

1.1x-1.75\ \left{3.05<x<3.566\right}

-0.25x+2.3675\ \left{3.05<x<3.47\right}

1.1x-2.3\ \left{2.91<x<3.457\right}

0.2x\ -1.37\ \left{3.2<x<3.7341\right}

-5x+15.27\ \left{3.2<x<3.25\right}

\sqrt[4]{x}-2.32\ \left{2.48<x<3.664\right}

x-4.6\ \left{2.58<x<3.664\right}

-x+0.56\ \left{2.58<x<3.16\right}

\sqrt[4]{x-0.30}-3.9\ \left{1.6101<x<3.16\right}

-\sqrt{-x+2.35}-1.97\ \left{1.17<x<2.1\right}

-\sqrt{x-1.1}-2.45\ \left{1.3634<x<1.621\right}

-\sqrt{-x+1.65}-3\ \left{1.35<x<1.621\right}

-6x+18.5\ \left{3.299<x<3.45\right}

-0.75x+0.39\ \left{2.8513<x<3.45\right}

\frac{\left(x\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+5\right)^{2}}{2}=3.5\ \left{1.489<x\right}\ \left{-5<y\right}

1.5\sin\left(100x-140\right)-2.1\ \left{3.151<x<3.641\right}

-\sqrt{x-1.7}-1.75\left{2.86635<x<3.641\right}

\left(x-1.3\right)^{3}-4\ \left{2.2361<x<2.3922\right}

-\sqrt{-3x+15}-0.3\left{2.2361<x<2.8664\right}

\frac{\left(x+1\right)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{\left(y+1.2\right)^{2}}{0.6}\le1

\frac{\left(x-1\right)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{\left(y+1.2\right)^{2}}{0.6}\le1

\cos\left(20x+24\right)-1.49\ \left{-2.1<x<-0.6\right}

\cos\left(-20x+30\right)-1.42\ \left{0.6<x<2.05\right}

\frac{\left(x-1.45\right)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{\left(y+1.2\right)^{2}}{1}=1\ \left{1.766<x\right}\ \left{-1.7<y\right}

\frac{\left(x+1.5\right)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{\left(y+1.2\right)^{2}}{1}=1\ \left{x<-1.75\right}\ \left{-1.8<y\right}

\frac{1.45}{1+e^{-\left(7x+6\right)}}-0.25\ \left{-1.334<x<-0.24\ \right}

\frac{\left(x+0.8\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y-0.4\right)^{2}}{0.5}=1\ \left{-1.331<x<-0.1\right}\ \left{y<0\right}

\frac{\left(x+0.2\right)^{2}}{0.06}+\frac{\left(y+1.85\right)^{2}}{0.01}\le1

\frac{\left(x-0.7\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+0.5\right)^{2}}{1.35}=1\ \left{-1.33<y<-0.197\right}\ \left{x<1\right}

-\sqrt{-4.5x+4.04}+0.68\ \left{0<x\right}

\frac{\left(x+0.5\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+1.85\right)^{2}}{2}=0.2\ \left{-0.75<x<-0.2062\right}\ \left{y<-2\right}

\frac{\left(x-0.13\right)^{2}}{0.9}+\frac{\left(y+1.83\right)^{2}}{0.9}=0.4\ \left{-0.2064<x\right}\ \left{y<-2.1\right}

-\sqrt{-0.4x}+0.094\ \left{-3.8993<x<-2.6\right}

\frac{\left(x+3.15\right)^{2}}{0.4}+\frac{\left(y+0.8\right)^{2}}{1}=1\ \left{-2.77<x\right}\ \left{y<-0.475\right}

\frac{\left(x+3\right)^{2}}{0.9}+\frac{\left(y-0.25\right)^{2}}{2}=1.75\ \left{-2.76<x<-1.9552\right}\ \left{y<0\right}

0.1x-0.9\ \left{-3.4<x<-2.558\right}

-0.9x-4.3\ \left{-3.4<x<-2.6\right}

6x+17\ \left{-3.237<x<-3.0869\right}

2x+3.25\left{-3.0839<x<-2.6\right}

0.5x-0.8\left{-3.237<x<-2.699\right}

0.2x-2.3\ \left{-3.0839<x<-1.8\right}

\frac{\left(x+0\right)^{2}}{1.2}+\frac{\left(y-0.05\right)^{2}}{1}=11\ \left{-2.0235<x<-0.5\right}\ \left{y<0\right}

0.1x-3.04\ \left{-1.55<x<-0.995\right}

-x-4.745\ \left{-1.555<x<-1.03\right}

5x+1.9\ \left{-1.228<x<-1.1074\right}

0.65x-3.44\ \left{-1.228<x<-0.844\right}

\frac{x^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+4.6\right)^{2}}{2}=0.9\ \left{x<-0.844\right}\ \left{-5<y\right}

-0.05x-3.2\ \left{-0.265<x<0.3\right}

-1.3x-3.53\ \left{-0.265<x<0.12\right}

\frac{\left(x-1.04\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+3.8\right)^{2}}{1.3}=1\ \left{x<0.2\right}\left{y<-3.565\right}

\frac{\left(x-2.05\right)^{2}}{1}+\frac{\left(y+5.5\right)^{2}}{1.1}=4.5\ \left{0.19798<x<2\right}\ \left{-5<y<-3.7\right}

0.2x-1.58\ \left{-2.3<x<-2.1\right}

0.4x-1.36\ \left{-2.1<x<-1.56\right}

0.7x-3.07\ \left{1.52<x<1.6809\right}

10x-18.7\left{1.6562<x<1.6809\right}

0.4x-2.8\left{1.6562<x<2.3\right}

Then set the last three to red and the rest to black

[marketresreasrch]

The global essential oil soap market size was valued at USD 0.339 billion in 2022. It is estimated to reach USD 0.660 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 7.7% during the forecast period (2023–2031).

[plotcryptocharts]

$IOST: 0.005 (2.03%) $SOL: 145.7625 (3.88%) $AXS: 4.8057 (3.69%) $ADA: 0.339 (0.92%) $OMG: 0.2344 (10.61%) $CRV: 0.3242 (4.44%) $ATOM: 4.6672 (0.81%) $SUSHI: 0.5688 (1.28%) $TRX: 0.1346 (-0.69%) $MASK: 2.025 (4.76%) $QTUM: 2.2479 (2.03%) (2024/08/19 01:05:10)

[nadovbank]

Курс на 25.01.2024

#USD 88.283 (+0.363) #EUR 96.166 (+0.339) Курс установлен ЦБ РФ от 25.01.2024 Конвертер валют и история цен: http://www.nadovbank.ru

[georgiagassavings]

When Do I Need a No Contract Gas Plan in Georgia?

New Post has been published on https://www.georgiagassavings.com/blog/when-do-i-need-a-no-contract-gas-plan-in-georgia/

When Do I Need a No Contract Gas Plan in Georgia?

Is a No Contract Gas Plan the Best Plan?

Being tied to a contract isn’t always convenient. Learn when it’s a good idea to use a variable rate, no contract gas plan and how flexibility could save you more.

The big problem with variable rate or no contract gas plans is that their rate can change from month to month. So, if you stick with one, you’ll usually pay a lot more than a fixed rate. — But — there are a few scenarios when a no contract plan can be your best natural gas choice. For example, you could be in short-term housing and only need a plan for a month or two. Or, maybe long term rates from Georgia gas companies are expected to fall next month. So maybe you want a no contract option to bide some time. And if you have poor credit, a no contract plan may offer the best deal. If any of these situations describe you, then let’s compare natural gas plans with no contract in Georgia.  

Standard No Contract Gas Plan

We’ll start with a standard variable rate plan.

Georgia Natural Gas® Variable Select

$1.809 per therm variable rate

$3.99-$6.99 monthly charge

No deposit

Gas prices were low this year, thanks in part to storage levels above the 5-year average. However, even under these circumstances, prices for this plan have been high. In fact their rate is often significantly higher than competitor standard variable rates according to data from the Public Service Commission (PSC).

Variable Rate Gas Plan for Credit Woes

If a low credit score is in your way, this plan could be a good option for natural gas.

Georgia Natural Gas® Pre-Pay

$1.949 per therm variable rate

$8.99 monthly charge

No deposit

With this plan, you pay your bill before you use gas based on an estimate. Unfortunately, the rate here is higher than even the provider’s standard variable rate. So, if you can get a fixed rate plan, go that route. However, if this is your best option, be sure to pay your bills on time. If you can manage that, you’ll get a discount of 5¢ per therm after 6 months. Then, after 12 months of on-time payments, you may be eligible to switch to another plan.

Introductory Deals Variable Plans

The following plans have crazy-low rates. But keep in mind that these are introductory rates that will rise to standard variable rates after one or two months.

Scana Energy Introductory Variable Rate

$0.339 per therm intro rate

$5.95 monthly charge

$5 credit on first 20 bills

To give you an idea what you would pay after the first month, according to the PSC, the standard variable rate for this provider is currently $1.799 per therm.

Gas South Acquisition Variable

$0.390 per therm intro rate

$6.95-$9.95 monthly charge

No deposit

$5 credit on first 10 bills

According to the PSC, the standard variable rate for this provider is currently $1.790 per therm.

Georgia Natural Gas® Market Intro

$0.499 per therm intro rate

No customer service charge for the first 2 months

According to the PSC, the standard variable rate for this provider is currently $2.059 per therm. Also, the typical monthly charge after 2 months is $3.99-$6.99.

The Best No Contract Gas Plan in Georgia

If you’re in a position where any of these plans applies to you, then my pick for the best no contract plan is the Scana Energy Introductory Variable Rate plan. It offers the cheapest introductory rate plus bill credits for 20 months in case you need the plan a little longer than the intro period.

These plans are great options if you need a no contract solution in your life right now. Get yours today at https://www.georgiagassavings.com.

[f1]

FP2: Verstappen continues to set the pace in second Barcelona practice

FP2: Verstappen continues to set the pace in second Barcelona practice By Balazs Szabo on 02 Jun 2023, 18:05 Double world champion Max Verstappen continued to dictate the pace at the Spanish Grand Prix, setting the benchmark with a time of 1m13.907s. Home hero Fernando Alonso took second with Nico Hulkenberg taking a surprising third for Haas. Results Pos. No. Driver Car Time Gap Laps 1 1 Max Verstappen Red Bull Racing Honda Rbpt 1:13.907 33 2 14 Fernando Alonso Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 1:14.077 +0.170s 29 3 27 Nico Hulkenberg Haas Ferrari 1:14.177 +0.270s 30 4 11 Sergio Perez Red Bull Racing Honda Rbpt 1:14.219 +0.312s 29 5 31 Esteban Ocon Alpine Renault 1:14.242 +0.335s 29 6 16 Charles Leclerc Ferrari 1:14.246 +0.339s 31 7 55 Carlos Sainz Ferrari 1:14.274 +0.367s 31 8 63 George Russell Mercedes 1:14.392 +0.485s 30 9 77 Valtteri Bottas Alfa Romeo Ferrari 1:14.448 +0.541s 31 10 10 Pierre Gasly Alpine Renault 1:14.457 +0.550s 28 11 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:14.549 +0.642s 30 12 81 Oscar Piastri Mclaren Mercedes 1:14.583 +0.676s 29 13 24 Zhou Guanyu Alfa Romeo Ferrari 1:14.585 +0.678s 28 14 4 Lando Norris Mclaren Mercedes 1:14.694 +0.787s 29 15 20 Kevin Magnussen Haas Ferrari 1:14.713 +0.806s 23 16 21 Nyck De Vries Alphatauri Honda Rbpt 1:14.785 +0.878s 32 17 22 Yuki Tsunoda Alphatauri Honda Rbpt 1:14.840 +0.933s 33 18 18 Lance Stroll Aston Martin Aramco Mercedes 1:15.010 +1.103s 30 19 23 Alexander Albon Williams Mercedes 1:15.056 +1.149s 31 20 2 Logan Sargeant Williams Mercedes 1:15.415 +1.508s 32 via F1Technical.net . Motorsport news https://www.f1technical.net/news/

[pokemonblog]

New Pokémon GO update version 0.339.1 now live on iOS and Android

Pokémon GO is being updated to a new version across all capable iOS and Android devices. The latest update is being rolled out to iOS and Android devices, respectively. According to patch notes from the development team at Niantic, the latest update implements various bug fixes and improvements for an overall smoother experience. What’s New in iOS Trainers, we hope you’re enjoying your…

[lupine-publishers-oajess]

Improving Quality of Water Using Natural Nano-Clay Composites: Isotherms Describing Water Purification Using Fe-Montmorillonite from Chelel, Kapchorwa in Uganda

Abstract

Pollution resulting from increased human activities is threatening Lake Victoria, its effects are characterized by high turbidity, pH, iron (II) concentration, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and eutrophication. The performance of Fe-montmorillonite as low cost adsorbent for purifying water was studied. The batch technique was used in which Murchison Bay (MB) water was mixed with varying amounts of clay and stirred at 80rpm for 10 minutes at ambient temperature; filtered through what man paper and the filtrate was used to determine residual COD, Fe, TN and TP. The optimum concentration of clay of 0.4gl-1 was observed to produce 73.5+2% fall in COD as microbes and organic waste was removed. The concentration of iron (II) fell from 3.7+0.3 to 2.5+ 0.2 predicting removal of heavy metal by the clays. The data accumulated was analyzed using Freundlich, Langmuir and Temkin isotherms. The isotherms best described the results because the R2 values were very high. The Langmuir constant KL related to adsorption capacity of clay varied from 0.436 to 12.996 for removal of ions of iron; 0.068 to 1.161 for nitrate ions; 0.365 to 1.7295 for phosphate ions and 0.912 to 0.989 for removal of COD reducing agents. The Freundlich exponential constant, n, characterizing energetic heterogeneity of the clay surface varied from 0.059 to 0.714 for removal of ions of iron; 0.997 to 1.083 adsorption and /or exchange of nitrate ions; 0.339 to 1.582 for removal of COD reducing agents. The Temkin constant BT varied from 6.1582 to 21.025 for the nitrate, from 2.64 to 43.42 for adsorption of iron and 26.24 to 65.38 for removal of COD reducing agents. So, Femontmorillonite can remove organic and inorganic pollutants from MB waters. There is need to investigate the effectiveness of acid- and alkali-leached clay on MB water as well as kinetic study on removal of impurities from the water.

Read more about this article: https://lupinepublishers.com/environmental-soil-science-journal/fulltext/improving-quality-of-water-using-natural-nano-clay-composites.ID.000164.php

Read more Lupine Publishers Google Scholar articles: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=f6syqaoAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=f6syqaoAAAAJ:OU6Ihb5iCvQC

[cannabisinvesting]

Searching for the “Amazon of Cannabis” Company

September 3, 2019 (Tokyo, Japan) - Will continue adding to our list of cannabis/hemp companies in this investing space as we monitor the news daily for updates. Its been a bad summer for cannabis stocks with almost every company listed here showing minus stock value. We will try to keep this list as current as possible trying to stay with those companies with favorable investment insights. A recent news article discussed one Canadian-based cannabis company being referred to as the “Amazon of cannabis” so will continue to search this company out. 

Unless you pay for a subscription to one of the publishers invested in and making recommendations on cannabis stocks, it is difficult weeding through the plethora of information. The following is older news so please remember, circumstances change fast with this turbulent market/industry. Worth noting Canada is ahead of the US in cannabis development so this may be a factor in cannabis investment decisions. In our case as we study the cannabis space, we are considering an initial four stocks: three of a Canadian company and one in the US.

News:

Can Namaste Technologies Become The Amazon Of Cannabis?

A Completely Unknown Pot Stock Aims to Be Canada's Third-Largest Cannabis Grower

3 Top Marijuana Stocks to Watch in September

The companies listed below in bold font look to be the most promising in terms of future potential. Stock prices are for August 30, 2019. The best thing for the novice is to monitor the news daily on these companies to see what is going on in the cannabis industry. 

**Big increase

________

22nd Century Group (XXII) - $1.98 https://www.xxiicentury.com

Acreage Holdings (ACRGF) - CD$7.27 (USD$8.63) https://www.acreageholdings.com

Aurora Cannabis (ACB) - $5.63 https://www.auroracann.com/age-gate

CannaGrow Holdings (CGRW) - $0.249 http://www.cannagrowholdings.com

Cannabis Science Inc. (CBIS) - $0.0229

Canopy Growth Corp. (CGC) - $24.20

Cara Therapeutics Inc. (CARA) - $23.00  https://www.caratherapeutics.com

Charlotte’s Web (TSE; CWEB) - $22.78 https://www.charlottesweb.com

Constellation Brands (NYSE; STZ) - $204.75

Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) - $11.20 https://thecronosgroup.com

CV Sciences Inc. (CANV) - HK$3.49 (US$0.44) https://cvsciences.com

Elixinol Global Ltd. (ELLXF) - $1.63

GrowLife Inc. (PHOT) - $0.0051

General Cannabis Corp. (CANN) - $0.936

Green Grow Technologies (GRNH) - $0.0152

Green Thumb Industries (GTBIF) - $8.62 https://www.gtigrows.com/

Green Organic Dutchman (TGOD) - $3.23 https://www.tgod.ca

GrowGeneration Corp. (SPRWF) - $5.35

GW Pharmaceuticals (GWPH) - $139.50

Hexo  (HEXO) - $4.03  https://www.hexocorp.com

Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE: IIPR) - $84.28

KushCo Holdings Inc. (KSHB) - $3.66 https://www.kushco.com

MedMen Enterprises Inc. (MMNFF) - $1.93 https://medmen.com

Medical Marijuana Inc. (MJNA) - $0.0417 https://www.medicalmarijuanainc.com

Mentor Capital Inc. (MNTR) - $0.20

Mountain High Acquisition Corp. (MYHI) - $0.0117

Namaste Technologies Inc. (NXTTF) - $0.339 https://www.namastetechnologies.com

New Age Beverages (NBEV) - $3.13 https://newagebev.com/en-us

Northsight Capital Inc. (NCAP) - $0.0023

Omnicanna Health Solutions Inc. (ENDO) - $0.0051

OrganiGram Holdings (NASDAQ: OGI) - $4.99

Origin House (NASDAQOTH: ORHOF) - $6.04 https://originhouse.com

Sequential Brands Group Inc. (SQBG) - $0.275

Supreme Cannabis Co. Inc. (SPRWF) - $1.02

Tauriga Sciences Inc. (TAUG) - $0.0285

TerraTech Corp. (TRTC) - $0.3526 https://www.terratechcorp.com

Tilray Inc. (TLRY) - $26.24

United Cannabis Corp. (CNAB) - $0.4615

Village Farms International Inc. (VFF) - $13.90 http://villagefarms.com

[cryptosnewss]

XRP Jumps 10% in 24 Hours as Ripple Seeks to Defeat SEC with Arguments

XRP Jumps 10% in 24 Hours as Ripple Seeks to Defeat SEC with Arguments

The XRP Price rebounded 10%, outpacing the top 10 cryptocurrencies in gains. At press time, XRP was changing hands at $0.38, up 9.67% in the last 24 hours. Interestingly, XRP remains the only weekly rising crypto asset – up 7% – while those in the top 10 have seen losses over the past seven days. After the crypto market sold off at the start of the week, XRP fell to a low of $0.339 on September…

[plotcryptocharts]

$IOST: 0.0052 (1.87%) $SOL: 145.7052 (-0.08%) $AXS: 4.8271 (2.75%) $ADA: 0.339 (0.59%) $OMG: 0.2299 (-1.45%) $CRV: 0.3135 (2.38%) $ATOM: 4.9071 (-1.23%) $SUSHI: 0.5983 (2.13%) $TRX: 0.1304 (3.15%) $MASK: 2.0646 (1.77%) $QTUM: 2.2849 (4.21%) (2024/08/14 17:05:11)